Monday, May 25. 2009Modernization of the Madrasah
For years, policy makers in education have been seeking ways to integrate the madrasah education (plural: madaris) into mainstream Philippine Education. The issue is a continuing concern. Personally, I believe that the word “integration” is at the crux of the madaris issue. Once gain, the word “integration” brings to memory the bad experiences of attempts towards “national integration of ethnic minorities into Philippine society. Integration connotes, in Philippine setting, “assimilation” at worst and “containment” at best.
The Peace Agreement between the GRP and the MNLF on September 02, 1996 introduces a refreshing vocabulary when it speaks of the madaris system. The document explicitly says that the Madaris system shall be recognize as a subsystem of Philippine educational system. But this is easier said than done. The paramount issue confronting educators is the understanding of madaris as well as the operation of the said system in Southern Philippines. Recognition is different from the two prevailing trends on the issue of madaris. The first trend is the “madrasa-fication” of the public school system and the second is the “government-ification” of the Madaris. Both trends are destructive of the madaris system and the public school system, as well. Both must be avoided at all cost to preserve and develop the madaris as a unique and specific educational system of our Muslim brother and sisters. The first trend will eradicate the difference between the public school system and the madaris system. The former is state controlled while the latter is intimately linked to the mosque or a religious man or group. Once the difference is removed, the pupils and students will go to the public school system that will, in time, undermine the madaris system. Both trends reveal total ignorance of the issues involved and the destructive consequences that they will inflict on the madaris system and the public school system, both in short and long terms. Historians are in some doubt about the history of the madrasa. Nizam al Mulk is given credit of having founded it, but some historians point out that madaris were already in existence before him. Next to Nizam al Mulk, Salah al-Din has the greatest reputation as a builder of madaris. From the very beginning the Madaris system is intimately connected to the Mosque. In fact, even before the introduction of madaris, the mosques had served as schools. During the time of the Umayyads, there were rooms attached to the mosques for lectures on the fiqh and hadiths. When particular room was set apart for teaching purposes in a mosque, this was called a madrasa. The madaris were also built close beside the big mosques, so that they practically belonged to them. In the beginning, the principal subjects in the madaris were the Qur’an and the Hadith to which was added the study of the Arabic language. However, as the system developed, other subjects were added. During the time of Nizam al-Mulk and Salah al-Din, two divisions of Islamic studies were noted by the survey made by ibn Khaldun in his famous Mukaddima. They were the ‘ulum taba’iya and ‘ulum nakliya. The former was based on observations of the senses and deduction, while the latter was dependent on revelation and was therefore based on special transmission. ‘Ulum nakliya therefore comprised all branches of knowledge which owed their existence to Islam, i.e., Qur’an and Tafsir, hadith, al fiqh and al-kalam. The ‘ulum taba’iya or ‘akliya was classified into seven main sections: al-mantiq (logic) which was the foundation of all others; al-arithmatiki (arithmetic), including hisab, al-handasa (Geometry), al hai’a (astronomy), al-musiki, the theories of tones and their definition by numbers, al tabi’iyat (physics, that is, the theories of bodies at rest and motion - heavenly, earthly, human, animal, plan and mineral), and al falaha (agriculture). In Southern Philippines, the madaris system is intimately linked either to a mosque or a teacher. It follows its ancient roots, which focuses on Islamic studies and Arabic. The method of teaching is learning by heart. The lack of instructional facilities as well as financial support to teachers contributes to low level of standards. The present trend of “integrating” the madaris system into mainstream Philippine educational system requires a serious examination. First, there is a need of a radical change in both our terminology and approach. The best word is “streaming” the madaris into the varied and plural educational systems in Philippine society. One way of streaming the madaris is a radical reform in the said system as done by Egypt, Iraq, Syria, and Libya and in SEA by Malaysia and Indonesia. No doubt, there is the urgent need to reform the curriculum. While preserving the religious studies, there is the urgent need as realized in the past of integrating other subjects like mathematics, sciences, and technology, including agriculture. Second, accelerated teachers’ training is needed, with special focus on methods of teaching. And third, there is the urgent need to develop instructional facilities including libraries and laboratories in the madaris system. There are enough examples of reforms of the madaris system. These examples can be systematized as learning models in our own desire to introduce developments in the madaris system of education. Teachers’ Colleges in the Southern Philippines, especially those with experience in accelerated teachers’ training can be tapped in capability building of the personnel in the said system. Donors from oil rich emirate and kingdoms can be accessed for special capital builds up to source the necessary financial assistance of the madaris system (FAME?). The madaris system can be a real instrument of peace and development for the Southern Philippines. But for this to become a reality, two things are needed: first, a reform of the madaris system and second, the support system to make the madaris real centers of learning for our Muslim pupils and students. Both requirements need a strong political will and a leadership that shows the way in the maze that prevents people to see… As an educator for many years in Southern Philippines, let me reiterate my strong beliefs and conviction vis-a-vis the issue of madaris… First, the Philippine educational system is not monolithic. We have many and varied educational traditions and systems. Second the Madaris system like the Catholic or Protestant educational system is a specific and valid educational system of our Muslim brothers and sisters. The madaris system is private, sectarian and intimately linked to a mosque or religious person or group. Third, I firmly believe that the state has the primary duty to educate its citizens. It is obligated to support all educational systems recognized by the states. In the final analysis, the end users of these systems are the society and good education redounds to the benefit of the society. The state shall not make any distinction between and among the educational systems it has recognized as valid and fulfilling its duty to give quality education to its citizens. Fourth, the Madaris system needs to be supported, “streamed” and recognized through curricular reforms, teachers training, and development of facilities and assistance to their students through an expanded Government Assistance to Students in Private education or the GATSPE Law. Fifth, do not, never integrate, assimilate, digest, and absorb the madaris into our public school system. This would spell not only disaster but and eradication of a rich heritage of our Muslim brother and sisters. Don’t, never make our public schools appear as madaris. They will compete with the genuine madaris and with the present state of our madaris they cannot survive the competition. Sixth, if we are not familiar with the history, development and identity of the madaris system, don’t dare do anything. The current trend at the DECS, including in the ARMM is a manifestation of ignorant enthusiasm to banner the madrasa. But this good intention if pursued shall spell disaster for the Madaris system in the long term. The trend will remove the madaris moorings and identity as private, sectarian and religious. Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
The madaris system CANNOT BECOME instrument of peace and development for the Southern Philippines, take a model examples in Saudi Arabia, in Afganistan, in Pakistan, this madaris become the origin learning for terrorist.
As an educator you must UPDATE your knowledges of the LATEST FINDINGS which lead to Total Changes in teachings and doctrines for students or else your UNDATED teaching will be DETRIMENTAL to the benefits of the Latest Findings. If the Philippine educational system is not monolithic, we will create CONFLICT for two or many Educational Systems teachings and doctrines which in our existing educational traditions and systems results to conflicts. The Madaris system is widely Different from the Catholic or Protestant educational systems we must admit. The madaris system is private as you said, sectarian and intimately linked to a mosque or religious person or group which contradicts the reality of the majority in this world society. If the state recognized two and opposite educational systems it will rip the society and bring division and separation. First madaris teach NOT TO TOUCH OR EAT PIG (Swine), can the other educational system accept this? second the wearing of vail for women, will the other accept this? This was past issues in schools in France and all over the world and still we don't learned from that. The present quality system of Public schools compared to private school was not yet harmonized and now you like for additional burden. As you said we are not familiar with the history, development and identity of the madaris system. The current trend at the DECS, including in the ARMM is a manifestation of ignorant enthusiasm to banner the madrasa. So the Problem was pointed out WE ARE NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE HISTORY. Therefore the HISTORY will be the answer, now new findings was found to spell the correct history, and it can be foung easily in the internet. Therefore we will not expect in New Books teachings that MAN CAME FROM MONKEY, the DNA, the Sattelites images, the latest communications and computers will change the old ways of false teachings. This is the same as in the RELIGION, ONLY IGNORANT will believed in the False Religions that prolifirate in our society now. Alam mo dath naka gapus ka pa rin sa maling pre-concieved ideas of what madaris is. Unless, we take the courage to give this educational system a chance to develop and for us to see it's value in society, then we will all remain in our own biases. like your bias for this educational system. Common open your mind and try to be positive about this system. Help and contribute what you can, try to appreciate our diverse culture. like you.. who also has a culture of your own, what would you feel if people would not appreciate your culture and way of life? Sobra kasi bias natin eh, kapwa natin ayaw nating tulungang umunlad. hay naku!
Yes I believed that the present religions are all FALSE RELIGIONS. Hindi nila itinuro ang TAMA kaya naglabasan ang marami, ang lumabas naman ay nabitbit (carry-over) ang mga maling turo. Kahit na imodernised ang Madrasa, ang Catholic schools at Protestant schools walang mangyayari dahil puro kasinungalingan ang itinuturo nila. Dapat individual sa atin ay magbasa ng Holy Koran at Holy Bible at ikumpara natin sa kasalukuyang mga natagpuan (new archaelogical findings) upang mahimay ang katotohanan na naka-sulat sa BIBLE at KORAN, kagaya sa Proverbs 22:28"remove not the ancient landmark which tour fathers have set". ito ang magpapa-alala sa atin sa tama at katotohanan. sa Proverbs 14:12"There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof [are] the ways of death". Di ba lahat ng religion sa tingin ng tao ay mabuti pero ang tinutungo niyan ay sa kamatayan. sa Holy Koran nakasulat ng limang beses sinabi ni Mohamad(PUH) " those pagan Arabs" ito ay patunay na si Mohamad ay HINDI ARAB, siya ay inampon ng Arab pagkatapos na masugatan sa labanan dahil inatrasan siya ng kanyang pinsan na Hudyo at doon nagsimula ang galit ng Arab na sumusunod sa aral ni Mohamad sa mga Hudyo.
Ituturo din ba kung paano mamugot ng mga Kristyano?
Ano ang flag ceremony Lupang Hinirang o Bangsamoro Kill? Sino teacher mga MILF rebels ba? Tuturuan din ba silang humawak ng baril? Magtataas din ba sila ng tuition fee? Alam mo Tintoy ang kasalukuyang sistema ng edukasyon sa Pilipinas ay Pattern sa Katolisismong pamamaraan tinuturuan ang mga lahing kayumanggi na maging sinungaling,manunuba,kawatan,magugulang,estapador,rapist,adulterer,swindler,adulterer,pamamalimos,corruption,pidophilia,prostitutes,atheist,hypocrites,idolater,etc.etc.etc.
at ano naman ang katunayan???Kailangan pa ba natin ipaliwanag???Facts,tignan mo kung anong nangyayari sa bansang kayumanggi,tignan mo angpadami ng padami mga puta at mga kabit na mga professionals,pagdami ng mga sinungaling at magnanakaw na leaders.At sino-sino naman ang mga yan???Di ba mga turo ng Katolisismo yan???Itinuro sa mga premier na mga eskwelahan ng Katolisismo tulad ng ateneo,sto Tomas,La-Salle,Notre Dame,Immaculate,Don Bosco,C.I.T.E,San Carlos University lahat yan ang mga naunang nagturo sa arkipelagong ito... Yung pamumugot ng ulo,tama ka dapat lang na pugutan ng ulo ang mga Kristyanus na lalabag sa Batas ng Allah or ng Islam.Sa relihiyon pa lang ninyo ay di na kailangan na magnakaw or mag murder kayo ng tao para pugutan kayo ng ulo,ulitin ko uli at hindi ko ikinahihiya yan na sa relihiyon pa lang ninyo ay dapat pugutan kayo ng ulo at walang masama sa batas at eduaksyon ng Islam yun at ng Madrasa... Kung Gusto mo Tintoy pugutan kayo lahat ng ulo at unahin ang Nanay mo na nagturo sa iyo na maging balahuba at Adulterer at Kawatan. Hehehehehehehehehe....Hahahahahahahaha...Dapat lahat ng Kristyanus ay pugutan ng ulo Unahin ang mga Pari ng Katoliko Romano.... I am very proud to cut all your heads...At i am recommending the Mujahedin an unahin itong si Jun Mercado....at ang pamilya nito.... at maganda pa nga niyan Tintoy na lahat ng mga Romano Katoliko sa Middle-east ay pauwiin sa Pilipinas at Pugutan yung mga nag adultery at yung mga bakalng katoliko na nagtitinda ng blowjob sa middle-east.
At lahat ng simbahan ng Katoliko sa Mindanao ay sunugin at massakerin ang mga Katoliko. Rekomendasyon ko ay hagisan ng granada ang mga simbahan katulad ng gingawa ng inyong mga sundalo sa mga masjid ng mga muslim diba??? At yung mga babae ninyo na mga puta at adulterer ay putulan ng suso at tanggalin ang mga kuko ng plies...hehehehehe At ang inyung madre na nakikipagtalik sa mga estudyante nito at pari ay batuhin hanggang sa mamatay diba.... Ngayon kung hindi ninyo kaya ang Islamic ay yung Erap style na lang na Lethal Injection tulad ng ginawa kay Echegaray na isang Katoliko Mnaghahalay diba? O di natamimi ka Tintoy,akala mo siguro ikinahihiya ko ang pagpugot ng ulo ng mga Katoliko ano??? Ipinagmamalaki ko pa yan,sapagkat yan lang ang dapat sa inyo dahil kayo ay mga virus ng lipunan na dapat kalusin ng isang Anti-Biotic na ang generic name ay Pugutnamycin, or di kaya Bitaynamoxin...hehehehehehe???
Ipagsigawan ko pa sa buong mundo yan...na lahat ng Simbahan,Eskwelahan,Pari,Madre,Radyo at mga center ng inyong mga prelate sa Mindanao ay Pasabugin at Kalusin upang magkaroon na ng kapayaan ang mga Moro sa Mindanao. I am very proud of it,for your information Tintoy!!! Sigue sabihin mo pa ang mga pamamaraan sa Islam ng pagparusa sa Katoliko at susuportahan ko yan ng todo-todo taas noo kahit kanino..... Andris, kawawa ka naman siguro kaya gust mo talaga magkagul sa mindanao ay wala kang lupain at gusto mo magkaroon ng hecta-hectariang lupa sa pamamagitan ng pagpatay.
Siguro napakapangit mong tao dahil sa ugali mo pa lang ay nuknukan na sa kapangitan. Nang reraip ka din ng musmos dahil walang matinong pumapatol sa maaskad nong mukha. Andris....mabaho ka pa sa baboy na tatlong araw nang patay.... maligo ka naman.
#3.2.1.1.1
Andres Bonifacio
on
2009-05-27 09:40
(Reply)
Hak!hak!hak! Tintoy yung nag pirporm sa dibidi...ulitin ko ulit...yung nag pirpurm sa dibidi...hekhekhekhek ...dibat mga Roman Catholic ang mga yan ????hakhakhakhak...At ang nagpakalat niyan ay isa ring maimpluwensyang Roman Catholic na manyak sa LAMAN!!!hikhikhik...diba ang abugado niyan ay isang Muslim hakhakhakhak...
Mga Roman Catholic mga adulterer hakhakhakhakhakhak...pugot at stone to death ang mga yan dapat hakhakhakhak.... We can learn, compare, analyze the present techno devt, consider global competitiveness & adopt from the educational system of some countries the way they handle this matter.
France, Canada, Australia, Turkey, Germany, USA, UK have various indigenous ethnic groups as we are. We dont want to marginalized our muslim brothers neither do we want to isolate them by our School System. They need to voice out their suggestions collectively & stand for a common goal regarding the type of Madaris that they prefer. Why Vatican nakiki-alam?
The prelature of Marawi was created on November 20, 1976 and made a suffragan of the Archdiocese of Ozamiz. It comprises the province of Lanao del Sur, of which Marawi is the capital. It is a land where Muslims predominate and Christians remain a small but courageous minority. It is also a land where a Christian extends his hand to his Muslim brother in a common search for God's all-encompassing Love. This is the story of the creation of that prelature. In 1971 the late Bishop Bienvenido Tudtud, then Bishop of Iligan which had jurisdiction over both Lanao provinces, found Lanao del Sur torn by hostilities, killings, and culture-rooted unrest. The situation was tense. The situation was frustrating. The situation was hopeless. In 1974 Bishop Tudtud went to Rome to study Islam. While in Rome he met with the Holy Father, Pope Paul VI who had sent for him. Bishop Tudtud explained the whole situation to the Holy Father � the animosities between Christians and Muslims, the seeming hopelessness of the whole situation, and the fact that there was really nothing the Church could do about it. The Holy Father's reply was: "The Gospel demandst hat we rise up not only above our unfounded prejudices, but specially that we should rise above when our well founded prejudices." This reply was to ring in Bishop Tudtud's ears for the rest of his life. The Bishop told the Holy Father that the message would be hard to sell to the people. And the Holy Father's reply was: "you will not tell them, you will show them." This was the vision of Pope Paul VI for the Christians and the Muslims of Mindanao. After he got back to Iligan, Bishop Tudtud was confronted with more difficulties than he had imagined in his pursuit of that vision, so he sought the advice of the Papal Nuncio. The Nuncio's advice was to effect the separation of Marawi from the then Prelature of Iligan. In October of 1976 Bishop Tudtud submitted a proposal to make Marawi, and Lanao del Sur, a separate prelature. And the speed with which Rome reacted was a clear manifestation that Pope Paul VI had a personal interest in a Christian-Muslim dialogue in the Philippines. On December 8, 1976, the Prelature of Marawi was erected. Rome never moved so fast. L'Osservatore Romano made the observation that this was so because the dialogue was the Pope's idea and personal project, "not for conversion but for dialogue of life and faith." The years that followed were difficult years for Bishop Tudtud and the prelature. Besides the vision formation, immersion was needed. But how to immerse? Events transpired to bring this about. The Carmelite nuns, uninvited, came by themselves, thus supplying the faith dimension. An earthquake and a tidal wave struck, and brought peoples of different cultures together for the relief work. When a Protestant church got burned down to harass the Christians, and a Catholic church was supposed to be next, the question was, if it happened should there be a retaliation? The answer was an emphatic NO. And that has been the answer for the last ten years. In time more and more people got involved with the vision of the prelature. This was the time for Basic Ecclesial Communities, meetings, consultations and representations. A re-structuring of the prelature was needed. So on June 2 to June 8, 1987, the First Pastoral Assembly of the Prelature of Marawi was convened. And out of that pastoral assembly has emerged a vision statement that could be one for all peoples and for all faiths: "To be loved by God and to be able to love Him in return�this is a human exchange is actually the essence of what Christians call the Good News, and of what Muslims mean when they refer to God as the Merciful (Al-Rahman), the Compassionate (Al-Rahim), and the Loving One (Al-Wadud). To hold and believe it is faith. To announce and proclaim it is an integral part of the mission of Christianity and the da-wah of Islam." To continue with excerpts: "�Every gift received from God is good. Every good must somehow be communicated. Belief in the Divine Mercy and Compassion must be shared. This sharing is dialogue. "�In a situation of prejudice, dialogue means an abiding and genuine search for goodness, beauty and truth. "To be wounded in the act of loving, to understand in a climate of misunderstanding, to trust in an atmosphere of suspicion�there are no light burdens to bear. Dialogue therefore demands a deep spirituality which enables a man to hang on to his faith in God's love, even when everything seems to fall apart. This spirituality is such that what is believed in the heart becomes alive in one's life. "This same dialogue demands a deep respect for the faith of others, for the way they understand it, and also for the manner in which they express it. The faith of the others may not be judged from the perspectives and categories of one's own faith. Thus dialogue also demands serious study of the faith and religion of others, as well as one's own. "In an area where Muslims and Christians live together, the dialogue described is an offering to both. It is an offering because, though it is a demand on the believer, he should not force it on those with whom he must relate. "It is an offering because it is ever extended not only in the pleasantness of appreciation but also in, and beyond, the pain of rejection. Dialogue is an offering because it respects the antipathies of both Muslims and Christians, and the pace with which they strive to ease their hurts and to heal their wounds. Here dialogue is compassion. "Besides being an offering, dialogue is a challenge as well. It asks of a believer whether his faith does not require him to rise above his prejudices, even those that stem from real pain. "Dialogue is above all a communion of men in total surrender to God, who persist in the hope that all can have a change of heart and participate in the building of God's kingdom whose completion He alone can bring about." Most Reverend Bienvenido S. Tudtud died in a tragic plane crash on June 27, 1987. He was then First Prelate Ordinary of the Prelature of Marawi. Since his death the prelature has been governed by the Most Reverend Fernando R. Capalla of Iligan, then by Very Reverend Desmond Hartford, MSSC. Ano naman po ba ang magiging Educational System ng mga pinoy buddhist, hindus, pinoy aborigines at mga non-militant communist? Dapat din ba silang bigyan ng kani-kanilang sistema sa edukasyon?
DAPAT NATING TANGGAPIN NA TAYO AY BANSANG BINUBUO NG MARAMING RELIHIYON AT KULTURA PARA MABIGYAN NG PANTAY NA KARAPATAN BAWAT ISA Dagdag ko lang po:
Isang Curriculum lang ang gamit ng Private Catholic schools at Private Protestant schools na katulad rin sa Public schools at hindi ipinipilit sa estudyante ang kanilang Religion subject Magkakaiba lang sa methodology at trainning ng mga teachers Ang pinansyal na tulong ng Gobyerno para sa Private schools ay kwestyunable dahil ang buwis ng mga relihiyoso ay hindi dapat ilaan sa Private Religious schools na hindi nila pinapaboran The Belligerent in Mindanao.
As the future BANGSAMORO cause advocates, I oblige myself to give justice to the needy, not only because it is my future obligation as what the Code of Professional Responsibility mandated that a lawyer shall not refuse his services to the needy, especially indigent client, but it is of my dream to be called a COMMANDER OF OPPRESSED. You can call me as LEGAL REVOLUTIONARIAN because my revolution is based on the existing laws of the land, as what the CPR mandated that a lawyer shall represent his client with zeal within the bounds of the law. You can even call me as LEGAL TERRORIST if you like, because I will twist the law if I can just to make my clients free from aggressions and injustices, as what the lawyers oath said that a lawyer should conduct himself as a lawyer according to the best of his knowledge and discretion. According to my simple legal dictionary belligerent refers to the nation or state of being at war or conflict and protected by the International laws on war. And according to the case of Tan Se Chiong, belligerent occupation is referring to the temporary military occupation of the enemy’s territory during the war. The occupation need not have its feet planted on every square foot of territory, provided it maintains effective control and military superiority therein, being able to send, in case of attack, sufficient forces to assert its authority within a reasonable time. We could deduce from the Colourful history of the Bangsamoro that prior to the Arrival of the Spaniards, and the Americans, and of the integration of the Bangsamoro to the Philippine political system, the Brave and honourable Sultans of Mindanao have established their own sovereignty ever their territories. But the Spaniards, the Americans and the Filipinos came without swearing allegiance to the Sultans; they fought against the Sultans and unconditionally grab the lands of the Bangsamoro. Therefore, the real rebel is the Philippine government. The bangsamoro homeland were temporarily militarily occupied by the government, as what the 1935 said that all territory over which the present Government of the Philippine Islands exercises jurisdiction. It is crystal clear from the definition of the BELLIGERENT that the Bangsamoro homelands and the civilians or the fighters are subject to be treated in accordance with the International Laws of War, the HAGUE CONVENTION to be particular. THEREFORE, in my scant understanding of the laws whether it be local or international laws, MO-OAD must be signed in accordance with the international laws not of the 1987 constitution. THANK YOU. I HOPE, I DID NOT HURT YOU. HEHE You can never consider the Moro war to be a Belligerent War mainly because MILF donot recognize International laws on war neither the GENEVA CONVENTION
The way Kumander Bravo and Kato burned villages, killed farmers, and gather war booty? How can you say that is sort of a BELLIGERENT WAR Your Mindanao history is inaccurate and you have never mention the Institutionalized slavery during the time of Sulu Moro Sultan and the contract whereby they have leased land & subsequently given full control of parts of their territories to White Rajas or British Trader. Issues at hand are now on Institutionalize Modern Islamic Education Panay ang sumbat mo sa nakaraan lahat na lang ng mga muslim gusto ibalik ang panahon.
Alam mo future COMMANDER you will someday be the like of commander Kato... who just today burned homes and looted the properties left behind by the terrorized residents.. I could just imagine how demonic this people while burning the homes of innocent people... I tell you your dream of having a seperate state will not be realized. Even your muslim brothers will go against a plan that will put mindanao in the hands of evil bandits. COMMANDER OF THE OPPRESSED...HAHAHA... Sana bumait kayo>>> Bakit kayong mga Katoliko ba ay humans? humanity ba ang magsugal,magpatayo ng sabungan sa lahat ng dako sa Mindanao,Magpatayo ng Kabaret sa Mindanao,Magpatayo ng simbahan sa Mindanao,Maglagay ng Grutto sa lahat ng parte ng Mindanao,Magpatayo ng mga naghuhubo na babae sa Discohan,Magnegosyo ng alak sa lahat ng dako sa Mindanao,Mang-agaw ng lupa sa Mindanao,Sasakupin ang buong Mindanao.
Yan ang response ng mga May-ari ng Mindanao na mga Morong Muslim. Sunugin ang mga establistamento ng mga Katoliko.Mga simbahan,Grutto,Sabungan...AAAAt kasama ang mga bahay ninyo kung maa-ari. O di kaya'y kailangan palayasin kayo dyan ay palayasin kayo. Kaya hindi kayo maituring na human dahil sa mga pinag-gagawa ninyo na kahayupan.Na maging sa batas ng inyung Katolisismo ay labag pero sinusuway ninyo. Kaya pugutan kayo ng ulo at sunugin lahat ng mga itinayo ninyo dyan lahat-lahat.... O ano pa Plaridel na Ilaga!!! Andres, lahat ng sinabi mo punta ka dito sa Dubai mas grabe pa...Mahal nga lang...
Ang tanga mo talaga nabili na ng lolo ko ang lupa nyo...Kaya ano pa nga ba?....Kayo ang lumayas....Kapal mo ah!!! Ang tapang ng hasang mo magsabi ng pugutan....isa kang duwag andres kasama ng mga terrorista...... Ano Pa....ginagawang pananggalang mga inosenteng siblyan... Duwag talaga mga kinikidnap mga walang armas...... Talagang duwag tapos tatakbo sa bundok .... Matagal ka na andres, wala ka naman alam kundi kagaguhan...magaral ka naman... Mga nakikitirang muslim sa lupa ng lolo ko.....Mas matalino pa sa iyo kasi pinagaaral ng pamilya namin..... Punta ka dito sa dubai mag basurero ka na lang tutal basura naman ang laman ng utak mo.... HAKHAKHAKHAKBasuraaaaaBasuraaaaaaGumamaaaaaaaa Tsaka kabaitan yung panununog sa mga establisamento ng mga Katoliko dyan...Isipin mo na lang matatakot na ang mga Katoliko ngayung magpatayo ng sabungan,casino,inuman,putahan,iyutan,babuyan,pronograpiyahan,discohan at hutang simbahan etc.etc.etc...
Dibat kabaitan yan dahil marami ng kabataan na uuwi ng maaga sa bahay nila,asawang uuwi sa bahay ng maaga, titinong asawa at hindi na mag-aadultery.. At ang hindi lang uuwi dyan yung mga Ilaga,Sundalo,Politiko at may-ari ng mga pasugalan dyan...dahil sa galit nila na napurnada ang Katolisismo nilang Negosyo.... Isang napakalaking kabaitan yang pagsunog sa mga establisamento ng mga Katoliko dyan...Lalo nat masunog ang Iligan,Zamboanga,Davao,CAgayan,Pagadian,Ozamis,Tiyak malaking pagbabago sa Mindanao at sa Pilipinas...o di ba We already pointed out the source of problem is NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE HISTORY, therefore the HISTORY will be the ANSWER: What is the History BEFORE Bangsamoro? Not during the time of Bangsamoro, this is the reason of conflict , everyone STOP and Stay in Bangsamoro era, but BEFORE Bangsamoro what is the History? Do you thing Bangsamoro originated in Mindanao, they just appear like mushroom?
