Friday, May 15. 2009The politics of separatism
The Mindanao Conflict is not a new invention of our times. In fact, the present realities of war in Mindanao are fruits of various attempts at the assimilation and integration of the ‘minorities’ with differing goals and emphases usually set by the central government.
Historically, the establishments of Fort Pilar in Zamboanga City, the naval station at Polloc in the present province of Maguindanao, the “intramuros” (within the walls) in the town of Jolo and the military stations/forts along the Rio Grande de Mindanao from Taviran to Reina Regente were few examples of “containment” program to build “peace” in the southern Philippines. The so-called Moro problem haunted the Spanish government in Manila for more than three centuries and half. The northern Mindanao and some parts of western and northern Mindanao were successfully brought to the mainstream politics by way of settlements beginning the second half of the 19th century. But in southern Mindanao, including the islands of Sulu, Tawi Tawi, and Basilan, the Spanish presence was limited to military stations and garrisons, except for pockets of civilian settlements in the present city of Zamboanga and Cotabato City. During the Spanish time, the Moro populace was, largely, left on their own. They lived under their sultans and datus and were governed according to their laws and traditions. The Spanish government interfered in the Moro affairs by way playing politics in several succession issues in the Sultanate of Sulu and in the two dominant Sultanates in the mainland Mindanao (Buayan and Maguindanao). However, the Moro people always rejected any Spanish ‘anointment’ of their Sultan. The political and economic configurations in Southern Philippines were radically altered during the American occupation. Paradoxically, the “new life” began with a peace pact known as Bates Treaty of 1899, with the Sultan of Sulu recognizing the sovereignty of the USA over Mindanao and the Archipelago of Sulu. This was the real beginning of the systematic program to integrate/assimilate the Moro people into the mainstream body politics of the whole Philippines. At the end of the Philippine-American War (from 1898 to 1902) with the defeat of the nascent Philippine Republic, the Americans unilaterally abrogated the Bates Treaty. And with the far superior army the Americans quashed all Moro resistance to the American rule. To put the peace in Southern Mindanao on a more solid footing, several “peace programs” were unfolded, again from the perspective of the central government in Manila. First was the creation of the Moro Province that would, in time, evolve/mutate into different government structures. It was a “de facto” autonomous government within the insular colonial administrative bureaucracy that ensured fast and effective governance of the Moro peoples and the Indigenous peoples. Second, the Moro Province looked into the economic development of Mindanao’s fertile land. Corporate plantations were opened and major trading posts in Zamboanga, Cotabato, Jolo, and Iligan. Third, Mindanao was opened to settlement of landless Filipinos from Luzon and the Visayas. It began with the establishment of the agricultural colonies in the fertile plains of the then empire province of Cotabato. This was followed by a massive and a well planned settlement programs during the Commonwealth period that continued unabated in the post war era during the subsequent administrations of Presidents Roxas, Quirino, and Magsaysay. (In time, the various settlement programs resulted to the ‘minoritization’ of the Moro and Indigenous peoples in Mindanao. Another pillar of the integration program was the establishment of educational system in the whole Southern Philippines. The two salient features of this ‘peace program’ were the “universal” public school system and the “pensionado” (scholarship) program for the children of Moro ruling families. From the latter would emerge the “new” Moro leaders (the Piang brothers, Pendatum, the Sinsuat’s, the Alonto’s, Lucman, Dimaporo, Kiram, etc.) who, with few exception, had served the Philippine government faithfully and advocated for the full integration of the Moro people into Philippine body politics. During the past 100 years, Mindanao has seen a dramatic shift in population and landownership that has contributed to the Moro rebellion. In 1900 the Muslim population in Mindanao made up more than 90% of the island’s inhabitants, but by 1970, the Muslims constitute barely 20% of the population of Mindanao. The population shift came about through policies that gave the settler population from Luzon and the Visayas incentives to migrate to Mindanao. The new immigrants cleared the vast plains in Central Mindanao for agriculture and soon new towns and provinces were established. The inevitable “minoritization” of the Moro and Indigenous peoples was compounded by what was then conceived as a “policy of neglect” or the failure by the Manila Government to deliver the basic social services and infrastructure for development of southern Mindanao. By the late 1960, the Moro peoples’ “groaning” and resentment reached a fever pitch that eventually led to the formation of the Moro National Liberation Front under the leadership of Prof. Nur Misuari. At the beginning of the Moro rebellion in the early 70’s, the MNLF espoused the politics of separatism. The conflict in Mindanao in the early 70’s was a secessionist war with a vision to establish a separate Moro homeland and Republic. However, through peace negotiation between the MNLF and the Government of the Republic of the Philippines under the auspice of the Organization of the Islamic Conference, the separatist war would be toned down to a fight for genuine self rule in local affairs in a sort of ‘autonomous arrangement’. This autonomous set up was the very core of the peace agreement signed in Tripoli, Libya on December 23, 1976. In a queer way, the Tripoli Agreement of 1976 has put an end to the politics of separatism in Southern Philippines. Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
We could never rewind time to undo what the present situation of mindanao is now into.
Politics will always be part of the solution to mindanao problem, as well as the populace of mindanao. Religion is also a big factor for the peace problem of the south. The solution of the problem is spreading the word of God...A MIRACLE The cry for self-determination among the Moro people is a never-ending gripe until such time that the traditional Moro leaders will pave the way to bring in economic democracy to their own people.
The propagation of religious socio-sentiment will not bring peace to Mindanao, this will only isolate the Moro people collective consciousness from the reality of social oppression and psycho-economic exploitation. Yes.. I agree to your point Muss nasser...
The Moro people will still continue to suffer the social oppression and psycho-economic exploitation by their own fellow muslim/ Moro politicians who are in power and in full control of everything their poor cities and municipalities. These powerful Moro political clans have been always been in government posts by massive cheating during elections and use of terror by their armed goons or private armies. Its not uncommon in muslim areas where the grandfather is the Governor, the father is the congressman, the sons as mayors or even the wives as vice mayors or board members in the same place. Not unless the Moro people can learn to stand up against these corrupt Moro politicians in their barrios then they will always remain a poor society while their elected Moro politicians ride on luxury SUVs with a 100 bodyguards that follow them around. Such a waste of taxpayer's money. Didnt you ever notice that in muslim areas/ barrios.. we rarely if not at all hear a news about people or students protesting against their moro elected officials? It is because of fear of reprisal by these powerful moro political families. That is the easiest way to die in muslim mindanao and your family too gets massacred. Moro politicians as tag of Political clans were only influenced by the Christians Politician clans which are more worst than the Moro,take a look the former dictator Marcos and his family,Corazon Aquino and his family,Erap and his family and Now the no.1 is Gloria Arroyo Family members which is supported by Roman Catholic Corporation.Don't ever stain your dirt over the others,it is not secret to everbody how the Christian community is being more worst than the Moros.Hypocrites people whose mind is always escaping from their own shadows, has no place in the truthful blogs like this.It's only shows, your stupidity and idiocy.
Oh sure, blame it all to the Roman Catholics. Blame them for your anger. Blame them for your failures. Blame them for your hurts. Blame them for your sleepless nights. Blame them for the death of your pet cat.
You can blame all your misfortunes to the Roman Catholics, simply because you are stupid and idiot. You really did NOT get my point...
The question is did the christians blame the Moro people for the Marcos atrocities? For Arroyo's Corruption? For Cory's inept governance? Did the christians take up arms, become rebels and then kill and bomb muslim towns because we are angry of our christian government officials? NO.. We DID NOT!!! Then how come you Moros when you are angry and disappointed by how your elected fellow MUSLIM government officials are handling your towns and cities then you start killing and bombing, kidnapping innocent christian civilians? Bakit di nyu kidnapin yung mga kapwa muslim nyung naka upo sa gobyerno???? Aber? Takut kasi,.... Kaya pala wala kaming makitang mga moro na nagwewelga sa daan laban sa kanilang mayor o governor kasi takut kasi.. hahahaha magaling lang kayu sa mga walang kalaban labang sibilyan na kristyanus.. eh hindi naman sila ang may hawak sa pondo nyu dyan... use your brain stupid.. Oh yes! in Singapore it is pleasing to notice that there are different religions living in a peaceful community.
The key? The religion is to each his own, no one will bother anybody in expressing ones faith as long as you don,t bother other faiths. Bottom line...respect to others equals peace Oh yiihh dat is in singgapur,da gabernment dher is nat a katolik romano,dat is whay dey hav a peaceful life.Ip unli pilipins is layk dem,dat katolik kanat kontrol dir gabernment dhen,dir is peace.In singgapur dhey dunt hav CBCP,in singgapur has no KATOLIK adbaysers,In Singgapur katulik is nat da majority dherpor dhey kannat mek eni kios der hakhakhakhakhakhak....mos op ol no singgel katolik pilipino dat is in dher gabernment opis...hakhakhakhakhakhak ar yu nat krizy???
Ang sigurado ko wala kasing Abu Sayyaf na nangingidnap at namumugot doon.
Wala din mga MILF at LOST command nila na nanunuinog at nagpapasabog sa public places na ang resulta ay kamatayan sa mga inosenteng mga tao at mga musmos. Galit daw sa mga gaya mo si MJ. And yes.. I was NOT exaggerating when i mentioned that a 100 bodyguards keep on tailing most of these powerful Moro politicians like Gov. Zaldy Ampatuan and his family clan of government officials of Maguindanao (ARMM), GOv. Khalid Dimaporo and his father Congressman Bobby Dimaporo and his mother former congresswoman annging dimaporo of Lanao del Norte, Gov. Abduskr Tan and his wife congresswoman Lady tan of Sulu, and many more moro governors and congressmen.
Wasting taxpayer's money on food for their bodyguards, Salary on their Guards and also the gasoline costs on their luxury SUVs in their armed convoy as they travel within mindanao. Arent these people also muslims? then why do muslims complain and blame the christians? They should blame their elected muslim politiciansn since they are the ones who handle the budget in their respective towns and municipalities. Wake up... 100 men as bodyguards?
I can say that almost all the moslem political bigwigs maintain their own private army. Just like in the days of their prophet mohammad, those who disobeyed him will find his head seperated from his body. That is the very reason why I am opposed for a separate state in mindanao since the very SAME elected MUSLIM government officials who are NOW in power in muslim areas as ARMM, maguindanao, Lanao del norte, Lanao del sur, Sulu, basilan, Tawi-tawi, sultan kudarat, etc.. will STILL BE THE SAME people to RULE mindanao as a separate nation.
So what then is the use of a separate state if these powerful political clans of muslim families would still be in power in mindanao with a broader land to rule, more resources to corrupt, and more private armies to maintain? A separate state wont change anything for mindanao since the common Moro people are helpless to get a new honest leader elected because these muslim political families have been in control for decades that they almost literally own everything in their respective towns and municipalities. We could compare it to a basketball team who wants to have a different name of its own... but with the same players and the same coach???.. then nothing is improved!... just like a separate state of mindanao with the same muslim political families ruling it now with or without the MOA. So it is still useless to have a separate state. period. I hope you guys got my point. The real culprit behind the centennial displacement and uprooted Moro nation is architecturally motivated by a demonic religious which in the beginning it is not only the moro whose victim's of their atrocitie's but including the indio's who was also by sacrifing their good maharlikan cultures and society adopting the evil system of paganism and neo-feudal-capitalism economic estability.Which until now still ruining the whole archipelago in vast corruption and taking advantage of it's fear,ignorance and programmed social-psycho capabilities to rethink the revival of the true identities in the new era.Poisoning the mind and setting them in a paradox of social main stream of truth and rhetoric acceptable system of society.Evil that is not only slaves the Archipelagic habitat but,even the other parts of the earth there making the people poor of the poorest.Those arms of this evil culprit behind the fancy systematic corrupt society is being played by their Priest and Laity's who are very well educated within the protocols of their real intentions to milk the whole world that can be defeated by means of dogmatic and rhetoric teachings and belief.
where did you get this COPY-PASTE article above?
we know you are good at it... searching the web then COPY-Paste them as your own... That is plagiarism my friend and it ia against the law. Aktwali dat is may uwn aydeya,neberdelis op yur kritisisim abawt may inglis no mattir haw? haw!haw haw de karabaw I am veri iger to spik inglis dohw I am nat dat vire vire pluwent in dilebereng...Bekuz I am a nasyunal pram da land op da brawn,plat noos and ismol pigmea.No matir haw, it is nat da isyu ip I am nat a gud spiker op da inglis langweds.Cuz I am nat ahmehrikanu.Bat da trut is,da KATOLIKO ROMANO has behaynd ol op da kurapsyun,sabutads,returik,plandir and ribelyun dat had ben done in da pilipins....anderstang????Ar yu nat ashem abawt ur klim op inglis pluwensi????hikhikhikhik...hakhakhakhak...Pwiiiiii.
Basahin mo ang comment ni MJ #14 , galit daw siya sa mga kapatid niyang katulad mo. Isa ka raw kahihiyan sa relihyon niya.
Ang askad mo kasi pwe! You are really justifying your being a BOBO!!!Plagiarism can be called if any idea is claimed by others.Did I claimed it?Did I say that,copy-paste is my idea?Did I manifest any claim on those ideas??Pasting those ideas is to prove that it is not my ideas and it is a proof that,in your own backyards,there are some people writing things about the truth of your Corporation Church which is the Roman Catholic Corporation.It is only then called as plagiarims if there is an evidence that the person who paste it here claim the idea...Understand Bobo who is BOBO ngayon???hekhekhekhek
Paluin ko kaya iyang Noo mo ng matauhan ka sa Kabobohan mo!!!Baka ito na namang kina copy-paste sasabihin mo na naman na plagiarism...hehehehehehehe...copy-paste yan...hindi ko inamin akin yan hehehehe....
Plagiarism, as defined in the 1995 Random House Compact Unabridged Dictionary, is the "use or close imitation of the language and thoughts of another author and the representation of them as one's own original work."[1] Within academia, plagiarism by students, professors, or researchers is considered academic dishonesty or academic fraud and offenders are subject to academic censure, up to and including expulsion. In journalism, plagiarism is considered a breach of journalistic ethics, and reporters caught plagiarizing typically face disciplinary measures ranging from suspension to termination. Some individuals caught plagiarizing in academic or journalistic contexts claim that they plagiarized unintentionally, by failing to include quotations or give the appropriate citation. While plagiarism in scholarship and journalism has a centuries-old history, the development of the Internet, where articles appear as electronic text, has made the physical act of copying the work of others much easier, simply by copying and pasting text from one web page to another. Plagiarism is not copyright infringement. While both terms may apply to a particular act, they are different transgressions. Copyright infringement is a violation of the rights of a copyright holder, when material protected by copyright is used without consent. On the other hand, plagiarism is concerned with the unearned increment to the plagiarizing author's reputation that is achieved through false claims of authorship. Copyright infringement (or copyright violation) is the unauthorized use of material that is covered by copyright law, in a manner that violates one of the copyright owner's exclusive rights, such as the right to reproduce or perform the copyrighted work, or to make derivative works. For electronic and audio-visual media, unauthorized reproduction and distribution is occasionally referred to as piracy (an early reference was made by Daniel Defoe in 1703 when he said of his novel True-born Englishman : "Its being Printed again and again, by Pyrates"[2]). The practice of labeling the act of infringement as "piracy" actually predates copyright itself. Even prior to the 1709 enactment of the Statute of Anne, generally recognized as the first copyright law, the Stationers' Company of London in 1557 received a Royal Charter giving the company a monopoly on publication and tasking it with enforcing the charter. Those who violated the charter were labeled pirates as early as 1603.[3] The legal basis for this usage dates from the same era, and has been consistently applied until the present time.[4][5] Critics of the use of the term "piracy" to describe such practices contend that it is pejorative, unfairly equates copyright infringement with more sinister activity,[6] though courts often hold that under law the two terms are interchangeable.[7]
#8.1.2.1.1
Bing Laden
on
2009-05-17 18:28
(Reply)
Kilala ka na kasi sa mga copy-paste mo na wala naman nagbabasa.
Mali yan! Ilagay mo man lang ang original na gumawa ng article o parte nito. lumalabas lang na hidi mo man lang binasa at naiintindihan ang copy-paste mo. He just want to look intelligent to the readers here i guess lol. However, people in their right mind wouldn't even bother to read his blogs here. They may read the first few sentences, but that's just about it. That includes me of course.
GAGO KA at TURTUGOK KA ....hehehehe..hayan tagalog yan!!!hakhakhakhakhak!!!
Sa totoo lang lahat ng muslim katulad ni andres.
Napaka gaspang ng pagkatao. Pakabait ka ha andres. pobre gayot!!! THE MOST EXPENSIVE WAR IN THE 21ST CENTURY.
Consider me as one of your sincere friends, who is willing to share with you his humble and honest knowledge of the past and the current wars and on how it affects our daily life. I love reading the history of war and therefore I believe that I have the obligation to tell you how the war devastated Millions of lives, so that we youth, the future heirs of the World might prevent future war when the time has come for us to dictate the course of the World. To have a peaceful and loving kind of life, a life who cares for the welfare and interest of the others. In The 20 century war like the World War 1 lasted for not more than ten years, the World War II lasted for at least more than ten years. In the Cold war it took 50 years, plus or minus. It involved continuous pressure of possible nuclear war between great nations, such as US, UK, France against the former USSR and China. It involved cooperation by a host of nations like the war in Vietnam where half million American soldiers sent to Vietnam at the war’s peak and lost 58,000 soldiers, and the skirmishes, guerrilla type lead by Che Guevara in Congo and in Bolivia, and the installation of nuclear missiles of Russia in Cuba. It involved the willingness of population in many countries to invest in it and to sustain it by believing to a certain IDEAL form of government like DEMOCRACY and COMMUNISM. It took leadership at the top from a number of countries that were willing to be principled and to be courageous and to put things at risk; and when it ended, it ended not with a bang, but through internal collapse. SADDAM HUSSIEN, the man who believed on his judgment whether it be wrong or not, who think that the way to unite the UMMAH is through force or war by invading his neighbour countries one by one and once he succeeded of accumulating the power into one fist he would subsequently inject to the minds of MUSLIMS to make them believe of the advantages of having a UNITED STATES OF UMMAH among the believers. I disagree with his way of uniting the Ummah, I think it is necessary to make the people first realize that the only way to achieve justice for the millions of Muslims who were massacred, murdered, and killed in the hands of aggressor countries such as the war in Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon, Palestine, Chechenya, Yuguslavia, Sumalia and many more other territories around the world, is unity for UMMAH. Once the Muslims from various countries realized that they would gladly renounce some of their privileges in life to obey the unanimous decision of the majority, if the unscrupulous leaders wouldn’t give up his possession of power, the bunch of people will execute him, and they will finally elect the SUPREME SLAVE OF UMMAH. The miscalculations of Saddam of his future was proven when The SUPER POWER NATION join the GULF WAR in 1990, Baghdad the capital city of Iraq was repeatedly bombed by the allied forces, day and night, with their guided missiles functioning well trough the use of satellites to pass information from sensors to shooters, and uses space-based Global Positioning Systems to guide bombs to their targets. IRAQ RESPONDED BY ATTACKING ISRAEL BY SCUD MISSILES, purportedly carrying a chemical warhead, which landed in Tel Aviv. Thereafter, PATRIOT MISSILES WERE EMPLOYED TO FIND AND DESTROY SCUDS, THE FIRST TIME USE OF PATRIOT MISSILES IN THE HISTORY OF WAR. The senior Bush did not pursue his invasion in Iraq when Saddam forces withdrew from Kuwait. But extreme grudges between the leaders were planted to their swords heart that someday the war will continue. OSAMA BIN LADEN, whose goal is the same with President Saddam, though they have different approach but had similar in mind and that is to unite the UMMAH. First he wanted the US to withdraw its 6,000 military forces from his native land SAUDI ARABIA, perhaps to topple the current government and use the huge income of Saudi for his honourable goal. According to him the presence of foreign troops in the cradle of Islam is the latest and greatest of all infidels’ aggressions against ISLAM in its 14 century history. Now the infidels can freely walk everywhere on the land where Mohammad was born and where the Quran was revealed to him, said by Osama. His doctrine on his Islamic Revolution is the principle of reciprocity, saying Americans had killed Muslims women and children, so their women and children would die too. He initiated the attack on American soil to attract them and bring the battle in Afghanistan, may be he is expecting the UMMAH to support his struggle, but unfortunately he also miscalculated his war, he neglected to count the fact the super power nation on the Earth is US, it has the capacity to influence even the Muslim countries using its money and to threaten the other nation using its sophisticated weapons such as the Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles, carrying of atomic warhead, and Nuclear Submarines, to engage the war against the Terrorist according to the USA. Therefore, the revolution of Binladen was isolated. After the 9/11 attack the US suspected the Alqaeda group lead by Osama Ben Laden to be the responsible for the attacks. The Prime Minister of England Tony Blair, the man who came recently in the Philippines to give advice to the current administration on how to solve the unending war in Mindanao, based on his theory of solving problem in Ireland, visited President Vladimir Putin of Russia in Moscow, President Perves Musharap of Pakistan in Islamabad and Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee of India in New Delhi to reinforce their support for international moves against Bin Ladin. In 2001 some 1,000 U.S. troops of the elite 10th Mountain Division left their base in New York en route to Uzbekistan, 200 km north of the Afgan boarder, the first U.S. troop to be based in a country of the former Soviet Union. The US lifted economic sanctions against Pakistan and promised 50 million dollars in US aid, to seek the support of the elder brother of Afganistan, in 2007 US intends to give an extra 750 Million Dollar to Musharraf over the next five years to support development in the tribal areas. Before US invade the Afganistan, President Bush announced that he would send an additional 320 Million Dollars worth of food and medicine to the region. Another millions of dollar from the pocket of US has led to the construction or renovation of several dozen mosques, 8 administration buildings, 27 health centres and 48 schools since 2001, according to US government figures. RICH HUH. But the violence has increased: there were 18 insurgent attacks in 2004, 50 in 2005, 107 in 2006, 165 in 2007 196 and in 2008, according to provincial police counter insurgency chief Razuddin. The US sent their 60,000 troops in the soil of Taliban a group of people which was formed at the numbered 30 only, but within months it had swelled into a conquering force fanning out of Kandahar to take control of all the Afgan territories. Taliban originated from the world Talib which mean a seeker of knowledge, their ideology is from the teachings of the Prophet to seek knowledge. However, they violated their own doctrines by destroying the classrooms where knowledge is being taught and prohibiting girls to seek knowledge, I cannot imagine what kind or behind of that philosophy. The US lost 642 lives of soldier. Civilian casualties in Afgan have climbed to 929 in 2006 to close to 2,000 in 2008, according to the United Nations. There are some 37,000 NATO troops in Afganistan. Obama administration has planned to finish the job by deploying another 60,000 US force which will cost about 70 Billion US Dollar a year. Training and supporting the 130,000 to 200.000 troops required for a proper Afghan army would take another decade and could cost at least 20 Billion. GEORGE WALKER BUSH, the AMERICAN REVOLUTIONARY. He once said during his campaign in his second term as president that ‘’whether you agree with me or not, you know where I stand, what I believed and where I’m going to lead.’’ Hemmm, No doubt why he never apologise to the public for alleging that there was a link between Saddam and Binladen, and that Iraq possessed a weapon of mass distruction, where in fact it has been proven that his contention was wrong. Bush owned oil industry in Texas, hemm, no question that he also likes oil huhh. Imagine according to the US report Washington has sent more than 100,000 troops in the beginning of war in Iraq and has already spent 600 billion on the said war, and the tally is likely to hit more than 1 trillion before the conflict is over. US also lost more than 4 thousand soldiers there, for the simple reason, OIL. Isn’t expensive huh? The Obama’s administration planned to withdraw the US troops from Iraq soon, they will rather focused in Afghanistan, and therefore, they will bring another counts of death from civilians and soldiers of both side. I think the American best thing to do is to accept the inevitable emerging of the Islamic Empire. They should have to pay all the losses they have done in all Muslim countries, so that the Muslim will have lesser anger to them and prevent future attack. Remember that in every kill to the Muslim side, they have created ten enemies. Therefore, choose live and every body is happy or stay long and die will be on you!!! Thank you, I hope you enjoy it… If that's what you think about Pres. Bush, you are wrong, for the past eight years of his administration, he did not tell me and those who are residing in america directly that he is after the oil in the middle east but he is after the prosperity and for the common good of all human beings in the muslim world and that is the role of america, a Police. America did it to Japan and their is no doubt about it.