Tanging sa Pilipinas Lamang Nanatili ang Tawag na Datu: DATU ay DATH sa Wikang Hebreo ibig sabihin ng Dath(Da-tho) "BATAS NAKASULAT SA PUSO". Ang mga Levitang Yahshear Dath o Seserdoteng Pari o "Dath‟ sa Hebreo sa lahi nila Dath-Gerson,Dath-Merari at Dath-Cohat ay nagsitakas sa panahon bago ang pananakop ng Assyria. Ang tanging paraan ng pagtakas ay ang mga barko na ipinagawa ni Haring YahdidiYah (Solomon) na pabalikbalik sa Ophir upang kumuha ng ginto, 1Kings 9:26. Kahit pagkatapos ng paghahari ni Haring YahdidiYah ay patuloy na naglalayag ang mga barko ni YahdidiYah sa Ophir. Tanging ang mga Pari ni Yahshhear (Pari ni Jacob) na binibigkas na Yahshear- Dath o Seser-dote o (Datho ni Yahshear o Pari ni Yahshear) ang may tanging titulo na Dath o DATUH. Si Haring Yeroboam ng Yisrawale (Israel) ay TINANGGAL ang Pagsisilbi ng mga Levitang YahshearDath o Seserdote sina YahshearDath-Cohat, YahshearDath-Gerson at YahshearDath-Merari at PINALITAN sila ng mga pangkaraniwang tao lamang na HINDI LEVITA. Si Haring Yeroboam ng Yisrawale (Israel) ay nagtayo ng templo sa mataas na lugar at ginawang Tigapagsilbing Pari ay pangkaraniwang tao lamang na HINDI LEVITA at itinalaga ang Kapistahan sa ika-Walong Buwan na dapat ay ika-Pitong buwan na ginaganap ng Kaharian ng Yahuwdah sa pagdiriwang ng mga kapistahan sa 1 Kings 12:31-32, 1 Kings 13:33-34. Levitang YahshearDath o Seserdote mula kay Yahshear-Dath Cohat, Yahshear-Dath Gerson at Yahshear-Dath Merari ay Tinanggal Bilang Tigapagsilbing YahshearDath o Seserdote sa Kaharian ng Yisrawale(Israel) at sila ay Lumayas sa lupain ng Yisrawale na dala ang kanilang mga ari-arian ay tumungo sa Kaharian ng YAHUWDAH sa lungsod ng Yahrusalem(Jerusalem): 2Chronicles 11:13-17 "at ang lahat ng mga Seserdoteng Pari at Levita na nasa Yisrawale at sa lahat ng baybayin ay lumayas na dala ang kanilang ari-arian at tumungo sa Yahuwdah at sa lungsod ng Yahrusalem: dahil si Haring Yeroboam at kanyang mga anak ay Pinalayas sila bilang Tigapagsilbing Seserdote para kay Yahweh at si Haring Yeroboam ay nagtalaga ng mga Seserdoteng Paring Hindi Levita sa matataas na lugar at para sa Demonyo at sa Istatwang Guya na kanyang ginawa. Ang mga Levitang YahshearDath o Seserdoteng Pari mula sa tribo ng Yisrawale, ay itinalaga ang kanilang sarili at puso na hanapin si Yahweh na Makapangyarihan ng Yisrawale sa pagpunta nila sa Yahrusalem upang magsakripisyo para kay Yahweh na Makapangyarihan ng kanilang mga magulang. Naging matatag ang Kaharian ng Yahuwdah at maging si Haring Rehoboam na anak ni YahdidiYah (Solomon) ay naging matatag, sa loob ng tatlong taon: dahil tatlong taon silang sumunod sa palatuntunan kagaya sa pagsunod ni DowDow (David) at YahdidiYah”(Solomon). Ang mga Levitang YahshearDath o Seserdoteng Pari na lahi ni Yahshear Dath Cohat, Gerson at Merari na pinalayas sa Kaharian ng Yisrawale ay hindi nagtagal sa Kaharian ng YAHUWDAH: 2 Chronicles 20:18-19 Ang mga Levitang YahshearDath o Seserdoteng Pari mula sa lahi ni Yahshear Dath Cohat, Gerson at Merari na pinalayas sa Kaharian ng Yisrawale na tumungo sa Kaharian ng YAHUWDAH sa Yahrusalem ay nawala sa kapanahunan ni Haring Yahoshaphat(776 B.C.E. 1Kings 22:51, 62 taon mula sa paghahari ni Haring Yeroboam) sa 2 Chronicles 20:18-19 “at ang mga Levita mula sa mga anak ni (Cohat) Cohathites at mga anak ni Corhites at tumayo upang purihin si Yahweh ang nag-iisang Makapangyarihan ng Yisrawale sa napaka-lakas na boses na mataas.” Mga Barko Patungong OPHIR: Mga Barko na ipinagawa ni Haring YahdidiYah (Solomon)1King 9:26 ay pumupunta parin sa OPHIR para kumuha ng mga ginto at tatlong (3) taon ang byahe pabalik, at nagpagawa pa ng mga panibagong Barko si Haring Yahoshaphat sa 1 Kings 22:48 ngunit hindi na ito natuloy. Ang mga Levitang Pari mula sa lahi ni Yahshear Dath Gerson, Cohat at Merari na pinalayas sa Kaharian ng Yisrawale na tumungo sa Kaharian ng Yahuwdah ay hindi nagtagal sa Kaharian ng Yahuwdah, sila ay sumama sa mga barkong ipinagawa ni Haring YahdidiYah na pumupunta sa OPHIR bago pa magpagawa ng panibagong Barko si Haring Yahoshaphat. Sa 2 Chronicles 20:18-19 sa paghahari ni Haring Yahoshaphat na 62 taon na ang lumipas mula sa paghahari ni Haring Yeroboan na katiwala ni Haring YahdidiYah(Solomon) sila ay hindi na natagpuan sa Yahrusalem. Dinatnan ng Mga Levitang Yahshear Dath o Datu sa Mga Isla ng OPHIR: Ang mga lahi ni OPHIR ay nagsasalita ng Wikang Hebreo na kagaya ng mga Levitang Yahshear Dath o Seserdote na sumakay sa mga Barko tumungong Ophir dahil si OPHIR ay apo rin ni Heber na pinagmulan ng tawag sa salitang Hebreo na nagmula sa pangalang Heber. Ang mga taga OPHIR ay masagana na sa napakaraming ginto at ang kanilang sinasamba ay mga anito na impluwensya ng malalapit na bansa sa kanila. Ang mga YahshearDath o Seserdoteng Paring Levita ay hindi kilala ng mga taga OPHIR na naitalaga na bilang Seserdoteng Pari (Dath) ni Yahshear (Yahcoob) o Yahshear-Dath o Seser-Dothe para sa pagsamba kay Yahweh, sa Hebreo ang Pari ay "Dath‟ o binigkas na Datuh sa mga naitalang lumang kasulatan ng mga Chinese na nagkaroon ng negosyo at relasyon sa mga naninirahan sa mga isla ng Ophir, at sa mga naitala nang panahon na dumating ang mga Kastila. Ophir ang Dating Pangalan ng mga Isla ng Pilipinas: Sa aklat ni Gregorio F. Zaide “History of the Filipino People”sa pahina 2, ang mga manunulat na mga taga Kanluran ay tinawag ang ating lupain sa pangalang Maniolas, Ophir, Islas del Oriente, Islas del Poniente, Archipelago de San Lazaro, Islas de Luzones (Isla ng Mortars), Archipelago de Magallanes at Archipelago de Legaspi. Ang Maniolas, Islas del Oriente, Islas del Poniente, Archipelago de San Lazaro, Islas de Luzones (Isla ng Mortars), Archipelago de Magallanes at Archipelago de Legaspi ay ang itinawag ng mga Kastila (mga salita at wikang Kastila hanggang maging Pilipinas) sa mga isla ng Ophir. Tinawag ang ating lupain na Ophir na nakasulat sa Biblia 1 Hari 22:48, 9:28 at 22:49, Awit 45:9, Isaiah 13:12, Job 22:24, 28:16, 1Chron. 24:4, 1:23, Genesis 10:25-26. Kung ang mga inapo ni Ophir ay ang mga Pilipino, dapat ang salita ay ang wikang Lumang-Hebreo hindi ang Makabagong-Hebreo. Ito ay pinatunayan ni Padre Chirino na naisulat ni Gregorio F. Zaide "History Of The Filipino People‟ pahina 24 “Of all our languages, the Tagalog has been adjudged the best by scholars. “I found in this language,” said Padre Chirino, eminent Jesuit-historian, “four qualities of the four greatest languages of the world – Hebrew, Greek, Latin and Spanish. It has “MYSTERY and OBSCURITIES of the HEBREW”, ang wikang Tagalog ay may misteryo at pagkakahawig sa wikang Hebreo. CHINESE MING DYNASTY & ISLAMIC INFLUENCES Author: Guo Zhongli 1368-1644 AD - The period of the Chinese Ming dynasty which brought to fore Islam’s heights in Celestial China under the aegis of her archetypical emperor- Chu Yuan-chang (better known as Hung Wu) who traced his Muslim roots to Madeenah in Saudia. 1372 AD - A Tausug mission was sent to Imperial China that, up to this time, had only received sovereign states; Jolo would send more missions in the years following. - Sabah Journal reported a Ming envoy, Prince Sahib ul-Kahar Ong Sum-ping to have sailed through the Sulu Archipelago to Kinabatangan in North Borneo and established a permanent Chinese foothold in that vast uninhabited island. 1380 AD - Arab judge-cum-scholar, Sheikh Karim ul-Makdum (Arabic for Afather@), arrived in Sulu from Melaka; He built the first mosque at Tubig Indangan in Simunul Sulu and advanced Islamic teaching to neighboring islands but died at Tandu Banak in Sibutu Sulu without ever returning home. 1386 AD - Admiral Cheng Chi-lung was installed as chief of the the Eastern hemisphere; his son Kuo Hsing-yeh (Koxinga to the Europeans) was better known in tactics and strategy is today revered as national hero in China. 1390 AD - Srivijayan Raja Baguinda, a minor ruler of Minangkabau, arrived in Sulu from Swarna Dwipa and founded the town of Bwansa in Jolo Island; His other compatriots, fleeing incoming Majapahit warriors, settled in Negri Sembilan (a state in present-day Malaysia). 1400-1440 AD – China reportedly sent naval expeditions to the coastal towns of present-day Philippines for forty years to familiarize with Moro piratical activities plying the south China Sea even engaging in desultory conflicts with Japanese corsairs. 1402 AD - Temasek ruler Parameswara, again running from invading Majapahit warriors, moved north to Muar and founded a Melaka settlement; He also embraced Islam on marrying a princess from Samudara Pasai and named himself Sultan Iskandar Shah of the Sultanate of Melaka to honor his ancestor Raja Iskandar Zulkarnain (the Macedonian greatman Alexander the Great). - Melakan Sultan Shah sent a mission to Imperial China in 1405 for which admiral Chengho returned the courtesy in 1409; Shah himself went to China in 1411 AD - with a retinue of four-hundred-fifty confederates accompanied by Chengho himself. - Melakan Sultan Shah’s home government reforms included specifying the functions of civil service offices like bendahara" (prime minister), temenggong laksamana" (admiral) and "shabandar" (harbor master) and adopted the custom of having ceremonial "white-and-yellow" umbrellas for royalties; He also laid the foundation of present-day Malay court procedures. 1403 AD - Melakan Sultan Shah was visited by a Chinese envoy Yin Ching, and admiral Chengho who arranged for his 1411 China visit; For this effort, Chengho was revered by the locals as the Venerated Sam-po Kong and built for him a baronial temple in Melaka. 1405-1433 AD - Ming emperor Yung Lo sent for seven naval expeditions from his Yangtze estuary to comb the shores of the Eastern Hemisphere employing 27,800 military crew in 1,180 Asampans@ and commanded by Muslim admiral Chengho; Chengho died in 1433 in Calicut (present-day Calcutta). According to Nichol, about the same period, another Chinese envoy was sent to Sulu corollary to this colossal plan of emperor Yung Lo. 1406 AD - Brunei Sultan Ahmad (a.k.a. Pateh Berbai) sent an envoy to Imperial China which occasion inspired him to change his north Bornean settlement to Brunei from a Sanskrit word Abarunai. 1408 AD - Chinese admiral Pei Pei Hsein, who was originally in the expeditionary fleet of Sam-po Kong that earlier visited Melakan Sultan Shah, was forced to land in Jolo because of monsoon rains and settled for sometime in Maubuh beach where he built a deep-well artesian as a gesture of gratitude for local hospitality. - Early Jolo Chinese settlers revered him on his death as Poon-tao Kong, Athe Celestial,@ and interred his immortal remains at Jati Tunggal in Indanan Sulu where a memorial tombstone stands today. - Islam widely spread to the North Borneo island in the Darvel Bay area. 1417 AD - Sulu Eastern Nakura Paduka Batara, together with Western Nakura Maharajah Gemding and Northern Nakura Paduka Balabu, including three-hundred-thirty-four Tausug nobles, visited Dezhou town in Shandong China on invitation of the Ming emperor Yung Lo. - Nakura Paduka Batara of the northern kingdom, however, fell ill in Dezhou and died, necessitating Emperor Yung Lo to order his ministers to honor the distinguished guest with a funeral befitting a visiting king. - Other tribute bearing missions were sent between 1420-1454 but contacts abruptly ended in 1473 when the Brunei leaders started to control the foreign policy of the Royal Sultanate of Sulu which is now under their governance. 1433 AD - A Seven-Datu-Council codified the Code of Kalantiaw (by Kalantiaw) and the Maragtas Code (by Sumakwel) for the people of Panay Island; Three Adatus from the original ten who came to Panay left for Batangas and Mindoro; Datu Putih was one of them but eventually returned to North Borneo from where no trace of him was found. SPANISH TIME:1521 A.D. Magellan's contemporary, Duarte Barbosa, wrote that the people of Malacca (in modern Malaysia) had described to him an island group known as the Lequios whose people were as "rich and more eminent than the Chins (Chinese)," and that traded "much gold, and sliver in bars, silk, rich cloth, and much very good wheat, beautiful porcelains and many other merchandises." However, Barbosa was not the only one to mention the Lequios during Magellan's time. About a decade after Magellan's voyage, Ferdinand Pinto had wrote in his journal of the experience of his crew and himself after being shipwrecked on the Lequios! Pinto was traveling through the Malay Archipelago at the time and he describes the Lequios islands as belonging to large group of islands many of which were rich in gold and silver. He mentions that at that time the Portugese were familiar with Japan and China, and also with the island of "Mindanaus" or Mindanao, so the Lequois islands must have been somewhere between these two areas. Furthermore, Pinto even goes as far as to give the exact latitude of the main Lequios island. He states that is was situated at 9N20 latitude and that the island was on a merdian similar to that of Japan. Now, in Magellan's time all exploration was done by latitude sailing and dead reckoning, as no navigational clocks were in use. Latitude sailing required fixing one's latitude precisely by means of an astrolabe. Longitude could only be approximated roughly by using a patent log to track the distance the ship has travelled in any particular direction. When Magellan began to suspect he was nearing the region of the Moluccas he deliberately steered on a north course and then turned westward at a latitude of 13 degrees North according to both Pigafetta and Albo. Pigafetta states that the reason was to get near the port of "Gaticara" which was the Cattigara mentioned by Ptolemy. In the book, Magellan's Voyage around the World, the author, Charles E. Nowell, offers another possible reason for Magellan steering so far to the north of the Moluccas. He notes that Magellan himself had rewrote part of Barbosa's book referring to the Lequios, and in his version Magellan substituted "Tarsis" and "Ofir" for the world "Lequios." Although these lands are not mentioned in Magellan's contract, less than six years after his voyage, Sebastian Cabot signed a contract with Spain which did have as one of its objectives the "lands of Tarshish and Ophir." Magellan had been to Malacca himself, and probably many have heard of the community of Filipino workers and merchants that lived there under the protection of the king of Malacca. Probably many of you already know of the theory that Black Henry, the slave Magellan purchased at Malacca, may have belonged to the Filipino community of Malacca as he was able to speak with the natives at Limasawa. Whatever the case, we know from his own pen that Magellan thought the Lequios islands might be the same as the Biblical Tarsis and Ofir, and it may be that his idea of the position of the Lequios was partly shaped by Barbosa's book, and partly by information he may have received from Filipinos in Malacca. Was the fact that Black Henry was able to converse with the people living at the latitude given by Pinto (but not with the people of Samar or Leyte) a coincidence, or something planned in advance from information gleaned in Malacca? Even after their discovery, many still regarded the Philippines, rich in gold and silver, to be the same as ancient Tarsis and Ofir. Father Colin, referred to them as such in the early 1600's and even at the turn of the century, the Philippine historian Pedro Paterno, still claimed that the Philippines were really Tarshish and Ophir! Whatever one thinks of these claims though, the search for the Biblical El Dorado appears to have played an important role in the European discovery of the Philippines. When the Spanish came they discovered an abundance of gold used among the people of the Philippine islands. Here are some relevant quotes: Pieces of gold, the size of walnuts and eggs are found by sifting the earth in the island of that king who came to our ships. All the dishes of that king are of gold and also some portion of his house as we were told by that king himself...He had a covering of silk on his head, and wore two large golden earrings fastened in his ears...At his side hung a dagger, the haft of which was somewhat long and all of gold, and its scabbard of carved wood. He had three spots of gold on every tooth, and his teeth appeared as if bound with gold. --- Pigafetta on Raja Siaui of Butuan during Magellan's voyage For brass, iron and other weighty articles, they gave us gold in exchange...For 14 pounds of iron we received 10 pieces of gold, of the value of a ducat and a half. The Captain General forbade too great an anxiety for receiving gold, without which order every sailor would have parted with all he had to obtain this metal, which would have ruined our commerce forever. --- Pigafetta on gold trade in Cebu Sailing in this manner, for some time, in 16° of north latitude, they were obliged by continual contrary winds, to bear up again for the Philippine islands, and in their way back, had sight of six or seven additional islands, but did not anchor at any of them. They found also an archipelago, or numerous cluster of islands, in 15 or 16 degrees of north latitude, well inhabited by a white people, with beautiful well-proportioned women, and much better clothed than in any other of the islands of these parts; and they had many golden ornaments, which was a sure sign that there was some of that metal in their country. --- Antonio Galvão in 1555 describing the journey of Bartholomew de la Torre in 1548 "...the ore is so rich that I will not write any more about it, as I might possibly come under a suspicion of exaggerating; but I swear by Christ that there is more gold on this island than there is iron in all Biscay." --- Hernando Riquel et al., 1574 In this island, there are many gold mines, some of which have been inspected by the Spaniards, who say that the natives work them as is done in Nueva Espana with the mines of silver; and, as in these mines, the vein of ore here is continouus. Assays have been made, yielding so great wealth that I shall not endeavor to describe them, lest I be suspected of lying. Time will prove the truth. --- Hernando Riquel et al. on island of Luzon, 1574 There are some chiefs in this island who have on their persons ten or twelve thousand ducats' worth of gold in jewels--to say nothing of the lands, slaves, and mines that they own. There are so many of these chiefs that they are innumerable. Likewise the individual subjects of these chiefs have a great quantity of the said jewels of gold, which they wear on their persons--bracelets, chains, and earrings of solid gold, daggers of gold, and other very rich trinkets. These are generally seen among them, and not only the chiefs and freemen have plenty of these jewels, but even slaves possess and wear golden trinkets upon their persons, openly and freely. --- Guido de Lavezaris at al., 1574 About their necks they wear gold necklaces, wrought like spun wax, and with links in our fashion, some larger than others. On their arms they wear armlets of wrought gold, which they call calombigas, and which are very large and made in different patterns. Some wear strings of precious stones--cornelians and agates; and other blue and white stones, which they esteem highly. They wear around the legs some strings of these stones, and certain cords, covered with black pitch in many foldings, as garters. -- Antonio de Morga, 1609 "... the natives proceed more slowly in this ,and content themselves with what they already possess in jewels and gold ingots handed down from antiquity and inherited from their ancestors. This is considerable, for he must be poor and wrethced who has no gold chains, calombigas, and earrings." -- Antonio de Morga, 1609 The Portugese explorer Pedro Fidalgo in 1545 found gold so abundant on Luzon the inhabitants were willing to trade two pezoes of gold for one pezo of silver. When the Portuguese first arrived, most of the gold traded into Brunei came from Luzon. That island was known as Lusung Dao or "Golden Luzon" to the Chinese who also traded for gold in this region. References: Legeza, Laszlo. "Tantric Elements in pre-Hispanic Philippines Gold Art," Arts of Asia, July-Aug. 1988, pp.129-136. (Mentions gold jewelry of Philippine origin in first century CE Egypt) Peralta, J.T. "Prehistoric gold ornaments from the Central Bank of the Philippines," Arts of Asia 1981, no.4, p.54. Villegas, Ramon N. Ginto: History Wrought in Gold, Manila: Bangko Central ng Pilipinas, 2004. Mines dating back to at least 1,000 B.C. have been found in the Philippines. When the Spanish arrived the Filipinos worked various mines of gold, silver, copper and iron. They also seemed to have worked in brass using tin that was likely imported from the Malay Peninsula. The iron work in particular was said to be of very high quality in some cases, and occassionaly in some areas, even better than that found in Europe. When the Spanish arrived, the Philippines was so gilded with gold that most of the gold mines had been neglected. According to De Morga: "... the natives proceed more slowly in this ,and content themselves with what they already possess in jewls and gold ingots handed down from antiquity and inherited from their ancestors. This is considerable, for he must be poor and wrethced who has no gold chains, calombigas, and earrings." However, things seem to already diminished from Pigafetta's time: "On the island [Butuan] where the king came to the ship, pieces of gold as large as walnuts or eggs are to be found, by sifting the earth. All the dishes of the king are of gold, and his whole house is very well set up." Pigafetta goes on to describe the huge gold ornaments, gold dagger handles, tooth plating and even gold that was used to decorate the outside of houses! On the gold work of the Filipinos is this description of the people of Mindoro: "...they possess great skill in mixing it [gold] with other metals. They give it an outside appearance so natural and perfect, and so fine a ring, that unless it is melted they can deceive all men, even the best of silversmiths." Apparently, even foreigners desired Filipino gold products. Recent discoveries show that gold jewelry of Philippine origin was found in Egypt near the beginning of the era. These finds are mentioned in Laszlo Legeza's "Tantric elements in pre-Hispanic Philippines Gold Art," (Arts of Asia, Jul-Aug 1988, p. 131) along a discussion of Philippine Tantric art. Some outstanding examples of Philippine jewelry, which included necklaces, belts, armlets and rings placed around the waist, are showcased in J. T. Peralta's "Prehistoric gold ornaments from the Central Bank of the Philippines," Arts of Asia 1981, no.4, p.54. OPHIR ang dating pangalan ng bansang tinawag ng mga Kastila na Felipinas na hinango sa pangalan ng Prinsipe ng Espanya na naging Hari si Haring Felipe. Sa paghahanap ni Fernando Magallanes (Ferdinand Magellan) sa Ophir na kanyang nabasa sa aklat ni Duarte Barbosa tungkol sa "Lequios" na mayaman sa ginto. Si Ferdinand Pinto ay sumulat din ng karanasan niya ng masira ang kanilang barko sa lugar ng mga isla ng "Lequios" na mayaman sa ginto sa kanilang paglalakbay sa Malay Archipelago . Binanggit niya na pamilyar ang Portugese sa Japan at China at isla ng Mindanaus (Mindanao) at ang mga isla ng "Lequois" ay nasa kalagitnaan nito at binangit na nasa 9N20 latitude at merdian kagaya ng Japan. Ayon kay Pigafetta at Albo ng nasa Moluccas sila ay pinatahak ni Magellan patungong Norte at tapos Kanluran sa latitude na 13 degrees North sa dahilan upang mapalapit sa daungan ng "Gaticara" na siyang nabanggit ni Ptolemy na "Cattigara". Ang aklat ni Barbosa ay isinulat muli ni Magellan na ang "Lequios" ay ang "Tarsis" at "Ofir". Paglipas ng anim na taon sa expedisyon ni Sebastian Cabot sa kontrata niya sa Spain na isa sa layunin ang marating ang "lupain ng Tarshish at Ophir". Si Padre Colin noong 1600 ay tinukoy na Ophir ang mga isla ng Felipinas, ganoon din ang Historian na si Pedro Paterno na ang Felipinas ay ang Tarshish at Ophir. Kahit na anumang resulta ng pag-aangkin sa mga research nito ay naging mahalagang dahilan sa pagkakatagpo sa mga isla na tinawag na Felipinas. Ayon kay De Morga at Pigaffeta na 1000 B.C. na ang idad ng mga minahan ng ginto at ang mga bahay ay pinapalamutian ng mga ginto sa bansang tinawag nilang Felipinas. Ito ay pinatunayan ni Padre Chirino na naisulat ni Gregorio F. Zaide "History Of The Filipino People‟ pahina 2 na "OPHIR" ang dating tawag at sa pahina 24 “Of all our languages, the Tagalog has been adjudged the best by scholars. “I found in this language,” said Padre Chirino, eminent Jesuit-historian, “four qualities of the four greatest languages of the world – Hebrew, Greek, Latin and Spanish. It has “MYSTERY and OBSCURITIES of the HEBREW”, (ang wikang Tagalog ay may misteryo at pagkakahawig sa wikang Hebreo). Katangian ng Nakatakas Mula Yisrawale: Ang katangian ng Natirang-Nakatakas ay sila‟y nagsasalita ng Lumang Wikang Hebreo dahil sila ay nakatakas bago maimpluwensiya ng wika ng mga Assyrian na wikang Aramaic at wika ng mga Babylonian na Chaldean. Mapapansin na ang mga naiwan sa Yahrusalem ay nagsasalita ng Chaldean-Hebrew o Modern-Hebrew na wika nila hanggang sa kasalukuyan. Ang pangalan na sinasamba ng Natirang-Nakatakas ay kapangalan ng sinasamba ni Abraham. Ngunit dahil sa sila ay tumatakas ay itinago ang kanilang pagkakakilanlan na pangalan na sinasamba ni Abraham na si YAHWEH ay itinago nila ito bilang "SUSI” na mababasa sa Lukas 11:52. Ang "Susi" ay si Yahweh sa Binisaya ang YAWE ay SUSI. Ang katangian ng Natirang-Nakatakas ay ang lahi ay mga "Tuli" kagaya ng Magpakailanmang-Tipan ni Abraham kay Yahweh. Ang katangian ng Natirang-Nakatakas ay ang lahi ay mga "Kayumanggi‟ na naitala sa Awit ni Solomon 1:5-6 (bago sila malahian ng mga taga Assyria at Babylonia ang kulay ng kanilang balat ay kayumanggi). Daratnan ni Yahshu‟a ang pangalan ng desipolo niyang si Juan na nakatala sa Juan 21:22-23. Si Juan na desipolo ni Yahshu‟a ay ang pangalan ay YahYah (Yahya) na makikita sa Holy Koran. Ang karakteristik ng Nawawalang Natirang Nakatakas sa Sambahayan ng Yisrawale ay sila ay sampung tribo at mayroon silang mga Yahshear-Dath o mga Datu na Seserdoteng Banal na nagtuturo at ang Sholtan o Sultan na namamahala. Sila ay taimtim na naghihintay sa inihula ng mga Propeta sa pagdating ng Messiah na tutubos sa kanila dahil ng sila ay nakatakas ay inihula na sa kanila ng mga Propeta ang pagdating ng Messiah. Mayroon silang katangiang-galing sa mga bagay na kanilang ginagawa at pinagpapala sila ni Yahweh sa kanilang gawaing kamay. Sa Visaya kapag sinabi mong "Yawa" ay dimonyo ito, kasi wala si "Yah", kasi ang „wa‟ ang ibig sabihin ay "wala", at ang "Ya" (Yah) ay ang pina-ikling pangalan na sinasamba ni Abrahan na si YAHWEH, Awit 68:4 Jah o "Yah". Hallelu-Yah ibig sabihin ay "Purihin-ka-Yah". Ang kabuuang pangalan na Yah ay YAHWEH ayon sa mga Hebrew Scholars sa Encyclopedia Judaica ay ang pinaka-banal na nag-iisang pangalan na sinasamba ni Abraham at ng mga orihinal na Israelita ay ang pangalang YAHWEH. Ang YA-WE naman sa Kabisayaan ay "Susi". Lukas 11:52 “tinanggal ninyo ang "Susi" ng karunungan”, sa Kawikaan 1:7 "ang pagkatakot kay YAHWEH ay pasimula ng karunungan‟. Ang tinutukoy na "Susi" ay si Yahweh. Bakit sa buong mundo tanging ang mga Kababayan lang natin ang pinagkalooban na tumawag sa tanging banal na pangalan ng Lumikha na YAHWEH na sinasamba ni Abraham at ng mga orihinal na mga Yisrawale o Israelita. Ito ay pinatunayan sa "Pilipinas Ay Nasa Biblia 2004 With Ophir" sa pamamagitan ng istorya sa Biblia na ang Natirang Nakatakas (Escaped Remnant) na mga Pare (Seserdote o Yahshear-Dath o Datuh) ng Yisrawale (Israel) ay nakarating sa mga Isla ng Ophir at ang wika ay Lumang-Hebreo, kulay ng balat ay kayumanggi (Awit ni Solomon 1:5-6), mga tuli na walang-hanggang kontrata ni Abraham kay Yahweh (Gen. 17:9-14). Marami sa mga Pilipino sa ngayon ay ang lahi ng mga Pare(Datuh) na nakarating sa Ophir na siyang ipinahahanap ni Yahshua Messiah sa Mateo 10:5-6. Panahon na upang Isulat na Muli ang Istorya ng mga taga OPHIR na tinatawag sa ngayon na Filipino. I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting the one who called you by the grace of Christ and are following a different gospel,
not that there really is another gospel, but there are some who are disturbing you and wanting to distort the gospel of Christ. But EVEN IF WE (or an angel from heaven-Gabriel) SHOULD PREACH A GOSPEL CONTRARY TO THE ONE WE PREACHED to you, let him be condemned to hell! As we have said before, and now I say again, if any one is preaching to you a gospel contrary to what you received, let him be condemned to hell! Galatians 1:6-9 I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting the one who called you by the grace of Christ and are following a different gospel,not that there really is another gospel, but there are some who are disturbing you and wanting to distort the gospel of Christ.But EVEN IF WE (or an angel from heaven-Gabriel) SHOULD PREACH A GOSPEL CONTRARY TO THE ONE WE PREACHED to you, let him be condemned to hell!
As we have said before, and now I say again, if any one is preaching to you a gospel contrary to what you received, let him be condemned to hell! Galatians 1:6-9. The original teaching can be found in Luke 24:47"AND THAT THE REPENTANCE AND REMISSION OF SINS SHOULD BE PREACHED IN HIS NAME (HIS NAME AT THAT TIME IS YAHSHUA IN JERUSALEM) AMONG ALL NATIONS, BEGINNING AT JERUSALEM". Paul messages to Galatians "if any one is preaching to you a gospel contrary to what you received, let him be condemned to hell!" Galatians 1:6-9. Paul HEARD the NAME of MESSIAH in HEBREW Acts 26:14-15. For SURE Paul heard the name in HEBREW for Paul knew and understand Hebrew, for SURE Paul heard the name in HEBREW is YAHSHUA not Jesus. Jesus was newly invented on 1700 century only in fact KJ Bible of 1611 His name written IESUS. Therefore if I am telling a story and I change the name of the subject person, do you think that I am misleading the listeners? Instead of Jun Mercado is the subject person and change the name of Jun Mercado into Ferdinand Marcos, do you think it is proper to do? John 14:26 "but the COMFORTER, which is the HOLY SPIRIT whom the FATHER will SEND in MY NAME"(His Name at that time is YAHSHUA). This means the Correct Name to be able to SEND by the FATHER in HEAVEN the HOLY SPIRIT is in the name YAHSHUA so that HOLY SPIRIT which will be the one to teach you everything. Those teaching that Yahshua Messiah is the same as the known Jesus Christ is preaching to you a gospel contrary to what you received, let him be condemned to hell! Galatians 1:6-9. Come Out of Jesus Christ , Jesus Christ DID NOT OR NEVER EXIST at the time of Ministerial of YAHSHUA MESSIAH 2,000 years ago , read from Internet letter J was newly invented 1633 A.D. only. Find what is the original name of Messiah in Internet. The Roman Catholic, Protestants, The Islam are all NEW RELIGION that Never Exist at the time of Messiah 2,000 years ago. Lets go back to the original belief of Abraham. No one among the Apostles have ever preach a gospel of OPHIR much more a gospel indicating salvation through Levitical lines from the Phillipines ever..never ..not ever...no one ever
Not even Jesus or Yashua ever mention the need of being from Levitical bloodline in order to preach salvation " Therefore produce fruit that proves your repentance, and don’t begin to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father.’ For I tell you that God can raise up children for Abraham from these stones! -Luke 3:8 It is not important if Filipinos are of the bloodline of Abrahamic Levites or not what matter is that we are could become children of Abraham by faith in Jesus-Yashua
#7.1.1.1.1
Andres Bonifacio
on
2009-05-26 17:42
(Reply)
Kung alam lang ninyo ang mga Prelates ng Katoliko at ang mga Pari nito ang mismong mga organizers ng mga kultong yan,na nag-aaral tungkol sa mga Metaphysics,Gnosticism,Anting-anting at kung ano-anong mga grupo tulad na lang ng rizalismo,Moncadista,PBML,at iba-ibang mga Gnostics na marunong sa mga Latin na orasyon at rituals na mismo ang Vatican at mga Pari ang may alam at nagtago ng mga misteryosong mga orasyon na mga yan.
At ang tanong naman,sino ba ang marurunong ng mga Latin??? Di bat mga Pari??? E di galing pa rin sa KAtolisismo...Maging mga naunang mga rabo tulad ng mga Assyrians,egyptians ay mga nagpractice din niyan before Kristyanismo,sa panahon ng Hellenism etc.etc.etc. kaya galing sa pagano at satanismong practices ang mga yan.Kaya nga pinadala ang mga Propeta upang sila ang mag correct dahil may kakayahan ang taong gumamit ng mga salamangka maging ang mga Jinn...Lahat ng mga practices na yan ay hindi sa katuruan ng tunay na mga alagad ng Tagapaglikha..
#7.1.1.1.1.1
DATH
on
2009-05-26 18:25
(Reply)
Tutuo na ang mga Prelate na Kastila ang nagpasimuno ng aral na Latin sa satanismo DAHIL sila ay ang mga (PEKE)(2Chronicles 11:13-17 "at ang lahat ng mga Seserdoteng Pari at Levita na nasa Yisrawale at sa lahat ng baybayin ay lumayas na dala ang kanilang ari-arian at tumungo sa Yahuwdah at sa lungsod ng Yahrusalem: dahil si Haring Yeroboam at kanyang mga anak ay Pinalayas sila bilang Tigapagsilbing Seserdote para kay Yahweh at si Haring Yeroboam ay nagtalaga ng mga Seserdoteng Paring Hindi Levita sa matataas na lugar at para sa Demonyo at sa Istatwang Guya na kanyang ginawa). ang mga Prelate na Kstila ay Bulaang Pare at walang katotohanan ang itinuro sa atin ay ang pangalan na nasa likod ang Demonyo kagaya ng Ie-SUS si SUS ay istatwa ng Demonyo.
Niloko tayo ng unang mga Pare ng Katoliko na nagturo ng salita ng demonyo na Latin Mark 5:9 And he asked him, What is thy name? And he answered, saying, My name is Legion: for we are many. Mark 5:15 And they come to Yahshua, and see him that was possessed with the devil, and had the legion, sitting, and clothed, and in his right mind: and they were afraid. Luke 8:30 And Yahshua asked him, saying, What is thy name? And he said, Legion: because many devils were entered into him. Legion, also known as the Gerasene Demon, is a demon found in the Christian Bible.
#7.1.1.1.2
DATH
on
2009-05-26 18:43
(Reply)
No one among the Apostles have ever preach a gospel of OPHIR much more a gospel indicating salvation through Levitical lines from the Phillipines ever..never ..not ever...no one ever
You must read the history of Levites priests that run away from Israel and reached Ophir see www. scribd.com PILIPINAS AY NASA BIBLIA 2004 WITH OPHIR. Not even Jesus or Yashua ever mention the need of being from Levitical bloodline in order to preach salvation HEBREW 4:14 Yahshua the Son Of Yahweh is our Great High Priest. Priesthood is on bloodline of Levites Exodus 29:1-42-44. Yahshua came from the bloodline of Levites Marriam his mother is Levite Luke 1:5, Luke 1:36 matt. 1:24-25. Moses is Levites Deut. 18: 15 prophet like Moses , like Moses a levite. " Therefore produce fruit that proves your repentance, and don’t begin to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father.’ For I tell you that God can raise up children for Abraham from these stones! Yes Yahweh can raise up children from these stones if NO ONE followed the Rules of Moses given by Yahweh. It is not important if Filipinos are of the bloodline of Abrahamic Levites or not what matter is that we are could become children of Abraham by faith in Jesus-Yashua You mean that even the UNCIRCUMCISED can be children of Abraham? see Genesis 17:14 the UNCIRCUMCISED shall be CUT OFF from his people. Is your faith the same as the faith of Abraham to be considered children of Abraham?
#7.1.1.1.2.1
Yashua=Jesus=Issa
on
2009-05-26 22:16
(Reply)
Who among the APOSTLES have preached the same gospel as yours?
Imbento lang po ang gospel nyo at nakabase sa Lumang Tipan na hindi naman itinuro ni Jesus o ng kanyang Apostol Jesus have made a new covenant instructions to his apostles Again from their word they say: EVEN IF WE SHOULD PREACH A GOSPEL CONTRARY TO ONE ONE WE PREACH TO YOU, LET HIM BE CONDEMNED TO HELL Kung hindi itinuro ng mga naunang Apostol ni Jesus ay huag daw tanggapin ang anumang bagong katuruan kahit pa ito ay dikta ng sinumang anghel -Galatians 1:6-9 PLEASE READ IT BY YOURSELVES
#7.1.1.1.2.1.1
DATH
on
2009-05-27 11:29
(Reply)
Totoo Lahat ng Sinabi mo na LUMALABAS NA IMBENTO LANG, Kasi BINAGO ang Naisulat ng mga Apostol.
Una. Ang Unang itinuro ni Apostol Saul (Ginawang Pablo) na si YAHSHUA(Hebrew Name)ay Anak Ni Yahweh Acts 9:20. hindi Jesus ang itinuro ni Saul dahil narinig niya ang pangalan sa Hebrew mababasa sa Acts 26:14-15. Kung Maliwanag ang isipan mo mauunawaan mo na HINDI NAGTURO NG JESUS SI APOSTOL PABLO dahil HINDI pa naiimbento ang Jesus (basahin mo ang "How Yeshua Become Jesus" sa internet. Samakatwid parehas ang binabanggit kong Pangalan na Yahshua ang Tunay na Messiah ay ganoon din si Apostol Saul na Yahshua ang itinuro niya. KASI PINALITAN NG MGA LITONG TRANSLATORS dahil hindi alam ng mga Foreigners na Translators ang tunay na pangalan ng Messiah ay Yahshua. Who among the APOSTLES have preached the same gospel as yours? Imbento lang po ang gospel nyo at nakabase sa Lumang Tipan na hindi naman itinuro ni Jesus o ng kanyang Apostol Ang Jesus ay IMBENTO LANG ng translators. Ang Binaggit kong Pangalan ng Messiah na Yahshua ay ang tunay niyang pangalan. Tungkol sa Gospel na binabanggit mo, sino ang tamang Gospel ? Gospel ni Jesus o Gospel ni Yahshua? John 14:26 Ang MANG-AALIW (Comforter) ay IPADADALA ng AMA sa pamamagitan ng PANGALAN KO. Sino ba ang nagsasalita noon at ano ang pangalan? di ba YAHSHUA ang pangalan ng nagsalita noon , HINDI SI JESUS. Iyang BANAL NA ISPIRITO ang MAGTUTURO sa iyo ng LAHAT. Samakatwid ipadadala ang Banal na Ispiritu sa panagalang Yahshua HINDI SA PANGALANG JESUS. Ngayon may BANAL NA ISPIRITU BA ANG MGA ARAL NI JESUS? SAGUTIN MO NGA, O DAPAT burahin sa Biblia ang john 14:26 para tunama na kahit kaninong pangalan ipadadala ang Banal na Ispiritu. EVEN IF WE SHOULD PREACH A GOSPEL CONTRARY TO ONE ONE WE PREACH TO YOU, LET HIM BE CONDEMNED TO HELL CONDEMNED TO HELL AYON SA IYO ANG NAGTURO NG KONTRA SA ITINURO NI YAHSHUA. sa LUKE 24:47 basahin mo na nagsimula sa Jerusalem ang Aral patungo sa iba-ibang bansa. Kung nagsimula sa Jerusalem ang aral - Yahshua ang itinuro hindi Jesus. Ganito kasi ang nagyari, Ang ORIGINAL YAHSHUA ang pangalan ng Messiah ay pinalitan at binago ang pangalan ginawang Jesus (Iesus-Issa) ang Messiah ay nag-iisa ang pangalan Act4:12 Ngayon kung sabihin ko na Yahshua ang pangalan lumalabas na INIBA KO NA. Buksan sana ang isip mo na IBALIK ang tunay na pangalan ng Messiah na Yahshua HINDI JESUS dahil HIndi darating ang Banal na Ispiritu para turuan ang naniniwala kay Jesus dahil ang Jesus ay walang banal na Ispiritu. John 14:26. How Yeshu’a Become Jesus By:JOSEPH STALLINGS Published in Catholic Digest January 1992 vol.32,no.6 page 17, The Mystery of the Magi We usually don’t think about it, but our Lord’s name was not always Jesus. It was in fact originally the popular Aramaic name Yeshu’a.. In first century Judea and Galilee, the name Yeshu’a was very common and shared fifth place with Eleazar (Lazarus) in popularity as a name for Jewish men. The most popular male names at that time were Shime’on (Simon), Yosef (Joseph), Yehuda (Judah or Judas) and Yochanan (John). In the Holy Land at the time of Christ, Aramaic had replaced Hebrew in everyday conversation, but Hebrew remained the holy language and was used in worship and daily prayers. The rabbis also used Hebrew when instructing their disciples. The two languages were closely related, however, as close as Italian is to Spanish, and both used the same alphabet. Yeshu’a was the Aramaic version of the Hebrew name Yehoshu’a (Joshua), and means “Yahweh saves”. Throughout Christ’s lifetime in Galilee, Samaria and Judea of course the name Yeshu’a presented no problem for those who spoke Aramaic and read the Bible and prayed in Hebrew. But outside the Holy Land it become a different story as Good News spread. The Gentiles of the Roman Empire spoke Greek and Latin and simply could not pronounce Yeshu’a. It contained sounds that did not exist in their language. When the Gospels were written in Greek, therefore, the Evangelists had a real problem regarding how they might render our Lord’s name into acceptable Greek. The initially ‘Y’ (Hebrew and Aramaic letter ‘yod’) was easy. The Evangelists could use the Greek letter ‘iota’, written ‘I,’ since it was pronounced like the ‘y’ in yet. The next sound was a vowel, and that was a little more difficult. Unlike Greek, all the letters of the Aramaic-Hebrew alphabet are consonants. The marks for the vowels were not invented until some centuries after Christ and were simple dots and dashes, placed above or beneath the letters. At the time of Christ apparently, the first vowel in our Lord’s name was pronounced like the ‘a’ in gate. And the Evangelists believed they could approximate that sound by using the Greek letter ‘eta’. (The capital Greek letter looks just like our English letter H). Then followed the first of two almost insurmountable problems with Hebrew and Aramaic pronunciation. There was no letter for the ‘sh’ sound in the Greek alphabet. Such a familiar name as Solomon was actually Sh’lomo in Hebrew, Samson was Shimson and Samuel was Sh’mu-El. Like the Greek translators of these Old Testament Hebrew names, the Evangelists used the Greek sigma (s) for the Hebrew shin (sh) when rendering Christ’s name. The first three Greek letters ‘iota’, ‘eta’, and ‘sigma’, moreover came to be used in early Byzantine religious art as an abbreviation of Jesus name. As they look very much like the Latin letters HIS, the letters were adapted in Western European religious paintings and church architecture as a symbol for Christ’s name. The next letter in the Aramaic name Yeshu’a was the Hebrew letter ‘waw’, which here represents the sound ‘oo’, as in too. It was easy for the Evangelists to duplicate this sound in Greek. It takes two letters, however, the omicron (o) and upsilon (u). But that easy substitution was followed by the biggest problem of all: the final ‘a’ sound. In Greek, there was no substitute for the Hebrew letter ‘aiyin’. Though the ‘aiyin’ has no sound of its own, it causes the vowel that it controls to be pronounced deep in the throat. The Greek couldn’t do that, and neither could the Romans when speaking in Latin. Usually, a Greek or Roman would pronounce an ‘aiyin’-controlled ‘a’ like the ‘a’ in father. A final ‘a’ on a name however was most commonly feminine in both Greek and Latin. Thus it was decided to drop the Hebrew ‘aiyin’ completely and replace it with the final Greek sigma (s) which most often indicates the masculine gender in nouns. Throughout the Roman Empire then our Lord’s Aramaic name Yeshu’a, had become the Greek name Iesous, pronounced yeh-SOOS. And this remained Christ’s name throughout the Roman Empire as long as Greek remained the dominant language. But after some centuries Greek lost its favored position and Latin took its place. In the last quarter of the fourth century, the Bible was translated from Greek into Latin by *St. Jerome who had no trouble rendering the Greek Iesous into Latin, it became Iesus. The accent, however, was moved to the first syllable and the name pronounced YAY-soos, since the Romans liked to accent the second from the last syllable. In about 14th century, in the scriptoria of the monasteries where Bibles were copied by hand, Monks began to elongate the initial ‘I’ of the words into a ‘J’. (The pronounciation remained the same-like the ‘y’ in yet but the Monks thought a ‘J’ looked better). Probably the first Monks to do this were Germans because the letter ‘j’ in that language sounds the same as the ‘y’ in English. The name Iesus, consequently, evolved into the familiar written form of Jesus by the 17th century. Everyone still pronounced it YAY-soos, however, as it was in the official liturgical Latin. Way back in the fifth and sixth centuries, some pagan Germanic tribes called the Angles and Saxons invaded England. St Augustine of Canterbury came to convert them to Christianity in A.D.396. Of course St. Augustine established Jerome’s Latin translation as England’s official Bible. The Anglo-Saxon learned that our Lord’s official Latin name was Iesus. Naturally the Germanic Anglo-Saxon converted the initial Latin ‘I’ into the German ‘J’. They pronounced the name, however, as YAY-zoos, since a single ‘s’ between two vowels is sounded like our ‘z’ in Germanic languages. When the Normans invaded England in A.D.1066 they brought with them the French language. Since neither the Anglo-Saxons nor the Normans would surrender their language to the other, the two become wedded and eventually evolved into Modern English. The Normans did influence the pronunciation of the first letter of Our Lord’s name, though, they brought the French pronunciation of ‘j’ (jh), which evolved into our English sound of ‘j’. When King James commissioned the first official translation of the Bibles into English in the early 17th century, the Latin Jesus was carried over unchanged into the new English Bible. The average English citizen of the day probably pronounced the name JAY-zus which ultimately evolved into our modern English JEE-zus. The long process was now complete. A name that began as the Aramaic Yeshu’a would remain written in English as it was in Medieval Latin, but now would be pronounced in English speaking countries as the familiar and loving name of the One who is our Savior, JESUS. St. Jerome is Eusebius Hieronymus A.D.347 – A.D.419 Mr. Dath Moncadist,taga New Israel ka ba sa Mt. Makilala or taga Samal Island sa White House Davao City or Taga Cebu City sa Sudlon????? hehehehehehe...secret....