God bless America and Israel, Hallelujah, amen. Imagine America is not existing for the pass 200 years, could you give me honest answers of what would be the situation of these world right now specially what can you say about peace, peoples ideology, development, modern technology, prosperity and many more.
Imagine Saddam Hussein, Hitler, Putin, Iran president, Hugo Chaves,Pres. of North Korea, Fidel Castro, Ayatollah Khomeni, Joseph Stalin, Mao Tse Tong is been ruling the planet for the past 200 years, please give me your conscience answers about peace, prosperity, inventions, development, modern technologies, peace, ideology of people and many more. The Most Heinous Crime in Modern Time
It is world wide known that Saddam's regime dropped chemical bombs by air fighter on Halabja in Northern Iraq in 1988. The UN, other international organisations and Western Governments' reports confirmed that more than 5000 thousands civilians were killed in few hours. Eye witnesses accounts , photos and films show the horrifying facts of the most heinous crime in modern time. I'm glad Saddam is already out of commission. Thanks for you Jun, I might give you some special thing made in my home town in Tugaya to show you my appreciation of what you have wrote above.
GMA is really fair... Thanks also to the management of GMA. The countries in the middle east are ruled by the so-called royal family. Oppose them and you will vanish from the face of the earth.
Exactly how mohammad ruled over his peaple. This style of leadership is probably prescribed in their faith. Mr MJ (morojasan) It won't affect me even america waste their dollor on war. but my concern is mindanao, why should there be much kidnap for ransoms, and why should all the victims be christians? Why should criminals behead innocent peaple, and again why are all the victims christians? This question always comes to my mind everytime issues like this comes out... Are those crimes sponsored by the ruling family of their place? Or is it a part of a bigger agenda? That is a very good question mr. Malvar
I will answer your question honestly, base on the capacity of my mind. First of all I don't know the exact reason of the kidnaping incident in Mindanao. May be those people just wanted to be famous in the world and they insirted to our belief that their fight is for the religion, but they failed to appreciate the fact that in reality it distroys the good image of Islam. Or may be that is their real agenda to distroy the beautiful teachings of Islam because they are puppets of the Government, to make the world believe that Mindanao is the most uncivilised world, and therefore, the independent shall not be granted for them. I condemned all of the inhuman action of my fellow Muslims, because it is distroying the economy in Mindanao or the whole country and it affects our daily life, it is not easy to make friend with the christians, only few of you trust our friendship. Don't you worry because if I could be somebody in my Homeland in the furure, all the dreaded things will be stoped because I will execute anybody who will violate my rules, no matter how big is his family...!!! TRUST ME. AND PEACE BE UPON US TODAY. I dont think any goverment will try to stain the image of his country. No one will gain on this actions.
Honestly I was awed the last part of your post " I will execute anybody who will violate my rules, no matter how big is his family...!!!" Is that a revelation of your true character? Sorry I have to ask. ahahaha.
Galit lang ako sa mga kapatid kong muslim na patuloy na sinisira ang islam. And dont ask of my character because I am nobody, I just live with my pride and principles. bro dati nang sira ang islam.
mga bobo lang ang mga taong patuloy na naniniwala sa kultong ito Same here Mr. MJ, I am also a nobody who have fear in the Lord.
Matthew 22:36-40 36"Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?" 37Jesus replied: " 'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. 38This is the first and greatest commandment. 39And the second is like it: 'Love your neighbor as yourself. 40All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments." PEACE BE UPON US ALWAYS.... The BIG question is DID WE BLAME THE MORO PEOPLE FOR MARCOS, ERAP AND CORY's CORRUPTION????
NO, we DID NOT! Instead we protested against them.. against marcos during edsa, against erap during edsa dos and against cory during the kudeta... Eh bakit kayu? sa mindanao eh you're blaming the christians for your poor and backward way of living.. eh hindi naman mga kristyanus ang naka upo sa city hall nyu dyan sa muslim areas? BLAME YOUR ELECTED MUSLIM OFFICIALS!! NOt us christians.. TAKUT KA KASI sa mga powerful muslim political clans dyan kaya ayun naghanap ng ibang masisi sa sitwasyun sa mindanao at ang kawawang mga sibilyang kristyanus ang sinisi... WAKE UP!!!! tama ka ang problema ng mga taga Mindanao ay ang mga lider nilang muslim na mga kurap,berdugo at hambog.
Kung gusto ng mga muslim politician umunlad at maging payapa ang Mindanao sila mismo ang dapat gumawa ng hakbang dahil sila ang maga nasa posisyon para pangalagaan at paunlarin ang kani-kanilang mga nasasakupan kaya lang pulos pansariling interest ang inaatupag ng mga muslim na politikos kaya resulta magulo at maralitang pamumuhay mayroon ang Mindanao. A failure of a leader is the sufferring of its people. People in Mindanao should blames their muslim leaders for bringing chaos,poverty and war along their regions. Vote buying isa now an accepted tradition in mindanao, the poor moslem citizens are going to vote only if a candidate give them money. In cases of both candidates are strong the highest bidder takes the vote.
What they vote is what they get......a corrupt leader. Comelec cheatings are sponsored by the moslem officials in their place, for a fee- definitely.. Now some moslems blame the christians for their unfortunate fate...... Yan din ang mismong hindi ko maintindihan sa mga muslims dito sa mindanao...
Nagrerebelde kasi ayun sa kanila ay pinabayaan na daw sila ng gobyerno kaya walang kaunlaran sa mga lugar nila. Tapus hindi man lang nila napansin ang magagarang mansion at luxury SUVs ng mga naka upong MUSLIM government officials nila sa kanilang distrito. Tapus ang sisihin ang mga sibilyang kristyanus na nakatira at namumuhay lang ng mapayapa at nagtratrabaho para may makainm lang sa mga karatig lungsod nila. Hindi ba may pondo ang bawat distrito, lungsod o munisipyo? Sana ay tanungin nila yung mga elected Muslim officials nila kung saan at papaano nagamit ang pondo at hindi nalang basta magrerebelde ta pumapatay ng mga sibilyang kristyanus na hindi naman kami ang nakinabang sa PORK barrel nyu. Ang totoo nyan ay takut kasi sila andres sa kapwa muslim nilang naka upo sa kanilang city hall o capitolyo kasi for sure yari ka andres kung ikaw ay magpoprotesta sa kanila. Kaya wala talagang mga rally o welga dito sa muslim mindanao against their muslim mayor o muslim congressman o governor. At ang binuntungan ng kanilang galit at desperasyun kagaya ni andres ay ang mga kristyanus. hehehehe wake up bro... kaya karamihan sa mga muslim na yan pumupunta na lang sa luzon para magbenta ng drugs at piniratang DVD
cristian belief: "i die on my belief"
muslem belief: "you die on my belief" "now you know" - pacman Andres talagang isang kang tunay na Maranao kasi ang bobo mo at ang tigas ng ulo at hirap paintidihin..
Ito yung issue: Hindi natin ma deny na kurakot si marcos, erap, si arroyo at iba pang kristyanung nasa gobyerno. Galit din kami mga kristyanus sa kanilang pamamahala nung una sa ating gobyerno kaya nga nagprotesta kami sa EDSA 1, EDSA dos at sa kay arroyo ngayun. Tanong ko lang... Bakit hindi din kayu magprotesta laban sa mga naka upong MUSLIM officials nyu dyan sa inyung baryo sa mindanao? bakit sa mga kristyanus nyu sinisisi ang inyung kapalaran dyan sa muslim areas ng mindanao? Bakit kailangan mang kidnap, pumatay, mang rape, mambomba ng mga sibilyang kristyanus? Kami ba ay pumatay ng mga Moro dahil galit kami nila marcos, erap at arroyo? hindi naman ah.. Ngunit kayu mga moros ay nagrebelde laban sa kristyanus eh yung naka upo naman sa inyung city hall at capitolyo ay kapwa MUSLIM... ano ba yan... Hindi ba sila dapat ang sisihin nyu???? O di kayay takut kayu sa kapwa muslim na naka upo sa gobyerno... Bobong BOBO,hanggang protesta lang kayo,kaya hayan namayagpag pa rin ang mga Clan at lahi at mga Cronies ng mga ROMAN CATHOLIC DOG'S na mga PRESIDENTE,untouchable ika nga.
Ang mga Mujaheedin ay hindi lang basta protesta,at alam ninyo yan kung ilang ulit ng nakaligtas sa AMBUSH ang mga hinayupak na mga yan na mga TUTA ng KATOLIKO ROMANO.At ikaw kung gusto mo pakilala ka at Ambushin ka rin nila, para malaman mo na GAGO ka!!! Nauulol ka na nga talaga, mujaheedin ka pa diyan. Mga mamamatay tao yan na naniniwala sa kabulukan ng islam.