Alam mo iyang mga palabras mo ay maaring totoo at maari ding hindi.Pero hindi ko kinokondena yan...dahil karapatan mo yan,kung yan ang belief mo or pilosopiya sa buhay. Sino ba si Dr. Hilario Camino Del Prado Moncado??? Isa lang naman siyang anak ng Friar,at anong doctorate ba ang kanyang mga pinag-aralan???He is a doctor of Psychic,from six he is already studying mystics in India,Calcutta..Isa siyang anak at bilyunaryong nearest descendants of the Royal Family of Spain.Isa siya sa mga prominenteng spanish Pinoy sa America. Pero bakit pa siya nagtatag ng Cult or Gnostic groups???Gayung sila na nga ang nagdala ng Katolisismo sa Pinas diba? Hehehehehe...medyo palalim na ng palalim yung mga kalkalan natin ng katotohanan sa Katolisismo hehehehehe... Kalkalin din natin ang mga Borromeo family ng Cebu City na mga kamag-anak ni St.Borromeo ng Italy na mga Kaibigan ni Vice-Gov. Manny Piñol na mga may-ari ng AMS Corporation sa North Cotabato at Surigao del Sur,na isa sa may pinakamalaking donasyon sa Katolisismo sa mga Diocese sa North Cotabato hehehehehehehe.....mahabang mga koneksyon yan hehehehehe...Diocese na palaging sumusuporta sa dating seminaryo na si Balahubang Vice-Gov.Manny Piñol.Tapos sila ang mga nagkukunyari na nangunguna sa Peace consultation kuno sa Mindanao buwahahahahahahahaha...Ito namang mga Ulama namin na mga Tanga din nagpasakop naman doon sa kanilang Bishop-Ulama Conference of the Philippines hakhakhakhakhak!!!! Hay naku!!!!Marami kasing pera dyan sa Ulama-Bishop conference na sponsor ng Roman Catholic Corporation... Hakhakhakhakhakhakhak.... Kabayan Andres Bonifacio alam ko di ka andres de saya lalong lalo na hindi ka under ng pekeng religion at ng pekeng pamahalaan. Una nauto ang ninuno natin ng mga Islam, ginoyo nila sa pamamagitan ng Tiwala, iiwan nila ang kanilang ari-arian sa ninuno natin at pagbalik ay daratnan nila uli, pati ang kanilang anak na babae iniwan narin para makapaglahi sa ninuno natin kaya nagkaroon ng Muslim sa Lahi natin. Ang Katoliko naman alam natin na hostage tayo ng Kastila kaya naging Katoliko ang ninuno natin. Pero ano ang nauna pang pananampalataya ng ninuno natin Bago dumating ang mga dugong Arabo at Dugong Kastila na iyan. Si Datuh Putih ay lahi ng Dath (Datho o Yahshear-Datho o Seserdota na nanggaling sa Israel, napatunayan iyan sa www.scribd.com "PILIPINAS AY NASA BIBLIA 2004 WITH OPHIR" at "PILIPINAS AY NASA BIBLIA 2008". kapag nabasa mo ito ma-aalala mo ang Una at Tunay na Original na Pananampalataya ng ating mga Ninuno. Hindi sila Katoliko at lalo-lalo na na Hindi sila Muslim kundi sila ay nananampalatay kagaya ni Abraham na nagpatuli.
Mr. Dath, huwag kang mag-alala hindi malayo ang pananaw nating dalawa,subalit kailangan pa nating pag-aralan ang mga tunay na isturya sa mundong ibabaw.Mga bagay at kasulatan sa totoong pananampalataya.
Sa ngayon,ay malinaw sa pa sa akin ang kadalisayan ng Islam,at ang batas na ipapairal nito ay isang banal na kautusan. Pasensya kana at medyo nasagi ko ang nakatago ninyong koneksyon sa Katolisismo at Judaism.Pero kailangan pa nating malaman ang katotohanan sa lahat ng katotohanan,maliban na lang kung tayo ay patay na. MADRASAH UPDATE
One horrible incident was reported on 11th December, 2004 in The Daily Times of Lahore. A 14-year-old Madrasah student, Abid Tanoli, had acid thrown on his face by his Madrasah teacher. This poor fellow had lost both his eyes with more than 50 % burn on his face. Left side of his face was horribly disfigured. This incident took place on 1st July 2002 in Karachi (Petit, 2004). His fault was that he rejected sexual demand from his Madrasah teacher. The Daily Times also reported that, during the year 2004, there are total 500 complaints of child sex abuse in Pakistani Madrasahs, but there was hardly any successful prosecution (Khawaja, 2004). Presently, the teacher (who cannot be named for legal reasons), and two of his accomplice are in prison awaiting trial for attempted murder and rape. All three denied the charges. The fourth culprit is still absconding. These incidents are increasing in number every year. Haroon Tanoli, the father of Abid, was threatened with harsh consequences when he tried to take up his son's case with officials at the school. The school authority initially tried to hush up the matter by offering him a cash payment of one million Pakistani rupees (£11,300), but Haroon refused to back down and took up the matter with police (Ansari, 2004). Haroon said “I despise hypocrites who sport huge beards in the name of religion and hinder the passage of justice in the name of Islam … I had a beard, and all my four sons were studying in a madrasa. However, following this incident, the first thing I did was to pull my children out of the madrasa - and shave off my beard" (Ansari, 2004). Even when Abid was receiving medical treatment, the religious authorities pressed the hospital authority to discharge him. Haroon managed to get him admitted to a different hospital for safety reasons. The family is too poor and cannot afford an operation to save his sight. The poor boy lost his sight forever. The Catholic Priest Never allow the members to read the Bible to avoid such deadly sickness like the Swine Flu or A(H1N1) It was written in leviticus 11:7 not to touch or eat the swine (pig). Even the president dont know that swine is deadly to eat but she says just washed your hand to avoid this epedemic.
THE CURSED SWINE By DR.GERALD B. WINROD Editor of the “Defender”, Wichita, Kansas U.S. Public Health Services CURSED SWINE By DR.GERALD B. WINROD Editor of the “Defender”, Wichita, Kansas The true science and the Bible are the best of friends. There is discord between the theories of scientists and the dogma of religionists. Render unto science the things that belong to science but render unto YAHWEH the things that are for Almighty One. Science is the servant of Christianity, not its master. Science reads the Book of books. There is perfect harmony between the two books; the difficulty often arises from the eyes through which these books are read. One of the amazing things about the Pentateuch is the fact of its absolute scientific accuracy. It is one of the most scientific documents ever written. Moses was one of the greatest scientific minds that ever lived. Exact statements of scientific laws only discovered in recent years will often be found in these sacred pages. Moses declared against the eating of any flesh that was killed by strangling or dying of itself. Moses knew the great scientific truth that putrid blood is poison. The nervous shock to the blood and flesh of an animal killed by strangling produces a poisonous condition making it unfit for table use. The law provided carefully for the bleeding and draining of flesh to be used as food. One well-known writer says, “This include a chicken whose neck has been wrung instead of being cut so as to properly bleed the victim; also, all creatures that are killed with a hammer instead of being bled, as are most of our beef cattle. The law provided that a keen knife be used to bleed them, thus enabling the heart to pump all the blood from the veins and leave the flesh free from all deleterious matter, which can never be done if the action of the heart is stopped by first striking down the animal. Has this law become obsolete? Never, as Yahshu’a the Messiah said, “Till heaven and earth pass away”. For our physical welfare only, YAHWEH wisely and kindly forbade the eating of blood in any and all forms. As an article of diet there are few more dangerous substances known that putrid blood. It is a venomous poison, and even the most thorough cooking does not entirely destroy the direful results. “The direful acts of some butchers in drinking warm blood are based on the densest ignorance, and yield their fearful fruits in an imbuted soul and a diseased brain and body”. LEVITICUS ELEVEN The eleven chapter of Leviticus is one of the mountain peaks of the Mosaic Law. It deals with diet. If the system promulgated here was observed today, the human race would be immune to about nine-tenths of its diseases. An old proverb says, “Tell me what you eat and I will tell you what you are”. There is a very real sense in which we are, physically, just what we eat. Leviticus 11:2 “These are the beasts which ye shall eat among all the beasts that are on the earth. Whatsoever parted the hoof, and is cloven-footed, and cheweth the cud, among the beasts, that shall ye eat”. This instructions were not arbitrary with YAHWEH or with Moses. They were revelations of great moral laws meant for the betterment of the nation. To oppose these laws was to break laws intended for the highest good of the people. The instructions were rooted in true science. Who told Moses? When the animals were killed and bled properly, we were permitted to eat cud-chewing, cloven-footed land animals, and water animals possessing fins and scales. In verses four to seven the following animals are forbidded: camel, coney, hare and swine. Certain fowls are forbidden while others are permitted. The animals possessing a cud and divided hoof have virtually three (3) stomachs as refining and purifying centers. They take in only vegetable foods and is requires twenty-four hours for this food to change into flesh. The food is refined, cleansed, purified, with poisonous matter removed by the cud process before it is built into the physical structure of the animal. It was not a matter of religious ceremony that the cud-chewing beast was permitted for food. It was a physiological provision for the welfare of the nation and for all subsequent generations that would abide by these supernaturally inspired instructions. THE CURSED SWINE Noticed that the swine is strictly forbidden. “And the swine, though he divide the hoof, and be clovenfooted, yet he chew not the cud; he is UNCLEAN TO YOU.”- Leviticus 11:7. The hog is an ugly creature. Nothing good can be said about him. The hog was in his proper sphere when Yahshu’a Messiah cast the demons out of the Gadarene and into the swine, as described in the eight chapter of Luke. The swine anatomy produces a bad appetite and it has a poorly built stomach. Within three hours from the time he grunts out of the mud to his swilltrough or putrid carrion, he may be butchered and man may eat him, assumed that the dirty, filthy, diseased matter has been changed into flesh, pork chops and spare ribs. Moses passes condemnation upon this kind of food. The best the hog can give you is produced from the dirtiest, filthiest, most rotten, most diseased material in the world. He is the muckraker of the farm. The food that it eats is polluted even before it passes into his polluted body. The best of modern science says that many of the worst diseases to which western civilization is subject to-day, can be traced to the blunder of eating pork. Moreover, in moral sense, animal flesh stirs to action the baser passions of the flesh life of depraved human nature – the very passions which Christians should be most eager to have destroyed through self-crucifixion. The hog can live only about eight years at best because his diet is so deadly poison. “The swine is a scavenger, the turkey buzzard of the animal kingdom, the hyena or jackal of civilization; and not withstanding the preaching of some of the contrary. YAHWEH has never cleansed or sanctified or transformed him. He is still a hog” –This is the language of one informed scholars. “EAT SWINE AND INHERIT FROM HIM ALL MANNER OF BLOOD DISEASES, STOMACH TROUBLES, LIVER ILLS, CANCERS and TUMORS”! He is the cause of much suffering. He deserved the curse that Moses placed upon him. Jews and Japanese, Muslim, who eat no pork, known little or nothing of the diseases which the hog hung on ancient Egypt and the western civilization of today. It is said that there was no word for cancer in the original Hebrew language. However cancer has become a fearful curse among Jews in recent years, and all because the modern Jew is letting down the bars on pork eating. An eminent preacher has this to say: “If you examine carefully you will find a small abrasion just behind the front foot of the pig. Rub it off clean and press the leg just above the abrasion and you may squeeze a teaspoonful of dirty matter from it. This is the outlet of sewer pipe that may be traced all through the animal’s body. It helps to drain off the teeming filth with which the system is filled. If this external opening become clogged, the animal will run about and grunt and rub his leg on anything handy, and manifest great pain. He seems almost to know that he will soon sicken of so-called cholera and bloodpoison and die of his own internal filth, unless he keeps this sewer open. “On a close analysis of this filthy, scrofulous serum – the ‘culture’ of its bacilli under varied conditions – it is seen to contain the elements of many dangerous diseases; yet how toothsome are ‘pickled pig feet’ to ignorance, unbelief, and disobedience. It is this internal and intrinsic vileness that causes a large percentage of our hogs to be filled with trichina and results in such havoc to human health. “We might be excused from diverting our attention from the scientific side of this discussion long enough to insert a few remarks on this heaven-forbidden delicacy. This creature, which has been condemned both logically and theologically, takes precedence with ignorance over all the creatures of the creation as an article of diet. He, of all creatures, is literally devoured. His body is eaten, his head turned into head cheese, and even his ears and tail inserted. His blood is turned into blood pudding; his stomach is transformed into tripe; his feet are pickled; his intestines are used for sausage covers, his heart, liver and kidneys are cooked; and his very bristles are sought for wax ends, etc. There is not even his grunt left unused, for the transgressors against YAHWEH and nature’s laws take up this undesirable remnant, and often grunt with disease and squeal in pain caused by their folly. Surely a man is what he eats. Is the law against this dirty, deadly diet obsolete? Ask the dyspeptic, the cancerous victim, or the consumptive.” LAW AND GRACE Yahshu’a Messiah great respect for the law of Moses. While some of the ordinance of worship were set aside by the advancement of Christianity over rites and symbols of Jewish worship, yet the great moral laws of Mosaic code remain unchanged. Yahshu’a Messiah said “Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one title shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled”. ( Matthew 5:18). TRICHINOSIS Trichinosis, a disease directly traceable to infection from eating the flesh of swine, is very, very seldom correctly diagnosed. Research on the infection with TRICHNIELLA SPIRALIS among the population of U.S. has been carried on under the skillful supervision of Dr. Willard H. Wright, Chief of the U.S. Zoology Lab. Dr. Thomas Parran, Surgeon General, Head of U.S. Public Health Services, makes the startling declaration that there are now 16,000,000 cases of Trichinosis in the U.S.A. Prof. Maurice Hall reports that out of 222 cases of Trichinosis (from a study of cadavers from hospitals), not one was correctly diagnosed! One of America’s greatest researchers on the problem states: “Upon the ingestion of the third stage larvae in infested muscle, the larvae are freed from the cyst by the action of the gastric juices and then proceed to migrate to the intestine. Here they develop to maturity and after fertilization the adult worms produce living embryos which invade the blood stream and are carried to all of the voluntary muscles of the body. These embryos develop in a relatively short time to third stage larvae in the muscles. The larvae remain alive during the low heat processing which transforms the SWINE’S FLESH (Isa.65: 3-4; 66: 17) into summer sausage, wienerwurst, frankfurters, etc. “When consumed by humans, the digestive juices in the stomach dissolve around the coiled worms and set them free. The young larvae born in the small intestine then begin to take their horrible toll. They travel through the body through the blood stream and lymphatics, and may lodge either temporarily or permanently in the glands and lymph nodes, brain, heart, skeletal muscles, or other tissue. It will thus be seen that the symptoms of different sufferers vary greatly and are not different than symptoms of other diseases, both infection and non-infection and the disease is difficult to diagnose. This horrible disease is diagnosed by physicians as “Ptomaine poisoning”, “Intestinal Influenza”, “Malaria”, Acute Alcoholism”, “Typhoid Fever”, “Appendicitis”, “Colitis”, “Ulcer”, “Gall Bladder Involvement”, Scarlet Fever”, “Asthma”, “Pneumonia”, “Neuritis”, “Mumps”, “Rheumatism”, “T.B.”, “Undulant Fever”, “Lead Poisoning”, flu, etc, etc. When the larvae lodge around the heart, the disease is diagnosed as various forms of “Heart Disease”, etc. etc… It realy it is “TRICHINOSIS” ! One reason million of people are infected with Trichinosis is because pork is used so widely as an adulterant in meat product.. The P.H.R. concludes that of the total persons dying over the period of these surveys, ONE out of SIX was infected with the Trichina parasite ! Further more, the hog is such a dangerous carrier of disease because the animal itself is diseased. Its lungs are frequently filled with ‘tubercules’. In 75 cases of 100 you will find the liver filled with abcesses. Lard then is nothing more than extract of a diseased carcass..” In Isaiah 65: 3-4 “A people that provoke ME to anger continually to MY FACE; that sacrificed in gardens, and burned incense upon altars of brick; which remain among the graves, and lodge in the monuments, which EAT SWINE’S FLESH, and broth of ABOMINABLE things is in their vessels “. In Isaiah 66: 17 “They that sanctify themselves, and purify themselves in the gardens behind one tree in the midst, EATING SWINE’S FLESH, and the ABOMINABLE, and the MOUSE, shall be consumed together, said YAHWEH” . (Do you wish to order “pork chops” for dinner tonight ? ) NAKU GANYAN PALA ANG BABOY, KAYA PALA BAH-BHOY NAPAKARUMI PALA AT PINANGGAGALINGAN NG MARAMING SAKIT HINDI LANG SWINE FLU . I WILL NOT TOUCH OR EAT ANYMORE BABOY KAHIT MAPAGKAMALAN PA AKONG MUSLIM , PERO DI AKO MUSLIM DI RIN AKO BILIB SA ARAL NG MUSLIM PARANG KINOPYA DIN SA BIBLE BINAGO LANG ANG EKSENA GINAWANG ARABO ANG MGA ARTISTA.
W A L A:
Walang prostitusyon, night club o sugalan sa mga bansang Islamiko Walang underground prostitution sa Al-Akaria at Shola, wala ring immoral na Immam na nahuling sumisiping sa kanyang anak (KSA) Walang satellite SPICY program ang lahat ng bansang muslim at hindi mo makikita dito ang mga muslim arabyanang gumagawa ng immoral Walang pumapatay sa Pakistan, Afghanistan, Libya sa mga taong ayaw yumapos sa Islam Walang nanloloko at nagnanakaw na opisyal ng gobyerno ang Shariah governance Walang muslim sa Quiapo ang nagbebenta ng X- DVD na may ibedensyang pati mga muslim arabs ay pokpok rin.. WALA- WALA -WALA Mga Kristyanus lang talaga ang immoral Hoy andris, Ibukas mo mata mo...para naman ang babait ng mga mamamatay taong mga muslim.
Sharia governance..ulol ka ba sa ganyang batas kapag ikaw ang nasa itaas o nasa katungkulan Ikaw mismo ang sharia law na yan.....Mga muslim walang check and balance.....Subukan mo punahin ang mga royal family sa middle east, haha andris, pugot ulo mo. Siguro ang trabaho mo andris mamumugot ulo....o di kaya manunuli.... Amdris, mabaho ka talaga....Ligo ka na......amoy kupal ka!!!!! May DVD ka na ba ni Hayden Kho??? Malinaw ba?...Magkano?? Dibidi-dibidi-dibidi-dibidi-dibidi-dibidi Hehehehe matanong lang kita Tintoy,ANO ANG RELIHIYON NG MGA TAONG TINUTUKOY MO???DIBA MGA ROMANO KATOLIKO ANG MGA YAN NA KATULAD MO HEHEHEHEHE....SYENTO PORSYENTO SILANG MGA ALAGAD NG KATOLISISMO HAKHAKHAKHAK...AT ANG LALAKI PA NG MGA DONASYON NG MGA YAN???
TSAKA BAKIT KAYA ANG MGA INVOLVE AY NAKUHA PANG KUNING ABUGADO AY ISANG MUSLIM NA HILAW????ESEP-ESEP HEHEHEHEHE KASI MGA MANYAK SA MUSLIM HAKHAKHAKHAKHAKHAK....IPINAGMALAKI MO PA SILA NA MGA KATOLIKO ANG MGA YAN....YUNG SANA DIBIDI ...YUNG MGA NAG PERFORM SA DIBIDI AT NAGPAKALAT NG DIBIDI...SILA AY MGA ROMAN KATOLIK...ISPELINGEN KO R.O.M.A.N K.A.T.O.L.I.K.=ADULTERER...HAKHAKHAKHAKHAKHAKJHAKHAK.....KAYA DAPAT LANG TALAGA PUGUTAN KAYONG LAHAT NG ULO MGA ADULTERER HEHEHEHEHEHEHE..... Madrasah 101
Out of all the heinous crimes modern societies have ever witnessed, the worst one obviously is crime against children. The barbaric violent acts of brutality against children often leave scars in their soft minds, which often never heals in their lifetime. Islam is such a wonderful religion that legalizes many crimes in the name of God. If there is any ‘beauty’ in Islam, here it is. In fact this is the main reason; many condemned criminals today are being attracted towards this wonderful religion. Crime against children is one of such many legalized crimes. There are many incidents where the keepers of Islam have shown merciless and cruel treatment towards children – child suicide bombers of Palestine, camel jockeys in Middle East and Islamic schools all over the world. Madrasahs are Islamic schools to study pure Islamic ethics. The culprits are the religious teachers and the victims include helpless innocent underage students. The sacred teacher-student relationship is given a new definition in these Islamic schools. Bakit wala na si Malvar, mababaliw ako kapag wala ang tuta niya mamaya sa pag tuwad ko. Malvar, Please malapit na ko tumuwad may pamada na at sisigaw nako.
Allahooo Malvar aaay ano ba yan malvaaar mabavaliw na kooooo. Malvaaaaar ang tutaaa mooooo. mahabag ka sa akin ilabas mo ang alaga tuta mong tutuaaa.
Andressssss alam ko na ikaw ang gustong mauna sa alagang tuta ni malvar.unahin mo ko malvar utang na loooooooov Meyroon akng secrito, alm nyo ba na ang sarap mag blow job. wow.
Pati si jesus cris natikman ko ang titi nya. tumahimik kayo jaan che at mj, chupaan ko kayo jaan eh.
Dito na kayo sa amin, Jesus has promised to us 70 big and handsome dicks. HOW TO BECOME A SHITSKIN MOSLEM
This is how: fuck goats, fuck your mother (nikomak), molest children, wear a beekeepers outfit all the time, never shower or bath, beat your wives, learn terrorist activities at a maddrassa, wipe your ass with stones, sell the donkey you fucked to a nearby village, marry a nine year-old , send your child off to an indoctrination camp, practice thighing with little kids, ............ Practice all those and you too could become a prophet !! Elif air ab tizak mohammad !!!! Hoy! Kabbalist na Evil Spirit Crypto-Jews tumahimik ka ha!!!Kayo ang isa sa nagpagulo sa buong mundo kaya dapat din na wakasan ang existence ninyo sa mundo mga Sorcerer....Dapat sa iyo batuhin hanggang mamatay hekhekhekhek!!!
Ano kaya ito hehehehehehehe....esep-esep!!!Medyo nasa second stage na ako hehehehehe....abangan!!!
Doctrine of mental reservation The doctrine of mental reservation, or the doctrine of mental equivocation, was a special branch of casuistry developed in the late Middle Ages and the Renaissance, and most often associated with the Jesuits. [edit] Secular use Mental reservation is a form of deception which is not an outright lie. It was argued for in moral theology, and now in ethics, as a way to fulfill obligations both to tell the truth and to keep secrets from those not entitled to know them (for example, because of the seal of the confessional or other clauses of confidentiality). Mental reservation, however, is regarded as unjustifiable without grave reason for withholding the truth. This condition was necessary to preserve a general idea of truth in social relations. A wide mental reservation is using equivocations and amphibologies to imply an untruth that is not actually stated. In the strict mental reservation, the speaker mentally adds some qualification to the words which he utters, and the words together with the mental qualification make a true assertion in accordance with fact. An anecdote often related, for instance by the canonist Martin Azpilcueta (aka Navarra) to illustrate his doctrine of a mixed speech (oratoria mixta) combining verbal speech and gestual communication, concerns Francis of Assisi, who allegedly declared to people pursuing a thief that he had just seen, "He hasn't passed by here," at the same time sliding his finger in his sleeve.[1] [edit] Mentalis restrictio in moral theology The doctrine of mentalis restrictio or mental reservation was most fully enunciated by the 16th-century Spanish theologian Martin de Azpilcueta (aka Dr. Navarrus). Navarrus held that mental reservation involved truths "expressed partly in speech and partly in the mind," relying upon the idea that God hears what is in one's mind while human beings hear only what one speaks. Therefore the Christian's moral duty was to tell the truth to God. Reserving some of that truth from the ears of human hearers was moral if it served a greater good. The user of the doctrine could reply "I know not" aloud to a human interlocutor, and "to tell you" silently to God, and still be telling the truth (stricte mentalis). The doctrine of mental reservation was intimately linked with the concept of equivocation, which allowed the speaker to employ double meanings of words to tell the literal truth while concealing a deeper meaning. Navarrus did not by any means originate these ideas, but he gave them a far more broad and liberal interpretation than had anyone up to that time. Other Catholic theological thinkers and writers took up the argument in favor of equivocation and mental reservation. Though the concepts remained controversial within the Roman Catholic Church (which never officially endorsed or upheld the doctrines), the Jesuits came to favor these tactics for their obvious advantages. The linked doctrines of mental reservation and equivocation became notorious in England during the Elizabethan era and the Jacobean era, when Jesuit agents penetrating England to maintain the Catholic cause were captured by the authorities, and used these concepts in their legal defenses. Robert Southwell (c. 1561–1595), a Jesuit priest and agent (also a poet of note) who was arrested in England in 1592, defended the doctrines at his trial, to the predictable resistance of the authorities. (Southwell was convicted, and executed in 1595.) More famous in his own era was Henry Garnet (1555–1606), who wrote a defense of Southwell in 1598; Garnet was captured by the authorities in 1606 due to his involvement in the Gunpowder Plot. He used the same doctrines in his own defense, with the same result as Southwell: Garnet was executed that year. The Protestants considered these doctrines as mere justifications for lies. Catholic ethicists also voiced objections: the Jansenist "Blaise Pascal...attacked the Jesuits in the seventeenth century for what he saw as their moral laxity."[2] "By 1679, the doctrine of mental reservation had become such a scandal that Pope Innocent XI officially condemned it."[3] Other casuists justifying mental reservation included Thomas Sanchez, who was criticized by Pascal in his Provincial Letters — although Sanchez added various restrictions (it should not be used in ordinary circumnstances, when one is interrogated by competent magistrates, when a creed is requested, even for heretics, etc.), which were ignored by Pascal. Of the 26 theses condemned by Pope Innocent XI, several were in Sanchez's works (see op. mor. in præc. Decalogi, III, vi, n. 15). One of them stated: “ If anyone, by himself, or before others, whether under examination or of his own accord, whether for amusement or for any other purpose, should swear that he has not done something which he has really done, having in mind something else which he has not done, or some way of doing it other than the way he employed, or anything else that is true: he does not lie nor perjure himself. ” This type of equivocation was famously mocked in the porter's speech in Shakespeare's Macbeth, in which the porter directly alludes to the practice of deceiving under oath by means of equivocation. “ Faith, here's an equivocator, that could swear in both the scales against either scale; who committed treason enough for God's sake, yet could not equivocate to heaven. (Macbeth, Act 2, Scene 3) ” Following Innocent XI's condemnation of strict mental reservation, equivocation was still considered orthodox, and was revived and defended by Alphonsus Liguori. The Jesuit Gabriel Daniel wrote in 1694 a reply to Pascal's Provincial Letters, titled Entretiens de Cleanthe et d'Eudoxe sur les lettres provinciales, in which he accused Pascal of lying, or even of having himself used mental reservation, by not precising all the restrictions given by Sanchez to the use of this form of deception. [edit] Legacy [edit] Kant and Constant This type of untruth was formally condemned by Kant in On a supposed 'right to lie’, who was debating against Benjamin Constant. The latter claimed, from a consequentialist stance opposed to Kant's categorical imperative, that: “ To tell the truth is thus a duty; but it is only in respect to one who has a right to the truth. But no one has a right to a truth which injures others.[4] ” On the other hand, Kant asserted, in the Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, that lying, or deception of any kind, would be forbidden under any interpretation and in any circumstance. In Groundwork, Kant gives the example of a person who seeks to borrow money without intending to pay it back. The maxim of this action, says Kant, results in a contradiction in conceivability (and thus contradicts perfect duty) because it would logically contradict the reliability of language. If it is universally acceptable to lie, then no one would believe anyone and all truths would be assumed to be lies (this last clause was accepted by casuists, hence the reasons for restrictions given to the cases where deception was authorized).[5] The right to deceive could also not be claimed because it would deny the status of the person deceived as an end in himself. And the theft would be incompatible with a possible kingdom of ends. Therefore, Kant denied the right to lie or deceive for any reason, regardless of context or anticipated consequences. [edit] Others The doctrines have also been criticized by Sissela Bok[6] or Paul Ekman, who defines lies by omissions as the main form of lying — though larger and more complex moral and ethical issues of lying and truth-telling extend far beyond these specific doctrines. Ekman, however, does not consider cases of deception where "it is improper to question" the truth as real form of deceptions[7] — this sort of case, where communication of truth is not to be expected, and deception is justified, was included by casuists.[5] Social psychologists have advanced cases[8] where the actor is confronted with an avoidance-avoidance conflict, in which he both doesn't want to say the truth and doesn't want to make an outright lie; in such circumstances, equivocal statements are standardly preferred by locutors. This type of equivocation has been defined as “nonstraightforward communication...ambiguous, contradictory, tangential, obscure or even evasive.”[9] People typically equivocate when posed a question to which all of the possible replies have potentially negative consequences, yet a reply is still expected (the situational theory of communicative conflict). Marranos or secret Jews (also known as Anusim) were Sephardic Jews (Jews resident in the Iberian peninsula) who were forced to adopt Christianity under threat of expulsion but who continued to practice Judaism secretly, thus preserving their Jewish identity. The term in Spanish meant pigs; it stemmed from the ritual prohibition against eating pork, a prohibition practiced by both Jews and Muslims. In Spanish, the term marrano acquired the meaning of "swine" or "filthy". In contemporary Spanish it is no longer associated with Jews. In Portuguese, the word refers only to crypto-Jews, since pig or "swine" is marrão or varrão. Under state pressure in the late 15th century, an estimated 100,000 -200,000 Jews in the Iberian Peninsula converted to Christianity. (The numbers who converted and those who migrated from the area have been issues of debate by historians.) The converts were known as conversos. They were also called Cristianos nuevos and Cristãos novos (new Christians) in Spain and Portugal, respectively. (Within Jewish tradition there was sympathy for forced converts and an assumption they would prefer to practice their original faith.) A disputed recent genetic study on the male Y chromosome conducted by the University of Leeds in 2008 appear to support the idea that the number of forced conversions were significantly underestimated, estimating that 20% of the male Iberian population have some Sephardim ancestry. These percentages are believed to represent the proportions of the respective populations at the time of mass conversions in the 14th and 15th centuries. [1]. Nevertheless, the Sephardic result is in contradiction [2][3][4][5][6] or not replicated in all the body of genetic studies done in Iberia and has been later questioned by the authors themselves [7][8][9][10] and by Stephen Oppenheimer who estimates that much earlier migrations, 5000 to 10,000 years ago from the Eastern Mediterranean might also have accounted for the Sephardic estimates: "They are really assuming that they are looking at his migration of Jewish immigrants, but the same lineages could have been introduced in the Neolithic"[11]. The same authors in also a recent study (October 2008) attributed most of those same lineages in Iberia and the Balearic Islands as of Phoenician origin [12] Not all conversos were immediately accused of being marranos. Those suspicions arose during times of social tension, when resentment targeted conversos who began to rise in position and influence. People who were jealous found it convenient to accuse them of secretly continuing Judaism as a way of attacking them in a society of state religion. Conversos In recognition of the force used against the Jews in Spain and Portugal, Jews outside the region judged the conversos gently; in Italy a special prayer was offered for them every Sabbath, asking that "God might lead them from oppression to liberty, from darkness to the light of religion."[citation needed] To the conversos who lived in secret conformity with Jewish law, the rabbis applied the Talmudic passage: "Although he has sinned, he must still be considered a Jew". Hebrew-speakers called forced converts anusim (constrained). (Anusim is a general word for forced converts from Judaism and is not specific to this period. According to rabbinic law, anusim (or conversos) who took the first opportunity to go to a foreign country and openly profess Judaism, were allowed to act as witnesses in religious matters. Historians have disagreed as to how many Jews converted in the 14th and 15th century, as opposed to the number who left the Iberian Peninsula. Numbers have been difficult to determine from historic evidence. There were reasons for historians of different backgrounds to favor material that suggested either more or fewer converts. A primary source, the Ladino Me'am Lo'ez in its section on Tisha b'Av, mentions that a third of the Spanish Jewish population converted, a third went into exile, and a third died for their faith. The fraction is obviously rounded, but the implication is clear that large numbers of people fell into each category. Within Spain and Portugal, different terms were used to describe the conversos, which were related to their degree of conversion in contrast to keeping Jewish practices. Cristianos nuevos (New Christians) The first category comprised those who legitimately converted to Christianity, whether for expedience or faith, and raised their children as Christians. These were called "New Christians" or Cristianos nuevos in Spanish and Cristãos novos in Portuguese. A number of Spanish poets belonged to this category, such as Pero Ferrus, Juan de Valladolid, Rodrigo Cota, and Juan de España of Toledo. De Espana, also called El Viejo (the old one), was considered a sound Talmudist before his conversion. Like the monk Diego de Valencia, himself a baptized Jew, De Espana introduced in his pasquinades Hebrew and Talmudic words to mock the Jews. There were others who, for the sake of displaying their new zeal and surviving in a hostile society, persecuted their former co-religionists, writing books against them, and denouncing those who wished to return to the faith of their forefathers, as happened frequently at Valencia, Barcelona, and many other cities (Isaac b. Sheshet, Responsa, No. 11). [edit] Marranos Marranos, the derogatory term for conversos who were believed to secretly practice Judaism, was apparently derived from a word in Arabic, محرّم muḥarram (cognate to harem), used by peninsular Jews to refer to "ritually forbidden". In Spanish it meant "pig", related to the ritual prohibition among both Jews and Muslims against eating pork. In Catalan such secret Jews were also called xuetes, derived from xua, a Catalan word referring to a pork recipe consumed publicly by xuetes in the Balearic Isles to display the sincerity of their Catholicism. [edit] Crypto-Jews This referred to those who secretly held on to the Jewish faith in which they had been reared. These were known as judíos escondidos - hidden Jews. The derogatory term would have been marranos. They preserved the traditions of their parents. Although some held high positions with the official government, they secretly attended synagogue, and fought and suffered for their religion.[citation needed] Many of the wealthiest marranos of Aragon belonged to this category, including the Zaportas of Monzón, who were related by marriage to the royal house of Aragon; the Sanchez; the sons of Alazar Yusuf of Saragossa, who intermarried with the Cavalleria and the Santangel; the wealthy Espes; the Paternoy, who came from the vicinity of Verdun to settle in Aragon; the Clemente; the sons of Moses Chamoro; the Villanova of Calatayud; the Coscon; and others. [edit] Temporary conversos The second category of marranos comprised those conversos who had yielded through force but who in their home life remained Jews. They did not publicly act as Jews. Neither did they voluntarily take their children to the baptismal font; and if obliged to do so, on returning home they washed the place which had been sprinkled with water. They ate no pork, celebrated Passover, and gave oil to the synagogue. While it was usually higher-ranking conversos who became subject to suspicion and attack, everyday crypto-Jews or temporary conversos could also have been attacked as marranos. "In the city of Seville an inquisitor said to the regent: 'My lord, if you wish to know how the Marranos keep the Sabbath, let us ascend the tower.' When they had reached the top, the former said to the latter: 'Lift up your eyes and look. That house is the home of a Marrano; there is one which belongs to another; and there are many more. You will not see smoke rising from any of them, in spite of the severe cold; for they have no fire because it is the Sabbath.' Pretending that leavened bread did not agree with him, one Marrano ate unleavened bread throughout the year, in order that he might be able to partake of it at Passover without being suspected. At the festival on which the Jews blew the shofar, the Marranos went into the country and remained in the mountains and in the valleys, so that the sound might not reach the city. They employed a man specially to slaughter animals, drain away the blood, and deliver the meat at their homes, and another to circumcise secretly". [edit] In Portugal Some Portuguese conversos or Cristãos novos continued to practice as crypto-Jews. In the early 20th century, historian Samuel Schwartz wrote about crypto-Jewish communities discovered in northeastern Portugal (namely, Belmonte, Bragança, Miranda, and Chaves.) He claimed that members had managed to survive more than four centuries without being fully assimilated into the Old Christian population. [13] The last remaining crypto-Jewish community in Belmonte officially returned to Judaism in the 1970s and opened a synagogue in 1996. In 2003, the American Sephardi Federation founded the Belmonte Project to raise funds to acquire Judaic educational material and services for the Belmonte community, who then numbered 160-180.