Wala kayong panakot kundi pumatay. GAGO, ang inspirasyon mong si mohamad ay isang kampon ni satanas... mga demonyong mujaheedin kuno. *Moslem bandits behead a farmer*:
I could not imagine how a satanic act be prescribed by a so-called religion of peace. The demonic act was probably done while they glorify the name of their god. Reports said that the head was found dumped in a secluded place, while the body was still missing. Beheading in Islam By Farzad Roohi Summarized by: MALVAR Did you know that beheading is a hundred percent consistent with the sacred teachings of the holy book of Quran? All you need to do is to read the Quran in any version and in any language. 1- *Book of Al-Maeda*, verse 33 (5:33) -“The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter;” 2-*Book of Al-Anfal*, verse 12 ( 8:12) - “I (Allah) will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off.” 3- *Book of Muhammad*, verse 4 (47:4) - “Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), strike off their heads; at length; then when you have made wide Slaughter among them, carefully tie up the remaining captives”: thereafter (is the time for) either generosity or_ ransom_: Until the war lays down its burdens.” 4- *Book of Al-Tawba*, verse 123 (9:123) - “Oh ye who believe! Murder those of the disbelievers and let them find harshness in you.” 5- *Book of Al-Baqara*, verse 191 (2:191) - “Kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from wherever they drove you out.” 6- *Book of Al-Baqara*, verse 193 (2:193) - “Fight them on until there is no more tumult and religion becomes that of Allah” 7- Book of Al-Tawba verse 29 (9:29) - "Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the last day... and fight People of the Book, (Christian and Jews) who do not accept the religion of truth (Islam) until they pay tribute (Jizyah tax) by hand, being inferior.” 8- *Book of Al-Anfal*, verse 17 (8:17) - It is not ye who Slew them, but Allah; And thou (Muhammad) threwest not when thou didst throw, but Allah threw, that He might test the believers by a fair test from Him. Lo! Allah is Hearer, Knower Allah is indeed the "Beneficent and the Merciful" and above all, Allah is knower of all things. My conclusion: Islam is bad for this world.. we'll i do agree with you kabayan
that islam is really the root cause of the moslems intolerance to other faith, for jun I beg to disagree exactly mindanao is not actually 100 percent muslim, U again are putting the lumads in bad light and forgot to acknowledge them. i think your are just one of those so-called apologist/ liberal who are trying to appease this cult and it's minions while turning a blind eye at the expense of the christians and the lumads.i will make a comparison muslims are the not only minorities who suffered so much, in fact so many islamic charities who are pouring money to alleviate their so-called sufferings. how about the igorots who helped them but see if you go to their place they're so pre-occupied about their work and they are not resenting about lack of government support, the kalinga's what about them. i think mr bernardo you are biased against the christian institution who nourished and build your character of what you become now. for your information muslim's did not invent anything for the last 500 years except bombs strap in your body(used by suicide bomber. read the koran by Al-Bukhari so you will know how much christians have suffered around the world in the name of this muslim god concocted by this so-called prophet. my father is an indian filipino and a lumad mother ramjan Ramjan Kumar,So You are Indian descent,it means you are belong to a humanoids that secretes a very very bad odor hormonal juices....Yaaaaks
For your information Ramjan Kupal,before west learned science, I would like to recommend to you, to ask your Forefathers who was captured by Muslims for almost 350 years and thought them about mathematics and algebra and proper hygene which was made your whole race became humans.And one of the evidence is the TAJ MAHAL that is magneficiently designed into a scientifically applied knowledge. MAybe you don't know the history of Golden Age of Islam,where the father of the modern medical and scientific systems had been derived. Before you laid down anything that is not credible from your mind,please try to think first million of times so that you will not be got embarassed in this blog.Your Ploy is like a silly featherbrained bee that flies in nowhere.Just think of your mental retarded delusionary ideas...ok? A typical muslim bad-mouth, this only confirms thar moslems are full of hatered.
Arrogance is one of the prescribed attitude by the koran especially to non-moslems.
#21.1.1.1.1
Andres Bonifacio
on
2009-05-20 16:53
(Reply)
A Catholic Retarded Child MalvaBOY is reacting buwahahahahahahahahahaha.....
That is why be sure of your words,also...hehehehehe...
#21.1.1.1.1.1
Anonymous
on
2009-05-20 19:11
(Reply)
Baka may lahi din yan na Indiano, na may pagka-walang hiyang kili-kili din yan.
My brothers don't forget that we Filipinos have the Muslim blood in our veins. We are only Christians because our forefathers were coverted by Spanish Colonizers into Christianity. Can't you see how our elected national leaders act the same with those elected Muslim leaders in Mindanao. Its a fact .
All of South East Asian countries were formerly under the empire of Sri Vijaya with capital in Sumatra(Buddhist State Religion)
Islam followers /proponents came over by trade & settlement schemes so they have been assimilated to society with the indegenous /native minorities Catholics became the 3rd major influence over the Asian region due to the expeditions of Spain & Portugal Sulu, Basilan, Tawi-Tawi, Maguindanao during that time were in the likes of Malaysia, Borneo, Indonesia with a MUSLIM SELF-RULE mode over their tribes Malaysia, Indonesia et al were now under a REPUBLIC GOVERNANCE with ISLAM as their State Religion It is therefore too difficult to comprehend why the MILF would want a SEPARATE STATE under Shariah governance guise over the assumption of an AUTONOMY whereas all of South East Asian region assimilated to a multi-ethnic base society Reconsider the MOA AD & you could rest assured that we shall all do whatever possible means to have AUTONOMY work on your behalf with MOROS side by side with other ethnic groups co-exist in relevant PEACE I am really amused about how these Roman Catholic Corporation are trying to divert the focus of their corporation by inventing so many terms thinking that they can convince Muslims that it is not their corporation which is the real culprit of all the Chaos and corruptions and conflict among the Muslims and the Indios in the island of the melting Pot Society.
If we are going to observe those palabras that those CAtholic Advocates had been presented in their ideas,it is about the blaming of the Muslim leaders now is their focus to divert attentions of the readers in this blog out of the issues regarding their Catholic corporation malpractices social doctrines. it is already recapitulated so many times,again and again telling this perverted so called novices and local philosophers of Catholic Defenders,that all what is in Political Practices now among the habitat of the so called Philippine archipelago Moro or Indios are all patterned in Catholic Corporation Social Doctrines.And the Moros are just only influenced by the powerful political needs of every clan in the whole country.No need to elaborate further just to elicit the truth of CAtholic Corporation.It is there already and being easy to understand even a small boy.It is these KAGWANG's only who are making the whole things very complicated by diverting so many terms,thinking of new Philosophy that can make readers to be entertained in their unending ideas and LIES. nakakasakit ng ulo ang inglis mo....tagalugin mo na lang.
sira siguro ulo mo!!!!!! observe ko lang..... Ang sabi ko Tintoy,kayong mga KATOLIKO ay mga BOBO at TANGA pero MAGULANG..magulang as in MARU or Sigurista,swetik, ganid, sindikato etc.etc. ano pa ba ang dapat itawag sa inyo?Kahit ilang beses ng pabalik balik na lang ang mga paliwanag sa inyo ay pilit pa rin kayong nagpapalusot sa mga KAGAGUHAN na kayo rin ang may gawa.
Ang Kasaysayan mismo ng Pilipinas at ng mundo ang magpapatunay niyan kahit sino sa mundo lalo na kung may talino ay talagang lalabas ang larawan ng Katolisismo na siyang may gawa sa lahat ng starvation or gutom, humanitarian crisis, economic crisis, political crisis, social crisis lahat ng yan ay kayo or Katolisismo ang dahilan. Isipin niyo na lang magpapakalat kayo ng Magandang balita tungkol kay Jesus ay kailangan niyo pang hingan ng pera ang mga taong nagpapaniwala sa relihiyon ng mga BAKLA,PIDOPHILES at mga Sodomist na mga PAri,MAdre at LAity ninyo? Gusto mo Tintoy ibalik ko uli ang pangangalkal ng inyung baho ulit at ng para tayong sirang plaka dito,gusto mo ba???O di kaya gagawa uli ako ng Tula? Ang KAtoliko,Opus Dei,Jesuits,OMI at Vatican City....Vow wow wow of Sacrifice... hehehehehehehe.... Again and again you blame the Christians on the misfortunes of Mindanao even if the leaders are Moslems like you. Why not blame your moslem leaders who dumped your brothers and sisters into the quicksand of poverty, ignorance, and confusion.
It is obvious that Moslems like you never desired to have peace in Mindanao, you wanted all of Mindanao. Just like the news today, the kidnapped farmers head was found discarded and the body still missing, a ghastly way to die. I could only pity the poor family whom the Moslem kidnappers demanded 5,000,000 pesos. Moslems terrorize the Christian residents into leaving their lands. This shows that the Islamic religion is weak and could not stand out with other religions. You speak of Christian corporations I think you should just look into the zakat of your brothers that should go to the poor Moslems for education, foods (in Africa) Date: May 21, 2009
Headlines: Isang muslim natagpuang pugot ang ulo matapos magprotesta laban sa kanilang muslim na mayor. Ayun sa PNP, minasaker ang pamilya ng blogger na si andres bonifacio at pinugot ang kanyang ulo matapos nitong mag tanong sa kanilang muslim mayor kung bakit walang kaunlaran ang kanilang baryo at kung saan napupunta ang kanilang pondo sa munisipyo. Takut ang mga kapwa muslim na tumestigo sa mga salarin kahit na may balita na mga goons ng muslim mayor ang mismong pumatay kay andres bonifacio na kapwa muslim din. Ang brutal na krimen na ito ay hindi na bago sa mindanao para gawing halimbawa para takutin ang mga moro dun na huwag susuway sa kanilang naka upong muslim mayor. Kaya pala hanggang ngayon ay wala kang mabalitang nagwewelga o nagproprotesta na mga kabataan, o mga tao dun sa muslim areas laban sa kanilang corrupt na muslim mayor at congressman. Kaya pala magaling lang sa mga kristyanus mangsisi itong si andres ay dahil alam nya ang sasapitin nya kung sakaling mag voice out sya laban sa mga katiwalian ng kanilang muslim mayor dun. hahahahahaha
eh wala naman talagang magagawa dyan sa Mindanao,hopeless case yan
eh pag nagpadala ka ng gagawa ng kalsada kikidnapin, papuntahin mo ang turista kikidnapin, papuntahin mo yung mga investor kikidnapin, ultimong teachers na pinapunta mo dun para turuan ng karunungan at kagandahang asal ang mga batang muslim kinikidnap din, eh pinugutan pa ng ulo yung isang titser na nakidnap nila kailan lang.. tapos sisihin ang kristyano sa kahirapan nila eh ang daming muslim kidnappers at killers dyan mismo sa kanilang lugar kaya walang katahimikan dyan sa lugar nila, dagdag mo pa yung mga leaders na corrupt din yung iba naman dating rebelde at killers din paano nga uunlad at matatahimik ang mindanao That is your foresight, there is a saying that; a person who is awoke is hard to be awaken.The solution of Mindanao si not that too hard to resolve in the part of the Muslims.It is only hard from the sides of Catholic.Indirectly Catholics will appoint immediately among its Brownies and Dobberman politicians to block any attempt of Moro freedom fighters to established a resolution that would pave the centennial claims and struggles of Bangsamoro people for self determination of their own ancestral land.Due to Catholics vulnerable economic and heirarchial interest that will be vanished the moment it will be pursued.
It is not new and rear awareness in the world what and how the Catholic had been very protective on their Heirarchial colonies like Philippines.No need to say again and again that if they will be displaced from Mindanao,their business interest will be lessen.Their power will weakened and influences will cut-off,thats how simple is it. If you are saying that the problems of Mindanao is not hard for Muslims to resolve why then are you asking , waiting and pointing your dirty fingers on the Catholic for the solution your own problems, its only common for everybody to protect their own interest..are you not protecting your own rights under Philippine republic Laws which you try to secede from, why then if you got robbed or punched on the face by somebody you go to police authority to made your complain..its hypocracy ..its like biting the hand thats feeding you..if you cannot stand your perceived violation of your right under the Catholic Phillipine Republic then you are free to leave and go to a Muslim country to train under a mujahideen, you can comeback if you want to sow terror on our midst but be sure not to asko protection from the Catholic Philiippine Republic,,by the way before you can go get a passport first where? I don't know just make sure its not the Phillpine passport .
Datu Piagong Kugang,the Moros never ask it,they demand it for it is their rights,and not only their rights, but a birth rights.The solution is stepping it by revolution now!, if cannot be resolved by demanding it through MOA-AD.
Moros is pointing it to the Catholics,why because everyone knows that behind those resistance of Catholic Politicians are the Roman Catholic itself.Does those who strongly opposed the MOA-AD are protestant???They are all Roman Catholics???And they are not just a Roman Catholic but a protectorate of Roman Catholic Corporation.Remember pointing fingers, to Catholic does not mean Moros cannot come up into a peaceful solution of their struggles.That is the very reason why that inspite of collaborating the Government for 11 years it is the facts that outside force from the Catholic Factions politicians were pushed to intervened in pursuant of the Catholic Heirarchial Interest. Why Manny Piñol,MAr Roxas,Franklin Drilon,Celso Lobregat,Mayor Cruz and others.Who are these people?Why not all the mayors of those affected areas???Why not all the Governors of those affected areas??? Do I reveal their connection in the Knight of Columbus,Opus Dei,St. Borromeo Family,Catholic Shepperd Army,The Jesusits Laity's and other Catholic Prelates????Again if it is mention,then you will say that it is plagiarism...hehehehehehehe...Oh my Goodness...Are we going again and again their connections in Catholic Social Doctrines????? Again and again, I am Categorically blaming the Catholics Corporation and Christians Churches for all the crisis that the Philippines society suffered from within its social turmoils.No need of recycling again and again the causes and effects of its Social Doctrines that ruined the whole society into a trap of social conflict and economic sabotage.
Does it needs to explain again the fraudulent and conspiracy of Catholic Corporation in order to maintain their interest and existence in the region??? I think no need,it has been elaborated already from the previous topics how the Catholicism manipulate all the things into a turmoil and dragged everyone into a well of nowhere. Just take a look what the CBCP had done!,their participation in all social actions which even the politics was not spared from their plan and intentions. How many times Catholics involves and participated on sabotage and policy interventions.Even in law making body, they are there,trying to influence everything and everyone just to protect their interest.How many times they have been succeed to influence the law making body.You cannot count the numbers and no need to enumerate. The logic is very simple,what is the function of CBCP and all its prelatures??? even if you repeat it again and again about Christianity's failure ang lagay ng buhay at katahimikan sa mindanao di na yan magbabago, I repeat hopeless case yan
unless magbago ang mga muslim at mga lider nila. eto nga paos na paos na ang mga Kristyano sa kasisigaw ng pagbabago sa mga lider namin sa Luzon dadagdagan nyo pa, eh samantalang kayo ni wala kaming nakitang nagrally lban sa corruption ng mga muslim leaders nyo dyan para sa katahimikan at kaunlaran ng mindanao. Tama ka Datu pianono!!!
Wala talagang mag rally o magprotesta man lang dito sa muslim areas laban sa kanilang naka upong corrupt na muslim mayor o congressman o governor kasi tiyak sa kankungan ka pupulutin na walang ulo... Kaya itong si andres sa mga katoliko sinisi ang kahirapan sa mindanao eh yung naka upong mayor naman nila ay kapwa muslim din. Bakit hindi nila tanungin yun kung saan ang pondo? Takut kasi.. Bakit ba andres mas maunlad ang mga christian cities like cagayan de oro city, davao city, bukidnon at iligan city? merun ka bang alam na muslim city sa mindanao na mapayapa at maunlad??? WALA!!! kasi puro violente at garapalan mangurakut yung mga muslim elected politicians nyu dyan,,, Walang masama kung ang Simbahan ay lumahok sa isyung pampulitika dahil sila ay isang Democratic Institution na kabahagi para magkaroon ng Check & Balance sa lipunan.
Kung punahin ng kurap ang kapwa kurap maniniwala kba? Yan ang dahilan kung kayat dapat lang sumali sa paghuhubog ng bansa ang mga Alagad-ng-Dios Hayaan nyong ang Simbahan ay gumabay sa pang moral at prinsipyong pundasyon sa bansa at lalu pa kung ang mga prinsipyong yan ay nababaliko na sa legalidad ng mga ipinapasang secular na batas Hindi ba't ang Shariah Law sa Islam ay batas rin sa gobyerno ayun sa paniniwalang relihiyon? Ang pakikilahok ng Simbahan ay para lang sa moral at prinsipyo pero hindi para isali ang doktrina sa mga Secular na batas ng bansa Lahat ng Relihiyon ay humihingi ng donasyon sa membro para maipagpatuloy nila ang serbisyong espiritwal PAGPALAIN KAYONG LAHAT NG PANGINOON Again here we are again,If we observe the way of formulating their ideas in persuading the readers with these Noviciates,you will detect the strategy of double meaning.This technique in any form of argumentation will not determine the end or no determination at all.In this way, the conversation or dialogue will only hang upto when both sides will agree to stop.
When you say principle,does it not involve laws???Why you confuse the audiences, if you are sincere enough to come into a solution???Your comparative between the corrupt and the other corrupt will only put them in the midst of incapability to detenrmine which is the rotten one.It is just like "Ang magnanakaw ay galit sa kapwa magnanakaw" then you will be in trouble now how to determine who is the true culprit between the two.And in that passage, the Noviciate will ask can it be possible to accept that a certain magnanakaw can be in the affirmative side since both of them are magnanakaw??So,Noviciate is giving a doubt to obstruct the justice between the two magnanakaw.But in the technical legal term of law,it is not a matter, whether they are both magnanakaw,because judgemental verdict is base on facts,evidence and witnesses. It is also the same in foreseeing between or among the religious struggling political authority,it is not by assumptions of both are corrupt but it is base on facts,evidence and witnesses.How could you check both the criminals if your argument is that both of them are suspects.So this is how noviciate theatrically mislead the audiences. alam mo ba andres na ang kaibigan mong si Ibrahim at mummin ay sumapi na sa dating daan?
Hinihintay ka na nila doon. It is unattainable for a man like Andres to comprehend the corruption of his cohorts in faith.
He will turn his head away from the beheadings, kidnappings rapes and the political misfits of his brothers and sisters in faith. A man like Andres is obsessed by the persona of his beloved Mohammad who killed senselessly and raped his captured women. Married a six year old girl and promised his cronies the prize of 70 virgin women in his imagined heaven. He violated the laws of islam because he knew too well that islam was only an invention of himself. The readers of this blog should wonder how this people glorify their gods name as they behead a person they kidnapped and tortured. Bomb and set fire on places that killed innocent lives. How can someone view those dreadful acts and point an accusing finger to the other religions. You have a wrong and twisted knowledege about Islam. I pity you.
that guy was delving into saying about lies , corruption and thievery "Ang magnanakaw ay galit sa kapwa magnanakaw" applicable din sa inyong Muslim yan batikos ka ng batikos ng kahinaan ng katoliko tingnan mo nga pinaggagawa nyo sa Mindanao..sa takot ng tao di na makalakad at makapamasyal sa mga lugar para magdala ng tulong sa mga kakabayang muslim na naghhirap..at least ang tao sa Luzon nakakapamasyal at nakakagala sa gusto nilang puntahan..
If you are saying that the problems of Mindanao is not hard for Muslims to resolve why then are you asking , waiting and pointing your dirty fingers on the Catholic for the solution your own problems,
its only common for everybody to protect their own interest..are you not protecting your own rights under Philippine republic Laws which you try to secede from, why then if you got robbed or punched on the face by somebody you go to police authority to made your complain..its hypocracy ..its like biting the hand thats feeding you ..if you cannot stand your perceived violation of your right under the Catholic Phillipine Republic then you are free to leave and go to a Muslim country to train under a mujahideen, you can comeback if you want to sow terror on our midst but be sure not to ask for protection from the Catholic Philiippine Republic laws ,,by the way before you can go get a passport first where? I don't know just make sure its not the Phillpine passport . At inamin din Ameeen...hehehehe...A fish cannot be caught from its tail,but from its mouth...hehehehe...Catholic like this is not so carefully watching his tounge in delivering his compounding and full of Lies palabras,that is why by his own carelessness he admitted a facts of clandestines.
I do believed that Andres Bonifacio is a malaysian national.He dream of having Mindanao becomes part of Malaysia.
Kaya anuman ang paliwanag nyong gawin sa taong yan ay hindi yan sainyo makikinig dahil ang ipinaglalaban ni Andres ang pansariling interest ng bansang pinanggalingan nya. It is very clear that Mindanao is already a part of Philippines Republic but that MILF man name Andres Mohammed Bonifacio is a diehard patriotic member of MILF,if not the intelligent officer of Abu Sayyap. Galit sya sa mga kristiyano dahil isa syang radikal na muslim. Gaya ng nangyari sa Sri Lanka ang mga hindu at buddhist ay nagpapatayan dahil sa lupang gusto masakop ng isa´t-isa. Walang kristiyanong kasali sa giyera doon pero bakit mga hindu at buddhist hindi rin magkasundo? Andres Mohammed Bonifacio simply want Malaysia to own Mindanao para si Andres ang magbuhay hari with 70 virgins. It only show that Andres only cares for his self-interest. Ang naiisip ko lang ang isang paraan ng pagkakabuklod buklod ng isang bansa katulad ng Pilipinas eh isang digmaan na alam naman natin ay mahirap at nakakatakot. Pag me common enemy dun nagbubuklod buklod , tingnan mo pamilya mo pag me nakaaway yung kapatid mo o kahit sinong kapamilya , tutulong ka kahit kagalit mo yung napaaway mong kapatid.
Di katulad ng gyera natin sa Pinas ngayon na war for corruption, war for good government..yung protracted war sa Mindanao at laban ng makakaliwa nag-uugat din yan sa corruption. Di nyo ba napapansin ang slogan ng makakaliwa pag nagrarally o protesta puro "itigil ang corruption" ,"palitan ang gobyerno dahil sa corruption" . Katulad ng ngyari sa Vietnam at ngayon sa Sri Lanka na gyerang sibilyan . kasi alam mo kung sino ang kalaban mo , kung sino ang papanigan mo , ang manalo sila ang masusunod at gagawa ng isang gobterno na susundin ng nakarami, ang matatalo naman talagang susunod ...ika nga national cleansing..from inside out ang cleansing, kasi paikot ikot lang ang problema natin simula pa nun, basahin nyo yung mga balita nung 1960's hanggang ngayon, halos pare pareho ang problema at daing ng mga Pilipino. Kaya nga halimbawang lumusob ang mga muslim na taga labas na may intensyong digmain ang Pilipinas palagay ko magkakaisa din ang mga Pinoy . O kaya lumusob ang mga kasamahang muslim ni Andres sa Luzon para sa gyera naku palagay ko kahit ayoko kay Arroyo basta sinabi nyang lusob mga kristyano sasama ako sa lulusob..ang sarap mangarap talaga The ethnic french-speaking minority of QUEBEC in Canada as well as Muslim minorities in Australia also tries to POLITICALLY SEPARATE themselves from the rest of their national community & existing government.