[citation needed] Two documentary films are known to have been made in north-eastern Portugal where present day descendants of Marranos were interviewed about their lives.In 1974 for "The Marranos of Portugal" the Israel Broadcasting Authority (IBA) sent reporter Ron Ben Yishai to carry out interviews with families about their religious practice. After being asked to prove he knew Hebrew before they would talk he found people still reluctant to talk openly but did eventually gain a remarkable insight into their version of Jewish customs, prayers and songs The film was commended at the 1976 Jerusalem Jewish Film and TV Festival. Another documentary, "The Last Marranos" was made by the New York Jewish Media Fund in 1997. [edit] Gastronomic Connections In the Alentejo province of Portugal a dish was created named 'carne de porco à algarvia' which is said to have been used to test whether Jews had truly abandoned their faith by being made to eat it in public. It consisted of pork and shellfish, both forbidden by Jewish law. Alheira is still widely eaten in present day Portugal and was originally created by Marranos in Trás-os-Montes to have the appearance of pork sausages, but was usually made with chicken. It is said that King Manuel of Portugal feared severe economic hardship if Jews left Portugal and their businesses closed, so he preferred them to be dragged to church for forced baptism and Alheiras was eaten to prove their conversion. A number of Portuguese dishes attest to a strong Jewish heritage in the country including Arrufadas de Coimbra which is similar to unleavened bread. Other remnants of Jewish practice that have been observed are the soaking and draining of blood from animals before cooking, the covering of any spilled blood with soil, a method of animal slaughter similar to shechita, and not consuming fish without scales. [edit] 1506 massacre at Lisbon After the expulsion of Jews and Muslims in 1492 from Spain and Portugal, conversos continued to be suspect in times of social strain. In 1506, a months-long plague caused people to look for scapegoats for the misfortune. Some became suspicious that conversos must be practicing Judaism and therefore be at fault. On April 17, 1506, several conversos were discovered who had in their possession "some lambs and poultry prepared according to Jewish custom; also unleavened bread and bitter herbs according to the regulations for the Passover, which festival they celebrated far into the night." Officials seized several, but released them after a few days. The populace, which had expected to see them punished, swore vengeance. On the same day on which the conversos were freed, the Dominicans displayed in a side-chapel of their church, where several New Christians were present, a crucifix and a reliquary in glass from which a peculiar light issued. A New Christian who tried to explain the miracle as due to natural causes, was dragged from the church and killed by an infuriated woman. A Dominican roused the populace still more. Friar João Mocho and the Aragonese friar Bernardo, crucifix in hand, were said to go through the streets of the city, crying "Heresy!" and calling upon the people to destroy the conversos.[citation needed] Attracted by the outcry, sailors from Holland, Zeeland and others from ships in the port of Lisbon, joined the Dominicans and formed a mob with local men to pursue the conversos. The mob dragged innocent victims from their houses and killed some. Old Christians who were in any way associated with New Christians were also attacked. The mob attacked the tax-farmer João Rodrigo Mascarenhas, a New Christian; although a wealthy and distinguished man, his work also made him resented by many. They demolished his house. Within 48 hours, many conversos were killed; by the third day all who could had escaped, often with the help of other Portuguese. King Manuel severely punished those who took part in the killings. The ringleaders were executed. The Dominicans who encouraged the riot were also executed. Local people convicted of murder or pillage suffered corporal punishment, and their property was confiscated. The king granted religious freedom for 20 years to all conversos in an attempt at compensation. Lisbon lost Foral privileges. The foreigners who had taken part generally escaped punishment, leaving with their ships. In 2006, the Jewish community of Portugal held a ceremony in Lisbon to commemorate this event. [edit] Messianic figures In 1528 King John invited the foreign Jew David Re'ubeni to Portugal. He had approached the Portuguese minister in Venice, where he presented himself as representing the Jews of the East, although he was said to be from Arabia. Re'ubeni was given permission to "to preach the law of Moses", according to a letter (Oct. 10, 1528) of D. Martin de Salinas to the Infante D. Fernando, brother of the emperor Charles I of Spain (Boletin Acad. Hist., xlix. 204). When Re'ubeni arrived, some crypto-Jews regarded him as a messianic figure. The New Christians of Spain also heard the news; some of them went to Portugal to seek Re'ubeni. The rejoicing lasted for some time; Emperor Charles even addressed several letters on the matter to his royal brother-in-law. In 1528, while Re'ubeni was still in Portugal, some Spanish conversos fled to Campo Mayor and forcibly freed from the Inquisition a woman imprisoned at Badajoz. The rumor spread that the conversos of the entire kingdom were uniting to make common cause. Mobs formed in some towns and attacked conversos. They attacked New Christians in Gouvea, Alentejo, Olivença, Santarém, and other places. In the Azores and the island of Madeira, mobs massacred former Jews. Because of these excesses, the king began to believe that a Portuguese Inquisition might help control such outbreaks. The Portuguese conversos worked to forestall such actions, and spent immense sums to win over the Curia and most influential cardinals. Spanish and Portuguese conversos made financial sacrifices. Alfonso Gutierrez, Garcia Alvarez "el Rico" (the rich), and the Zapatas, conversos from Toledo, offered 80,000 gold crowns to Emperor Charles V if he would mitigate the harshness of the Inquisition (Revue des Etudes Juives, xxxvii, p. 270 et seq.). The Mendes of Lisbon and Flanders also tried to help. None were successful in preventing Portugal from introducing the Holy Office in 1478. The conversos suffered immensely both from mob violence and interrogation and testing by the Inquisition. Attacks and murders were recorded at Trancoso, Lamego, Miranda, Viseu, Guarda, and Braga. At Covilhã, there were rumors that the people planned to massacre all the New Christians on one day. In 1562 prelates petitioned the Cortes to require conversos to wear special badges, and to order Jewish descendants to live in ghettos (judiarias) in cities and villages as their ancestors did before the conversions. [edit] In Spain Marranos. Secret Seder in Spain during the times of inquisition. Painting by Moshe MaimonAccording to historian Cecil Roth, Spanish political intrigues had earlier promoted the anti-Jewish policies which culminated in 1391, when Regent Queen Leonora of Castile gave the Archdeacon of Ecija, Ferrand Martinez, considerable power in her realm. Martinez gave speeches that led to violence against the Jews, and this influence culminated in the sack of the Jewish quarter of Seville on June 4, 1391. Throughout Spain during this year, the cities of Ecija, Carmona, Córdoba, Toledo, Barcelona and many others saw their Jewish quarters destroyed and massacred. It is estimated that 200,000 Jews saved their lives by converting to Christianity in the wake of these persecutions. Other Jews left the country altogether. In 1449 feelings rose against conversos, breaking out in a riot at Toledo. Instigated by two canons, Juan Alfonso and Pedro Lopez Galvez, the mob plundered and burned the houses of Alonso Cota, a wealthy converso and tax-farmer. They also attacked the residences of wealthy New Christians in the quarter of la Magdelena. Under Juan de la Cibdad, the conversos opposed the mob, but were repulsed. They were executed with their leader. As a result, several prominent converso men were deposed from office, in obedience to a new statute. Nearly 20 years later in July 1467, another riot occurred where a mob attacked conversos in Toledo. The chief magistrate (alcalde mayor) of the city was Alvar Gomez de Cibdad Real, who had been private secretary to King Henry IV of Castile. He was a protector of the conversos. Together with prominent conversos Fernando and Alvaro de la Torre, Alvar wished to take revenge for an insult by the counts de Fuensalida, leaders of the Old Christians. His intention was to seize control of the city, but fierce conflict erupted. Opponents set fire to houses of New Christians near the cathedral. The conflagration spread so rapidly that 1,600 houses were consumed. Both Christians and conversos perished. The brothers De la Torre were captured and hanged. [edit] Riots at Córdoba Tensions arose in Córdoba between Christians and conversos, where they formed two hostile parties. On March 14, 1473, during a dedication procession, a girl accidentally threw dirty water from the window of the house of one of the wealthiest conversos (the customary way to dispose of it.) The water splashed on an image of the Virgin being carried in procession in honor of a new society (from which conversos had been excluded by Bishop D. Pedro.) Thousands immediately joined in a fierce shout for revenge. The mob went after conversos, denouncing them as heretics, killing them, and burning their houses. To stop the excesses, the highly respected D. Alonso Fernandez de Aguilar, whose wife was a member of the converso family of Pacheco, together with his brother D. Gonzalo Fernandez de Cordova ("El Gran Capitán"), and a troop of soldiers, hastened to protect the New Christians. D. Alonso called upon the mob to retire. Its leader nsulted the count, who immediately felled him with his lance. Aroused the people considered him a martyr. Incited by Alonso de Aguilar's enemy, they again attacked the conversos. Men, women, and children were all killed. The rioting lasted three days. Those who escaped sought refuge in the castle, where their protectors also took shelter. The government decreed that no converso should thenceforth live in Cordoba or its vicinity, nor should one ever again hold public office, as if that meant the people would never find a reason to riot. In 1473 attacks on conversos arose in numerous other cities: Montoro, Bujalance, Adamuz, La Rambla, Santaella, and elsewhere. Mobs attacked conversos in Andujar, Úbeda, Baeza, and Almodovar del Campo also. In Valladolid groups looted the belongings of the New Christians. At Segovia there was a massacre (May 16, 1474). D. Juan Pacheco, a converso, led the attacks. Without the intervention of the alcalde Andreas de Cabrerafamily, all New Christians may have died. At Carmona, every converso was killed. [edit] The Inquisition The conversos of Seville and other cities of Castile, and especially of Aragon, bitterly opposed the Spanish Inquisition established in 1478. They rendered considerable service to the king, and held high legal, financial, and military positions. The government issued an edict directing traditional Jews to live within a ghetto and be separated from conversos. Despite the law, however, the Jews remained in communication with their New Christian brethren. "They sought ways and means to win them from Catholicism and bring them back to Judaism. They instructed the Marranos in the tenets and ceremonies of the Jewish religion; held meetings in which they taught them what they must believe and observe according to the Mosaic law; and enabled them to circumcise themselves and their children. They furnished them with prayer-books; explained the fast-days; read with them the history of their people and their Law; announced to them the coming of the Passover; procured unleavened bread for them for that festival, as well as kosher meat throughout the year; encouraged them to live in conformity with the law of Moses, and persuaded them that there was no law and no truth except the Jewish religion." These were the charges brought by the government of Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella I of Castile against the Jews. They constituted the grounds for their expulsion and banishment in 1492, so they could not subvert conversos. Jews who did not want to leave Spain had to accept baptism as a sign of conversion. The historian Henry Kamen's recent Inquisition and Society In Spain in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries questions whether there were such strong links between conversos and Jewish communities. Whilst historians such as Yitzhak Baer state, "the conversos and Jews were one people"[14], Kamen claims, "Yet if the conversos were hated by the Christians, the Jews liked them no better."[15] He documented that "Jews testified falsely against them [the conversos] when the Inquisition was finally founded."[16] This issue is being debated by historians. [edit] Dispersion and persistence Threatened and persecuted by the Inquisition, many conversos left Spain, both in bands or as individual refugees. Many migrated to Italy, attracted by the climate, which resembled that of the Iberian Peninsula, and by the kindred language. When they settled at Ferrara, Duke Ercole I d'Este granted them privileges. His Alfonso confirmed the privileges to twenty-one Spanish conversos: physicians, merchants, and others (ib. xv. 113 et seq.). Spanish and Portuguese conversos settled also at Florence and contributed to make Livorno a leading seaport. They received privileges at Venice, where they were protected from the persecutions of the Inquisition. At Milan they materially advanced the interests of the city by their industry and commerce. At Bologna, Pisa, Naples, Reggio, and many other Italian cities, they freely exercised the Jewish religion again. They were soon so numerous that Fernando de Goes Loureiro, an abbot from Oporto, filled an entire book with the names of conversos who had drawn large sums from Portugal and had openly avowed Judaism in Italy. In Piedmont Duke Emmanuel Philibert of Savoy welcomed conversos from Coímbra and granted them commercial and industrial privileges, as well as the free exercise of their religion. Rome was full of conversos. Pope Paul III received them at Ancona for commercial reasons. He granted complete liberty "to all persons from Portugal and Algarve, even if belonging to the class of New Christians." By 1553 three thousand Portuguese Jews and conversos were living at Ancona. Two years later Pope Paul IV issued orders to have all the conversos thrown into the prisons of the Inquisition which he had instituted. Sixty of them, who acknowledged the Catholic faith as penitents, were transported to the island of Malta; twenty-four, who adhered to Judaism, were publicly burned (May, 1556). Those who escaped the Inquisition were received at Pesaro by Duke Guido Ubaldo of Urbino. Guido had hoped to have the Jews and conversos of Turkey select Pesaro as a commercial center; when that did not happen, he expelled the New Christians from Pesaro and other districts in 1558 (ib. xvi. 61 et seq.). Many conversos also went to Dubrovnik, formerly a considerable seaport. In May, 1544, a ship landed there filled with Portuguese refugees. [edit] Latin America During the 16th and 17th centuries, some conversos were able to get to New Spain, where they believed that they would be able to live without persecution. The Inquisition followed them in short order and records exist of executions of conversos by the Inquisition in México and other parts of New Spain. From urban México, there was a migration of conversos into the area now known as New Mexico during the 1700s. An article in 1990 in the "New York Times" stated that about 1500 Hispanic families in northern New Mexico had Jewish backgrounds. The article raised a small number of responses from readers, some asking that the issue be dropped. [17] Similarly, Catholic priests in the southwestern United States have mentioned that they have occasionally been asked peculiar questions by parishioners about whether it was proper to light a candle on Friday afternoon for good luck and whether the candle should be covered by an olla or a basket. [edit] In France At this same period the conversos were seeking refuge beyond the Pyrenées, settling at Saint-Jean-de-Luz, Tarbes, Bayonne, Bordeaux, Marseille, and Montpellier. They lived as Christians; were married by Catholic priests; had their children baptized, and publicly pretended to be Catholics. In secret, however, they circumcised their sons, kept the Sabbath and feast-days as best they could, and prayed together. King Henry III of France confirmed the privileges granted them by Henry II of France, and protected them against such slanders and accusations as those which a certain Ponteil brought against them. Under Louis XIII of France the conversos of Bayonne were assigned to the suburb of St. Esprit. At St. Esprit, as well as at Peyrehorade, Bidache, Orthez, Biarritz, and St. Jean de Luz, they gradually avowed Judaism openly. In 1640 several hundred conversos, considered to be Jews, were living at St. Jean de Luz; conversos who had returned to Judaism founded a synagogue at St. Esprit as early as 1660. [edit] The rest of the world Upon reaching the Ottoman Empire, conversos openly declared their return to Judaism and later built important communities in cities such as in Salonika. They also migrated to Flanders, where they were attracted by its flourishing cities, such as Antwerp and Brussels. Conversos from Flanders and others direct from the Pyreneean Peninsula, went under the guise of Catholics to Hamburg and Altona about 1580, where they established commercial relations with their former homes. Some migrated as far as Scotland. Christian IV of Denmark invited some New Christian families to settle at Glückstadt about 1626, granting certain privileges to them and to conversos who came to Emden about 1649. Large numbers of conversos, however, remained in Spain and Portugal, despite the extensive emigration and the fate of countless victims of the Inquisition. The New Christians of Portugal breathed more freely when Philip III of Spain came to the throne. By the law of April 4, 1601, he granted them the privilege of unrestricted sale of their real estate as well as free departure from the country for themselves, their families, and their property. Many, availing themselves of this permission, followed their coreligionists to North Africa and Turkey. After a few years, however, the privilege was revoked, and the Inquisition resumed its activity. Portuguese who were not affected by radicalism could see that no forcible measures would induce the conversos to fully turn away from the religion of their fathers. Numerous New Christians migrated to London, from where their families spread to Brazil, where conversos had settled at an early date, and to other colonies of the Americas. The migrations to Constantinople and Salonika, where Jewish refugees had settled after the expulsion from Spain, as well as to Italy, Serbia, Romania and Bulgaria, and to Vienna and Timişoara, continued to the middle of the 18th century. [edit] Recent history Late 20th century political and social changes in Spain caused reappraisal of Jewish and Muslim contributions to its culture. There has been much new scholarship on Sephardic Jews, Moors and the consequences of conversion and expulsion. In addition, there have been official governmental efforts to welcome tourists of both ancestries to Spain. Towns and regions have worked to preserve elements of Jewish and Moorish pasts. By Spanish Civil Code Art. 22.1, the government created concessions for gaining citizenship to nationals of several countries and Sephardic Jews historically linked with Spain. It allows them to seek citizenship after five rather than the customary ten years required for residence in Spain.[18] In October 2006, the Andalusian Parliament asked the three parliamentary groups that form the majority to support an amendment that would similarly ease the way for nationals of morisco descent to gain Spanish citizenship. The proposal was originally made by IULV-CA, the Andalusian branch of the United Left O SINO ANG MAKAKAHULA NA SA MGA SUSUNOD NA KABANATANG NG BLOG NA ITO HEHEHEHEHE... Si andris copy-paste na naman. hehehe alam ko susunod diyan .
Ang tanga mo talaga, ang susunod diyan ay copy-paste na naman. BWISIT KA TALAGA. Ang pangit talaga , mabaho pa.... If the atrocities of Kumander Kato, Bravo and Macaspar be not deplore by the justice commitee of MILF
The cause for Bangsamoro land will be tag as terroristic in nature and OIC with all the other muslim support that they recieved will wane in time It is better if they will channel their support in strengthening Islamic Institutions (Madaris System) in the Philippines and that all moderate muslims be regarded as peaceful and pious I BEG OF YOU LET'S HAVE PEACE IN MINDANAO Hahah
paano ba yan si andris mismo pupugutan daw ng ulo ang pamilya ni Fr. Jun Mercado....Proud pa ang gago sabihin ang banta niya.. Lahat daw ng Kristyano pupugutan niya ng ulo. may sapi ang andris na yan.. At napakapangit na tao at mabaho ang hininga ...may putok kaya lahat ng Kristyanong lumapit sa kanya mamamatay sa kapangitan at kabahuan ni andris. andris pogotan mo na lang sarili mo, kadiri ka talaga.... Hak!hak!hak!hak!....May sapi or Way Sapi??? hek!hek!hek! Asar ka ba??? hehehehehe...
Tintoy,ano ba philosophy mo???? Lahat ng mga ideya mo pinag-aralan ko kung saan pumasok na Philosophy...Ni kahit isa wala...hak!hak!hak!...Gusto mo copy-paste ko uli dito kung ano-ano ang mga nasulat mo na hehehehehe... hahaha
Sana kasama si andris sa mga natimbog sa mindanao kanina....natuguk ka na sana andris buhay ka pa namamaho ka na... ambaho mo andris, maligo ka namaaaan!!! Tintoy,hehehehehe....hindi ka lang pala Romanong Katoliko,ASWANG kapa dahil pati baho ko naamoy mo sa internet hakhakhakhakhakhak!!!666 ka nga.
Ano ba ang grupo mo Tintoy???PBMA,MONCADIST,FILIPINISTA,AGLIPAYAN,ILAGA,SHEPPERD,ATTY.ELLY VELEZ AMATONG,ETC.ETC.ETC...Lahat yan ay organized ng Katoliko,saan ka ba dyan??? Baka naman sa side ka ng mga Tiriring,Baliw,Ulol,Buang,Sinto-Sinto, o di kaya'y Amaw or Kuwanggol !!!! Hakhakhakhakhakhak!!!Wala sa uri ng Philosophy yun hekhekhekhek!!! haHaHaHaha..
buhay pa pala si andris, interesado ka talaga sa mga relihyon, hehehe Hung binasa mo lang ang Biblia hahihiya ka sa pagiging muslim mo... Sige hanap ka na naman ng makikidnap at mamomolestya mo.... just wanna ask why gma7 is still supportive of katrina halili who shamed and degraded herself for all the world to see. katrina h is engaged in immorality of the highest order, changing lovers like she changes her undies. any yet gma7 stands by her. why? is gma7 not sensitive on the issue of morality and the immorality and the need to preserve the former? i think the least gma7 should do is to remove katrina halili from its stable of stars, because katrina halili should never a model for every young girl on planet earth. earning loads of money out of katrina halili i think is immoral, it is also like exploiting her plight if gma7 continues to have her in its stable of stars. gma7 should drop katrina halili to give her a lesson, that young boys and girls are watching her shows on gma7. it is time gma7 and other tv stations by taking stock of their stars, remove those who foster immorality and destroy society's moral fiber. if katrina halili is not with gma7. gma7 also has in its stable of stars such as maureen larrazabal who has pornographic movies and yet they are big money maker for the tv station. i hope gma7 is not practicing double standard by using a higher standard of morality for others while accepting movie and television actors and actress who promote immorality. just thinking aloud, no offense meant. thanks.
You dare throw stones at the poor girl, yes she may have erred but I just wonder , who are you to condemn her as if you are a saint....
There are lessons to be learned and you are too quick to condemn. I hope your life is as sinless as the saints. Condemn the sin and not the sinner.... ABS is now number 2 in the ratings, GMA is not channel 7 but #1 in the ratings....Gets Mo? Yung pamumugot ng ulo,tama ka dapat lang na pugutan ng ulo ang mga Kristyanus na lalabag sa Batas ng Allah or ng Islam.Sa relihiyon pa lang ninyo ay di na kailangan na magnakaw or mag murder kayo ng tao para pugutan kayo ng ulo,ulitin ko uli at hindi ko ikinahihiya yan na sa relihiyon pa lang ninyo ay dapat pugutan kayo ng ulo at walang masama sa batas at eduaksyon ng Islam yun at ng Madrasa...
Kung Gusto mo Tintoy pugutan kayo lahat ng ulo at unahin ang Nanay mo na nagturo sa iyo na maging balahuba at Adulterer at Kawatan. Ang mga salitang ito ay galing sa isang taong nasapian ng 70 demonyo Hehehehehehehehehe....*Hahahahahahahaha*...Dapat lahat ng Kristyanus ay pugutan ng ulo Unahin ang mga Pari ng Katoliko Romano.... I am very proud to cut all your heads...At i am recommending the Mujahedin an unahin itong si Jun Mercado....at ang pamilya nito.... Ang salitang yan ay galing kay andris na nasasapian ng 71 diablo. Tintoy at Aling Dioni,buti pa magtayo din kayo ng grupo niyo at doon niyo itayo sa Mt. pinatubo o di kaya sa Mt. Mayon.Pero huwag niyong kalimutan na isangguni sa Romano Katoliko yan dahil kung wala silang parte sa kita niyan ay pag namatay kayo ay wala kayong basbas galing sa Catholic Corporation...
Bagay kayong dalawa mag tandem kasi puro kayo sira-ulo at ang utak ay nasa talampakan...hakhakhakhakhakhak... hekhekhekhekhek...At pareho kayong bobo at trying hard copy cat meooowww!!! hindi copy-cut ha hehehehehehe... Mga amaw na Katoliko takot mapugutan hakhakhakhakhak.... Iwan ko ba kung bakit pwede sa blog na ito ang mga Tiriring at Kulango hakhakhakhak.... Ito po ang lesson plan ng Morong teacher sa Educational system ng muslim mindanao:
1. Physics - To learn how maximize the explosive effect of a bomb to kill innocent civilians 2. Mathematics - To calculate the highest number of casualties after a suicide bombing 3. Geometry - To find the best angle for an artillery mortar to hit civilian villages 4. Physical education - To train how to shoot and kill civilians 5. English - not applicable. Students have a hard time learning english 6. Philosophy - To teach students that it is okay to kill, rape, kidnap, bomb civilians in the name of allah 7. History - To brainwash students into thinking that the history of mindanao started with muslim scholars and that islam is the first religion (although mindanao has its own religion already before islam came to spread its teachings) 8. Science - not interested. Dont have to be a scientist to shoot an AK -47 anyway or an RPG... Sarap maging muslim...
1. Pwede apat ang asawa. Iba-iba kasiping tuwing gabi. MWF TTHS 2. Mga babae parang hayop lang kasi walang karapatan. 3. Kung maging muslim mayor naman ako ay pwedeng akong mangurakut ng garapalan total pag walang kaunlaran ang lungsod namin ay sisihin naman ng mga tao ang mga kristyanus na walang kinalaman sa kurapsyun ko. har har har 4. Sarap mangurakut. Tapus yung sisihin yung mga sibilyang kristyanus. Syempre naman takut kasi mga moro sa kapwa muslim nilang MAYOR o GOVERNOR. Kaya naghanap ng ibang masisi na lang. 5. Tapus kami mga moro ay mga supot kasi takut kami sa tuli. Hindi na kailangan pang dumaan sa masakit na pagtuli. 6. Tapus basta may pera ka lang ay mapapangasawa mo na kahit sinong gusto mo. Bayaran mo lang ang mga magulang ng babae o bata. Disguise ay dowry kuno er The Madrasah Educational System is just a breeding ground for young muslim terrorists. It brainwashes the new generation muslim students into extremism, radicalism, fanaticism and all the -isms you can imagine.
It teaches them lies, distorts historical facts, and makes the young innocent muslims harbor too much hatred in their hearts to the so-called "unbelievers of islam or infidels". These madrasahs are used to corrupt the young minds of the muslim youths. It is the ideal place to sow terror and deception. To awaken the beast within each person. Hahaha
Andris Bonifacio atapang atao apugot aulo hindi atakbo.......Aputul autin atakbo atulin...... Syempre yan si andris nasa utin ang utak.....Apugut a utin andriiiis Tintoy,Dioni,at Bobo mayron akong tip sa inyo upang maging mga personalidad ninyo at being ay magkaroon ng kabuluhan,ay dapat mag-aral na lang kayo ng spiritual direction ni St. Ignatio Loyola.Ng sa ganun ay maging kawatan din kayo at maging espiritista tulad ng PBMA,Moncado,Rizalian,Marcosian,Quiboloy,Pamatong,Ilaga,Sheppherd etc.etc.etc. hekhekhekhek....
Alam niyo ba na may grupo din si Dioni,tanong niyo sa anak niyang si Pacman hekhekhekhek...member yan ng Kuot sa kuluoton ug Hikap sa hilikapun....Ang mga Mantra niyan ay Pat..tulo...pat..tulo hehehehe ibig sabihin sabong ng manok hakhakhakhakhak... O di kaya magpa-rehistro kayo sa Chabad Haruth sa makati para mag-aral ng Kabbalah...hakhakhakhakhakhak... Mga Katoliko Romano mga Sephardic Jews hakhakhakhakhakhak....Manunuba,Kawatan at mga economic saboteur...hekhekhekhekhek...Katoliko Romano sa Pinas mga Crypto-Jews or mga Marranu or mga Cristianus Novos...Mga exiled jews panahon ng Spanish Inquisition sumakay kay Magellan..hakhakhakhakhak... I have an "itch" here that really needs scratching. What is "madrasah"?
Madrasa is an exclusive school of islamic studies that long been independence from any government influence or authority.
any attempt by the government to integrate madaris into philippine educational system will never works, because madrasa's primary purpose is for studies of religious teachings and dawah or islamic propagation. The ustadz or teachers owes allegiance to islam and not to the government. most of the teachers were volunters, some specially those who finished their higher islamic studies in ME were given allowance by the government of the place were the ustadz/scholars took their diploma. Madaris school in the philippines were not organise by one entity. every madrasa were independent from one another. some were funded by foreign governmnent, private institution or wealthy individuals in the ME, specially those orphanage center. but most madaris were organise and run by local groups and individuals. This is how dynamic and complex madaris school in the philippines were. I agree with fr. jun that it easy for the government to say than done. The different heads as well as the moro people will views this government moves as another ploy to influence or meddling the daily life of the moros in the philippines. We fear that OIC will support any Islamic attempt to DISRUPT DEMOCRATIC HOLD ON RP
Whether it is by financing muslim rebellion, applying pressure over democratic legal system or by funding an Independent Islamic Educational System These Muslim Organizations are trying to destroy Foundational Institutions in the Philippines The Filipino people want to bring this matter to the International Body & not over the OIC nor with The Arab League Are you out of your mind mr. Guardian? did you ever think before posting your comments.
Theres no history that OIC influence any government in the world. in fact, it was the philippine vigorously pushing or influencing others to vote for philippines inclusion in the OIC member states. If indeed the OIC or Muslim states actively supporting Moro rebellion in Mindanao, the moro people would have long gained their independence and have their own separate state today. In fact, in the contrary most Islamic states discourage any Moro attempt to separate from the main land. thats why the MNLF yield to the pressure of OIC to limit their demand to a mere autonomy. OIC similarly, persuades the MILF leadership to accept a compromise deal with the government and thats why the proposed MOAD-AD cames to being. but Some clan politicians and landowners in mindanao sabotage the plan, They torn apart the agreement that might bring long lasting peace in the promise land. MOA-AD is not a compromise deal of the MILF with the Government.
It is a joint violation of OIC-MILF & Govt towards the Philippines constitutions with RP civilians as their sacrifice-hostage. Now that People & RP Judiciary exclaim the MOAD- AD as illegal over an international body of observer, it is therefore appropriate to imply malicious intent for the OIC in applying pressure over RP constitution in this regard For your info, It was the GRP who seek the help of OIC and malaysia to persuades MILF to enter into peace talk with the government. And for ten (10) years of on and off peace talk, the MILF finally agreed to compromise settlement with GRP which was the MOA-AD. In fact it was the OIC and malaysian government who persuades MILF to accept the MOA-AD in exchange for the moro people inspirational goal of independence.
Theres no violation of constitution, the agreement per se is an international commitment or agreement entered into by the GRP. In that case, a municipal law or the phil. constitution must respect or give way to the int'l law, meaning the consti. has to be amended in order for the phil. to comply with its int'l commitment. why are you giving so much regard to the consti? when you people were the one more often disregard it when it comes to demand of or dealing with your Uncle Sam (USA). The subsequent adjudication of the court portrait itself on the negative light and acted grossly against its founding principle of justice. some justices clearly yield to the whims and selfserving desire of the few elite. contradicting their own decisions and jurisprudence in order to appeased the elite of this country is something unacceptable. Your allegation of malicious intent on the part of the OIC has no basis as it is obviously a product of your wicked imagination. Again it was the GRP insisting of active OIC participation on the MILF and GRP peace talk. And in fact, it was the philippines who look foolish in the int'l community for utterly disregard its int'l commitment. As I understand, no such thing as constitution being under influence, only the makers of the consti can be subject of whether bad or good influence. review your posting! This chat box is more becoming serious, I tought this is dedicated for grammar only?
where is your grammar? HOY! anong "i tought" nyahahaha
I tot i taw a putty tat?! che blogger "thought" po ang tamang spelling kapatid... che hahah andyan na alagang tuta ni malvar. Tumuad ka naaaa
Tintoy pakitanong nga kay Jun Mercado kung anong stage na siya sa Mysticism???Baka nasa purgation na siya hekhekhekhek...
Ikaw Tintoy, ni kahit sa guni-guni na ma awaken ka ay wala dahil sa angkin mong KABOBOHAN HAKHAKHAKHAKHAK.... MAGNAKAW NA LANG NG MAGNAKAW NG PERA NG MGA TAGASUNOD NINYONG MGA TANGA...TAPOS TURUAN NA LANG NINYO NG MGA LOHIKA SA PAGNANAKAW ANG INYONG MIYEMBRO SA ATENEO,NOTREDAME,STO.THOMAS,UNIVERSITY OF SAN CARLOS,L SALLE,DON BOSCO,C.I.T.E, ETC.ETC.ETC CATHOLIC SCHOOL CORPORATIONS HAKHAKHAKHAKHAK... Thank you very much of reminding me of my mistake Tintoy.
Si malvar kasi kaya ganyan yan ay dahil bakla yan. Nag ingles ka pa !!!!
Kapal mo talaga.. Thank you very much of reminding me of my mistake from po! Yan kaiisip sa alagang tuta ni Malvar, Hehehe. Pabakla bakla ka pa kay Malvar alam naman namin na miss mo lang tuta ni Malvar.... really.
HAHAHA kaw si malvar. Alam mo malvar ginawa ang titi para sa mga babae. hindi para mga lalaki, bading. GAGO. hahaa.
Wala akong alagang tuta che at Andris, baka gusto mo alaga ko ANACONDA, baka himatayin kayo sa katutuwad nyo. hehehe Bakit? Sawa na ba kayo sa tuta ni Malvar. Sigurado ka mauunat ang isaw nyo sa alaga ko. Andris, Sino nga ba ang bobo hahaha Halata ko naman na mababang klase pinagaralan mo at kaning baboy lang ang laman ng ulo nyo ni che. Ang TANGA mo sabihan mo pa ang nagaral sa mabubuting Unibersidad na magnanakaw..Ulul.. Ang magnanakaw ang mga bandido na kasamahan ninyo..Kapal ninyo pati mga barong-barong sinunog nyo na ninakawan nyo pa? Kung di ba naman kaning-baboy ang laman ng bugok mong ulo.. Andris talaga pati mga paaralan ng kristyano, inggit ka talaga. Kaning-baboy na binudburan ng mga turo ng propeta nyong manyakis , Magnanakaw mamamatay tao, manloloko, raipist, kidnapper na sinakupan ng 71 diablo.. Galit ka sa kristyano dahil inggit ka lang at wala kang bayag sumapi sa kristyanismo dahil kakatayin ka ng mga magulang at kapatid mo!!! Nga pala si Atty. Adel Tamano nagaral ng maayos ayun nagasawa ng kristyano hehehe Magaral ka andris at hwag sa madaris kasi lalo lang lalala ang kaningbaboy na laman ng ulo mo.. Ok, mamaya kung handa ka nang maunat ang isaw mo..tumuwad ka lang....wawa si Andris at che. Hak!hak!hak! Tintoy,may utak ka rin pala pagdating sa imbestigasyon ng Adultery at walang kwentang mga issue ng mga Katoliko hakhakhakhakhak!!!Kahit hindi ko binanggit ang pangalan ni Adel ay nalaman mo hekhekhek!!!Kaya lang sablay ka doon sa pagmamalaki mong siya ay nagtapos ng pag-aaral sa Katolikong paaralan at huwag na huwag mong banggitin na eskwelahan ng Kristyanus dahil hindi kayo kristyanus mga Katoliko kayo hakhakhakhakhak!!!
Alam mo ba ang ibig sabihin ng hypocrisy Tintoy??At alam mo ba ang ibig sabihin ng crypto-muslim???Ganyan Tintoy ang mangyayari sa sinumang muslim na mag-aral sa eskwelahan ng mga Katoliko nagiging baboy din hakhakhakhak!!!Alam mo ba kung bakit??Dahil siya ay na brainwashed na ng Pilosopiyang Katolisismo at hindi ng Kristyanismo...Alamin mo kung bakit sinabi kong Katolisismo at hindi kristyanismo!!!Dahil ang uri ng pamumuhay ngayon ni Adel ay hindi kay Kristo or Isa ,bagkus ay sa demonyong mga Katoliko na mga nagtataglay ng doktrinang panggugulang at hayok sa kapangyarihan at popularidad.... Lahat ng mga tunay na sumusunod sa yapak ni Jesus or Kristo ay hindi tulad ng mga Pari ninyo at kay Adel at sa iyo Tintoy...Pilosopiyang sa mababaw na mundo lamang matatagpuan at masumpungan tulad ng KABOBOHAN at kawalang alam sa pilosopiyang pang langit at kalinisan ng budhi...Tintoy isa kang taong serpente ang Awra hakhakhakhakhak.... may nalalaman ka pang pilosopiya ngayon..hahaha
Ang mga taong katulad mo ay kasuka-suka, alam mo ba yan, hahha pati kapwa mo muslim ikakahiya ka .. Bottom line mga kidnapper , mamamataytao, mga rapist kayo....Yan ang walang makakatanggi...kaya ayan pangit ka.. Pilosopiya ka pa diyan dahil sa kapangitan mo at desperado ka galit ka a mundo..gusto mo pang mamugot... kawawa kang nilalang andres, malungkot ang buhay ng taong galit sa mundo... Andris, katotohanan lahat ng binaggit ko....at madaling maintindihan kung bakit....wawa ka naman andris.. Hakhakhak Tintoy dimo pala alam ang pilosopiya???hekhekhekhek..dapat hindi ka dito makipag blog hakhakhak...ultimo pala pilosopiya hindi niya alam hakhakhakhak....
Ang batas na pamumugot ay isang mataas na uri ng Pilosopiya ng pagpaparusa sa mga taong katulad ninyo Tintoy hakhakhakhak...itanong mo kay Jun Mercado kung ano ang pilosopiya para maintindihan mo kung bakit may pugot na parusa...hakhakhakhak... Kaya rekomendasyon ko sa katulad mo ay mag-aral sa San,Jose Dinagat Island kay Ruben Ecleo Jr. para matuto kang mang rape at pumatay ng asawa at manghuthot ng pera tulad ng Romano Katoliko buwahahahahahahaha... O di kaya sa Sudlon,Cebu City sa mga Moncadista at matuto ka pa ng ibat-ibang kalse ng martials arts...hehehehehe at pagkatapos patayo ka rin ng paaralan tulad ni Quiboloy,Soriano,Adventista,Iglesia ni Cristo at higit sa lahat tulad ng Demonyong Romano Katoliko buwahahahahahaha.... Tintoy di mo ba napansin kaya sobrang galit ko sa romano katoliko?!
Kasi nung bata pa ako ay na sexually molest ako ng isang pari. OO... tama ka.. isang pari na gwapo at crush ko. Pero kahit crush ko sya nun ay wala pa rin syang karapatan para gahasa-in ako... although nag enjoy ako pero masakit pa rin,.. masakit kasi malaki ang tuta nya... At ngayun.. galit na galit ako sa katolikong simbahan kasi dahil sa isang pari at akoy naghahanap na ng mga tuta.. sila ang sinisi ko kung bakit nagka ganito ako ngayun... hakhakhak Si Tintoy nag astral transfer sa aking pangalan hakhakhakhak!!!Sira-ulo at Tiriring ka talaga,MalvaBOY....Ilipat mo nga uli sa pangalan mo yan medyo Psychia-traffic violators itong unggoy na ito e...hehehehe mahilig magpapalit-palit ng channel palibhasa Katoliko Romano palipat-lipat ng lugar kung saan makakakwarta hakhakhakhak...Crypto-Jews talaga hakhakhakhakhak...
Could you translate this please.....
La illaha ill Allah Dalla, Muhammadur Rasul Lulla Chode Pilla” kitang-kita kung paano pinagkakaisahan ng mga muslim na bansa at organisasyun ang Pilipinas para baguhin ang sistema ng pamamahala sa bansa .....
takot na ang mga guro sa zambo upang magturo pa sa gitna ng kidnap for ransom ng mga bandidong muslim....... kung magpapatuloy pa ang pang gugulo ng MI, kawalan ng control sa mga lost command at di-maawat na muslim extremist, hindi lang sistema ng edukasyon ang mababago sa mindanao kundi ang pagkawasak ng isang demokratikong bansa Anonymous,matanong kita bakit mo sinasabing Demokrasya ang bansang Pilipinas??? Iisa lang ba ang ibig sabihin ng demokrasya??Ang demokrasya ba na idolohiya ay yung sa iyo lamang ???Paano naman yung demokrasya ng iba???Tulad ng sa Tibet may sarili silang demokrasya???Sa China ang komunista ay itinuring nilang mas mataas na porma ng idolohiya kaysa sa Kapitalismong demokrasya na itinataguyod ng Romano Katolisismo.Ganun din ang Islam ay isang uri ng demokrasya sa mga bansang Islamiko at middle-east.Bakit mo sinsabing yang pagiging Katoliko at imperialismo lamang ang gustong mong tanggapain ng lahat na demokrasya???
Gago kaba??Baliw kaba?? or Talaga lang BObo ka!!! Andres, isa kang muslim na nagtatago sa pangalang kristyano. Demokrasya ba ang sistema sa middle east o Sharia?