Quebec however were given AUTONOMY due to results of a privelege referendum while muslims in Australia were denied of their demands to adopt Shariah laws for themselves. Because Democratic System at this point in time were the best tool to govern a Multi-ethnic society wereby each minority group determines their own representation to governance. Each minority group shares the same responsibility to national society as a whole that is why that POLITICS OF SEPARATISM will not hold water in RP or in any other country that you can name. Is there any term as Political Separatism?Most of the Social,political,sociologist enthusiast called the act of the Moro as Secession.
Let us analyze between the secession and political separatism that this noble of the bopols noviciate. The term SECESSION is not part of Political theory mainstream it was largely ignored.Therefore Secession is morality of Political Divorce,but not political itself, it is the right of any society if they believe that they were abusely or denied by equal protection of fundamental law of the land.It is a right rather than a political entity that would compete to rule a certain country,administration or authority.It is a social rights of people to have a self determination for their own good. Now let us talk about Political Separatism, does any groups or academic groups that exist and define a Political Separatism?Even in any form of Academic Philosophy we cannot find a term political separatism.I don't know where Noviciate took this term himself. In secession there is no contest of ruling as the term politics define itself.in Secession is only demanding separation, in it is in the form of revolution or demand of recognition.Secession will never contest by campaigning of favor nor submission to an election from the majority of the society,but it demands by either revolution or recognition. What is a political?is a term use to any entity that involve in any policy making or a social decision for common good or civil government,while secession is not. This noviciate is really a Catholic Prelate and he is deeply contaminated with the Catholic Virus of Social Doctrines and libelous mentality that would create a very deep confusion among the audiences.Using and creating his own terms,in order that the mind settings of the blog audiences will believe on his new philosophical idea that only pave away from the real issue of Catholic Social Doctrines and its involvement in blocking the secession movement of the Moros. Mr. Noviciate if I where you, it is better kill yourself rather than make yourself as sarcastic entity and a slander person for the sake of your religion It is evident that there is no chance for peace with Moslems.
The islam religion is actually an evil cult. Remember they claim that their god is the creator of mankind and is a most merciful god. In contradiction why does a god who so-called created mankind is the one murdering his creation. They say a most merciful god but why is he prescribing people to mercilessly behead innocent people in his name.. Their gods chosen prophet mohammad should be imitated by muslems. A pedophile who married a 6 year old girl and murdered many people and raped his captured slaves. Mohammad died while in the act of having sex with his 8 year old wife.. kaya nga sinasabi ko hopeless case yang problema ng gulo sa Mindanao.
di nga yan napatino ng mga sumakop na Kastila at yung sumakop na Amerikano eh etong dalawang foreign powers eh ginamitan na nila ng brutal force ang mga moro nun wala ring ngyaring kalahatang katahimikan, eh tayo pa kayang Kristyanong Pinoy na mahabagin at maawain na pag lumusob ang AFP at nakipagpalitan ng bala sa mga Moro at me tinamaan na batang muslim o sibilyan..hala dyaryo na yan tigil ulit ang putukan at katakot takot na imbestigasyon. problema naman kasi pag pinabayaan mong humiwalay ang mindanao eh wala naman katapusang gulo yan kasi hihingi naman ulit ang mga muslim ng ibang lupain ng Pinas sasabihin historically rights ng muslim ang Pilipinas. gulo din pulitikal kasi ayaw namang mabawasan ng mga makasariling national leaders natin ang kikitain nila financially...daming commercial plantation dyan na mawawala at lupain , yung mga mining business madami din, natural forest sus ang daming pwedeng gawing logging firm dun atbp, kaya mga kabayan wag na kayong umasang me kapayapaan mangyayari sa Mindanao parang Afhganistan yan na walang katahimikan kahit na sinakop ng USSR dati at kano naman ngayon, Unless mag tuloy tuloy ang global warming at tumaas ang dagat at malubog ang isla ng Pilipinas ayun cguro ang kapayapaan na hinihintay ng mga muslim. Mahirap talaga ang pamumuhay sa Mindanao dahil narin sa kaibang pamamalakad..PAPAANO Magkakaroon ng kapayapaan sa Mindanao lahat yata halos sa kanila ay gustong MAGHARI HINDI SA KAUNLARAN KUNG HINDI SA PAGPAPAYAMAN..BIRUIN MO BINIBIGYAN NA SILA NG SARILING LUPAIN (BANSA) SA TINGIN KO AY AYAW PA NILA..??? MAGULO HINDI BA..? DAHIL MAY SARISARILI SILANG HANGARIN OR SABIHIN NA...BAWAT GRUPO SA KANILA AY NAIS MAGING "LIDER" KAYA WALANG IBANG GUMAGAWA NG GULO SA MINDANAO KUNG HINDI SILA SILA RIN..ISAMA PA NATIN ANG MGA IBINIBIGAY NA TULONG NG LAHAT NG ARAB COUNTRIES..SA TINGIN NYO SAAN ITO NAPUPUNTA...WALANG NAKAKA ALAM..SAAN PA KUNG DI "KUNG SINO ANG MAY MALAKING GRUPO ITON ANG MAKIKINABANG SA LAHAT NG TULONG PINANSIYAL NG LAHAT NG ARAB COUNTRIES...
KUNG NATATANDAAN NINTO NG MAMMATAY SI "ARAFAT".. ALAM NATING LAHAT KUNG SINO SI ARAFAT SIYA AY KINILALA SA BUONG MUNDO BILANG MAGITING NA "MANDIRIGMA" NG PALESTINIAN..SAKSI TAYONG LAHAT SA KARUMALDUMAL NA KRIMEN NANGYARI NG NASA LEBANON AT IKINAMATAY NA ANG PAKIKIPAG LABAN... HINDI KO HALOS MAKAKAPANIWALA ANG MADISKUBRE NG GUBYERNO NG LEBANON SA PERANG NAKATAGO SA ACCOUNT NIYA US.4 BILLION..WOW..PAPAANO SIYA NAGKAROON NG GANITONG HALAGA..MAHABA ANG ISTORYANG ITO.. KAYA SA AKING PANIWALA "PERA" AT PULITIKA ANG DAHILAN KAYA WALANG KATAHIMIKAN SA MINDANAO..LAHAT GUMAGAWA NG "M A D U M I" PAGKAKAPERAHAN..!! The separatist TAMIL TIGERS of Sri Lanka are now defeated completely after 27 years of rebellion
The government of Sri Lanka are offering a power sharing strategy to governance & have allowed Tamil ethnic communities to flourish Maybe we can bring NPA-NDF & the MILF group to participating on governance, engage on politics & recieve their legitimate claims without this much dreaded war. Be it reminded to them as well that NATIONAL INTEREST & the welfare of various ethnic groups shall not in anyway be forfieted MINAMAHAL NA BANSANG PILIPINAS In War, there is no defeated nor victory.In Battle yes, there is winner and losser. In the case of Tamil tigers and Sri Lankan war,try to trace back their war history.It is not only once they defeat the Tamil Tigers in Battle but never in War.Because War is different from battle though battle is an element of war.
Do you think Iraqi were defeated from war?Do you think the West will win the Al-Qaida?Hehehehehehehehe...MGA UGOK AT BUGOK!!! Andres tanga ka ! pareho lang yan ng digmaan at gyera tanga!
Totoo na ang ninuno natin (history) tayo ay mga muslim at napalitan ng dumating si Magellan,ganoon paman mahirap ng intindihin ang magkaibang kultura na ating kinalakihan..bakit nga kaya ginagawa ng mga Muslim sa Mindanao ay puro Kristiyano ang dinidukot at hindi mga muslim..galit ba sila sa mga kristiyano..?? sa paki wari ko hindi itnuturo sa "quran" ang gumawa ng ganyan..di kaya pulitika rin ang dahilan na kaylan lang ay napabalita na may sumosoporta na hindi maipaliwanag..may dahilan din na ito ay ginagawang hanap buhay..dahil narin sa ito ang madaling pagkaka perahan..at kung mapapansin ninyo ang MILF ay walang pakialam sa Abu Sayaf dahil ang MILF ay iba ang pinag kakakitaan ANG TULONG NG ARAB COUNTRIES..malakihan kaya nga kahit anong sulong ng gubyerno para matuldukan na ang gulo ay AYAW PA NILA..kahit pa binibigyan na sila ng sariling lupa ay EWAN KO BA..???
Gusto lang ng MILF ay makasiguro na sila ang mamumuno..papaano kaylan lang nagkaroon ng halalan hindi sila ang naka "tala" na mamumuno kaya malabo..malabo pa sa LUBLUBAN NG KALABAW..at nakaka siguro ako hindi nila kaylan man na gusto "humiwalay" PAPA ANO NA ANG GRASYA IBINIBIGAY NG ARAB COUNTRIES...SAAN KAPA..DI SA MAY GRASYA...BAKIT PA NGA SILA HIHIWALAY SA PINAS..??? As one of a close muslim friend told me...
"If ever mindanao is to secede and govern on itself from the Philippines then there would be endless chaos and violence. She said it is because these ruling powerful muslim political clans and families will fight with each other in control over areas of mindanao." Then mindanao will be like somalia without a ruling government. Each city or town will have its own warlord with its own private armies to maintain and sow terror among its residents. Mindanao will be like afghanistan when the strict islamic laws will be imposed upon its people. Women will not be allowed to go to school, or wear make up and must cover their faces or be executed on sight. And the rich flourishing city of cagayan de oro, davao, bukidnon and iligan city will be in ruins. and the backward way of living of marawi city will be imposed in those cities. And andres bonifacio will be the pet dog of a muslim governor in mindanao. Chained to a leash and very loyal to his master. And barks at catholics. While his master tries to pacify the dog andres. si andres ka ba???
hindi siguro..... philippines a muslim country before?? are you kidding or joking... or you're just an ignorant,stupid tama si kabayansiguro mujahideen ka nga a.k.a."braindead zombie" muslims are all believers of conspiracy theory.. they are all perverting the written history... anyway i'm a human not a zombie its no sense talking to a zombie. i'm proud of my heritage as an indian and a filipino christian, who abhorrs 7th century barbarism in the name of religion... shalom... ramjan Ehemm...
I am sorry if I was not here from your previous discusions. Anyway, you called the muslims in this chat room who are defending their religion in a very diplomatic way as a terrorist, OW I SEE, DID WE BOMBED YOU IN OUR LANGUAGE? I think using legal argument is not withint the elements of the so called HUMAN SECURITY LAW as to be called a terrorist. How about you guys are not terrorist also if your difinition of terrorist is being radical of the religion of God. You are also using harsh and insulting terms or words, just to defend your religion. Ako ang taga bantay ng english nyu!!
Hoy! anung sabi mong "DIFINITION" ? Definition po ang tamang spelling kapatid. Bakit si MJ lang ang napansin mong may mga mali sakanyang grammar?
Bk8 d ung iba. Atsaka isa pa it will not affect him, gwapo parin c MJ Sagotin mo ang mga katanungan nya...? Hindi nyo masagot no kasi bobo ka hindi mo alam ang sagot. PORO NOVEL kasi ang binabasa mo??? Kya laman ang utak mo NOVEL, bading. d nmn yta ito debate for good grammar ah?? Wag kang bading stick to the real topic. Bago e publish ang isinulat ng manunulat iniidit muna ito gago. kc bka may mga mali s spelling nya o s grammar. kya normal lng ngkkmli ung grmmr o splng ng isng man2lt. gago.. HOY! ako ang taga bantay ng english nyu!
Anung sabi mong "DID WE BOMBED... "? Dapat "BOMB" lang ang gamiting verb pag ikaw ay gumamit ng word na "DID" Ang tamang phrase asy "DID WE BOMB.." Saan school sa marawi ka ba nag aral ha? Ha pakituruan mo bakla yung mga kababayan mong gumamit ng I, period at apostrophe. ung mga spelling at grammar din nila malimali.
Ung bading bawal sa Religion nyu yan. Kaya wag kang HOY na HOY dito gago. You were also vehemently calling our leaders as corrupt public offocials. Thus, you blamed to them the plight of Bangsamoro.
My answere is very simple, they became corrupt because of the corrupt system of government that we adopt from western colonizers. What if our system of government is like in Sudi Arabia, Kuwait, Brunie, Malaysia, Qatar, Dubai and etc., do you think corruption will be part of our culture in this country, my answer would be no, because corrupt public officials will be scared to the law who would give them harsh punishment once they attempt. Remeber that the richest and most beautiful country now in the world are Muslim countries, were millions of our compatriots are woskin like slaves. Can you name even five public officials in Country who are honest and never corrupt in their whole life of public service? PLATO, the man who invented the word democracy as a system of goverment, and from which George Washington the founder of the US Democracy copied his ideal form of government.
The famous political scientist once said that '' justice means minding one's own business and not meddling with oher men concerns.'' Again you said that in Somalia, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Palestine, let me add Sudan have a very chaotic and low kind livelihood because of the Religion Islam. Your contention is 110 percent wrong. Because in Somalia, when the Sharia law established their as the fundamental law of the land, every thing became moot and acadimic. The warlords that you said arosed when US started meddling to the National soveriegnty of Somalia, US gave Billions of dollars to its neighbor countries for weapons purposes to supress the Sharia implementation in Somalia. I think the US government forgot the doctrine of DEMOCRACY and that is to mind your own business and not to middle with the life of the others. Wala ka ng pag asa pa MJ... puta puro wrong spelling at wrong grammar ang last 2 paragraphs mo!!!
Nakakadiri!!! Wag ka nalang mag englis please... parang awa mo na.... Bakit si MJ lang ang napansin mong may mga mali sakanyang grammar?
Bk8 d ung iba. Atsaka isa pa it will not affect that, dahil gwapo parin si MJ. Clerical error lang yan bro. Sagotin mo ang mga katanungan nya. Atsaka anong ''hoy'' bading, ang hoy gay language yan. Bakla Wheeeeeeew!
BLAME OH BLAME!!! Democratic governance were always immoral & corrupt.....while Shariah governance a divine & in perfect utopia..... SOMALIA AFGHANISTAN NIGERIA INDONESIA PAKISTAN et al Sinong lokohin nyo sa argumentong ganyan??? In Afghanistan and Iraq were peaceful and loving country, no crimes in day and night.
But when the American came in the said countries and teached them to be worst citizen of the world, the once prosperous and peaceful nation became the nightmare of the world. Ako ang taga bantay sa mga maling english nyu!!!
Anung teached???? "taught" po ang past tense ng teach... ngeks... I might be a liar for sometimes, but trust me not this time.
Why don't you read the history, specially the history of Israil on how they grabed the lands of ARABS in PALESTINE. Imagine, what will you do if somebody who is came from no where, will suddenly appear in your quite home and burn it, murder your parents, and rape your beautiful sisters? Lahat ng bansang muslim binaggit ni MJ ay datihan ng magulo dahilan sa awayan ng bawat muslim tribes at warlords.
Chaotic na yan bago paman pumasok ang UN intervention dahilan sa mga humanitarian crisis.....kaya lang ang bansang US at UK lang ang palaging nakikitang nanghihimasok dahil sila ay kilalang christian countries Huag kayong kakagat sa propaganda ng militanteng muslim dahil gusto lang nilang makakopo ng pamamahala dahil nakundisyon ang mentalidad nila sa paghahabol ng SPOILS OF WAR sa kulturang Islam sa paraan ng Jihad Have you read the statement of the great Jun Mercado above?
let me qoute it to you mr. coward. ''During the past 100 years, Mindanao has seen a dramatic shift in population and landownership that has contributed to the Moro rebellion. In 1900 the Muslim population in Mindanao made up more than 90% of the island’s inhabitants, but by 1970, the Muslims constitute barely 20% of the population of Mindanao. The population shift came about through policies that gave the settler population from Luzon and the Visayas incentives to migrate to Mindanao. The new immigrants cleared the vast plains in Central Mindanao for agriculture and soon new towns and provinces were established.'' NOW TELL ME FROM THE DEEPEST OF YOUR CONSCIENSE, WHO IS THE REAL AGGRESSOR? PLEASE? HOy! anung CONSCIENSE???
Puta ka MJ... english ka ng english eh puro naman mali spelling mo at grammar.. Please po mag tagalog ka na lang kasi nakakasuka na! CONSCIENCE po ang tamang spelling!! KANINA KA PA HA... Bakit si MJ lang ang napansin mong may mga mali sakanyang grammar?
Bk8 d ung iba. Atsaka isa pa it will not affect that, dahil gwapo parin si MJ. Clerical error lang yan bro. Sagotin mo ang mga katanungan nya. TAMA na man ang spelling ni IDOL MJ AH.
CONSCIENCE. cra p t ang mta mo ah. hbd k lng pla bkla no. TAMA na man ang spelling ni IDOL MJ AH.
CONSCIENCE. cra p t ang mta mo ah. hnd k lng pla bkla no. Huag kayong kakagat sa propaganda ng militanteng muslim dahil gusto lang nilang makakopo ng pamamahala dahil nakundisyon ang mentalidad nila sa paghahabol ng SPOILS OF WAR sa kulturang Islam sa paraan ng Jihad.
What kind of reasoning is that? Are you elementary? What books did you read? Do you know how to make debate using cogent and intellect arguments? Please I am encouraging to all of you to reason within the capacity of your mind. Avoid copying and pasting the works of the other here. Your proposotion must be directly, exclusively and independenlty coming from in your mind. Do not cheat me. Aha!!! from # 29 above, NOVICIATES said that
Walang masama kung ang Simbahan ay lumahok sa isyung pampulitika dahil sila ay isang Democratic Institution na kabahagi para magkaroon ng Check & Balance sa lipunan. OH really, you are not aware of the 1987 constitution, the supreme law of the land mandated that the CHURCES and the STATE shall be seperated at all times. For that reason the People's CONSTITUTION abolished the religion!!! Mr. Noviciates claim again from his above statement that Lahat ng Relihiyon ay humihingi ng donasyon sa membro para maipagpatuloy nila ang serbisyong espiritwal. The law said that the money of the governmet shall not be used in any religion denomination impliedly or direcly. Now brilliant people of this chat room tell whose religion has violated the laws of the land? PLEASE??? Separation of Church & State:
Ang mga isyu ng doktrina at pinansyal na tulong ng Estado sa Simbahan ang tinutukoy dyan na pagbubukod ng Simbahan at Estado Hindi kasama sa separation of Church & State na ibukod ang religion sa pagmamalasakit para sa bansa Dahil nakatala sa Kunstitusyon na bawat Pilipino ay dapat makilahok para sa kapakanan ng bansa Many of those Non-Government Organization & Institutions involved in lobbying political agenda involving Pinoy values, principles & morality have a religious mass base http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-3X5hIFXYU
please see it to inspire you. Oh! The richest and the most beautiful countries in the world are in the middle east.
What? In the middle east where our filipina workers are raped by their employers. And if the raped filipina goes to the sharia law the employers invent an accusation that the filipina is a thief. Oh yes, in your koran moslems are allowed to rape their slaves as their prophet did. And who are the terrorists, are you blind not to notice the kidnappings and beheadings done by your brothers and sisters in faith. I could not imagine that you blame the christians for the currupt moslem leaders. Hey, are you going to blame the kidnappings and beheadings to the other religions. Sharia law that will make corruptions extinct by killing them all. Yes kill, kill and more killings. I'll bet the moslems in power will eliminate all his oppositions by no less than kill, kill and more killings. Is there an election in the middle east? From what I know the ruling family owns the country, oppose them and the sharia law will drown them in the middle of the desert. And yes, catholics other religions had bonded in EDSA 1 to overthrow a corrupt government. In sharia can we do this? OO nga tama nga sila na ang richest countries ay nasa middle east..
Pero dahil yan sa langis at petroleum oil na nasa ilalim ng kanilang lupain... Kung hindi dahil sa OIL na yan mas mahirap pa sa pilipinas ang mga taga middle east kasi alam naman natin na mga tamad itong mga arabo at muslim sa middle east... Kaya nga maraming nag abroad dun para magtrabaho as truck drivers, oil factory workers, construction workers, domestic helpers, nurses, medtechs, industrial workers, etc... kasi mga tamad ang mga arabo magtrabaho.. INCOME lang nila ay dahil sa OIL... Hintayin natin na maubusan ng OIL yan sila o di kayay magdatingan na ang mga ELECTRIC cars (which is what is happening now in america with the invention of hybrid vehicles and electric vehicles)... hindi ba maghihirap din yan ang mga arabo sa middle east kasi walang ibang alam na talento o trabaho kundi magbenta lang ng langis... Swerte lang sila dahil sa langis... mga tamad naman yan at bobo... yumaman lang dahil sa langis at hindi sa sariling kayod o talento.. #47 Iraq were peaceful & loving country....
How can u say that when iraqi soldiers rampages over Kuwait & rape fellow filipinas Malinaw na analysis lang at rationality ang kailangan mo MJ Hlatang propagandista ka ng MILF mga tol'
hindi nga natin alam na baka yong kinikita nila sa pagbebenta ng pirated na mga DVD baka gagamitin sa pagbili ng mga baril para doon sa jihad nila sa mindanao. there is no god but allah and mohammed is his prophet... actually mohammad is allah lahat ng gusto ni mohammad gusto rin ni allah kaya kahit bata, kanyang daughter in-law na babae kinuha niya dahil may rebelasyon si allah para kay mohammed lang.anong gusto nya masusunod sabi ni allah.imagine si almeda gusto nya si lucy torres at may nakita syang vision na para sa kanya lang si aling lucy...anong gawin ni mang richard maraming goons si almeda either kukunsinti sya sa kapritso nitong si loko o payag syang pugutan na lang sya ng ulo. kagaya sa ginawa niya sa tribung hudyo na Banu Qurayza, 700 na katao pinugutan nya nang ulo...maniwala kayo dahil andoon yan sa kanilang banal na libro... kaya wag kayong magtaka kung ang mga abu sayaf may bihag silang babae eh rape yun at kung lalaki..eh syempre pugutan blues lang... yan lang po.... www.islam-watch.com www.faithfreedom.org ramjan I cannot understand the reason why religion is being drag into this Debate when in fact religion has nothing to do with the original topic and nothing to do with the conflict in Mindanao.