Kung demokrasya sa Saudi halimbawa anu namang form of government meron cla, meron ba clang botohan para sa isang bukod na konstitusyon? Huag ka naman snang magtanga-tangahan. E yan ang demokrasya nila,bakit mo sila didiktahan ng demokrasya mo?E ang komunista na mga bansa,tanungin mo ba rin sila ng tanong mo kung mayron ba silang botohan??Loko-loko pala ito ito,e kaya nga depende sa kultura ng bansa yan kung anong klaseng pilosopiya ng gobyerno at politika ang gusto nilang demokrasya sa bansa nila yung hindi ipasunod mo sa kanila ang demokrasya ng Katoliko at mga hudyo.Hindi yung didiktahan mo sila ng demokrasya mo.Kanya kanyang demokrasya yan,huwag kang manggiit ng gusto mo,tulad sa mindanao gusto ng mga moro islamikong demokrasya,hindi kasama ang mga katoliko dyan dahil di naman taga dyan sa mindanao ang mga katoliko e!!Diba?Kung ayaw ninyo ang islamikong demokrasya sa mindanao e di lumayas kayo dyan balik kayo sa Luzon at bisayas....
#39.1.1.1.1
C. Anonymous
on
2009-05-31 13:22
(Reply)
Meron kang pilipit na depinisyon sa DEMOKRASYA at ipinipilit mong maging bukod na Islamiko ang buong Mindanao sa paraan ng karahasan at hindi sa botohan
Kahit kapwa mo muslim ay ayaw sa prinsipyo mo at takot na sa Islamikong Demokrasya ng kaguluhang itinutulak mo. Abu Sayyaf lang at Taliban ang natutuwa sau Ibrahim = Andres You say you understand clearly the Koran......Please translate this phrase...If you can't you are a fake moslem.....
"La illaha ill Allah Dalla, Muhammadur Rasul Lulla Chode Pilla" MADRASAH EDUCATION IS A VIOLATION OF SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE, AS STATED IN THE CONSTITUTION.
IF MUSLIMS WANTED TO TEACH THE ISLAMIC FAITH IN THE EDUCATION SYSTEM, PARTICULARLY FOR THEIR FELLOW MUSLIM, IT SHOULD BE DONE IN A PRIVATELY OWNED SCHOOL. IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS OWNED BY THE STATE, EDUCATION SHOULD NOT FAVOR ANY PARTICULAR RELIGION. THE STATE HAS ALREADY SO MANY LAWS FOR ITS CITIZENS TO FOLLOW, AS GUIDED BY THE CONSTITUTION, THAT RELIGIOUS FAITH SHOULD BE CONFINED WITHIN THE PERSONAL CIRCLE OF EVERY PERSON AND NOT TO COMPEL ANYONE TO FOLLOW THEM. OTHERWISE, WE WILL BE VIOLATING THE PRINCIPLES OF FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY. To: Mr. Radical,
You are refering to an Autonomous MOA -AD of which in actual form do state that parts of Mindanao & their policies be reneged of loyalty to the state. MILF will have their own laws, governance, foreign dealings, own an independent military, have their own flag & national anthem & obtain tracks of lands that were formerly registered under the auspices of the constitutions. What form of Autonomy are you refering to when even Palestine desires the very content of the MOA-AD bearing all the necessary details of a 2 state solutions with Israel. Malaysia, Saudi Arabia & the Organization of Islamic Countries pointed out that it is the RP constitutions that hinders the implementation of your MOA-AD. Those are visible signs that the former are all up to pressuring the constitutions to give way to their demand of a separate state for their muslim brothers. They would like to act as participant & not as observer as they should be. There are no International law that binds the MOA -AD for its implementation because the appropritae signatures are not affix. Besides the MOA-AD is crafted by a single branch of Govt which is the Executive branch alone & it does not represents the consent of the Judiciary as well as the Legislative. Therefore, there is no international commitment vested by the GRP nor the Philippines as a whole pertaining to the MOA-AD. To: Mr Gurdians
First, You just keep repeating your previous false allegations, about ....conspiracy, political influence and undue pressures which doesnt make sense and that already been reputed. Please, Bring something worthy of argument otherwise its useless to chat with people whose rational thinking has been clouded by his prejudiced and hatred. thus he can no longer distinguish truth from falsehood. Second, MOA-AD has been agreed upon by the party and in fact both parties put their initials as a sign of intent to bind themselves to the said agreement. the aborted ceremonial signing was insignificant as it is just a formality. Lastly, The president or executive branch of government has the prerogative or authority to enter into executive agreement with foreign states or entities, which is purely political in nature, without prior concent from legislative or judiciary branch of government. therefore it is within the executive power to enter into executive agreement such as MOA-AD without violating the constitution. study your political and international law so you can easily relate with what am posting OK! First, there is no signature of the Executive office that is affix over this war-crafted MOA-AD!!!
It is the Judiciary/ Supreme Court who will decide & interpret what the constitutions/ law of the nation states & OIC or any International law has no room to interpellate on RP NATIONAL AFFAIRS!!!! oh man! it clearly show, you dont have any idea about laws. Have you ever heard about delegated power of the president? that the president has the power to deputize or appoint anyone to works at the discretion of the president. thus, the acts of secretaries is the act of the president. secretary is the alter ego of the president. whatever works done by the secretaries binds the president.
peace and order matters are purely political natures which falls under the jurisdiction of the head of the government that is the president. therefore, what is the nature of talk between MILF and GRP? clearly thats involves political matters that falls within the prerogative of president. However, the president is not the one going out and talk to any one, thus the president deputized or delegate such duty to its representative or secretary through executive acts or orders. Therfore, the GRP peace panel is directly connected to the president, as if the president is the one doing all the works. When the MILF and GRP peace panel affix their initials to the agreement that considers as initials of the leadership of MILF and the president.
#42.1.1.1.1
The Guardians
on
2009-05-31 21:40
(Reply)
The Executive Office by her Press Secretary issued a statement under-oath in the panel of the Supreme Court saying: The President has no knowledge of the content much more of the details of the defunct MOA-AD
Could you pls checked the ruling of the Supreme Court & the official statement of the Executive itself before you insist on the implementation of your MOA-AD
#42.1.1.1.1.1
Radical
on
2009-06-01 14:24
(Reply)
So you believe such crap! thats a deliberate lying to undermine any possible court ruling against the government that might trigger the downfall of the administration.
In fact, it was the president who announce the signing of comprehensive peace settlement in her last SONA, remember! It is not the question of whether or not she knew the contain of the agreement but it is whether she has the political will to implement such agreement. The answers obviously; in a negative! unportunately, she is preoccupied with survival of her administration nowadays.
#42.1.1.1.1.1.1
The Guardians
on
2009-06-01 14:48
(Reply)
Mr. Radical,
Of course u will never accept the ruling of the Supreme Court, u will never accept the will of the Filipino people either by way of suffrage. Because as muslims u are obliged to submit under a single order that is to 'surrender to the will of Allah' with Shariah Law not only being superior to International Law but as a Universal Law to be uphold. There were no confirmatory signature affix in the MOA-AD because that Malaysian GRP-MILF meeting were abruptly adjourned STOP THIS MUSLIM EXTREMISM THAT U ARE TRYING TO SUPPORT BECAUSE U ARE THE BRAIN THAT HAS CALLED FOR SO MANY CIVILIAN ATROCITIES PERPETRATED BY UR ARMED COMRADES!!!!!!!!
#42.1.1.1.1.1.1.1
Radical
on
2009-06-02 13:48
(Reply)
Supreme Court was created to serve and administer justice but when the court abused or undermined its authority then by implication the court deem divest itself of its authority. why should we then accept or respect any biased rulings of the court?
Call us whatever name you wish, but we and the world community knew the fact that Moro Rebels are freedom fighter. Fighting for Moro's fundamental rights to be freed from the yoke of neo colonialist manila. We regret the unnecessary deaths of innocence in this conflict. This is the unavoidable consequences of war that government chooses to pursue instead of peaceful settlement of the problem in mindanao.
#42.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1
The Guardians
on
2009-06-02 16:56
(Reply)
MORO FREEDOM FIGHTERS OR MORO SEPARATIST?
You dont speak for the whole muslim community of Mindanao bec your group have numerous cases of civilian atrocities committed to muslims & non-muslims at large It is so ironic that MILF HAD HELD THE GOVT IN HOSTAGE BY THIS TACTICAL MILITARY RAMPAGES & were claiming lands that was legaly tended & owned by non-muslims The CORE OF MUSLIM EXTREMIST values are to establish a separate Islamic society where independent governance be upheld under the auspices of Shariah Laws This is a serious legal concern when non-muslim minorities resides, willing to remain & un-willing to convert over regions dominated by muslims Govt military approaches will be applied when your group rejects all legal means & resort to all forms of havoc to fight for your cause Whay cant you join the mainstreams of MUSLIM MODERATES & aspire to edify Islamic Institutions in RP??? Date: May 30, 2009
Headlines: Organization of Islamic Countries ay nasa likod ng pagpapatuloy ng pagrebelde ng mga MILF sa mindanao. Ayun sa source, matagal na palang may pakana itong mga arab nations ng OIC na magkaroon ng separate state ang mindanao. Ito ay naka disguise sa pag donate ng pera para kuno sa ikauunlad ng mga kapwa muslim sa mindanao. Ngunit ginawa itong military funding para sa logistical supplies ng mga rebeldeng moro. Kaya pala kahit na palaging nag rereklamo ang mga moro na wala daw kaunlaran ang kanilang lugar kaya sila nag rebelde ngunit may mga mamahaling high powered weapons sila at kumpleto pa ang full battle uniform nila. Saan kaya galing ang pondo? Akala natin walang pera sa mindanao dahil napabayaan ng gobyerno? Bakit kumpleto ang camouflage uniform ng mga MILF soldiers at mga mamahalin baril pa ang dala nila? Its ironic how they complain that there is no money in mindanao and yet they carry expensive military weapons, grenades, bombs and wear complete uniforms and boots... Instead of food, shelter and education the so-called Zakat of moslems go to guns and ammos, propaganda and moslem rebel military trainigs...
Itong mga taong nag mamarunong ay imbes na i-refute yung aking mga sinsabi,umiiwas pusoy paano makita dito sa blog na ito kung sino ang nagsasabi ng totoo...Tulad sa #39.1.1 kinekwestyun kung demokrasya ba raw ang mga bansang Islamiko...Ang sagot ko demokrasya sila kanilang paniniwala at pag-akap sa kanilang sariling sistema,sapagkat itoý nagmula sa mga mamayan at hindi pwedeng diktahan ng ayaw naman nilang sistema ng idolohiya na galing sa Katoliko or Hudyo syempre..Kahit sino sarili mong bahay tapos bigalang may papasok na hindi ninyo kaano-ano tapos pagsabihan ka na hindi demokrasya ang sistema mo sa pamamahay mo hindi ka kaya TATAAS ANG KILAY???Tulad sa Luxemborg,British or di kaya sa North Korea ,bigla mo silang sasabihan na pangit ang sistema nila dahil hindi sila demokrasya hindi ka kaya palayasin???Ang ibig sabihin lang niyan na gusto ninyo ang mga Muslim na maging tulad ninyo...HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...NAKAKATAWA KAYO...GUSTO NINYO ANG DEMOKRASYA ANG MASUSUNOD NILA..GAYUNG HINDI NINYO INIISIP NA SA GANUNG PARAAN AY NANGDIDIKTA KAYO NG GUSTO NINYO HINDI YUNG GUSTO NILA SAAN ANG DEMOKRASYA DYAN???MGA TANGA...SAAN KAYA NAPULOT NITO ANG MGA PILOSOPIYA NILANG DEMOKRASYA NA YAN???HEHEHEHEHEH BOBO..
Following the traces of a beautiful noise...
I like to discover that bashful behaviour, and always my mind appears in the light with a luminous lantern now recalling a spell. Francesco Sinibaldi headlines:
1. Priest having blow job with long dick, in his office. 2. Wife having sexual appear with his son. 3. Wife fucking her nighboors. 4. cristian father fucked his daughter. 5. cristian kidnaped and raped one of the popular anchor. Square ruler+Compass+Gate=Iluminatti=Freemasonry=Kabbalah=Satan.....
Malapit na ba or nakarating na hakhakhakhakhakhakhak...... At 56 Years Old, Mohammed Married A 7-Year Old Baby Girl And Doesn't That Make Mohammed a Child Molesting Pedophile and a Rapist ?
Mohammed, at age Twenty-five (25) married his boss, a forty (40) year old rich woman named Khadijeh, after she proposed to him. They had four daughters together but we know a lot about one daughter named Fatemeh. When Khadijeh died Mohammad at age fifty-six asked to marry Ayesha, daughter of his friend and first follower Abobakr. She was just a seven years old baby. Abobakr requested from Mohammed to wait till she reached the age nine before consummating their marriage.So at age fifty-Eight the great “Prophet”, raped a nine-year-old child. This is a sick act of an animal today and it was back then also. That is the reason for marriage age for girls age is nine years old (and sometimes younger in Islam). Then Mohammad married anywhere between 29 to 45 more women. According to Ebn Abbas, "The highest member of Moslems who is the Prophet Mohammed has also the highest appetite for women." The Koran says a Muslim may have up to four (4) wives. I guess there was an exception made in Mohammed’s case. In another place Mohammed claimed God told him that "*we have made such women available to you without any payment to them, these are all your cousins, slave women and any Moslem woman who would like to give you herself free of charge*." So slavery at least for women was quite common. Mohammad even asked his own adopted son, Zaid Ebn Hares, to divorce his wife, Zeinab, so that he could marry her. When the members of tribe protested this marriage, because the daughter-in-law was considered like one's daughter, *Mohammed answered that he received a revelation from God, that "A Moslem man cannot adopt another man's child." Hence Hares was not his real son, therefore he could marry his adopted son's wife*. Jesus said in Matthew 18:6, and Mark 9:42, that whoever harms a child it would be better for him to have a millstone tied around his neck and to be thrown into the deepest sea. It could be argued here that Jesus was advocating the death penalty for child abusers. Mohammed was the lowest filth of all, by raping a little baby. If you are a follower of Islam, you are following a belief handed down by a filthy child molester. Think about it! _*You could not deny the accusations because it is all written in your Koran*…. Come on Mr Proudkafir! dont be so silly hypocrit, we all knew whose real phidopile and rapist. it is proven fact that those supposed to be the men of god in your convents and churches were the one molesting and raping young siminaries. according to recent news report that 70-80% of siminaries has experience sexual abused from priests.
Even to this day, Santo papa harbor many alleged phidopile priests in the Vatican. In fact the Vatican has been paying the victims of its phidopile priests. And not long ago, Philippines Media has sensationalized alleged sexual assault, by prominent bishop to his secretary. No wonder, why theres so many cases of prostitution, adultery, incestous relation, rape, homosexuality and all kind of immorality in the philippines and other christian countries than the entire Muslim countries altogether. This is because their own churchmen, who supposed to be models of morality and good deeds, were the one committing evil and immoral acts. Now, with regards to your copy paste allegation of prophet(S) marriage to hazrat Aisha(R) which you considered as phidopile then perhaps you can considers also the marriage of mary and joseph as phidopilia because mary was 12 years old when she get married. I doubt you have any idea of what you were posting. I know you just copy paste your posts from some haters website. thats why, I felt not oblige to respond to every garbage you're posting here. for your info, Hazrat Aisha was one of the compiler of prophet's hadiths. She had many contributions in the early spread of Islam. Oh please, Mr. ProudKafir tryng to learn at least the basic teaching of islam because you dont even know the difference between Hadith and Qur'an; {_*You could not deny the accusations because it is all written in your Koran*….} your last statement, your allegation was not taken from Qur'an but from Hadith, stupid! You really dont know how doctrines works in Islam.....QURAN and HADITH verses are deemed EQUAL IN STANDING
There are proofs in Quran and Hadith records that Mohammad fucks an 8 year old wife & played on those of his slave girls, ordered the torture of an old woman mercilessly Hadith- Bukhari 59:5 Tabari 8:96 For you info. Muslim believes that Qur'an is purely words of god, dictated to the prophet thrugh angel gabriel, Hadith on the other hand is the collective sayings and traditions of the prophet. they are not equal. Qur'an is free of errors and contradictions, Hadiths is not. There are creterion to consider whether certain hadiths are weak or strong, true or fabricated.
Obviously, you are the one pretending to be well versed in islam and its teaching. you know nothing about Islam, you've just another wicked haters of Islam. Bakit kaya galit na galit sila sa akin gayung sinabi ko lang naman yung FREEMASONRY=ILUMINATTI=SATAN....HEHEHEHEHE....ITO PA GREAT SEAL OF U.S.A=FREEMASONRY=SATAN...HEHEHEHE...ITO PA PHILIPPINE FLAG+CUBAN FLAG+KOREAN FLAG=ISRAEL FLAG..HAKHAKHAKHAKHAKHAK...ITO PA ROTARY+LIONS CLUB+PBMA+MONCADIST+MORMONS+DEMOLAY+TABERNACLE OF CHRIST...ETC=FREEMASONRY BUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....ITO PA
REYNATO PUNO+ZOBEL AYALA+LOPEZ+SORIANO+ABOITIZ+ALCANTARA+BORROMEO+OSMEÑA+MIKE ARROYO+MARCOSES+ABALOS+RAZON+COJUANGCO..ETC.ETC.ETC.=FREEMASONRY...BUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA..... MGA BUANG UG AMAW NA MGA ILUMINATTI=FREEMASONRY....MGA CRYPTO-JEWS NA MGA SATANIC Judaism=Roman Catholicism=Sufism=Kaballasticism=Freemasonicism=Gnosticism=Mysticism=Jesuitism=Satanism=Terrorism......Hakhakhakhakhak...
New World Order=Judaism+Roman Catholism+Freemasonry+Shiaá+Sufism+Gnosticism+Terrorism...Hakhakhakhakhak Judaism=Freemasonry=Banking System=Terrorism Roman Catholism=Monasticism+Usurism+Adulterism+Coercionism+Loan Sharking+Tallageism+thought reformation+indoctrination Pseudo-Islamism=Sufism+Shia'cism+ Hindus=Mysticism+Gnosticism+Nepotism+favoritism.... HAKHAKHAKHAKHAKHAKHAKHAKHAK..... ISLAM: SATANIC CULT OF THE DAMNED
Prov 24:20 "For there shall be no reward to the evil man; the candle of the wicked shall be put out." Before you begin reading this article, let me make it clear that I do not hate people of Middle Eastern descent. I do NOT, and I repeat, do NOT hate Muslim people. Anyone who says I hate people who are Muslims are lying. I also want to state that I realize that not all Muslims want to cause devastation and destruction, nor do they all support the acts of those who want to kill Jews and Christians. There are some Muslims who would not hurt anyone. *IT IS MY BELIEF THAT MUSLIMS DO NOT GO TO HEAVEN*. ISLAM IS SATANIC. *To worship Allah is to worship Satan*. "Allah" is a false 'god' created to divert people from the REAL and TRUE Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. God's love is for all races of people. (John 3:16) He loves the Jews He loves the Palestinians, He loves all people of Middle Eastern heritage, as well as all people of all races. Islam is a cult, and the Koran advocates the killing of Christians and Jews. God loves the sinner but hates the sin. Islam says they are doing the will of God, but they are not. They are doing the will of Satan, who was a murderer from the beginning. (St. John 8:44) Islam is a SATANIC religion and is a fanatical, murderous cult. Those who follow it are in deception. We want you to know that Christ awaits with open arms to forgive and accept you! Islam is determined to eliminate Jewish people as well as Christians from planet Earth, and this is a fact according to the writings of Mohammed, the founder of Islam. I do not understand how anyone could follow a "religion" that was founded by a man named Mohammed who "married" a 7-year old BABY. If a grown man was to do this today, he would be considered a pedophile and outcast from society. He certainly would not gain millions of followers in a "religion" that worships this man as a full-on prophet of God. I have offered proof in this article beyond any shadow of a doubt that Mohammed was a child molester. How anyone can follow a religion that was founded by a man who molested children is beyond belief. If you are a Muslim, we hope after reading the following facts that you will abandon that ideology and make Jesus your Lord! After studying what Islam really is, I am even more determined to help people get out of this cult. The Koran is an evil, satanic book that encourages the afore mentioned things along with a Jihad or Holy War to where non-Muslims are wiped off the planet, and only those who convert to Islam are spared_. The Nazis advocated the same thing. I don't think anyone would mind the burning of Hitler's book, "Mein Kampf," so I encourage everyone to burn every Koran you can find. Do you think that sounds too radical or too extreme? Well, I don't believe there is one Christian who would not hesitate to burn Anton LaVey's "Satanic Bible" or a book on witchcraft if they came across one to keep it from falling into the hands of someone who might be converted to Satan. We must burn every Koran we can find, or flush the pages down the toilet to keep it from influencing people into joining this satanic cult of the damned!..... Wow! this some kind of proselytizing eh?!
demonising other religion to advance own's religion. typical tacitcs of fooling unaware people to switch allegiance from one to other which have worse hidden defect. Amm... so far am little bit convinced by you... I think am seeing light at the end of the tunnel... inlighten me more by answering this question please... I thought your god is merciful and loving but read this following verses: 1 Samuel, chapter 15, verse 3: "Go now and put Amalek to the sword, putting to the curse all they have, without mercy: put to death every man and woman, every child and baby at the breast, every ox and sheep, camel and ass." Yahweh orders the destruction of an entire city, including children and even breastfeeding babies. This is a war crime under the Geneva Convention Hosea, chapter 13, verse 16 (chapter 14, verse 1 in some translations): "Samaria will be made waste, for she has gone against her God: they will be cut down by the sword, their little children will be broken on the rocks, their women who are with child will be cut open." More "pro-life" stuff, breaking up little children & cutting up pregnant women. Even Adolf Hitler didn't descend to this kind of despicable act. Psalm 137, verse 9:"How blessed will be the one who seizes and dashes your little ones against the rock." Ezekial chapter 9, verse 4-6: "The Lord commands: "... slay old men outright, young men and maidens, little children and women" Kill them all, after all, Yahweh commands it. See that little crying baby over there, slaughter it - that's an order Numbers, chapter 31, verses 17-18: "So now put every male child to death, and every woman who has had sex relations with a man. But all the female children who have had no sex relations with men, you may keep for yourselves." After slaughtering all the young boys and women following a battle, the victorious Israelite soldiers get to keep all the young virginal girls for their own enjoyment. Isiah chapter 13, verse 16: "Their young children will be broken up before their eyes; their goods will be taken away, and their wives made the property of others." More mindless slaughter, theft and rape all directed by the "loving" Christian god. And to think that I actually used to worship this cruel & vicious being! Exodus chapter 21, verse 7: "If a man sells his daughter as a female slave, she is not to go free as the male slaves do." Leviticus chapter 27, verse 6: "And if it be from a month old even unto five years old, then thy estimation shall be of the male five shekels of silver, and for the female thy estimation shall be three shekels of silver." Not only does the Bible condone slavery, it actually values female slaves as worth less money than males. Disgraceful. I have lot more but that is enough for now. You accusing others of being devils but you and your religion hiding something much more worse than any religion in the world. Can yo preach this in your congegation? I dont think so... and to Jesus, the mediator of a new covenant
-Hebrews 12:24 New Testament-Covenant supercedes the Old Testament How I wish Mohammad recant all of his anti-jewish sentiments so that muslims could co-exist with jews. Oh I see, never thought jesus contradict himself when He said and qoute; I did not came to replace the law (old testament) but to fulfill it. sorry I forgot the verse. The New testament is mostly wrote by paul of tarsus, and not jesus. Thats why He is considered the founder of christianity.
#51.1.1.1.1
Anonymous
on
2009-05-31 21:55
(Reply)
There were no contradictions in the words of Jesus but you have rather made a wrong interpretations of it
Mohammad made it plain, simple and clear that 'to kill an infidel is a religious duty' and that oaths admnistered to non-muslims are subject to change all for the interest of Islam Hadith- Bukhari 59:5 Quran- Sura 33:36
#51.1.1.1.1.1
Radical
on
2009-06-01 13:21
(Reply)
wrong interpretation? Ok, then were not going to use old testament. let limit our self to new testament. read this following verses:
In Mark 7:9, Jesus is critical of the Jews for not killing their disobedient children as prescribed by Old Testament law. In Luke 19:22-27, Jesus orders killed anyone who refuses to be ruled by him. With regards to the Hadith you just posts. That is pure nonsense. You and others doing this are taking selected passages and reading them completely out of context to support whatever argument you wish to make. As I just did qouting the Bible verses above. Good Luck!
#51.1.1.1.1.1.1
KAFIR
on
2009-06-01 14:31
(Reply)
Poor Muslim RADICAL,
The UlAMMA center for Islam Propagation (KSA) have just issued a fatwa that says ALL INTERPRETATIONS OF THE QURAN & HADITH WILL BE BASED ON ITS LITERAL FORM When Mohammad says 'KILL' whether it is in Quran or Hadith it would mean literal killing. If he would say 'DECEIT' it would mean deceiving non-muslims literaly as it is (Would u guess why all muslims have the same mindset?)
#51.1.1.1.1.1.1.1
Radical
on
2009-06-02 12:58
(Reply)
Sources?! I doubt you can give any or if indeed thereis one. I'm sure, you just select some passages that justified you utter prejudice and hatred against Islam. You knew, you have no locus standi you just a bigoted glogger who spew slanderous words in this blog.
People like you will never understand Islam because you not reading Islamic books in order to understand it but rather to find errors or inconsistancies unportunately you've never found any, unlike your bible which contain so many errors and contradictions. thus, you resort to making malicious allegations by citing verses in the Qur'an and Hadith completely out of context. it is futile to explain things to people who has bigoted way of thinking like you because their mind had already brainwashed and keep on insisting their own wicked beliefs.
#51.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1
KAFIR
on
2009-06-02 15:56
(Reply)
U dont need to be a scholar to understand the life stories & ideals of Muhammad but u need to be a muslim to understand that
A MUSLIM PROPHET IS ENTITLED TO MARRY AND CONSUME MARRIAGE TO AN 8 YEAR OLD A MUSLIM PROPHET IS ENTITLED TO MOLEST CHILD-GIRL SLAVES A MUSLIM PROPHET IS ENTITLED TO BREAK OATHS-TREATIES WITH NON-MUSLIMS A MUSLIM PROPHET IS ALLOWED TO KILL & GIVE ORDERS TO KILLING CIVILIANS Quran 4:24 Quran 23:6 Quran 33:50 Quran 70:30 Quran 2:187 Hadith- Bukhari 6:316 For muslims it is acceptable for their Prophet Muhammad to behave this way that's why they find no fault at all to the Quran or Hadith Why you start in Samuel time when NO rulers in Israel? Lets start from the beginning so we will know why Yahweh done this things to them, because the Evil tell a lie on Eve contradicting the word of Yahweh in Gen. 3:4 “the serpent said to woman’ ‘you shall NOT SURELY DIE ‘ . THIS IS AGAINST the word of Yahweh in Gen. 2:17 “the tree of knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat for in the DAY you eat thereof YOU SHALL SURELY DIE’. This happened in Paradise remember this happened in Paradise. In 2Peter 3:8 “But Beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that ONE DAY IS WITH YAHWEH AS A THOUSAND YEARS AND A THOUSAND YEARS AS ONE DAY”. That 1,000 years on Earth Time is ONLY ONE (1) Day with Yahweh in paradise or heaven.
After this Gen.3:15-19 “and I will put enmity between you and the woman and between your seed and your seed”, on 19 death comes to Adam. In Gen. 3:23-24 “therefore Yahweh sent him forth from the garden of Eden to till the ground from where he was taken, so he drove out the man and he placed at the east of the Garden of Eden..” In Gen.6:2-8 “the SON OF YAHWEH saw the daughters of SON OF MAN that they were fair and they took them wives of all they chose”. The Son of Yahweh married the daughters of Son of Man.. In Gen. 6:13 Yahweh destroy all flesh because the earth is full of violence. Only eight (8) son of Yahweh survived. In Abraham time Gen. 12:3”AND I WILL BLESS THEM THAT BLESS YOU AND CURSE HIM THAT CURSED YOU. In Gen.14:14-16 “and when Abram heard that his brother (Lot) was taken captive, he armed his trained servants born in his own house, 318 men and pursued them unto Dan”. Can we blamed Abraham for killing, it was his enemy who started and done evil thing by capturing his brother Lot. “ The Sodom and Gomorrah in Gen. 18:20 “and Yahweh said BECAUSE THE CRY OF SODOM AND GOMORRAH IS GREAT AND BECAUSE THEIR SIN IS VERY GRIEVOUS”. It was because of the SIN of the people the reason Yahweh done this to them that includes their descendants include children of course. So much for the Christians saying that one should love the sinner but hate the sin eh!
Oppzh!! I heard Hayden Said that passage eh... bunch of hypocrits!!
#51.1.2.1.1
KAFIR
on
2009-06-01 14:18
(Reply)
JESUS VS PHARISEES
He also said to them, “You neatly reject the commandment of God in order to set up your tradition. For Moses said, ‘Honor your father and your mother,’ and, ‘Whoever insults his father or mother must be put to death." -Mark 7:9 (Jesus is critical to Pharisees & Scribes who insist on the technicality of Moses Law because Jesus would want an interpretation of the OT by its substance & not by mere outward form) PARABLE OF TEN TALENTS The king said to him, ‘I will judge you by your own words, you wicked slave! So you knew, did you, that I was a severe man, withdrawing what I didn’t deposit and reaping what I didn’t sow? Why then didn’t you put my money in the bank, so that when I returned I could have collected it with interest?’ And he said to his attendants, ‘Take the mina from him, and give it to the one who has ten.’ But they said to him, ‘Sir, he has ten minas already!’ ‘I tell you that everyone who has will be given more, but from the one who does not have, even what he has will be taken away. But as for these enemies of mine who did not want me to be their king, bring them here and slaughter them in front of me!’” -Luke 19:22-27 (Jesus illustrates by using parables the forthcoming judgement of the wicked) PARABLES- Are not true-to-life stories, they are used to convey spiritual truth) Radical, i-solve mo muna ang gera ng mga muslim (Shias vs Sunni vs Wahhabis vs Fatihmids vs Ishmaelites vs Abbasids vs Talebans vs Kurds vs Maranao vs Tausugs dahilan sa doctrinang Jihad ni Mohammad) Bakit ang Madrasah pati na ang bahayan ng mga muslim na sibilyan ay nakapalibot sa kampo ng mga rebeldeng muslim?
Kung lusubin ng militar ang kampo nayan tiyak na madadamay ang mga sibilyan Sa malinaw na mata ay totoong gumagamit ng sibilyan ang mga moro bilang human shields Target ren nila ang mga sibilyan lalu pa't kristyanus dahil immoral at batik sa Islam ang ibang relihiyon, ganyan ang prinsipyo ni Ibrahim = Andres Matatapang naman ang mga morong ito pero nagtatago cla sa abaya ng mga sibilyan War is deceit sabi ni Mohammad pero dapat silang sumunod sa mga alituntunin ng labanan at huag pahawakin ng baril pati musmos nilang mga anak Hadith, Tabari 7:97 -Iniutos ng Propeta na patayin lahat ng sibilyan dahil sila ay hudyong ayaw yumapos sa Islam Sinong maniniwala sa ganyang prinsipyo ng Jihad? Ano kayang masasabi dito ni Andres = Ibrahim? nawala na si Radical.....nasupalpal cguro nung Guardians....hehehehehe
Talagang yung galit ni Anonymous sa akin di mapantayan no? After na mabuking kasing mga KRISTIYANUS na mga baklang pastor na nagtatrabaho sa bansang muslim....hakhakhak! Nasan na nga ba ang mga dignidad ninyo? mga pinapakain ninyo sa sarili ninyo galing sa mga taong sinasabi ninyong mga masasamang tao? Hakhakhak....nasan ang ARAL ninyo?
Mga kapanalig nasa sa inyo si Jesus...nasa sa inyo ang ispirito...iaabot na ninyo ang pera ninyo dahil enrolmment na ng mga fafah ko!....diba Malvar na TUTA? Ang mga Immam, Ulamma, Muttawa ay may karapatang bumili ng maraming asawa galing mula sa pondo ng Islam at wala na kayong pakialam duon.....yan ang ARAL namen!
Napakapangit talaga ng mga turo ng Islam. mahusay din talaga si Satanas at nagtayo din siya ng sarili niyang relihyon, Yan ang islam.
Nakasulat na yan sa bibliya... Na bago ang katapusan ng mundo ay maraming tao ang maloko ng anti-christ even the good ones at i think that from the way islam is spreading now parang malapit na ang katotohanan.
The Organization of Islamic Countries made a curricula on establishing Shariah governance posted over Arab News and Saudi Gazette.
That would mean an outright support to all muslim rebellion on Non-muslim countries. That OIC hidden-agenda over MILF-GRP negotiations were now unmasked. The Philippine Flag,The Coat of Arms of philippines,The Lion,The bald eagle,the star,The octagon sun,The Centennial Commision,the president,the magnate business man,the mestizo's,the colors,banking system,Jose Rizal,Douglas Mc Arthur,Andres bonifacio,Apolinario Mabini,All Philippine Heroes,The Magellan's passengers,The Friars,The GomBurZa,Manuel L. Quezon,Elpidio Quirino,Ferdinand Marcos,Hilario Moncado,Hermogenes Ebdane,Fernando Zobel,Ruben Ecleo Sr.,Gregorio Aglipay,Reynato puno,Cezar Virata,Emilio Aguinaldo,Magdiwang,The Freider Family,The Soriano's,The Lopez's,Juan Luna,Felix Hidalgo,Fernando Amorsolo,Marcelo H. del Pilar,Graciano Lopez Jaena,Galicano Apacible,Domingo Panganiban,Jose Alejandrino,EDSA,Tomas Arejola,Ariston Bautista,Julio Llorente,Ambrocio Flores,Numeriano Adriano,The 13 Matyr's of Cavite a very important number in Judaism,Arthur Mc Arthur,John J. Pershing,Harry Bandoltz,James G. Harbord,Ret.Gen.Arturo Lumibao,Ret.Gen.
In Other words ito..... .....of Freemasonry in the Philippines By: Bro. GeminianoV. Galarosa, Jr. Dagohoy Lodge No. 84 In the Beginning... The history of Philippine Masonry may be likened to the history of the first Grand Lodge. On the Feast of St. John the Baptist in 1717, four of the pre-existing Masonic lodges in Great Britain organized what became the first Grand Lodge of the world. On December 19, 1912, three lodges that were chartered under the Constitution of the Grand Lodge of California finally succeeded in establishing the Grand Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons of the Philippine Islands, the forerunner of what is now officially known as the Most Worshipful Grand Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons of the Philippines. Masonry existed in England long before the creation of the first Grand Lodge, so was Philippine Masonry already alive even before the formation of the Grand Lodge of the Philippine Islands. In 1856, for example, Primera Luz Filipina, the first Masonic lodge in the Philippines, was formed by Jose Malcampo y Monge, a naval captain who subsequently became Governor General of the Philippines. Primera Luz was chartered by Gran Oriente Luisitano and admitted only Spaniards in its fold. Subsequently, three other lodges were established one after the other: the first by the Germans, the second by the British consul in Nagtahan, and the third by the Spaniards in Pandacan. Not only that, Dr, Serafin Quiazon, head of the National Historical Institute of the Republic of the Philippines, while researching in London on the British trade with the Philippines, stumbled upon a significant piece of historical data. Guissippe Garibaldi, that brilliant Italian revolutionary whom President Abraham Lincoln offered a command in the United States Army during the American Civil War, captained a vessel that anchored in Manila Bay sometime in the middle of the nineteenth century. There is little doubt that the tenets of the Craft landed with Garibaldi in the sandy beaches of the Philippine Islands during that period. The Filipino Patriots Embrace the Tenets of Freemasonry Abroad... It was the influx of the students who pursued higher studies in Europe, among them Marcelo H. del Pilar from Bulacan, Graciano Lopez Jaena from Iloilo, the Luna brothers from Ilocos, Galicano Apacible from Batangas, Domingo Panganiban from Camarines Norte, Jose Alejandrino from Pampanga, Tomas Arejola from Camarines Sur, Ariston Bautista from Manila, Julio Llorente from Cebu, and the country's foremost hero, Jose Rizal from Laguna, that made a conglomeration of Masonic patriots from the entire archipelago. In 1886, some of them joined Lodge Solidaridad No. 53 in Barcelona, Spain, while others joined Lodge Revoluccion, and, exposed to the tenets of the fraternity, established local lodges upon their return to the islands. Nilad Lodge was formed first on January 6, 1891, and, in no time, several lodges mushroomed in Manila and its environs, even reaching as far as Zamboanga in the southern backdoor. By 1893, they had succeeded in establishing the Grand Regional Council under the leadership of Ambrocio Flores. Three years later, the Philippine Revolution conflagrated an armed rebellion that was initiated by the Katipunan led by Andres Bonifacio. Bonifacio's organizational skills and the secret codes that he employed were said to have been copied from the Masonic secret rules and procedures. These ultimately led to the downfall of the nation's conquistadors who for more than three centuries wielded the stick without dangling any carrot over the subjects of the entire archipelago. It can be said, however, that Masonry during those tumultuous and rebellious years was in suspended animation. The "hawks," among them Andres Bonifacio and Emilio Aguinaldo, became Katipuneros; the "doves," which included among others, Jose Rizal, Numeriano Adriano and the thirteen martyrs of Cavite were herded in the dungeons and ultimately shot at Bagumbayan. A third group called the "chameleons" or balimbings, simply changed their coats and did what they thought best, be pliant as a bamboo and swing to the rhythm of nature, wherever the wind blows. The Americans Enter the Political and the Masonic Scenes... Then came the American conquerors that hounded the self-proclaimed Philippine President Emilio Aguinaldo and his ragtag band to the boondocks. Many of these Philippine Masons, already sporting their avowed roles as "Rebolucionarios," were at their wits’ end, eluding the pursuing Gringos. What the Filipinos did not realize was that these soldiers were led mostly by Masons: Generals Arthur MacArthur; John J. Pershing who was then but a captain, a Shriner and who answers to the monicker "Black Jack Pershing;" Harry Bandoltz; and James G. Harbord; the last two named generals later forming the forerunner of the Philippine Constabulary or the present-day Philippine National Police (PNP). The Country As A Free-For-All Masonic Jurisdiction... The surrender of General Aguinaldo effectively ended the armed insurrection against the Americans and also resulted in a field day for the different Grand Lodges and appendant bodies of the Masonic fraternity. Early to make their presence felt were the American Military Lodge led by the United States Volunteers from North Dakota, the Knights Templar, and the Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Missouri, a lodge composed of Negro soldiers from the United States. These were immediately followed by the Grand Lodge of California through the creation of what is called "The Sojourners Club" and thereafter was followed by creation of Manila Lodge No. 342, Cavite Lodge No. 350 and Corregidor Lodge No. 386 On the local front, first to reorganize was Grand Master Ambrocio Flores who attempted to establish the Filipino Grand Orient in 1899. This was followed by the Gran Oriente Espanol through the reactivation of Modestia Lodge No. 199, the Grand Orient of France that was introduced by Dr. Trinidad Pardo H. de Tavera, the Philippine Grand Orient that was established by Jose Utor y Fernandez, and the Grand Lodge of Scotland that established Lodge Perla de Oriente 1034 in Manila and Cebu Lodge No. 1106 in the Visayas. Gran Oriente de Espana also came into existence and so did Gran Oriente Luisitano Unido, making the country a conglomeration of several Masonic disciplines and jurisdictions. Furthermore, the Americans brought to the fore several appendant organizations, notably the Scottish Rite, the York Rite, the Mystic Shrine and the Order of the Eastern Star. Even the Chinese secret societies composed of Chinese Masons who claimed kinship with the worldwide fraternity entered the picture. All these complemented and co-existed with one another. The Formation of the Grand Lodge of the Philippine Islands... Invariably, confusion ensued. The Americans kept membership in their lodges to themselves; the Filipinos clamored for recognition, until, finally, the three American lodges that were chartered under the constitution of the Grand Lodge of California sought dispensation from their Mother Grand Lodge to form their own and thus established in 1912 what came to be the Grand Lodge of the Philippine Islands. Their respective Lodge numbers were also changed and became Manila Lodge No. 1, Cavite Lodge No. 2 and Corregidor Lodge No. 3, respectively. Masonry Silently Works by the Sidelines... It is interesting to note that Masonry worked in mystic ways. Unknown to many, Generals Harry H. Bandholtz and Gary G. Harbord took Manuel Luis Quezon into their protective wings and gave him his political start in Tayabas by helping him get elected an Assemblyman. It was most reasonably because of his close association with the two that encouraged Quezon to join the Masonic fraternity by petitioning for membership at Sinukuan Lodge No. 273 in 1907. His appointment as Resident Commissioner in Washington would later serve as guiding light in his future Masonic endeavors when he was refused admission in a lodge in the United States on the ground that his lodge in the Philippines was clandestine. At about the same time that Quezon was initiated into the mysteries of Masonry, Rafael Palma petitioned for membership at Bagong Buhay Lodge 291 while Juan Sumulong joined a lodge of Gran Oriente de España and later became member of Bagumbayan Lodge No. 4 under the jurisdiction of the newly-formed Grand Lodge of the Philippine Islands; three illustrious Freemasons who were all admitted to the Philippine bar and would make their respective presence felt in the corridors of power of the American-guided government. The Polarization of the Brethren into Two Main Bodies... The existence of lodges under several jurisdictions became as confusing as would two amateur players playing chess with so many boisterous kibitzers watching the game on a chessboard. The California Lodges recognized the Scottish Lodges but did not accept brethren from the Filipino Lodges. The Scottish Lodges maintained relationship with both the American and Filipino lodges but completely ignored the black-skinned Prince Hall lodges. Until finally the Masonic field polarized into only two main bodies, the Grand Lodge of the Philippine Islands composed of the white-skinned Americans, and the Regional Grand Lodge which consists of the brown-skinned Indios of the land. Merging Into One Masonic Roof... It is doubtful whether Masonry in the Philippines could have achieved easy unification and harmonious relationship without the combined talents of Governor Francis Burton Harrison and Manuel Luis Quezon. Harrison was appointed Governor General in the Philippines and had publicly acknowledged that he owed his appointment to Quezon. The Governor was raised to the sublime degree of Master Mason on July 11, 1916 and brought with him his pro-Filipino inclination to the Masonic world. It was therefore inevitable that the fusion gained headway on both sides and when the election for Grand Master was held for the first time under the fused bodies in 1917, the Americans who were easily outnumbered, were surprised to see MW William H. Taylor reelected during the first year of fusion. It was also the start of what would later amount to a Rigodon de Honor of electing a Grand Master, much like the checkered floor of King Solomon's Temple; if it is white this year, then it should be brown next time. Una sin otra were the Spanish words for it. Growth, Expansion, and the Role of Filipino Masons... The years that followed the unification registered impressive growth for the Craft. In four years time starting in 1918, thirty-eight lodges were established. The Filipinos that were elected Grand Masters, alternating with the Americans every two years, was led by Manuel L. Quezon. MW Quezon was followed by Rafael Palma, Quintin Paredes, Wenceslao Trinidad, Francisco Afan Delgado, Teodoro M. Kalaw and Vicente Carmona, in succession. These illustrious gentlemen were also quite active in the corridors of power. At this point and time, most of the notable political figures were Freemasons. It was therefore no wonder that Monsignor Michael O'Doherty wrote in his diary in 1917 shortly after his installation as Archbishop of Manila, "Masonry is a menace. Osmena, (the incumbent Speaker of the House) is the only government official of any standing who is not a Mason here in Manila." The Nation Gains Independence... The 1935 Constitution led to the granting of the country's Commonwealth status and ultimately her independence. This Philippine independence was gained largely through the efforts of Masons. No wonder, the names Manuel L. Quezon, Rafael Palma, Quintin Paredes and Manuel L. Roxas alternated in shuttling to and from the United States to lobby for the untangling of the country's umbilical cord with the United States. When the election of the Constitutional Convention delegates were tallied, 42 out of 202, or 21 percent of the total, were Masons. The War Years... Wars always inflict destruction not only to the country and its people but more so to the Masonic fraternity whose tenets would not allow them to stay idle by the sidelines. Masonic records were destroyed and countless of its sons were either incarcerated or suffered heroic deaths. Topping the list is MW Jose Abad Santos who was executed by the Japanese government for non-cooperation. Grand Master John Robert McFie, RW Jose P. Guido, Deputy Grand Master and RW Antonio Ramos, Junior Grand Warden, also became casualties. So did many more of its sons. Rebuilding From the Ashes... It is a truism that after the storm is peace. Lodges were rehabilitated, new ones were added and, progressively, the tenets of the Craft were indelibly imprinted in the country's history unnoticed by many as it vaulted through the 21st Century. Freemasonry... The sheer lack of drum-beaters within the Craft does not allow that the sterling qualities of members go unnoticed. A major factor that influence this situation is the generally subdued attitude of the members themselves. Except for the brethren who are in the know, the public does not realize that Freemasonry and its adherents always play important roles in the nation's history. The two EDSA revolutions have produced Freemasons from both sides of the political fence whose names, because of the lapse of time, will no longer be mentioned. The Recent Political Turmoil- Results updated to March 1, 2007 But the political turmoil that rocked the country that was caused by the allegation that the nation’s president won through dubious means has shown several members of the Craft unflinchingly doing their duties on both sides of the political fence. Eight brothers whose sterling qualities are admirable may indirectly be mentioned. At the other side A brother from Salug Valley No. 216 and the whistle blower who produced the tapes that rocked the entire country, a former Deputy Director of the National Bureau of Investigation, whose dedication to the cause he believed in is beyond compare. What happened to him, his whereabouts and the status of the cases filed against him are unknown. A brother from Luzon No. 57-the Philippine Army’s Brigadier General who sacrificed his expected pension six days before retirement by honoring the Senate investigation on the alleged election irregularities in Mindanao and even subjected him to court martial for his heroic deed. A case was filed against him at the military tribunal but media has since been ominously silent on the status of the case. From the Philippine National Police From Bontoc No.140-the Director of the PNP who walks the tight rope doing police functions to the best of his abilities, cognizant of the constitutional rights of his fraternal brothers at the other side that these are duly protected. He has since retired as PNP Chief and after retirement was appointed head of the National Irrigation Administration. From. Pampanga No. 48- the Deputy General of the PNP for the National Capital Region who is in charge of the peace and order in the entire metropolis and whose ending statement when interviewed over the radio is invariably "May God bless us all always," debunking the myth that Freemasons are Godless. Word has it that he was recently appointed ambassador to Indonesia. From Congress From Jacobo Zobel Memorial No. 202- The debonair Chairman of the Public Information Committee whose finesse and fair play at conducting the investigation is indeed admirable. His political fortunes still reverberating, it would be safe to guess that he is running for reelection on his seat at Congress. From. Kutang Bato No. 110- The Chairman of the Justice Committee, who formerly was both Justice, and Public Works and Highways secretary, adeptly steered the proceedings exonerating the lady president from impeachment charges and thus eluded being thrown to the wolves at the upper branch of the Legislature called the Senate. His present preoccupation is undermined but if his stint at Congress has not yet reached the final third term, may again present himself as a candidate for reelection in his home province. At the Judiciary From Hiram Lodge No. 88- a past Grand Master and revered elder in the Fraternity whose appointment as the most eminent jurist of the judicial branch, being the most senior member at the bench was thought certain, was bypassed by the appointing authority using the political maneuver called revolving-door -policy. Although publicly admitting he was hurt, he accepted calmly the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune and promptly continued his work at the bench doubly aware that the All Seeing Eye never sleeps and that he will ultimately be vindicated by God Almighty. On December, 2006, he was finally appointed Chief Justice of the Supreme Court thus vindicating his case and finally reached the apex of his illustrious career at the bench. And finally, from the Executive Branch The Fraternity’s immediate past Grand Master, member of Alfonso Lee Sin No. 158 whose indispensable duty as Secretary of Public Works and Highways require that he performs without fanfare at the sidelines and also to do the tasks and biddings that his superior dictates. In February 2007, he was appointed Secretary of the Department of National Defense by the country’s president thus pole vaulting from the Department of Public Works and Highways to the more awesome task of defending the nation’s citizenry This brief history, first written in 2002, updated in 2006 and again revised to cover significant events to March 2007, can never end for as the earth rotates upon its own axis each day, worthy brothers also etch out daily their own accomplishments that bring honor and glory to this ancient and honorable Fraternity. Freemasonry are the Crypto-Jews who are living and coming in the Philippine island long time ago ladies and Gentlemen.... Hakhakhakhakhakhakhakhakhak.... Bistuhan na ito hakhakhakhak...sa totoo lang ayaw ko sana kaya lang sobra na e!!! hehehehehehehehe.... O ano gusto ninyo further elaboration??? Pati si Nur Misuari, Hashim Salamat, Al Hajj Murad, at Eid Kabalu ay FREEMASONS naren
Kaya lang gaya sa lahat ng nauna mong copy-paste sila man ay TUMATANGGI sa iyong mga bintang Islamic Democracy na walang botohan....hahahahahahaha! Some previously posted comments really makes sense by their argumentation
Avoid mudslinging and naming names and pursue those values that will display a true spirit of pinoy brotherhood Andres ang tigas talaga ng ulo mo bata ka...
Ilang beses pa ba naming sasabihin sa iyu na walang bumabasa sa mga napakahabang CUT-COPY-PASTE mo na articles... bobo naman... Abay,dimo ba alam na halos lahat ng mga Mason ay matitigas ang ulo at involved sa mga rebulosyon...BUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAKHAK...AMININ....HEHEHEHEHE....
UMUUSOK SILA SA GALIT HEKHEKHEKHEKHEK... BAKIT KAYA ANG GMANEWS.TV AY KAPUSO ANG GINAGAMIT?...HMMMM...ESEP-ESEP???HEHEHEHE...TSAKA Bakeeet ang GMA ay may picture ng Philippine Flag at ang Luneta kung saan nakatayo ang Bantayog ng Great Mason na si Jose Rizal????hekhekhekhekhek.... MGA MASON AT ROMANO KATOLIKO AY MGA CRYPTO-JEWS...BUWAHAHAHAHAHAHA.... PINAG BAWALAN PA AKONG MAGLAGAY NG PANGALAN PASENSYA NA NADALA LANG AKO HEHEHEHEHE FOUL PALA YUN HEHEHEHEHE!! Ako'y isang muslim sa puso't diwa Muslim na isinilang sa aking bansa Ako'y hindi sanay sa wikang mga banyaga
ARABIC ang kapalit ng sariling wika.....HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Sabayan mo ang kanta ni Florante...UNGGOY! NYAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Andres sinung maniniwalang muslim ka eh kristyano ang pangalan mo....pero may tama ka kc amoy arabo ka...hahahahahaha....weeeeeeeeeeeh!!! Andres ilantad mo na ang muslim mong pangalan
Huag mong ikahiya ang Islam Naaamuy ko talagang muslim ka nga, bato ang pampunas mo sa pwet at nakaupo ka kung umihi Maghugas ka muna ng kamay..... bago kumain at yung batong pamunas ilagay mo muna sa platito itabi mo sa hapag dahil baka gumulong...sayang galing pa naman yan sa Makka At napansin ba ninyo na ang Araw sa Flag na ginamit ng GMA7 ay yung nasa Flag nung unang flag na lumabas sa Pilipinas hehehehe...na kahawig ng sa mga Jewish na Star of David!!!hekehkhekhek...At napansin ba ninyo ang bantayog ni Rizal sa Luneta yung mismong pinatungan niya ay kamukha rin nung Unfinish Pyramid sa likod ng Great Seal ng Amerika...Hakhakhakhak...at yung coat of arms ng Pinas di niyo ba napapansin ang agila at ang lion na simbolo ng mga hudyo at ng Freemason hakhakhakhakhakhak...Ibang klase talaga ang mga crypto-Jews...hekhekhekhekhek
#60.1.1.2.1
Ibrahim
on
2009-06-02 15:38
(Reply)
Andres anak, tandaan mong kaliwang paa muna ang ipapasok mo sa toilet at kung makaapak ka ng ebak eh sana sa kaliwang paa ren
Tandaan mong mas nagiging masama sa muslim kung gawin sa kaliwa at mas nagiging mabuti naman kung gawin sa kanang kamay....para naman hindi masyadung masama kung ihagis mo ang bomba o supot ng ebak mo sa kaliwang kamay......hahahahaha! at Andres anak.....maligo ka naman...hindi pwede yang pahilahilamos lang at daanin mo sa perfume na amuy-lupa ren......hahahahahaha! Nakakalibang, nakaka-aliw, nakakabaliw maging muslim.....hahahahahaha! wrong interpretation? Ok, then were not going to use old testament. let limit our self to new testament. read this following verses:
In Mark 7:9, Jesus is critical of the Jews for not killing their disobedient children as prescribed by Old Testament law. In Luke 19:22-27, Jesus orders killed anyone who refuses to be ruled by him. With regards to the Hadith you just posts. That is pure nonsense. You and others doing this are taking selected passages and reading them completely out of context to support whatever argument you wish to make. As I just did qouting the Bible verses above. Good Luck! JESUS VS PHARISEES
He also said to them, “You neatly reject the commandment of God in order to set up your tradition. For Moses said, ‘Honor your father and your mother,’ and, ‘Whoever insults his father or mother must be put to death." -Mark 7:9 (Jesus is critical to Pharisees & Scribes who insist on the technicality of Moses Law because Jesus would want an interpretation of the OT by its substance & not by mere outward form) PARABLE OF TEN TALENTS The king said to him, ‘I will judge you by your own words, you wicked slave! So you knew, did you, that I was a severe man, withdrawing what I didn’t deposit and reaping what I didn’t sow? Why then didn’t you put my money in the bank, so that when I returned I could have collected it with interest?’ And he said to his attendants, ‘Take the mina from him, and give it to the one who has ten.’ But they said to him, ‘Sir, he has ten minas already!’ ‘I tell you that everyone who has will be given more, but from the one who does not have, even what he has will be taken away. But as for these enemies of mine who did not want me to be their king, bring them here and slaughter them in front of me!’” -Luke 19:22-27 (Jesus illustrates by using parables the forthcoming judgement of the wicked) PARABLES- Are not true-to-life stories, they are used to convey spiritual truth) Radical, i-solve mo muna ang gera ng mga muslim (Shias vs Sunni vs Wahhabis vs Fatihmids vs Ishmaelites vs Abbasids vs Talebans vs Kurds vs Maranao vs Tausugs dahilan sa doctrinang Jihad ni Mohammad) The ULAMMA center for Islam Propagation (KSA) have just issued a fatwa that says ALL INTERPRETATIONS OF THE QURAN & HADITH WILL BE BASED ON ITS LITERAL FORM When Mohammad says 'KILL' whether it is in Quran or Hadith it would mean literal killing. If he would say 'DECEIT' it would mean deceiving non-muslims literaly as it is (Would u guess why all muslims have the same mindset?) ON THE RECORDS:
Bible: Si Jesus ay namatay para sa tao Quran & Hadith: Si Muhammad ay pumatay ng maraming tao....ehehehehe! naka record sa Quran-Hadith ang kanyang krimen Ibang klase itong si Muslim Radical.....legaly insane, at hindi makita ang krimen ng MILF sa sibilyan naghahabol pa ng pabor at amnesty sa kanilang grupo eh ang dami nyo pang kaso sa estado?
Kahit si Adel Tamano at maraming grupong muslim ay umaayaw sa MUSLIM RADICALISM....kuha mo? Wow! this some kind of proselytizing eh?!
demonising other religion to advance own's religion. typical tacitcs of fooling unaware people to switch allegiance from one to other which have worse hidden defect. Amm... so far am little bit convinced by you... I think am seeing light at the end of the tunnel... inlighten me more by answering this question please... I thought your god is merciful and loving but read this following verses: 1 Samuel, chapter 15, verse 3: "Go now and put Amalek to the sword, putting to the curse all they have, without mercy: put to death every man and woman, every child and baby at the breast, every ox and sheep, camel and ass." Yahweh orders the destruction of an entire city, including children and even breastfeeding babies. This is a war crime under the Geneva Convention Hosea, chapter 13, verse 16 (chapter 14, verse 1 in some translations): "Samaria will be made waste, for she has gone against her God: they will be cut down by the sword, their little children will be broken on the rocks, their women who are with child will be cut open." More "pro-life" stuff, breaking up little children & cutting up pregnant women. Even Adolf Hitler didn't descend to this kind of despicable act. Psalm 137, verse 9:"How blessed will be the one who seizes and dashes your little ones against the rock." Ezekial chapter 9, verse 4-6: "The Lord commands: "... slay old men outright, young men and maidens, little children and women" Kill them all, after all, Yahweh commands it. See that little crying baby over there, slaughter it - that's an order Numbers, chapter 31, verses 17-18: "So now put every male child to death, and every woman who has had sex relations with a man. But all the female children who have had no sex relations with men, you may keep for yourselves." After slaughtering all the young boys and women following a battle, the victorious Israelite soldiers get to keep all the young virginal girls for their own enjoyment. Isiah chapter 13, verse 16: "Their young children will be broken up before their eyes; their goods will be taken away, and their wives made the property of others." More mindless slaughter, theft and rape all directed by the "loving" Christian god. And to think that I actually used to worship this cruel & vicious being! Exodus chapter 21, verse 7: "If a man sells his daughter as a female slave, she is not to go free as the male slaves do." Leviticus chapter 27, verse 6: "And if it be from a month old even unto five years old, then thy estimation shall be of the male five shekels of silver, and for the female thy estimation shall be three shekels of silver." Not only does the Bible condone slavery, it actually values female slaves as worth less money than males. Disgraceful. I have lot more but that is enough for now. You accusing others of being devils but you and your religion hiding something much more worse than any religion in the world. Can yo preach this in your congegation? I dont think so... ...and to Jesus, the mediator of a new covenant
-Hebrews 12:24 New Testament-Covenant supercedes the Old Testament-Covenant which means to say Old Testament teachings are to be replaced by the New one because it has served its purpose of introducing the Ministry of Jesus Whereas Quran & Hadith are declared immutable to say that KILLING INFIDELS & BREAKING OATHS AMONG NON-MUSLIMS will continue its evil-cycle forever. How dare you cursed the name of our Lord!
Do you not know you have just committed the ONLY SIN on earth that CAN NOT BE FORGIVEN? To mock or ridicule the Holy Spirit. And since you ridiculed Jesus and He is One with the Holy spirit so you also mock the Holy spirit fake malval. I feel sorry for you. That is the only sin that can not be forgiven in this world. So guess you already have a sure one-way ticket to hell. take care sa byahe mo... you will see muhamad there for sure. Speaking of Adel Tamano,what is his connection to Puno Family especially to Reynato Puno the Chief of Mischief Freemasonry in the Supreme Court????Hehehehe...Esep-esep uli..hakhakhakhak...
Who is Jesus Estanislao?and Davide Hilario???hakhakhakhak...What about the Mike Arroyo and Jok-Jok Bolanteng of rotary ikot ng ikot na parang mga Kabalistic rituals hakhakhakhakhak.... Freemasons are the culprits at the back of the Jesuits and Roman Catholics...Who supports weapons and arms of the MILF???Sabi nga ni Sec. Gonzales may naga supporta sang mga MILF sang bala kag armas!!!Bakit di ninyo tanungin ang Maguindanao Lodge!!! hekhekhekhek...magulo nu???Tapos biglang nag react si Pangilinan at si Enrile buwahahahahahahaha....Pangalanan daw kasi invoved yung pari sa surigao na isa ring masonic father tulad ni Aglipay na nagbiagy ng anting-anting sa yumaong diktador at mason an si Apo Ferdie hakhakhakhakahkahkahka Sino-sino ba talaga ang mga Freemasons dyan sa demonyong republic of the Jews-Philippines???Sino??? Pakisagot nga ninju mga ninja???hakhakhakhak...mga demolay,antharium,lions club,rotarians,gmanews at iba pang sangay ng Crypto-Jews groups dyan!!!! Ang bobo mo talaga andres..
Anu naman koneksyun ng FREEMASONRY sa galit mo sa mga katoliko? Hindi mo ba alam na kalaban din ang Katoliko at ang FREEMASONRY??? Bobo ka talaga noh... hakhakhak Kasi akala mo iisa ang katoliko at ang FREESMASONRY... hakhakhak please read your history and facts andres... kakahiya ka naman... Alam mo bang mismong roman catholic church ay galit sa FREEMASONRY dahil sa pag-aakala nilang mga atheist at anti-christ ang pagiging FREEMASON. Para kasing sinasabi mo na kakampi sila at iisa lang ang katoliko at FREEMASON.. hakhakhak bobo talaga.. GAGO ano koneksyon???BOBO ka talaga hehehehehe...gusto mong malaman??
SPIRIT TRUTH MINISTRIES RIGHTLY DIVIDING TRUTH FROM ERROR NOT BY MIGHT BUT BY HIS SPIRIT cont ILLUMINATI /SECRET SOCIETIES/FRONTS/ ANTICHRIST'S NEW WORLD ORDER Edmund Paris wrote a book that thoroughly documents the cunning and prowess of the Jesuits. He attributes the instigation of the world wars, and even the writing of 'Mein Kampf' to the Jesuits. Hitler himself stated, "I learned much from the Order of the Jesuits. Until now, there has never been anything more grandiose, on the earth, than the hierarchical organization of the Catholic church. I transferred much of this organization into my own party." Hitler, Mussolini, and Franco were all groomed and brought into power by the Jesuits and Catholic organizations. At the close of WWII, Catholics who knew what the Vatican had done, accused Pope Pius the XII of "having blood on his hands." The Jesuit's sworn, military mission to the Pope, (his primary weapon of counter-reformation) is to destroy or control all of Protestantism, and all countries not loyal to the Vatican. The charges against the Jesuits (Illuminati) are so dark and so unbelievable that most people won't even consider the heavy documentation and historical evidence against them for fear of being accused of religious hatred and bigotry. Another, more recent book by Eric Phelps he named 'Vatican Assassins, also documents the machinations of the Jesuits. The vow that Jesuits must take remained a secret for centuries but has been revealed by former Jesuits. The "vow" makes their evil mission crystal clear; that they are bound to prosecute warfare (covert) against any government or ruler that does not obey the edicts of the pope. This vow has been silently expanded to include anyone who is a threat to the Jesuits and their agendas as well. The extreme oaths supposedly taken by the Knights of Malta, Knights of Columbus, the Jesuits and Illuminati, seem extremely similar in origination. Freemasonry is completely incompatible with biblical Christianity. View this conclusive and revealing expose on secret Masonic practices, oaths and vows, the taking of which are heretical for Christians to participate in let alone take. If link does not appear, here is the address for the video: http://www.hickoryhammockbaptist.org/mason/dvdmason.html This occult conspiracy that is now in the process of completely taking over America (and the world aka: the government of the Antichrist) overtly through its Marxist / leftist wing of their cabal, was originally conceived by occultic "Illuminists" led by a Jesuit priest, Dr. Adam Weishaupt, right after the time when the Jesuits had been "suppressed" (dissolved) by their own pope because of their evil machinations. A former occultist, now powerful servant of Jesus, Pastor David Meyer, has crystal clear discernment and insight into their history, genesis and powerful satanic goals for mankind: "five men went into a cave near Ingolstadt, Bavaria, on May 1st, 1776. It was Dr. Adam Weishaupt, who with four other men, met in the cave at the behest of the Rothschild banking cartel to bring forth a conspiratorial plan to take over the world and present it one day to their god Lucifer. In that cave, these five men consulted with an invisible force that they called the controlling unknown. This “force” gave them the plan to recruit members of their new organization, which would become known as the Illuminati. They would conceal themselves by hiding in the high levels of the Masonic Lodge until they could foment revolutions and three world wars until their objective was achieved. There is much more to this story. When five men gather secretly in the realm of occultism, they represent the five points of the pentacle, a five-pointed star. Those five points are earth, wind, fire, water, and spirit." Pastor David Meyer's Last Trumpet Newsletter This is an absolutely critical insight that explains why by the end of the 18th century, Masonic lodges in America were being infiltrated and repossessed by the satanic force that originally created its seemingly altruistic "orders." The Jesuits were forced to morph into the ultimate evil underground secret society with goals of regaining control of the Catholic Church and the world. This also explains how many of our founding fathers who had been Freemasons had become Masons prior to the satanic "Illuminization" of the lodges, which became supercharged with occultic ideals and goals after great men like Washington had been members. Yes, it is possible to be used by God and yet be deeply flawed. (Obviously many of our founding fathers also owned slaves- though they claimed to disapprove of it.) Freemasonry went from being a fairly innocuous (yet highly influential and powerful) secret society (Freemasonry has NEVER been an appropriate association for a Christian to join even prior to it being "Illuminized") to becoming a front for the evil works of the Jesuits (This is my opinion/ analysis/ spiritual discernment of their history, though several brave scholars have exposed and share much of the same assessment. Remember that Satan often appears as an "angel of Light." I mention this because the Jesuits and Freemasons also perform many "good works" but it is a front that they must portray in order to cover their profoundly evil works. A genuine study of the history of the last several centuries, implicates the Jesuits and Freemasonry in all sorts of skulldugery. These secret societies are so powerful that they control the major "accepted" publications, text book publishers and the media in order to squelch any "mainstream" criticism or exposure of their cabal. People such as I are marginalized as being "conspiracy kooks" and most of the deceived and brainwashed populace (including the majority of Christians) agree with them! Researchers and prophetic ministers like David Meyer and myself, are either liars, lunatics or brave, godly discerners who are willing to lay down our lives and reputations in order to warn any one who might have ears to listen. The following is an article from www.myfortress.org (posted here because link was dead/ no copyright indicated) Masonic Lodge: Freemasons "I do not see how any Christian, most of all a Christian minister, can go into these lodges with unbelievers. They say they can have more influence for good, but I say they can have more influence for good by staying out of them and then reproving their evil deeds. You can never reform anything by unequally yoking yourself with ungodly men. True reformers separate themselves from the world. But, some say to me, if you talk that way you will drive all the members of secret societies out of your meetings and out of your churches. But what if I did? Better men will take their places. Give them the truth anyway and if they would rather leave their churches than their lodges, the sooner they get out of the churches the better. I would rather have ten members who are separated from the world than a thousand such members. Come out from the lodge. Better one with God than a thousand without Him. We must walk with God and if only one or two go with us, it is all right. Do not let down the standard to suit men who love their secret lodges or have some darling sin they will not give up." Dwight L. Moody Freemason Teachings: 1) When the candidate is going through the initiation ceremony, he is made to stand before the Worshipful Master and say something like: "I am lost in darkness, and I am seeking the light of Freemasonry." This is the case even for the Christian who has already been delivered from the kingdom of darkness into the kingdom of light--Christ's kingdom (Ephesians 5:8-11) 2) When the candidate is going through the initiation ceremony, he is made to swear a horrible blood oath, saying, "Binding myself under no less penalty that that of having my thraot cut across, mt tongue torn out by its roots, and my body buried in the rough sands of the sea, at lowwater mark, where the tide ebbs and flows twice in twenty-four hours, should I ever knowingly violate this my Entered Apprentice obligation. No Christian has any business taking oaths that speak of cutting the throat or tearing out his tongue if he gives away the secrets of the Lodge (Leviticus 5:4-6). 3) The candidate is taught that the Bible is not God's only revelation to humankind, but it is simply one of the many holy books that contain religious and moral truth. The Bible is said to be just a symbol of God's will. Other "revelatory" books include the Hindu Vedas and the Muslim Koran. This is an outrage to the on true God, who has given us all the truth He desires us to have in the Bible (Timothy 3:16, 2 Peter 1:21). 4) The candidate is taught that Jews, Christians, Hindus, Muslims, and those of and other faiths are all worshiping the same god using different names. God is said to be "the nameless one of a hundred names." This is so despite the fact that Christianity teaches a triune concept of God, Islam denies the Trinity and says that God cannot have a son, and Hinduism involves virtually millions of gods. 5) God's true name is said to be Jabulon- a name that associates the God of the Bible with Baal and Orsiris, ancient pagen deities. Baal worship in particular is the epitome of evil idol worship in the ancient world and involved such things as ritual prosititution (Judges 2:17, Hosea 4:13-14), self-mutilation (1 Kings 18:28), and the sacrificing (ritual murder) of the little children (Jermiah 19:4-5). 6) Freemasonary has strong connections to the ancient mystery religions, and often cites such false gods as Isis, Serpis, Osiris, Re, Apis, Thoth, Phtha, Hermes, Orpheus, and Horus. These are the very gods that the true God Yahweh condemned and judged through the hand of Moses (Exodus 7-12). 7) Jesus is viewed not as God but rather as a good, moral teacher. His name is systematically stripped from prayers and from Scripture verses cited within the Masonic Lodge. By contrast, the Bible not only asserts the absolute deity of Christ (John 1:1, 8:58;. 19:30, 20:28; Colossians 2:9), but tells us we should always pray in the name of Christ (John 16:24). Further, Christ Himself affirmed, "If any one is ashamed of me and my words, the Son of Man will be ashamed of him when he comes in his glory and the glory of the Father and the holy angels" (Luke 9:26). To ignore Christ is to do so at our own peril. 9) Man is said to be saved not by trusting in Christ but by engaging in good works and chartiable acs. This flatly goes against the clear teaching of Scripture (John 3:16; Acts 16:31; Romans 3:20-22; Ephesians 2:8,9). 10) Masonry makes no mention of the future judgment or the reality of hell, thus implying that all Masons will end up in heaven. Jesus taught that those who reject Him will suffer in hell for eternity (Matthew 25:46; 5:29-30; Luke 16:23; 2 Peter 2:4; Revelation 20:13-15). 11) Masonary involves various forms of occultism in its literature and rituals- including Kabbalism, Rosicrucianism, and alchemy. Scripture, by contrast, absolutely condemns all forms of occultism as detestable to God (Deuteronomy 18:10-12; Leviticus 19:31; Jeremiah 27:9; Micah 5-12). In view of how all these doctrines go against what God's Word reveals about these issues, it is obvious that the right decision for a Mason is to leave the Masonic Lodge. To not leave amounts to living in apostasy. Christian author Walton Hannah writes, "I am firmly convinced that for a Christian to pledge himself to a religious (or even, to avoid begging the question, to a quasi-religious) organization which offers prayer and worship to God which deliberately excludes the name of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, in whose name only salvation to be found, is apostatic." He notes that this is something that the early Christians in the first century would have never succumbed to. "Christians in those days were willing to face death rather than cast a few grains of incense to the Emperor or other deities." Ron Rhodes, Reasoning From The Scriptires With Masons Is Freemasonry A Religion? "Every Masonic Lodge is a temple of religion, and its teachings are instructions in ... the universal, eternal, immutable religion...." (Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, by Albert Pike, Washington D.C., 1958, pp. 213, 219.) "[Masonry is] ... the custodian and depository (since Enoch) of the great philosophical and religious truths, unknown to the world at large...." (Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, by Albert Pike, Washington D.C., 1958, p. 210.) "Without this religious element it would scarcely be worthy of cultivation by the wise and good...." (An Encyclopedia of Freemasonry, by Albert G. Mackey, 1921, pp. 618-619.) "The difference between a Lodge and a church is one of degree and not of kind." (Coil, Masonic Encyclopedia, p. 512; cf Lyndon Ellis, Blinded By the Lie, p. 42) "A religious service to commit the body of a deceased brother to the dust whence it came and to speed the liberated spirit back to the Great Source of Light. Many Freemasons make this flight with no other guarantee of a safe landing than their belief in the religion of Freemasonry." (New York: Macoy Publishing & Masonic Supply Co., 1961, pg 512) "There he stands (outside) our portals, on the threshold of this new Masonic life, in darkness, helplessness, and ignorance. Having been wandering amid the errors and covered only with the pollutions of the outer and profane world, he comes inquiringly to our doors, seeking the new birth, and asking a withdrawal of the veil which conceals divine truth from his uninitiated sight." (Albert Mackey, A Manual of the Lodge (New York: Charles Merrill, 1870) 20) "Every Masonic lodge is a temple of religion, and its teachings are instructions in religion... this is true religion revealed to the ancient patriarchs; which masonry has taught for many centuries, and which it will continue to teach as long as time endures." (Albert Pike, Morals And Dogma, Pg. 213-214) "The religion, then, masonry, is pure theism..." (Albert Mackey, A Lexicon Of Freemasonry, Pg. 402) "I consider freemasonry is a significantly organized school of mysticism to be entitled to be called a religion...Freemasonry... taught that each man can, by himself, work out his own conception of god and thereby achieve salvation..." (J.S.M. Ward, Freemasonry: Its Aims & Ideals, Pg.185) "I boldly avere that freemasonry is a religion, yet it no way conflicts with any other religion, unless that religion holds that no one outside its portals can be saved." (J.S.M. Ward, Freemasonry: Its Aims & Ideals, Pg.187) "The religion of Masonry is cosmopolitan, universal...." (Albert G. Mackey, An Encyclopedia of Freemasonry and Its Kindred Sciences, vol. 1 (Chicago: Masonic History Company, 1921), 301) "Masonry...is the universal, eternal, immutable religion...." (Albert Pike, 219) "Everything in Masonry has reference to God, implies God, speaks of God, points and leads to God. Not a degree, not a symbol, not an obligation, not a lecture, not a charge but finds its meaning and derives its beauty from God the Great Architect, in whose temple all Masons are workmen." (Joseph Fort Newton, The Religion of Masonry (Richmond: Macoy, 1969), 58-59) Their god Is The god Of Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, etc. "God is known as "the nameless one of a hundred names." (Henry Wilson Coil, "A Comprehensive View of Freemasonry," Richmond: Macoy Publishing, 1973, p. 192.) "For Masonry knows, what so many forget, that religions are many, but religion is one...therefore, it [Masonry] invites to its altar men of all faiths, knowing that, if they use different names for 'the nameless one of a hundred names,' they are yet praying to the one God and Father of all." (Joseph Fort Newton, "The Great Light in Masonry" (title of the section containing: "The Words of a Great Masonic Divine: The Bible and Freemasonry," in The Holy Bible: The Great Light in Masonry (Nashville: A. J. Holman, 1940) "God is equally present with the pious Hindu in the temple, the Jew in the synagogue, the Mohammedan in the mosque, and the Christian in the church. (Albert Mackey, "Mackey's Revised Encyclopedia of Freemasonry," Richmond: Macoy Publishing, 1966, 1:409-410.) "Freemasonry is not Christianity ... it admits men of every creed within its hospitable bosom...." (An Encyclopedia of Freemasonry, by Albert G. Mackey, 1921, pp. 618-619.) "[Freemasonry] reverences all the great reformers. It sees in Moses, the Lawgiver of the Jews, in Confucius and Zoroaster, in Jesus of Nazareth, and in the Arabian Iconoclast, great teachers of morality, and eminent reformers, if no more: and allows every brother of the Order to assign to each such higher and even divine character as his creed and truth require." (Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, by Albert Pike, Washington D.C., 1958, pp. 277, 525.) "The Bible, with all the allegories it contains, expresses, in an incomplete manner only, the religious science of the Hebrews." (A. Pike, Morals and Dogma (Charlestown: Southern Jurisdiction of the US, Supreme Council of the 33rd Degree, 1958) 744) "[The Mason] must declare his faith in a Supreme Being before he may be initiated. But note that he is not required to say, then or ever, what God. He may name him as he will, think of him as he pleases; make him impersonal law or personal and anthropomorphic; Freemasonry cares not...God, Great Architect of the Universe, Grand Artificer, Grand Master of the Grand Lodge Above, Jehovah, Allah, Buddha, Vishnu, Shiva, or Great Geometer." (Carl H. Claudy, Introduction to Freemasonry, vol. 2 (Washington: The Temple, 1984) Southern Baptist Convention and Freemasonry In 1993, the Southern Baptist Convention published a Report on Freemasonry. They concluded that they will not forbid its members from being members of a Masonic Lodge even though they admited that many teachings of Freemasonry are not compatible with christianity. This is tragic, how in the world could this happen? Below is the unorthodox teachings of Freemasonry that the Southern Baptist Convention found in its report: "The prevalent use of offensive concepts, titles, and terms such as Worshipful Master for the leader of the lodge; references to their buildings as mosques, shrines, or temples; and the use of words such as Abaddon and Jah-Bul-On, the so-called god. to many, these terms are not only offensive but sacralegious... The use of archaic, offensive rituals and so-called bloody oaths or obligations, among these being that entered that promised Entered Apprentice... The reference to the Bible placed on the altar of the lodge as the furniture of the lodge, comparing it to the square and compass rather than giving it the supreme place in the lodge... The implication that salvation may be attained by one's good works, implicit in the statement found in some Masonic writings that Masonry is continually reminded of that purity of life and conduct which is necessary to obtain admittance in the Celestial Lodge Above where the Supreme Architect of the Universe presides... The refusal of most lodges to admit for membership African-Americans." ("A Report on Freemasonry," Home Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention, 1993) Amazingly, the Southern Baptist Convention still thinks that it is ok for a Christian to be a member of Freemasonry! "In light of the fact that many tenets and teachings of Freemasonry are not compatible with Christianity and Southern Baptist doctrine, while others are compatible with Christianity and Southern Baptist doctrine, we therefore recommend that consistent with our denomination's deep convictions regarding the priesthood of the believer and the autonomy of the local church, membership in a Masonic Order be a matter of personal conscience. Therefore, we exhort Southern Baptists to prayerfully and carefully evaluate Freemasonry in the light of the Lordship of Christ, the teachings of the Scripture, and the findings of this report, as led by the Holy Spirit of God." ("A Report on Freemasonry," Home Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention, 1993) This report by the Southern Baptist Convention basically served as an endorsement for Freemasonry: "Because of your support, the vote of the Southern Baptist Convention is a historic and positive turning point for Freemasonary. Basically, it is a vitalization of our Faternity by America's largest Protestant denomination after nearly a year of thorough, scholarly study. At the same time, it is a call renewed effort on the part of all Freemasons today to re-engerize our Faternity and move forward to fulfilling its mission as the world's foremost proponent of Brotherhood of Man under the Fatherhood of God." (The Scottish Rite Journal, A Masonic Periodical, Reasoning From The Scriptures With Masons, Ron Rhodes) What Have Other Denominations Concluded? "An ungodly brotherhood of satanic darkness...there is an inherent incompatibility between Masonry and the Christian faith...there is a great danger that the Christian Mason may find himself compromising his allegiance to Jesus....total obedience to Christ precludes joining any organisation such as the Masonic movement which seems to demand a whole-hearted allegiance to itself, and at the same time refuses to divulge all that is involved in that allegiance prior to joining...The initiate is required to commit himself to Masonry in a way that a Christian should only commit himself to Christ"" (The Baptist Union of Scotland, 1965) "Masonry amounts to idolatry." (Lutheren Missouri Synod, 1959) "Masonry is a religious institution and as such is definitely anti-Christian." (Presbyterian General Assembly, Rochester, 1942) "There is a great danger that the Christian who becomes a Freemason will find himself comprising his Christian beliefs. Methodists should not become Masons." (Methodist General Assembly, London, 1985) "All organisations, whether secret and oath-bound or open, which are either avowedly religious, or practise the forms of religion, without confessing as a matter of principle the Triune God and Jesus Christ as the Son of God come in the flesh and our Saviour from sin... are anti-Christian." (The Lutheran Church of Australia, Doctrinal Statements and Theological Opinions, 1956) "There is an inherent incompatibility between Freemasonry and the Christian faith. Also that commitment within the movement is inconsistent with a Christian's commitment to Jesus Christ as Lord." (The Baptist Union of Great Britain and Ireland, 1988) "Freemasonry transgresses the first three Commandments by its use of titles and attributes of God not revealed in Scripture." (The Presbyterian Church of Queensland, The Lodge and Presbyterianism, 1987: 20) What The Bible Says: "Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? And what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? Or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? For ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you. And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty." 2 Corinthians 6:14-18 "And when they had kindled a fire in the midst of the hall, and were set down together, Peter sat down among them." Luke 22:55 "Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them. For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple." Romans 16:17-18 "Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son. If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds." 2 John 9-11 "Be not deceived: evil communications corrupt good manners." 1 Corinthians 15:33 "Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? Whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God." James 4:4 "Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him." 1 John 2:15 "And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God." Romans 12:2 "Now it came to pass, when they had heard the law, that they separated from Israel all the mixed multitude." Nehemiah 13:3 "Now the LORD had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's house, unto a land that I will shew thee." Genesis 12:1 "If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness; He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings, Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw thyself." 1 Timothy 6:3-5 "This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away." 2 Timothy 3:1-5 "Then they came to Zerubbabel, and to the chief of the fathers, and said unto them, Let us build with you: for we seek your God, as ye do; and we do sacrifice unto him since the days of Esarhaddon king of Assur, which brought us up hither. But Zerubbabel, and Jeshua, and the rest of the chief of the fathers of Israel, said unto them, Ye have nothing to do with us to build an house unto our God; but we ourselves together will build unto the LORD God of Israel, as king Cyrus the king of Persia hath commanded us." Ezra 4:2-3 "And the rest of the people, the priests, the Levites, the porters, the singers, the Nethinims, and all they that had separated themselves from the people of the lands unto the law of God, their wives, their sons, and their daughters, every one having knowledge, and having understanding...And that we would not give our daughters unto the people of the land, not take their daughters for our sons." Nehemiah 10:28, 30 "Depart ye, depart ye, go ye out from thence, touch no unclean thing; go ye out of the midst of her; be ye clean, that bear the vessels of the LORD." Isaiah 52:11 "Thy words were found, and I did eat them; and thy word was unto me the joy and rejoicing of mine heart: for I am called by thy name, O LORD God of hosts. I sat not in the assembly of the mockers, nor rejoiced; I sat alone because of thy hand: for thou hast filled me with indignation." Jeremiah 15:16-17 "Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful." Psalm 1:1 "Take fast hold of instruction; let her not go: keep her; for she is thy life. Enter not into the path of the wicked, and go not in the way of evil men. Avoid it, pass not by it, turn from it, and pass away." Proverbs 4:13-15 "And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues." Revelation 18:4 "And he spake unto the congregation, saying, Depart, I pray you, from the tents of these wicked men, and touch nothing of their's, lest ye be consumed in all their sins." Numbers 16:26 "Ephraim, he hath mixed himself among the people; Ephraim is a cake not turned." Hosea 7:8 "They did not destroy the nations, concerning whom the LORD commanded them: But were mingled among the heathen, and learned their works. And they served their idols: which were a snare unto them." Psalm 106:34-36 "When the LORD thy God shall bring thee into the land whither thou goest to possess it, and hath cast out many nations before thee, the Hittites, and the Girgashites, and the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and mightier than thou; And when the LORD thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them: Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son. For they will turn away thy son from following me, that they may serve other gods: so will the anger of the LORD be kindled against you, and destroy thee suddenly. But thus shall ye deal with them; ye shall destroy their altars, and break down their images, and cut down their groves, and burn their graven images with fire. For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God: the LORD thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth. The LORD did not set his love upon you, nor choose you, because ye were more in number than any people; for ye were the fewest of all people: But because the LORD loved you, and because he would keep the oath which he had sworn unto your fathers, hath the LORD brought you out with a mighty hand, and redeemed you out of the house of bondmen, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt. Know therefore that the LORD thy God, he is God, the faithful God, which keepeth covenant and mercy with them that love him and keep his commandments to a thousand generations; And repayeth them that hate him to their face, to destroy them: he will not be slack to him that hateth him, he will repay him to his face. Thou shalt therefore keep the commandments, and the statutes, and the judgments, which I command thee this day, to do them." Deuteronomy 7:1-11 "In those days also saw I Jews that had married wives of Ashdod, of Ammon, and of Moab: And their children spake half in the speech of Ashdod, and could not speak in the Jews' language, but according to the language of each people. And I contended with them, and cursed them, and smote certain of them, and plucked off their hair, and made them swear by God, saying, Ye shall not give your daughters unto their sons, nor take their daughters unto your sons, or for yourselves. Did not Solomon king of Israel sin by these things? yet among many nations was there no king like him, who was beloved of his God, and God made him king over all Israel: nevertheless even him did outlandish women cause to sin. Shall we then hearken unto you to do all this great evil, to transgress against our God in marrying strange wives? And one of the sons of Joiada, the son of Eliashib the high priest, was son in law to Sanballat the Horonite: therefore I chased him from me. Remember them, O my God, because they have defiled the priesthood, and the covenant of the priesthood, and of the Levites. Thus cleansed I them from all strangers, and appointed the wards of the priests and the Levites, every one in his business; And for the wood offering, at times appointed, and for the firstfruits. Remember me, O my God, for good." Nehemiah 13:23-31 "And now, O our God, what shall we say after this? for we have forsaken thy commandments, Which thou hast commanded by thy servants the prophets, saying, The land, unto which ye go to possess it, is an unclean land with the filthiness of the people of the lands, with their abominations, which have filled it from one end to another with their uncleanness. Now therefore give not your daughters unto their sons, neither take their daughters unto your sons, nor seek their peace or their wealth for ever: that ye may be strong, and eat the good of the land, and leave it for an inheritance to your children for ever. And after all that is come upon us for our evil deeds, and for our great trespass, seeing that thou our God hast punished us less than our iniquities deserve, and hast given us such deliverance as this; Should we again break thy commandments, and join in affinity with the people of these abominations? wouldest not thou be angry with us till thou hadst consumed us, so that there should be no remnant nor escaping? O LORD God of Israel, thou art righteous: for we remain yet escaped, as it is this day: behold, we are before thee in our trespasses: for we cannot stand before thee because of this. Now when Ezra had prayed, and when he had confessed, weeping and casting himself down before the house of God, there assembled unto him out of Israel a very great congregation of men and women and children: for the people wept very sore. And Shechaniah the son of Jehiel, one of the sons of Elam, answered and said unto Ezra, We have trespassed against our God, and have taken strange wives of the people of the land: yet now there is hope in Israel concerning this thing. Now therefore let us make a covenant with our God to put away all the wives, and such as are born of them, according to the counsel of my lord, and of those that tremble at the commandment of our God; and let it be done according to the law. Arise; for this matter belongeth unto thee: we also will be with thee: be of good courage, and do it. Then arose Ezra, and made the chief priests, the Levites, and all Israel, to swear that they should do according to this word. And they sware. Then Ezra rose up from before the house of God, and went into the chamber of Johanan the son of Eliashib: and when he came thither, he did eat no bread, nor drink water: for he mourned because of the transgression of them that had been carried away. And they made proclamation throughout Judah and Jerusalem unto all the children of the captivity, that they should gather themselves together unto Jerusalem; And that whosoever would not come within three days, according to the counsel of the princes and the elders, all his substance should be forfeited, and himself separated from the congregation of those that had been carried away. Then all the men of Judah and Benjamin gathered themselves together unto Jerusalem within three days. It was the ninth month, on the twentieth day of the month; and all the people sat in the street of the house of God, trembling because of this matter, and for the great rain. And Ezra the priest stood up, and said unto them, Ye have transgressed, and have taken strange wives, to increase the trespass of Israel. Now therefore make confession unto the LORD God of your fathers, and do his pleasure: and separate yourselves from the people of the land, and from the strange wives. Then all the congregation answered and said with a loud voice, As thou hast said, so must we do. But the people are many, and it is a time of much rain, and we are not able to stand without, neither is this a work of one day or two: for we are many that have transgressed in this thing. Let now our rulers of all the congregation stand, and let all them which have taken strange wives in our cities come at appointed times, and with them the elders of every city, and the judges thereof, until the fierce wrath of our God for this matter be turned from us. Only Jonathan the son of Asahel and Jahaziah the son of Tikvah were employed about this matter: and Meshullam and Shabbethai the Levite helped them. And the children of the captivity did so. And Ezra the priest, with certain chief of the fathers, after the house of their fathers, and all of them by their names, were separated, and sat down in the first day of the tenth month to examine the matter. And they made an end with all the men that had taken strange wives by the first day of the first month." Ezra 9:10-10:17 "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." John 14:6 "Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved." Acts 4:12 "For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus." 1 Timothy 2:5 "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made." John 1:1-3 WHAT THE BIBLE TEACHES ABOUT FREEMASONRY "Half a million Southern Baptists (at least) are now Masons including many Southern Baptist pastors, ministers of education, deacons, and directors of missions." (Minutes of the General Assembly, appendix R, The Report of the Ad-Interim Committee to Study Freemasonry, 16th General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in America, 6 June 1988, 64-65) Eto po ang sinulat mo andres ugok...
"Freemasons are the culprits at the back of the Jesuits and Roman Catholics...Who supports weapons and arms of the MILF???" Kaya nagtanong ako kung bakit mo nasabing yan na Freemasons are the culprits behind Jesuits and Roman Catholics eh magka-away naman sila!!! ANg bobo mo andres.. nabiktima ka ng sariling COPY-PASTE mo.. eto pa sinulat mo sa reply blog mo "Freemasonry is completely incompatible with biblical Christianity". Do you understand that statement?! Ha?! That means hindi pareho ang freemansory at christianity!! So papaano mo masabi na ang freemasonry ang nasa likod ng roman catholics eh magkalaban naman sila. Bobo mo... Mali yung conspiracy theory mo na ang freemasons at roman catholics ay IISA. Kasi magka away nga silA!!! tigas ulo... hakhakhak... ikaw mismo ang sumagot sa contradiction mo... kahiya naman... Patunayan mo na totoong magkaaway ang dalawang yan hehehehehehe....The burden to prove and to convince us is yours!!!hehehehe...ang Question lang ay kung paano mo mapapatunayan...madaling magsabi na magkaaway sila...Pwede ko ring sabihin na kunwari lang yun or drama lang yun para linlangin ang madla diba?Ano ang logic?Karamihan sa mga mason ay mga Katoliko tama?Paano naman kakalabanin ng Romano katoliko ang mga mason na katoliko???Maaring ang dalawang grupo na yan ay magkalaban pero paano mo kakalabanin gayung ang mga miyembro ng Mason na yan ay miyembro din ng Romano Katoliko????Hekhekhekhek yan ang logic at yan ang tunay na BOBO!!!hekhekhekhek...
Halimbawa yung binabanggit kong Crypto-Jews ay mga Hudyo na nagkunwaring mga Cristiaos Novos or mga Cristianos Nuevos or mga Jews na umakap sa Romano Katoliko...Papaano mo mapapatunayan na ang lahat ng mga Crypto-Jews na Katoliko ay loyal sa Katoliko???Diba??Papaano mo mapapatunayan na ang mga Rotarians na mga Katoliko ay loyal sa Katolisismo???Gayung mga Jewish mason ang mga yan???At takenote mayron ding mga Paring Mason at mga Jesuits pa,halimbawa lang niyan ay yung GomBurZa,Si Aglipay ay isang Heswita...Papaano ka nakakasigurong lahat ng mga Jesuits ay hindi mason???Mismong mga Bishops ay may mga mason!!!Papaano yan??? Hekhekhekhek... Bobo ang Philosophy mo ay mababaw at nagpapakita ng pagiging pangalan mo.Wala kang logic at para bagang isa kang Parot na ngawa ng ngawa na wala namang laman ang nginangawa...hekhekhekhek... Bobo hindi ka ba nahihiya or tinatablan sa sinasabi kong BOBO ka!!! Hakhakhak ang bobo mo andres....
Sabi ko patunayan ko nga magkaaway ang freemasonry at roman catholics.. Eh ikaw na mismo ang sumagot sa challenge mo bobo... basahin mo ng maayos ang comment # 67.1 na COPY-PASTE mo... at iyan ang sagot sa challenge mo! Siguro hindi mo binabasa at ini-intindi ang mga COPY-PASTE articles mo andres noh... Yung comment # 67.1 mo ang mismong sagot kung bakit ang freemasonry at roman catholics ay hindi IISA. hakhakhak Ang bobo mo kasi ikaw pa ang mismong nagbigay ng sagot at hiya sa sarili mo.. nyahahahaha read comment 67.1 mo... yan ang sagot! BUWAHAHAHAHAHA AY TANGA!TANGA!TANGA!HAKHAKHAKHAK....HINDI NIYA NAKUHA ANG LAMAN NUNG SINABI KO....HINDI mo pala naintidihan ang sinabi ko doon na ganito.."madaling magsabi na magkaaway sila...Pwede ko ring sabihin na kunwari lang yun or drama lang yun para linlangin ang madla diba?Ano ang logic?Karamihan sa mga mason ay mga Katoliko tama?Paano naman kakalabanin ng Romano katoliko ang mga mason na katoliko???"
Porket nagkuwento ako ng ganun ay yun daw ang katunayan hakhakhakhak...wala pa lang alam ito sa tinatawag na scenario..hehehehe e ang tinatanong ko ay paano nga mapapatunayan na magka-awaya sila???Paradox yung ibinigay kong statements hakhakhakhakhak...kinonsider ba namang yun daw at pinatunayan ko hakhakhakhak...Kung mag-aral ka ng Philosophy tiyak 100% lagpak ka hakhakhak....wala palang alam ito sa mga klase ng statements...buwahakhakhakhakhak.... Mabuhay si Gloria Arroyo!
Ibinasura na niyang tuluyan ang MOA-AD! Gusto siyang patayin ng mga muslim sa ginawa niya, gusto rin siyang patayin ng mga kristyano at minorities dahil ibinenta niya ang bansa Naipasok na ang Cha-cha kaya mabuhay siyaaaaaa! Mabuhay siyaaaaaa, kailangan niyang mabuhay para mai-torture muna....he-he-he-he! You dont need to be a bible scholar to understand the life stories & ideals of Muhammad but YOU NEED TO BE A MUSLIM to understand that
A MUSLIM PROPHET IS ENTITLED TO MARRY AND CONSUME MARRIAGE TO AN 8 YEAR OLD A MUSLIM PROPHET IS ENTITLED TO MOLEST CHILD-GIRL SLAVES A MUSLIM PROPHET IS ENTITLED TO BREAK OATHS-TREATIES WITH NON-MUSLIMS A MUSLIM PROPHET IS ALLOWED TO KILL & GIVE ORDERS TO KILLING CIVILIANS Quran 4:24 Quran 23:6 Quran 33:50 Quran 70:30 Quran 2:187 Hadith- Bukhari 6:316 Tabari 7:97 (Pls read for yourself) For muslims it is acceptable for our Prophet Muhammad (PUH) to behave this way that's why we find no fault at all to the Quran or Hadith aaaaaaaaw grabe yan this is but plain to mean a religious cult
Andami kong abasang kalokohan dito ang ginagawa nyo kc ay junijugde ang tao at ngayon alam nyo nagpapauto lang kayo sa internet kayo ng tanda tanda nyo na ay pinagbabasehan nyo ung kalokohan ng anti-islam missionaries, at ngayon nagsisilabasan ang mga walang kewntang komento na puro paninira sa Islam hindi daw Arabo si Muhammad, basahin mo muna ang Arabian History ha hindi ung biased na cnsbi ng kung cnucno ang pangalan ng tatay ni Muhammad(pbuh) ay 'Abdullah ibn 'Abdul Muttalib, at namatay xa at inampon xa ng uncle nya kahit grade 1 malalaman na pure Arab c Muhammad, taz yang sapilitan daw ang islam at patayan na yan bago kayo magsabi ng ganyan basahin nyo muna ang Quran at ang sarili nyong bibliya bakit? Basahin nyo ito, unahin natin bible mo kung MAY FREEDOM BA NG RELIGION, 2 Chronicles 15:13 "All who would not seek the LORD, the God of Israel, were to be put to death, whether small or great, man or woman." AH GANUN? MAY FREEDOM DAW KPG DKA SUMUNOD AYON SA BIBLE PATAY KA AGAD, eh sa Quran? Noble Verse 18:29 "Say, 'The truth is from your Lord': Let him who will believe, and let him who will, reject (it): for the wrong doers We have prepared a Fire whose (smoke and flames), like the walls and roof of a tent, will hem them in: if they implore relief they will be granted water like melted brass, that will scald their faces, how dreadful the drink! How uncomfortable a couch to recline on!" LET HIM WHO REJECT IT AYAN UNG FREEDOM NILALAGNAT KA ATA D MO ALAM CNSBI MO, isa pa
Noble Verse 2:256 "Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from error: whoever rejects evil and believes in Allah hath grasped the most trustworthy handhold, that never breaks. And Allah heareth and knoweth all things." LET THERE BE NO COMPULSIOM IN RELIGION AYAN UNG FREEDOM PURO KAYO QUOTE HINDI NYO ALAM KUNG ANO NANDUN ITO UNG SABI NG ISANG POSTER AT UNG LIE NINYO SA PATAYAN DITO KO NA SASAGUTIN AT MAKIKITA SA BIBLIYA YANG PATAYAN NA CNSBI MO, #70 Radical on 2009-06-03 14:07 (Reply) You dont need to be a bible scholar to understand the life stories & ideals of Muhammad but YOU NEED TO BE A MUSLIM to understand that A MUSLIM PROPHET IS ENTITLED TO MARRY AND CONSUME MARRIAGE TO AN 8 YEAR OLD A MUSLIM PROPHET IS ENTITLED TO MOLEST CHILD-GIRL SLAVES A MUSLIM PROPHET IS ENTITLED TO BREAK OATHS-TREATIES WITH NON-MUSLIMS A MUSLIM PROPHET IS ALLOWED TO KILL & GIVE ORDERS TO KILLING CIVILIANS Quran 4:24 Quran 23:6 Quran 33:50 Quran 70:30 Quran 2:187 Hadith- Bukhari 6:316 Tabari 7:97 (Pls read for yourself) For muslims it is acceptable for our Prophet Muhammad (PUH) to behave this way that's why we find no fault at all to the Quran or Hadith ayan ung cnbi nya hindi ko na rereplyan ung nasa itaas wala namang proof sasagutin ko lng ung mga verses na kinowt nya read this! Does Islam really allow muslim men to rape female slaves? A refutation of the false claims concerning this issue (slaves in islam) By Karim (He is a new convert to Islam, from the Netherlands) Blue = text of the christian missionary sham shamoun Black = my islamic response Contents: Refutation of sham shamoun’s false claim ( does islam really allow muslim men to rape female slaves ? ) Status of Slave Women in Islam What about the female slaves who were married ? Islam restored dignity to slaves and enhanced their social status The Non-Muslim Perspective (about the position of slaves in Islam) Fatwa by Dr. Taha Jaber Al-`Alwani and Sheikh Muhammad Nur Abdullah The christian missionary sham shamoun on his website writes: Here is a reference permitting to rape captive women: Also (prohibited are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess: Thus hath God ordained (Prohibitions) against you: Except for these, all others are lawful, provided ye seek (them in marriage) with gifts from your property, - desiring chastity, not lust, seeing that ye derive benefit from them, give them their dowers (at least) as prescribed; but if, after a dower is prescribed, agree Mutually (to vary it), there is no blame on you, and God is All-knowing, All-wise. S. 4:24 Y. Ali The above passage emphatically allows for the raping of women that are taken captive, even if these captives happened to be married! It did not remain an abstract theoretical right, but was readily put into practice by the Muslim jihadists: Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa'id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): O Abu Sa'id, did you hear Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-'azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi'l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing 'azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah's Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. (Sahih Muslim, Book 008, Number 3371) Ibn Kathir wrote: except those women whom you acquire through war, for you are allowed such women after making sure they are not pregnant. Imam Ahmad recorded that Abu Sa’id Al-Khudri said, "We captured some women from the area of Awtas who were already married, and we disliked having sexual relations with them because they already had husbands. So, we asked the Prophet about this matter, and this Ayah was revealed… . Consequently, we had sexual relations with these women." This is the wording collected by AT-Tirmidhi, An-Nasa’i, Ibn Jarir and Muslim in his Sahih. (Tafsir Ibn Kathir (Abridged) Volume 2, Parts 3, 4 & 5 (Surat Al-Baqarah, Verse 253, to Surat An-Nisa, Verse 147), abridged by a group of scholars under the supervision of Shaykh Safiur-Rahman Al-Mubarakpuri [Darussalam Publishers & Distributors, Riyadh, Houston, New York, Lahore; First edition, March 2000], p. 422; bold emphasis ours) Response: Before i start with my response to sham shamoun’s comments i first want to tell the reader that only non-muslim prisoners of war could become slaves in islam (therefore slavery was doomed to disappear with the expansion of Islam). It’s important to know that slaves in islam had the same right to respect and good treatment like any other human being.,I shall show and proof the reader that the raping of female slaves is forbidden in islam, rather islam gave men the permission to have sexual intercourse with their slave-girl and this did certainly not mean that muslim men could rape their female slaves (female prisoners of war ) , since Allah swt and the prophet (saw) command muslim men to treat their slave girls well and with respect and dignity. The next quotations from the authentic hadith proof that the raping of female slaves is forbidden in islam: Related by Al-Daraqutni, Ibn Majah and Ahmad: “The Prophet said, “There shall be no infliction of harm on oneself or others". ‘Others’ includes all people, so also slavegirls ! Raping a slavegirl is clearly doing her harm (emotional and physical) which would be a big sin for a muslim to commit and violation of the above hadith. Moreover the prophet (peace be upon him) commanded muslims to treat their slaves well and with respect, which clearly proofs that rape of female slaves is forbidden in islam. The prophet (peace be upon him) said: Your servants and your slaves are your brothers. Anyone who has slaves should give them from what he eats and wears. He should not charge them with work beyond their capabilities. If you must set them to hard work, in any case I advise you to help them. Source: Bukhari, Iman, 22; Adab, 44; Muslim, Iman, 38–40; Abu Dawud, Adab, 124 Ali reported that the last words of the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, were: "The prayer! The prayer! Fear Allah concerning your slaves ! " Source: Al-Adab al-Mufrad Al-Bukhari , Nr. 158. · Jabir ibn 'Abdullah said, "The Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, advised that slaves should be well-treated. He said, 'Feed them from what you eat and clothe them from what you wear. Do not punish what Allah has created.' " Source: Al-Adab al-Mufrad Al-Bukhari , Nr. 188. · Sallam ibn 'Amr reported from one of the Companions of the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, "Your slaves are your brothers, so treat him well. Ask for their help in what is too much for you and help them in what is too much for them." Source: Al-Adab al-Mufrad Al-Bukhari , Nr. 190. · Abu Hurayra reported that the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, "The slave has his food and clothing. Do not burden a slave with work which he is incapable of doing." Source: Al-Adab al-Mufrad Al-Bukhari , Nr. 192. Not one of you should [ when introducing someone ] say ‘This is my slave’ , ‘This is my concubine’. He should call them ‘my daughter’ or ‘my son’ or ‘my brother’. Source: Ibn Hanbal, Musnad, 2 ,4 For this reason ‘Umar and his servant took it in turns to ride on the camel from Madina to Jerusalem on their journey to take control of Masjid al-Aqsa. While he was the head of the state, ‘Uthman had his servant pull his own ears in front of the people since he had pulled his. Abu Dharr, applying the hadith literally, made his servant wear one half of his suit while he himself wore the other half. From these instances, it was being demonstrated to succeeding generations of Muslims, and a pattern of conduct established, that a slave is fully a human being, not different from other people in his need for respect and dignity and justice. "The masters were obliged not to put slaves under hardship; slaves were not to be tortured, abused or treated unjustly. They could marry among “themselves with their master's permission - or with free men or women ! They could appear as witnesses and participate with free men in all “affairs. Many of them were appointed as governors, commanders of army and administrators. In the eyes of Islam, a pious slave has precedence over “an impious free man." Source: Al-Tabataba'i, Tafsir ( vol.16, pp. 338-358 ) The Prophet, upon him peace, had stipulated in his "last pilgrimage" speech: "And your slaves ! see that you feed them such food as you eat yourselves and dress them what you yourself wear. And if they commit a “mistake which you are not inclined to forgive then sell them, for they are the servants of Allah and are not to be tormented! " Source: Ibn Sa'd, op. cit., vol. II:1, p. 133 And again in another hadith the prophet (saw) makes clear that rape of female slaves is forbidden, The prophet (peace be upon him) said: “Whoever causes harm to others subjects himself to harm caused by God.” Source: Related by Ibn Majah and Abu Dawood on the authority of Abu Sirmah. “You must refrain from dealing wickedly with others, for that would count as a benefaction you do to yourself”. Source: Related by Al-Bukhari and Muslim on the authority of Abu Tharr. ‘Others’ includes all people, so also slavegirls ! Raping a slavegirl is clearly doing her harm (emotional and physical) which would be a big sin for a muslim to commit and violation of the above hadith. Allah swt also commands in the Qur’an muslims to treat their slaves (female slaves) kindly: "Serve God, and join not any partners with Him ; and do good to parents, kinsfolk, orphans, those in need, neighbours who are near, neighbours “who are strangers, the Companion by your side, the way-farer (ye meet), And what your right hands possess : for God loveth not the arrogant, the “vainglorious" Surah An Nisa, verse 36 The phrase "What your right hands possess" refers to one’s slaves (male and female). Allah swt ordains the kind treatment of slaves in the same verse where He commands man to worship Him and to treat his parents, relations and neighbours generously, and this signifies the importance of this ruling. For more proof read:: http://www.answering-christianity.com/right_hand_possession.htm -Status of Slave Women in Islam When Islam was reveled to Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him), slavery was a worldwide common social phenomenon; it was much older than Islam. Slavery was deeply rooted in every society to the extent that it was impossible to imagine a civilized society without slaves. In spite of this social fact, Islam was the first religion to recognize slavery as a social illness that needed to be addressed. Since slavery was deeply rooted in the society, Islam did not abolish it at once. Rather, Islam treated slavery in the same manner it treated other social illnesses. Islam followed the same methodology of gradual elimination in dealing with this social disease as it did with other social illnesses, for example: the prohibition of alcohol in three steps. Concerning having slave women, we would like to let you know that it happens to be a practice necessitated by the condition in which early Muslims found themselves vis-a-vis non-Muslims, as both parties engaged in wars. Slave women or milk al-yameen are referred to in the Qur'an as “Those whom your right hand possess” or “ma malakat aymanukum”; they are those taken as captives during conquests and subsequently became slaves, or those who were descendants of slaves. Thus, it was a war custom in the past to take men and women as captives and then turn them into slaves. Islam did not initiate it, rather, it was something in practice long ago before the advent of Islam. And when Islam came, it tried to eradicate this practice, bit by bit. So it first restricted it to the reciprocal practice of war, in the sense that Muslims took war captives just as the enemies did with Muslims. But as it aimed at putting an end to such issue, Islam laid down rules which would eventually lead to eradicating the practice. So it allowed Muslims to have intercourse with slave women taken as captives of just and legitimate wars. In so doing, the woman would automatically become free if she got pregnant. What's more, her child would also become free. Not only that, Islam also ordered a Muslim to treat the slave woman in every respect as if she were his wife. She should be well fed, clothed and given due protection. In the family environment, she had the opportunity to learn about Islam and was free to accept it or reject it. She also had the opportunity to earn her freedom for she could be ransomed. In the light of the above-mentioned facts, and the nature of the question posed by people, it's clear that some people misunderstand the wisdom behind the permissibility of having female slaves and think that it is meant to unleash men’s desires and give them more enjoyment. Never ! That is not the point ! It is, rather, means of freeing slaves; and this is clarified above in the fact that if a master got a female slave pregnant, then he could neither sell her nor give her away as a present. And if he died, she would not be considered part of his property. She'd receive her freedom and her baby would also be free. But, we have to stress that this case should not be confused with that of female servants or maids, for they are free and not slaves. Therefore, it is forbidden to engage in sexual relations with them except through an Islamic marriage. Slavery has been abolished by international conventions, and goes in line with aims and objectives of Islam, as it has called for centuries ago. As for marrying slaves, it is something permissible under two conditions: first, if one is unable to pay the dowry of a free woman. Second, if there is fear of committing adultery if one doesn’t get married. This is clarified by the following verse: “And whose is not able to afford to marry free, believing women, let them marry from the believing maids whom your right hands possess. This is “for him among you who feareth to commit sin. But to have patience would be better for you.” (An-Nisaa’: 25) This verse shows that Muslim men should abstain from illicit relations and seek enjoyment through marriage to free women or through their female slaves. In conclusion, Allah has forbidden certain types of behavior and permitted other kinds of behavior as a safeguard to the individual and to the society. Allah has forbidden fornication and adultery. However, in the case of captives whom your right hands posses, it's something necessitated by the special circumstances which were created when the Muslims were at war.” Source: Status of Slave Women in Islam -What about the female slaves who were married ? Mufti Ebrahim Desai in his fatwa comments: After their return to Islamic territory. Each soldier was then entitled to have relations only with the slave girl over which he was given the right of ownership and not with those slave girls that were not in his possession. This right of ownership was given to him by the “Ameerul-Mu'mineen” (Head of the Islamic state.) Due to this right of ownership, It became lawful for the owner of a slave girl to have intercourse with her ( which doesn’t mean that he can rape her, since doing harm to female slaves and rape in general is strict forbidden in islam, see the hadith quoted in my previous sections in this article as proof ). If a slave woman was married previously in enemy territory to a non-Muslim, and is then captured alone, i.e. without her husband, it is not permissible for any Muslim to have relations with her until her previous marriage is nullified, and that is done by bringing her to an Islamic country and making her the legal possession of a Muslim. Bringing her into Islamic territory necessitates the rendering of her previous marriage as null and void by Islamic law because with her husband in enemy territory and she in Islamic territory, it becomes virtually impossible for them to meet and live as man and wife. That is why it is not permissible to have intercourse with a woman whose husband is also taken into captivity and put into slavery with her. Another resemblance between the two is that, just as a divorcee has to spend a period called "Iddat" before another man is allowed to marry her, similarly, a slave woman has to spend a period called "Istibraa" before her owner can have coition with her. Rasulullah (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) enjoined his followers to treat the slaves kindly, gently, and, above all, to regard them as members of the family. In this way, they were made to feel wanted; which was far better than treating them as outcasts and leaving them to wander the streets of a strange society in a peniless, destitute condition. Such treatment would have ultimately forced them to take up evil occupations such as prostitution in the case of slave woman in order to fill their hungry stomachs. The First World War in 1914 was a clear reflection of the evils involved in setting captive women free to roars about in a strange society with strange surroundings. During that war, German and English women prisoners on either side were set free to roam the streets with no-one to feed them. The result was obvious that they resorted to other unrefined and uncivilised methods of income on the streets. Thus, it is evident that the Islamic treatment of women prisoners of war was conducive towards better social relations and led to the refinement of their overall social lives. Over and above all this, History will show that Islam did not encourage slavery but rather encouraged moves towards the extirpation of slavery. Rasulullah Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam has said something to this effect in a Hadith, that: "Whosoever freed a Muslim slave, the Lord would redeem all his limbs - in compensation for each limb of the slave, so much so that the private parts for the private parts - from the Fire of Hell. If a slave woman becomes pregnant from her owner, and delivers his child, she automatically gets her freedom after the death of her master whose child she gave birth to. Moreover, there are many wrongs and sins for which the liberation of a slave serves as a compensation and atonement. This was a further incentive for the extirpation of slavery. Rasulullah Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam also taught that whosoever teaches good manners to his slave girl, adorns her with politeness and good education, then frees her and gets married to her, for him there is double recompense and reward. These encouraging teachings served as incentives towards the emancipation of slaves and slaves were liberated by the thousands. Rasulullah Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam himself freed 63 slaves, Hazrat Abu Bakr Radhiallahu Anhu freed 63, Hazrat Abdur-Rahman bin Auf Radhiallahu Anhu 30,000; Hazrat Hakim bin Huzam Radhiallahu Anhu 100; Hazrat Abbas Radhiallahu Anhu 70; k Hazrat Ayesha Radhiallahu Anha 69; Hazrat Abdullah bin Umar Radhiallahu Anhu 100; Hazrat Uthman Radhiallahu Anhu used to free one slave every Friday and he would say that he would free any slave who performed his prayers-with humility. k Hazrat Zul-Kilah Radhiallahu Anhu freed 8,000 slaves in a single day. Hazrat Umar Radhiallahu Anhu passed certain laws during his Khilafat which led to the emancipation of thousands of slaves, and to the prevention of certain specific forms of slavery. Some of the edicts that he issued: 1. All the apostate tribes that were enslaved during the Khilaafat of Hazrat Abu Bakr Radhiallahu Anhu were to be freed. 2. A Zimmi (protected non-Muslim subject of an Islamic state) should not be enslaved. 3. Arabs will not be enslaved. 4. Those who had been enslaved during the days of ignorance (prior to the advent of Islam) and had lived to witness the Islamic era, should redeem themselves from slavery by paying their costs (their value) to their owners whether they were willing or not. As a result of all these laws, there came a time when slavery was totally extirpated. But of course, this extirpation came about after a gradual process because that was the only safe and expedient way of tackling the problem. Islam restored dignity to slaves and enhanced their social status Guardianship: A father or grandfather had absolute authority over his offspring. He could sell or gift him or her away; could lend him or her to someone else, or exchange him or her with another's son or daughter. When Islam came on the scene, it nullified and negated the last two factors completely. No ruler or progenitor was allowed to treat his subjects or offspring as his slaves. Every individual was bestowed with well-defined rights; the ruler and the ruled, the progenitor and the offspring had to live within the limits prescribed by religion; no one could transgress those limits. And it drastically restricted the first cause, i.e., war, by allowing enslavement only in a war fought against unbelieving enemy. In no other way could anyone be enslaved. At the same time, Islam raised the status of slavery to that of a free man; and opened many ways for their emancipation Source: al-Tabataba'i, Sayyid Muhammad Husayn, al-Mizan fi Tafsir'l Qur'an, vol.16, 2nd ed. (Beirut, 1390/1971), pp. 338-358. Islam restored dignity to slaves and enhanced their social status. It made no distinction between a slave or a free man, and all were treated with equality. It was this fact that always attracted slaves to Islam. It is painful to see that those who never cease to be vociferous in their unjust criticism of Islam should take no notice of this principle of equality, when even in this enlightened age there are countries where laws are made discriminating against the vast majority of population, to keep them in practical servitude. Islam recognises no distinction of race or colour, black or white, citizens or soldiers, rulers or subjects; they are perfectly equal, not in theory only, but in practice. The first mu'azzin (herald of the prayer call) of Islam, a devoted adherent of the Prophet and an esteemed disciple, was a Negro slave. The Qur'an lays down the measure of superiority in verse thirteen of chapter forty-nine. It is addressed to mankind, the whole human race, and preaches the natural brotherhood of man without distinction of tribe, clan, gender, race or colour. It says: “O you men! We have created you of a male and a female, and then We made you (into different) races and tribes so that you may know (and “recognise) each other. Surely the most honourable of you with Allah is the one who is most pious among you; surely Allah is All-Knowing and “Aware.” The Qur'an 49:13 This verse makes clear the view point of Islam as regards human life on earth. It lays down only one criterion of superiority or honour and that is piety, which means complete obedience to the will of God. It annihilates all man-made and artificial distinctions of race, gender and colour which we find all over the world even now (this verse proofs my case even more: ‘ that it is strict forbidden in islam to rape female slaves’ , since rape is clearly forbidden in islam, since slaves in islam have the same position and status to allah as other human beings, it is clear that therefor rape of female slaves is strict forbidden, since rape of a free women is also strict forbidden, this verse proofs that a slave woman and a free woman have the same postion to allah swt and status as human beings in islam, therefor the raping of female slaves is strict forbidden in islam just as it is strict forbidden in islam to rape a free woman ). To explain the qualities of piety, let us note what Allah says: “It is not righteousness that you turn your faces towards the East and the West, righteousness is this that one should believe in Allah, the Last Day, “the angels, the Book and the Prophets, and give away wealth out of love for Him to the near of kin, the orphans, the needy, the wayfarer, the “beggars and to those in bondage and keep up prayers, pay the poor-rate; and those who fulfil their promise and the patient ones in distress and “affliction and in the time of war - these are they who are the truthful and these are they who are pious.” The Qur'an 2:177 This verse clearly shows that by itself there is no specific virtue in turning towards any particular direction for prayer. (The unity of the Qiblah indicates the unity of faith which leads to spiritual unity and culminates in physical harmony.) The belief and practice enjoined in the verse are the real virtues, and apart from being ordered by God, they appeal to human reasoning. Please mark that "to give away wealth out of love for God to...those in bondage" is one of them. The Non-Muslim Perspective: On the attitude of Muslim master with his slaves, Will Durant says, "...he handled them with a genial humanity that made their lot no worse - perhaps better, as more secure - than that of a factory worker in nineteenth-century Europe." Source: Hurgronje C., Mohammedanism, (N.Y., 1916), p. 128 as quoted by W. Durant, The Story of Civilization, vol. IV (N.Y., 1950), p. 209. At the end of the 18th century, Mouradgea d'Ohsson (a main source of information for the Western writers on the Ottoman empire) declared: "There is perhaps no nation where the captives, the slaves, the very toilers in the galleys are better provided for or treated with more kindness than among the Muhammedans." Source: As quoted in The Encyclopaedia of Islam, vol.I, p. 35. P. L Riviere writes: "A master was enjoined to make his slave share the bounties he received from God. It must be recognised that, in this respect, the Islamic teaching acknowledged such a respect for human personality and showed a sense of equality which is searched for in vain in ancient civilization" Source: Riviere P.L., Revue Bleaue (June 1939). And not only in ancient civilisations; even in the modern Christian civilisation the ingrained belief of racial supremacy is still manifesting itself every day. A. J. Toynbee says in Civilization on Trial: "The extinction of race consciousness as between Muslims is one of the outstanding achievements of Islam, and in the contemporary world there is, as it happens, a crying need for the propagation of this Islamic virtue..." Then he comments that "in this perilous matter of race feeling it can hardly be denied that (the triumph of English-speaking peoples) has been a misfortune." Source: Toynbee, A.J., Civilization on Trial (New York, 1948), p. 205. Napoleon Bonaparte is recorded as saying about the condition of slaves in Muslim countries: "The slave inherits his master's property and marries his daughter. The majority of the Pashas had been slaves. Many of the grand viziers, all the Mamelukes, Ali Ben Mourad Beg, had been slaves. They began their lives by performing the most menial services in the houses of their masters and were subsequently raised in status for their merit or by favour. In the West, on the contrary, the slave has always been below the position of the domestic servants; he occupies the lowest rug. The Romans emancipated their slaves, but the emancipated were never considered as equal to the free-born. The ideas of the East and West are so different that it took a long time to make the Egyptians understand that all the army was not composed of slaves belonging to the Sultan al-Kabir." Source: Cherfils, Bonaparte et l'Islam (Paris, 1914) Annemarie Schimmel writes: "The entire history of Islam proves that slaves could occupy any office, and many former military slaves, usually recruited from among the Central Asian Turks, became military leaders and often even rulers as in eastern Iran, India (the Slave Dynasty of Delhi), and medieval Egypt (the Mamluks). “ Source: "Islam: An Introduction", p. 67 Islam totally objects and fights all forms of slavery. The focus of Islam in all its teachings and rites was to eradicate this prevailing practice. Now, slavery has been abolished by international conventions, and this goes in line with aims and objectives of Islam. -Dr. Taha Jaber Al-`Alwani, President of the Graduate School of Islamic and Social Sciences and President of the Fiqh Council, states the following: When Allah created human beings, He created them to be free and to be vicegerents on the earth. Slavery is something that came from people who couldn’t understand the position of the human being and it was made, in the past, as a global phenomenon. When Islam came, it tried to bring change to get the human being back to being free, as Allah has created us, by certain procedures. Those procedures of Islam went through without interference from the other nations or states who are non-Muslim states or nations. Maybe within the third century of Hijrah or the migration of the Prophet to Madinah, this phenomenon would have been over and disappeared. But as I mentioned, because it was a global phenomenon, that procedure which was established by Islam couldn’t go through and finish with this very bad phenomenon. Now, al-hamdulillah all people have agreed to stop this phenomenon and stand up against it. With this, there is no way to go back to adopt this phenomenon again in any way, especially for Muslims, since they must protect the freedom of others and always be with their rights to be free servants of Allah only. We should remember when the Caliph `Umar Ibn Al-Khattab (may Allah be pleased with him) said in a famous khutbah (Speech or sermon) of his, “ When did you make the people as slaves or servants of you while Allah, the Almighty, created them free” This means that the Muslims from the very beginning advocated the freedom of all human beings and were against the oppression of free people by tyrants and dictator leaders. Having clarified the above, we would like to states that it was a war custom in the past to take men and women as captives and then turn them into slaves. Islam did not initiate it, rather, it was something in practice long ago before the advent of Islam. And when Islam came, it tried to eradicate this practice, bit by bit. So it first restricted it to the reciprocal practice of war, in the sense that Muslims took war captives just as the enemies did with them. Source: Islam and Slavery -Sheikh Muhammad Nur Abdullah comments: Slavery was a universal law in the Arab culture, Persian, Indian, and Roman civilizations. It was not Islam that introduced slavery. Islam came when slavery was practiced widely. It was not suitable to ban slavery at once. Islam, however, tried to drain the source of slavery and close its gate gradually. After the advent of Islam, slaves were given better treatment. All their human rights were safeguarded. The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) commanded proper treatment for slaves, that they should be fed from what other Muslims eat, be clothed from what other Muslims wear, and be not asked to do work beyond their ability unless they're helped. The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) also forbade Muslims to slap their slaves. One time he summoned a man who had beaten his slave and said to him: "Remember, you have power over him, but Allah the Almighty has power over you. Imagine you were in his situation, how would you like to be treated ? .The man felt sorry for what he had done, and he released the slave. Upon this, the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "If you didn't do .that, you would be punished by Allah on the Day of Judgment." This is how Islam honors the rights of slaves after they used to be tortured and persecuted. Coming to the issue of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), he never had a slave. The first slave that was given to him by his wife Khadija was Zayd Ibn Haritha whom the Prophet adopted as his son and called him after his name (that was before adoption was declared forbidden in Islam), but later on called him after his father. As for his wives, there is difference among scholars whether Mariya of Egypt, who was also given as a gift to the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him), was a slave or not. Even if we agree that she was a slave, the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) married her, and she embraced Islam and became one of the Mothers of the Faithful (ummahat-il-mu'mineen). Anyway, this question is not now a living question. Slavery has been banned by all international laws. It is against human rights. We Muslims honor human rights and we cannot enslave people while they were created free by Allah the Almighty. Slavery is neither legal nor Islamic to practice. The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) is reported to have said, "The worst sin is to capture a free person and take him as a slave." Source: Islam-Online Web Site at basahin mo ung bible mo, read this! Rape In The Bible Rape is one of the most heinous crimes imaginable. Yet few people know that the Bible often condones and even approves of rape. How anyone can get their moral guidance from a book that allows rape escapes me. Perhaps they have been lied to about the Bible and carefully detoured around all the nasty stuff in the Bible. So grab your Bibles and follow along as I show you all the nasty rapes that your priests and preachers don't want to tell you about. Note that in many places in the Bible there are references to "taking a wife". Don't be fooled into thinking that these were voluntary marriages. This first quote clearly shows that murder and force were used to "take" these wives. 1) Murder, rape, and pillage at Jabesh-gilead (Judges 21:10-24 NLT) So they sent twelve thousand warriors to Jabesh-gilead with orders to kill everyone there, including women and children. "This is what you are to do," they said. "Completely destroy all the males and every woman who is not a virgin." Among the residents of Jabesh-gilead they found four hundred young virgins who had never slept with a man, and they brought them to the camp at Shiloh in the land of Canaan. The Israelite assembly sent a peace delegation to the little remnant of Benjamin who were living at the rock of Rimmon. Then the men of Benjamin returned to their homes, and the four hundred women of Jabesh-gilead who were spared were given to them as wives. But there were not enough women for all of them. The people felt sorry for Benjamin because the LORD had left this gap in the tribes of Israel. So the Israelite leaders asked, "How can we find wives for the few who remain, since all the women of the tribe of Benjamin are dead? There must be heirs for the survivors so that an entire tribe of Israel will not be lost forever. But we cannot give them our own daughters in marriage because we have sworn with a solemn oath that anyone who does this will fall under God's curse." Then they thought of the annual festival of the LORD held in Shiloh, between Lebonah and Bethel, along the east side of the road that goes from Bethel to Shechem. They told the men of Benjamin who still needed wives, "Go and hide in the vineyards. When the women of Shiloh come out for their dances, rush out from the vineyards, and each of you can take one of them home to be your wife! And when their fathers and brothers come to us in protest, we will tell them, 'Please be understanding. Let them have your daughters, for we didn't find enough wives for them when we destroyed Jabesh-gilead. And you are not guilty of breaking the vow since you did not give your daughters in marriage to them.'" So the men of Benjamin did as they were told. They kidnapped the women who took part in the celebration and carried them off to the land of their own inheritance. Then they rebuilt their towns and lived in them. So the assembly of Israel departed by tribes and families, and they returned to their own homes. Obviously these women were repeatedly raped. These sick bastards killed and raped an entire town and then wanted more virgins, so they hid beside the road to kidnap and rape some more. How can anyone see this as anything but evil? 2) Murder, rape and pillage of the Midianites (Numbers 31:7-18 NLT) They attacked Midian just as the LORD had commanded Moses, and they killed all the men. All five of the Midianite kings – Evi, Rekem, Zur, Hur, and Reba – died in the battle. They also killed Balaam son of Beor with the sword. Then the Israelite army captured the Midianite women and children and seized their cattle and flocks and all their wealth as plunder. They burned all the towns and villages where the Midianites had lived. After they had gathered the plunder and captives, both people and animals, they brought them all to Moses and Eleazar the priest, and to the whole community of Israel, which was camped on the plains of Moab beside the Jordan River, across from Jericho. Moses, Eleazar the priest, and all the leaders of the people went to meet them outside the camp. But Moses was furious with all the military commanders who had returned from the battle. "Why have you let all the women live?" he demanded. "These are the very ones who followed Balaam's advice and caused the people of Israel to rebel against the LORD at Mount Peor. They are the ones who caused the plague to strike the LORD's people. Now kill all the boys and all the women who have slept with a man. Only the young girls who are virgins may live; you may keep them for yourselves. Clearly Moses and God approves of rape of virgins. 3) More Murder Rape and Pillage (Deuteronomy 20:10-14) As you approach a town to attack it, first offer its people terms for peace. If they accept your terms and open the gates to you, then all the people inside will serve you in forced labor. But if they refuse to make peace and prepare to fight, you must attack the town. When the LORD your God hands it over to you, kill every man in the town. But you may keep for yourselves all the women, children, livestock, and other plunder. You may enjoy the spoils of your enemies that the LORD your God has given you. What kind of God approves of murder, rape, and slavery? 4) Laws of Rape (Deuteronomy 22:28-29 NLT) If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father. Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her. What kind of lunatic would make a rape victim marry her attacker? Answer: God. 5) Death to the Rape Victim (Deuteronomy 22:23-24 NAB) If within the city a man comes upon a maiden who is betrothed, and has relations with her, you shall bring them both out of the gate of the city and there stone them to death: the girl because she did not cry out for help though she was in the city, and the man because he violated his neighbors wife. It is clear that God doesn't give a damn about the rape victim. He is only concerned about the violation of another mans "property". 6) David's Punishment - Polygamy, Rape, Baby Killing, and God's "Forgiveness" (2 Samuel 12:11-14 NAB) Thus says the Lord: 'I will bring evil upon you out of your own house. I will take your wives [plural] while you live to see it, and will give them to your neighbor. He shall lie with your wives in broad daylight. You have done this deed in secret, but I will bring it about in the presence of all Israel, and with the sun looking down.' Then David said to Nathan, "I have sinned against the Lord." Nathan answered David: "The Lord on his part has forgiven your sin: you shall not die. But since you have utterly spurned the Lord by this deed, the child born to you must surely die." [The child dies seven days later.] This has got to be one of the sickest quotes of the Bible. God himself brings the completely innocent rape victims to the rapist. What kind of pathetic loser would do something so evil? And then he kills a child! This is sick, really sick! 7) Rape of Female Captives (Deuteronomy 21:10-14 NAB) "When you go out to war against your enemies and the LORD, your God, delivers them into your hand, so that you take captives, if you see a comely woman among the captives and become so enamored of her that you wish to have her as wife, you may take her home to your house. But before she may live there, she must shave her head and pare her nails and lay aside her captive's garb. After she has mourned her father and mother for a full month, you may have relations with her, and you shall be her husband and she shall be your wife. However, if later on you lose your liking for her, you shall give her her freedom, if she wishes it; but you shall not sell her or enslave her, since she was married to you under compulsion." Once again God approves of forcible rape. They must be dividing the spoils they took: there must be a damsel or two for each man, Spoils of dyed cloth as Sisera's spoil, an ornate shawl or two for me in the spoil. (Judges 5:30 NAB) 9) Sex Slaves (Exodus 21:7-11 NLT) When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she will not be freed at the end of six years as the men are. If she does not please the man who bought her, he may allow her to be bought back again. But he is not allowed to sell her to foreigners, since he is the one who broke the contract with her. And if the slave girl's owner arranges for her to marry his son, he may no longer treat her as a slave girl, but he must treat her as his daughter. If he himself marries her and then takes another wife, he may not reduce her food or clothing or fail to sleep with her as his wife. If he fails in any of these three ways, she may leave as a free woman without making any payment. (Exodus 21:7-11 NLT) 10) God Assists Rape and Plunder (Zechariah 14:1-2 NAB) Lo, a day shall come for the Lord when the spoils shall be divided in your midst. And I will gather all the nations against Jerusalem for battle: the city shall be taken, houses plundered, women ravished; half of the city shall go into exile, but the rest of the people shall not be removed from the city. (Zechariah 14:1-2 NAB) sa Al-Quran 23:6, 33:50, 70:30 nya same pa rin ung women slaves kc ikaw malibog ka ndi mo alam kung ano ang status ng women slave sa Islam nasa article din yan na pinost ko, at ung RAPE SA BIBLE napost na rin. at ung isang verse pa napinost nya Yusuf Ali: [002:187] Permitted to you, on the night of the fasts, is the approach to your wives. They are your garments and ye are their garments. God knoweth what ye used to do secretly among yourselves; but He turned to you and forgave you; so now associate with them, and seek what God Hath ordained for you, and eat and drink, until the white thread of dawn appear to you distinct from its black thread; then complete your fast Till the night appears; but do not associate with your wives while ye are in retreat in the mosques. Those are Limits (set by) God: Approach not nigh thereto. Thus doth God make clear His Signs to men: that they may learn self-restraint. natural lang yan kc nasa state of purity ka dapat ndi ka dpt magappoarch sexually of makipagsex kpg bnagfafasting ka ikaw kpg nasa simbahan ka nakikipagsex ka? Cguro kc nangrarape ung mga pari ng sisters so i cant blame you. At sa PATAYAN LIE mo pala baka Jihad pinapaamoy mo? BASA! Quick Noble Verses that refute the terrorism LIE in Islam: "Fight in the cause of God those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for God loveth not transgressors. (The Noble Quran, 2:190)" "But if the enemy incline towards peace, do thou (also) incline towards peace, and trust in God: for He is One that heareth and knoweth (all things). (The Noble Quran, 8:61)" "If thou dost stretch thy hand against me, to slay me, it is not for me to stretch my hand against thee to slay thee: for I do fear God, the cherisher of the worlds. (The Noble Quran, 5:28)" "God does not forbid you from showing kindness and dealing justly with those who have not fought you about religion and have not driven you out of your homes. God loves just dealers. (The Noble Quran, 60:8)" "And fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for God. But if they desist, then let there be no hostility except against wrongdoers. (The Noble Quran 2:193)" "Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from error: whoever rejects evil and believes in Allah hath grasped the most trustworthy handhold, that never breaks. And Allah heareth and knoweth all things. (The Noble Quran, 2:256)" "Again and again will those who disbelieve, wish that they had bowed (to God's will) in Islam. Leave them alone, to enjoy (the good things of this life) and to please themselves: let (false) hope amuse them: soon will knowledge (undeceive them). (The Noble Quran, 15:2-3)" "Say, 'The truth is from your Lord': Let him who will believe, and let him who will, reject (it):......(The Noble Quran, 18:29)" "If it had been thy Lord's will, they would all have believed,- all who are on earth! wilt thou then COMPEL mankind, against their will, to believe! (The Noble Quran, 10:99)" "Say: 'Obey Allah, and obey the Messenger: but if ye turn away, he is only responsible for the duty placed on him and ye for that placed on you. If ye obey him, ye shall be on right guidance. The Messenger's duty is only to preach the clear (Message). (The Noble Quran, 24:54)" "Say : O ye that reject Faith! I worship not that which ye worship, Nor will ye worship that which I worship. And I will not worship that which ye have been wont to worship, Nor will ye worship that which I worship. To you be your Way, and to me mine. (The Noble Quran, 109:1-6)" sa hadith nya ipopost ko ung 2 na magkasunod Volume 1, Book 6, Number 316: Narrated 'Urwa: 'Aisha said, "We set out with the Prophet in his last Hajj. Some of us intended to perform 'Umra while others Hajj. When we reached Mecca, Allah's Apostle said, 'Those who had assumed the lhram for'Umra and had not brought the Hadi should finish his lhram and whoever had assumed the Ihram for 'Umra and brought the Hadi should not finish the Ihram till he has slaughtered his Hadi and whoever had assumed the lhram for Hajj should complete his Hajj." 'Aisha further said, "I got my periods (menses) and kept on menstruating till the day of 'Arafat, and I had assumed the Ihram for 'Umra only (Tamattu'). The Prophet ordered me to undo and comb my head hair and assume the lhram for Hajj only and leave the 'Umra. I did the same till I completed the Hajj. Then the Prophet sent 'Abdur Rahman bin Abi Bakr with me and ordered me to perform 'Umra from At-Tan'im in lieu of the missed 'Umra." -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Volume 1, Book 6, Number 317: Narrated 'Aisha: Fatima bint Abi Hubaish used to have bleeding in between the periods, so she asked the Prophet about it . He replied, "The bleeding is from a blood vessel and not the menses. So give up the prayers when the (real) menses begin and when it has finished, take a bath and start praying." ewan ko kng ano problema mo dyan o malibog ka lang. Ung isa ung Tabari mo ewanko kung asan ko hahanapn yan ang 2 most authentic Hadith ay Sahih Muslim at Sahih Bukhari sa aking pagbabasa ng mga entry nyo dito sa blog ni Jun Mercado,lahat kayo ay tama ayon sa sarili nyong paniniwala sa relihiyon inyong pinaniniwalaan.
Para sa akin anuman relihiyon kinabibilangan ng isang tao kung gawain nya ay labag sa batas ng Diyos sya ay masahol pa sa hayop. Kung tutuusin mas mabuti pa ang hayop ang tanging alam ay magmahal,kumain,matulog at maglingkod sa kanyang itinuturing amo. Ang tao malimit ay gumagawa ng labag sa batas ng Diyos. Kung mayroon dapat iligtas sa mundong ito ay walang iba kundi ang mga banal at maamong hayop. kakatawa sa pakistan
ung mga islamik schools doon, tinuturuan ung kanilang mga estudyante na habang nagbabasa ng koran na igalaw ang kanilang ulo (paharap at patalikod) ... dahilan nila para daw hindi antukin ung nagbabasa ... nakakaantok palang basahin ung koran! sana dito sa pinas tuturuan na iuntog nalang sa pader ang kanilang ulo habang nagbabasa ng koran.... baka matauhan pa sila at mag convet nalang sa mas matinong relihyon ... hahahahaha!!!! May nag astral transfer na naman sa codename ko hekhekhekhkehek...Ano daw?Sa Pakistan?Hehehehehe..totoo yan may mga pakistani na nagpapaikot ng kanilang ulo hehehehehe....Ang tanong ..mga muslim ba yun sila???E practice ba ng mga real na mga muslim yun???Sino ba nag nagprapraktis niyan???Diba mga Mason at Hudyo at mga Monastics na mga Katoliko!!!!Diba?Diba?Diba? ...hehehehehehe...At yung mga pakistani na mga gumagawa niyan ay mga Sufism na kulto na Freemason or Hudyo din ang nag organize nag start sa turkey mula nung pinagpapatay ang mga kabbalist na mga Mason or Hudyo sa Iberian Peninsula....
No doubt dahil kahit sa Pinas umabot yan hehehehehe...andyan sila Jose Rizal ang dakilang mangkukulam at Kabbalist na Freemason or jewish practitioner hehehehehe...at na recruit pa niya ang isang Moro na si Datu Buto Rasul..hakhakhakhak... FREEMASON RIN PALA ANG MUSLIM SUFISM AT FREEMASON REN ANG QURAN NA GAMIT NILA....NAGUGULUHAN AKO SA MGA ILUSYON MO ANDRES MERON KAPANG ISLAMIC DEMOCRACY NA WALANG BOTOHAN
MAGPAGAMOT KA MUNA NG UTAK AT SAKA KA MAKI-BLOG. Correction please Sufism lang huwag mong ikabit ang Muslim ok!!!Walang Muslim sufism,Sufism lang at Muslim lang hindi po magkasama at parehas ang dalawang termino na yan.Although ginagamit ng mga Sufism ang Quran,ay hindi namin pinapasubalian yan dahil talaga namang sa Allah ang Quran...yun nga lang ginamit nila yan...na hindi naman ipinag-utos yan ng Propheta Muhammad sa kanyang Hadith kaya nga may mga grupo na pilit ibalik ang mga yan sa basic principle na teachings ng propeta at hindi sa paggamit ng salita ng Allah na katulad ng mga naunang pinili ng Allah na mga Kabbalist na hudyo at mga Mason at hindus at mga Romano Katoliko na mga Monasticist...hekhekhekhekhek...
Kasi kung tutularan mo ang mga Kabbalist na mga Hudyo or Freemasons at Romano Katoliko na mga Monasticist ay magiging Diyos na rin sila at yung ang Shirk,tatambalan na nila ang tunay na tagapaglikha ng Universe...Dahil may kakayahan na daw sila na equivalent sa tagapaglikha..Oo nga mayron pero siguro mga ni sa kalingkingan wala pa yan at dahil dyan gingamit nila sa pagpapaniwala at paghuhuthot ng pera sa mga bulag at Tangang katulad ni anonymous at BOBO...hekhekhekhekhek...Tignan ninyo si Rizal,Moncado,Freemason,Ecleo,Aglipay..Marcos at iba pang mga naging mga mayaman na tulad na lang ng Katoliko Romano na ito...buwahahahahahaha...
#72.1.1.1.1
Ibrahim
on
2009-06-04 16:58
(Reply)
nakooow! Abangan mo lang ha, papakita ko sayo na ang Sufism na tinatawag mong Freemason ay branch ng Islam
abangan mo rin na may quranic at hadith verse na ang classification kay muhammad ay katambal ng allah sa mga gampanin Shirk din siya lumalabas sa paghayag ng Quran ipapakita ko rin sayo na ang mga ulamma, immam muttawa muslims ay gumagamit sa pera ng kuleksyon sa Islam pambili ng 8 years old na asawa pero maniniwala ka naman kaya kung mailantad ko yun sayo eh biyak na ang bao ng bungo mo eh...hahahahaha! palagay ko kahit magkakaiba tayo ng paniniwalang politikal at panrelihiyon ay nagkakaisa tayo sa pag ayaw sa chacha at sa parliamentaryong isinusulong nito pabor kay arroyo
kung hindi nyo ilabas ang galit nyo sa chacha ngayon wla na kayong hahabulin pa sa 2010 lintik na personal interest sa likod ng chachang hindi makahintay sa 2010! masyado ka naman takot sa chacha,eh ano kung may personal na interes si arroyo sa pagsulong ng chacha,lahat naman ng politiko ay pansariling interes ang hangad,kaya nga gusto maisulong ang chacha para sa kanilang kapakanan,dahil kung hindi nila maisulong tiyak may bagong uupo sa trono at magpapayaman din.
kung ayaw mo kay arroyo,ikaw ang pumalit,sipain mo sya kung kaya mo. Tanggap mo na ang kurapsyon at tiyak na kasali ka sa galamay ng kurapsyon pero kami ay hindi kasali sa kurapsyon at lumalaban sa kurapsyon?
Kahit pa nga puro magnanakaw lahat ang kapitbahay mo magpapasalamat ka parin sa amin kung makita mong pino-protektahan namin ang mga anak mo sa iyo at sa mga kapitbahay mo!!! i don´t think you are truly honest and clean,kung sakali ikaw na ang makaupo sa mataas na posisyon gaya ng presidente,sa palagay ko ganon rin gagawin mo sa ngayon kunwari lumalaban sa kurapsyon pero ikaw mismo at ang grupo nyo ang mangungurap kung kayo na ang nasa puwesto,gaya ng sabi ni Erap pana-panahon lang yan.
For two years wala rin ginawa si Erap kundi magtago ng salapi para sa kanyang mga kerida at ng mapatalsik sya mga Arroyo at aliporis naman niya ang nagpasasa sa kaban ng bayan. Kailangan mo nga talagang mapigilan ang pagsulong ng chacha dahil kung hindi maalis sa puwesto ang mga Arroyo at galamay nya patuloy lang sila sa pagpapayaman. Sa dami ng gustong yumaman sa pinas dapat every two or one year lang ay magpalit ng lider para ang mga nakapilang presidential aspirant ay may tsansa rin yumaman. Halos lahat ng tao ang hangad ay yumaman dahil sa mundong ito kapag wala kang pera alipin ka ng maypera.. balita ko merong clan wars ngayon sa mindanao....
kayong nga sira ulong muslim dito sa blog na ito..... saang mga clans kayo? sana maubos na nga clan wars ang nga ankan nyo ...... para tumahimik na ang pilipinas..... kayo ang nag papagulo sa pilipinas MABUHAY ANG PILIPINAS! E ano ngayon?bakit gusto mong sumali?hehehehehehe....Huwag na!!! mayron na kayong inter-religous war dyan...Hindus+Roman Catholic+Judaism or Freemason+ All kabalistic and Mysticist religous VS. ISLAM...
Hakhakhakhakhakhakhak.... SUFISM (Arabic, tasawwuf),
Collective term for an important movement of mystical beliefs, traditions, and rituals widely accepted throughout the Islamic world since the 11th century. While most Sufis happen to be nominal Sunnis, Sufism is non-denominational and has, for instance, Shiite members and brotherhoods too. Other Islamic movements may rival it in mysticism—such as the Ismailis and the “Oriental Illumination” (Ishraqi) school of philosophy—but these tend to be élitist or more sectarian. Futhermore, unlike the Shiite Imam who stands alone in his generation, the Sufi equivalent is merely a man at the top of a hierarchy of revered masters or saints whose attributes come ever closer to his, in quality and quantity, the higher their station. Sufis typically revere countless celebrated Muslims as past masters and perfect men, though not all of these—such as Muhammad, his companions (sahaba) and the Shiite Imams—are even acknowledged as Sufis by modern scholars and other Muslims. Sufi masters offer a rival source of divine knowledge—gnosis (marifa)—to traditional Islamic scholarship (jurisprudence and theology), they also present an alternative spiritual authority to the learned classes. For this reason, Sufis have often been accused of permitting themselves practices resembling antinomianism on the grounds that their superior knowledge places them outside the constraints of Islamic law (Shari'ah), a restriction solely reserved for the uninitiated. Ang Sufism ay isang Islamic brand of religion na may kasamang mystical practices at lahat ng may mystical conotations ay tinatawag mo namang Freemasons lalu na kung may simbolo ng star of David dahil galit-na-galit ka sa mga hudyo na gaya ni Muhammad. Hindi lang sila matanggap ng mga modern Islamic scholars dahil kaagaw sila sa autoridad at control sa mga muslim na membro. Isang dahilan ren ang Sufism sa gera ng mga Sunni at Shiites dahil tumbok nito ang kanya-kanyang scholars sa magkabukod na chain of authority mula kay Abu Bakr laban naman kay Ali Bin Abi Talib Isama mo ang grupong Ismailis sa lista ng Freemason secta mo kc ay karibal rin sila sa ganitong Islamic Mysticism ANDRES, Kung magri-research ka ay basahin mo mabuti at huag kang magdunong-dunungan na binibigyan mo ng bukod na paliwanag ang mga linya at alamin mo muna ang background ng author at salain kung may credito ang mga pagbibintang. Bakit hindi mo maitanggi ang mga krimen ni Muhammad? Dahil sinusuportahan ito ng Quran at Hadith andun ang record niya, lantad-na-lantad at mahirap nyong itanggi. Ang ginagawwa nyo nalang ay ilihim ito sa mga baguhang muslim na inyong hinihikayat. MAGSALITA KA NGAYON!!! Hoy!!!Mason Crypto-Jews,iba ang Muslim sa Sufism,Hindi porket may Sunnah ang Propheta ay pwede ng lahat yun ay gagawin ulitin ko,gagawin at hindi susundin ha!!!Tulad ng alin,pag-aasawa ng higit sa apat ay isang prophetic distinction yan,ikalawa yung gnosism or mysticism,...Kung titignan ninyo ang mga una hanggang pangatlong henerasyon ng mga muslim magmula kay propeta Muhammad [pbuh] ay hindi gumagawa ng mga mysticism at gnosis na tulad ng ginagawa ng Hudyo or Freemasons,Katolisismo at ibang diabolic cult...Intiendes!!!Tsura nito...
Tsaka paalala ko lang sa iyo ha!!na may hadith ang propeta na kung ang hudyo or freemason ay mahahati sa 71 na sekta or grupo,ang kristyanismo ay mahahati sa 72 na grupo,at ang mga angkan ng ummah ng Allah ay mahahati sa 73...ano ang ibig sabihin niyan??Hindi na lingid sa mga tunay na sumusunod sa pananampalatayang Islam ang nangyayari sa loob ng ummah...dahil mismo ang mga angkan ng mga dating sumusunod sa tunay na Islam ay ganun nga mahahati sa 73 dahil sa kagagawan yan ng mga kabbalistic na freemason or hudyo iluminatti...ngunit ganun pa man ay lalabas ang Mahdi or ang guided one, upang sugpuin ang mga followers ng Dajjal or anti-Christ na mga Freemasons at ang pagbabalik ni Propeta Isa, [upon peace on him]ay siyang papatay sa anti-Christ...Sino ba ang Anti-Christ???siya ay gumagawa ng mga ritual na gnosis at may kapangyarihan na katulad din ng sa mga propeta...kaya mag-ingat sa Anti-Kristo na mga Iluminatti or Freemason or Crypto-Jews....Buwahahahahahahak...
Napakadilim ang daigdig ng mga bloggers dito..Wala akong Makitang Liwanag...Kawawa naman ang mga Bloggers dito NABULAG sa kanikanilang Paniniwala...Ang Gagaspang ng mga Ugali...Wala akong natutunang MORALIDAD sa mga Taong ito puro KAHIPOKRITOHAN...Sayang ang oras sa mga KALokohang Pinagsasabi nitong mga Nagdudunong dunongan dito sa Blog ni JM
Dyan na Kayo!!!! Mga walang MODO NAPAKA MORAL AT MALINIS NAMAN NG PANGALAN MO
MAGSALAMIN KA MUNA IHO Itong si Andres Bonifacio ay nagmamarunong.. pero panay COPY-PASTE naman ng mga articles na hindi man lang nya binabasa o iniintindi ng maayos.
Kaya sa comment # 66 ni andres sinulat nya na "Freemasons are the culprits behind roman catholic religion" Sinasabi nya IISA ang freemasonry at christianity. Ngunit ng tinanong ko na papaano maging nasa likod ang freemasons sa pagpapatakbo ng roman catholicism eh magka-away naman yang dalawang grupo na iyan ever since. Sumagot naman si andres ng COPY-PASTE comment # 67.1 sa tanong ko. Ngunit mga tol, basahin nyu ang sagot nya sa comment # 67.1 at matuwa kayu kasi he just contradicted himself by writing na "Freemasonry is incompatible with christianity". hakhakhak Andres ang bobo mo talaga.. yan ang mapala mo kung hindi mo binabasa ang mga COPY-PASTE articles mo kasi hindi tugma ang sagot mo at mismong ikaw na rin ang nag contradict sa sarili mo sa first accusation mo sa comment # 66 na "freemasons are the culprits behind roman catholics" hakhakhak kakahiya naman... at comment mo sa #67.1 basahin mo nga ulit yung mga comments mo sa # 66 at # 67.1 kasi puro sila hindi sang-ayun... nalilito tuloy ako sa pag iisip mo... Anu ba talaga andres? freemasons are the culprits behind roman catholics OR freemasonry is INCOMPATIBLE with christianity???? Nakakahawa ang kabobohan mo.. hakhakhak Freemasons is simply a sort of fraternity/brotherhood.Its primary mission is simply to protect and support every member.
Basically their god is ""MONEY & POWER"". Walang pagkakaiba yan sa mga politicians. Maraming mga POLICE and MILITARY officer ang member ng MASON na corrupt or pasaway pero hindi sila ma prosecute kasi nga MASON sila, and I know kung sino at ano ang mga posisyon sa gobyerno and private sectors most of its members. Ako GENERAL sa AFP,member din ako nyan. kaya nga successful career ko sa AFP dahil mason ako hak hak hak. Layo tuloy sa topic ang comment ko. pero eto din ang comment ko about the topic. ISALI NA DIN NATIN LAHAT ANG MGA SUBJECT ABOUT budhsm,Born again,hindu,JIL,el shaddai,jehovas witnesses,baptist,ano pa ba meron, pasensya na yung di nabanggit na religion.... LAHAT ISALI NA, HUWAG LANG ABOUT MUSLIMS (masyado naman kayong KSP) Nagtagumpay ang mga Nazi na lipulin ang maraming mga hudiyo sa europa nooon dahil maraming napaniwalang mga mamamayan ng europa ang mga Nazi na masasamang tao ang mga hudiyo at kailangang puksain.
Madali nilang nagawa ang bagay na ito dahil konti lang ang mga kumontra dahil sa mga propaganda ng Nazi sa tv, radyo, dyaryo at iba pa. Ngayon namay ganun din, ang mga dating biktima nambibiktima na ngayon. Bihira sa atin lalo na sa kanluran bahagi ng mundo ang naaapektuhan pag may mga namamatay na mga arabo or muslim (para bang walang kristyanong arabo - marami o sila lalo na sa Palestine)kagay sa mga giyera sa Iraq. Para bang walang taga Irag na inosente, na paralahat sila ay mga terorista. Kung maglalaho ang lahat , as in lahat ng muslim sa Pilipinas. Ang pilipinas ay magiging corrupt pa rin, magnanakaw pa rin ang mga pinuno at mga nakaaasa ang taong bayan sa biyaya ng mga politiko. Ibig sabihin , hindi islam o mga muslim ang problema sa Pilipinas. Isipin mo yan kabayan..... haaaaaaaaaaaaay.....
the problem in the Phils is not religion, its the culture of the people. People their loved to be oppressed, believed in fallacy and false hope. Innocent civilians in ARMM were being robbed by their brother Muslims with hidden self interest. They keep on asking independence in order to have peace and progress, and yet 95% of the politicians, leaders, and policy makers in ARMM are muslims. A lot of money in the form of aid has been poured down in that region, and yet it always goes in to the wrong hands. Corruptions and evil doings are not all about religion. Its all about few people with self interest disguising in the eyes and hiding under the shirts of innocent people. These few individual always used their brother Muslims to accomulate vast amount of wealth leaving thier brothers in sufferings. the evildoings of those few individuals leave the ARMM thousand of miles behind thier neighboring towns and cities in terms of development. We should not blame religion. Religions are founded to shower love, peace, and prosperity. there are only few people who use religion to satisfy their evil doings. THE SOLUTION...... IT'S IN OUR HAND... I am not going to engage in this discussion with scholarly flamboyance. But I would simply ask you to discern Islam using these simple questions: What notable contributions the religion of "peace", Islam, has given to the humanity in the past centuries? Which people of what religion contribute to the chaos of what is going on the world today?
Topics about "Religion" has and always been a "futile" discussion, warring ideas, conflicting facts, opinions between and among, which eventually generates hatred to all mankind.
Sa tagal ko nang naki-kipag de bate in defense of my catholic faith, my conclusion proved me right. WALA TALAGANG NANGYARI AT MANGYAYARI (future tense ). Religion ONLY provokes war. All we need is love and respect regardless of faith, race, gender. OUR EARTH'S CURTAIN WILL FALL ON DECEMBER 21, 2012. Thus, the end of MANKIND. And welcome to our new world and to our new DIMENSION. PEACE TO EVERYONE!!! |
Latest Posts
Monday, May 25. 2009» Modernization of the MadrasahCalendar
CategoriesSyndicate This Blog |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