Why not confine your great debate in the original Blog of Jun Mercado and let's find out who are the Great Debaters here? Huwag kayo mag sira-an ng religion dahil walang matatalo jan. Thank you My friend, you are wrong when you said that "religion has nothing to do with the original topic and nothing to do with the conflict in Mindanao"
Sharia law is a religious matter, The killings and kidnappinps of christians are religious matter. Let us not insult ourselves in believing that this is just a matter of peace and order problem. peace bro'
correct ka, pero in christian perspective only(we have separation of church and state..but in islam political islam is the same as religious islam, 1st case saudi arabia may saligang batas ba sila...wala kundi sharia! ok 2nd case iran ganoon pa rin sharia...at kung titiwalag ka sa relihiyon mo(islam) sa yo lahat ng impyerno at mas matindi pugutan blues! yun lang po...sana mahimasmasan kayo. kung anong klaseng problema ang idinulot kultong islam sa mindanao. shalom... ramjan philip Religion is a formative mentality.
Every decision a person makes depends mainly on principles adhering to religion A pious muslim will always prefer to separate themselves among non-muslims when religious teachings about national concerns indicates Shariah Law as a universal tool for government & that any other form of govt were corrupt or immoral Muslims believed that all nations eventually will surrender under the auspices of Shariah by hook or by crook. We determine the root cause of all conflicts & social psychology also involves diagnosis why a particular group of people behave the way they do. So as debates & any other forms of communication has to resort on every factor that influence behavior including religion Examples are the conflict between Catholics & Protestants in Ireland of which today the issues concerning religious hostility are now resolved I wonder how muslim factions can resolve their differences peacefully when each of them are angrily crying 'Allah Akbar' ...much more to engage themselves peacefully among christians is a far cry Religious beliefs I say again is a major factor of all existing conflict Sumisigaw ang MILF / Abus / at ang di-maawat na mga muslim lost command ng.......
ALLAH HU AKBAAAAAAAR!!!!!!!! (God is great!) Huag nyong sabihing walang kinalaman ang relihiyung Islam sa kanilang pakikibaka at hindi kasama ang relihiyon sa kaguluhan ng Mindanao Si ibrahim, andres at mummin ay pumasok na sa ibang relihyon. Di nila makayanan ang katotohanan kaya ayun bumalimbing na...Welcome Bruder.....
Naks naman tong mga moklo na ito..
English ng english eh puro naman mali yung grammar and spelling!!! Haayyy... hindi na talaga bago ito... kahit sa mga kaklase kong moklo nun sa elementarya at high school sa iligan city ay nakakatuwa talaga ang kabobohan nila... Kaya gusto lang nilang tumakbo at mahalal sa gobyerno kasi ang bobo nila para mag trabaho as professionals... puro nalang kurakot ang alam kaya gusto maka upo sa gobyerno kahit sa DPWH, o LTFRB ay kurakut talaga mga moklo na iyan. Sa pagkakaalam ko itong isyo na to ay nag uugay sa pa sa ating mag ninono. Pareho lang tayo, isa tayong lahi,isa tayong bansa. pero ang pagkakaiba ay sa ating paniniwala.
the conflict between Fmuslim and Fcristian ay: ang di pagkakaintindihan. meron ng hatred sa isat- isa. Pinapabayaan kasi ng ating pamahalaan. walang development puro mahirap sa bandang silangan. KUrapsyon kasi sabi nila kung may geyra may pera.... totoo yan.kaya ang ating mga kapatid na muslim nag rerebelde kasi merong pang aabuso na ang kanilang pagaalsa na umaabot sa karahasan kasi walang pagpapahalaga isolated kasi ang mindanao puro sa capital region lang ang tinutuonan nag pansin kaya ngayon di mo na sila mapipigilan kasi winalang bahala lang nag pamahalaan dapat noon pa mag pagkaunawan pero walang gumagawa. kasi ang gusto pera lang. .... Kaya gusto nila mag sarili at magtatag ng sariling pamahalan kasi bulok nag sistema ng ating mga politiko at pamahalaan. Merong self interest ika nga im doing good in this business wala kang kapital pero magka pera ka doble pa. Kaya di mo na sila mapipigilan sakit na sa ulo. kaya kayo mga politiko pwera sa mababait. magdusa ka...... Hindi naman siguro sila napabayaan ng gobyerno natin kasi meron naman talagang pondo para sa bawat distrito o munisipyo...
Ang problema lang ay yung mga naka upong MUSLIM govt officials na buong pamilya ang nasa pwesto kagaya ng mga AMPATUAN ng ARMM at Maguindanao, DIMAPORO ng Lanao del NOrte, Abdulskr Tan ng SULU, DATUMANONG, MACALINTAL, at iba pang mga powerful muslim political clans na sobrang mangurakut kaya tuloy ang muslim areas ng mindanao ay walang kaunlaran. Eh bakit yung mga christian dominated ares ng mindanao kagaya ng CAGAYAN de oro city, ILigan City, DAVAO city, Bukidnon city ay pawang mga progresibo at maunlad? Hindi ba nasa mindanao din yung mga cities na iyan? Kasi kahit na kurakut din yung mga kristyanung naka upo sa mga cities na iyan pero at least nagtitira din sila ng pondo para may kaunlaran din ang kanilang mga lungsod. Di kagaya sa mga elected muslim officials na garapalan mangurakut tapus yung mga residente nila ay hindi man lang maka protesta kasi pugot ulo buong pamilya nila. Wag po sisihin ang buong pilipinas sa kahirapan sa mindanao kasi may mga elected MUSLIM officials op kayu dyan. At tsaka maunlad naman ibang mga cities like cagayan de oro at davao. i quote... politiko. so lahat.
kasi alam mo every politiko may share yan. ika nga ten percent c ganito at c ganyan. Di lang muslim brothers and sister natin ang gusto ng changes lahat tayo. for example sa isang group... kung na miss manage niya magkakagulo kung alam niya problema solusyunan kaagad di yong walang magawa kundi kurakot. Ang nakakataas ang may kilikili power to sugpuin ang masamang baho sa kanya kanyang kilikili member. Ganoon dapat yon ika nga solusyonan yong malilit na problema kasi may potensyal yan sa lumaki tapos sakit ng ulo kaya .... gyera para magka pera.... diba dapat sila nalag ang geyrahin. Nagpapasalamat ako naging Christiyano ako dahil may PASKO,BAGONG TAON AT MARAMI PANG MASASAYANG OKASYON..
Dati ang lahat ng Arab Countries ay nagkaka isa nagkakaroon pa nga sila ng pagtitipon madalas sa Saudi Arabia ginaganap... Noon yon..ngayon iba na MAGKAWATAK WATAK NA SILA..NOONG PANAHON NI SADAM HOSEIN..MARAMI KUMAMPI KAY SADAM..SUDAN,YEMEN,PALESTINE,JORDAN AT mayroon pa..kamontik ng masakop ang Saudi Arabia.. Alam natin na galit lahat ng Arab Countries sa US kahit hangang sa ngayon..pero ng panahon ng naghasik ng lagim si Sadam NAG IBA..THEY LOVE USA..pati ang dating salita na binibigkas naririnig lagi sa radyo at television ang katagang "ISRAELY ENEMY" ay biglang nawala pati ang FORD motors at COke com.ay nakapasok sa Saudi Arabia alam naman natin na mga "Jews" ang mga may ari.. Ito ay nagpapatunay lang na wala talaga silang pagkaka isa katulad din ng mga taga Mindanao na Muslim lahat gusto maging "SIGA".. Imposible walang ibinibigay na pondo ang ating gubyerno sa Mindanao para ano pa at may mga Governador,Mayor at Kongresista sa kanilang lugar.. kung si Nur Miswari nga noon na agresibo ng panahon ng MILF ng maupo sa Kongreso nag iba..or lumabas ang tunay na pakay..magnakaw ng pera ng gubyerno.. Kaya mahirap talaga magkaroon ng katahimikan sa Mindanao..kung gugustuhin lang talaga nila puwede..may ipinaglalaban sila na hindi talaga mawari ang kadahilanan..kawawa ang mga ordinaryong mamamayan..hangang kaylan..hangat may nakukuhang pinansiyal na tulong sa mga Arab Countries.. sa totoo lang ang mga may kapangyarihan sa Mindanao ay walang paki alam sa mga mamayan doon.. Tama ka eden!
May pondo naman talaga sa bawat distrito o munisipyo ng mindanao.. Hindi lang nila napansin ang mga magagarang luxury SUVs ng mga naka upong MUSLIM mayors, congressmen at governors sa mindanao. Dito lang sa mindanao, mas marami pa ang luxury H3 at H2 na hummer na SUV at ang mga may ari ay ang mga MUSLIM politicians. Dito marami din mga Toyota PRADO at LAND CRUISER at FORTUNERS... at ang mga may ari ay pawang mga MUSLIM govt officials. Uso na yan dito sa mindanao.. yung mga bodyguards ng muslim mayor eh sa mga mamahaling toyota fortuners at pajeros naka sakay... sosyal yung mga bodyguards kasi mamahalin SUV ang sinasakyan sa convoy nila... normal na yan na 15-20 luxury SUVs mag convoy ang isang muslim mayor.. daig pa ang security detail ng pangulo arroyo sa paramihan ng escorts... Tapus, mag rerebelde at sisihin ang mga kristyanus kung bakit daw pinabayaan sila ng gobyerno? Samantalang nagbulag-bulagan sa nakikitang lantarang kurapsyun ng kanilang muslim mayors at governors dun... kasi takut masakerin ang kanilang pamilya kung sakaling magrereklamo sila andres dun. ALam mo andres...
Yung ugali mo at ugali ng mga moro sa mindanao ay kopyang-kopya sa ugali ng mga arabo sa saudi... Kasi hindi nyu makita o matanggap ang kasalanan ng kapwa muslim nyu kaya sinisisi nyu sa iba (christians).. Halimbawa, kung ang isang tao ay mag abroad sa saudi at nasagasaan ng isang arabo. Ang may sala ay yung taong nasagasaan kasi daw ayun sa logic o pag iisip ng mga arabo.. kung hindi ka daw pumunta sa kanilang bansa eh hindi ka daw masasagasaan. Kaya ikaw pa ang magbayad sa nasirang kotse ng arabo. Eto naman sa mga Moro sa mindanao... Inihalal nila sa pwesto ang mga kurakot na kapwa muslim na powerful political muslim clans... tapus nanakawin lahat ng pondo o budget para sa lungsod nila... Tapus yung mga tao magrerebelde at sisihin yung mga kristyanus... eh hindi naman mga kristyanus ang kumurakut sa kanilang budget dun kundi yung naka upong muslim na mayor at governor!!! See... parehong-pareho ang ugali ng arabo at moro sa mindanao... makikitid utak.. galing maghanap ng ibang sisihin sa walang kaunlaran ng lungsod nila... asus... Philippines is the only christian majority country in asia. Despite the fact that the christianity was founded in asia. King Philip a devoted christian, wants philippines to be exclusively christian country but the moros never give up their religion and they resist the castile and leons attempt to christianize them. until then the mindanao was and always been moros and indigenous islands. however, when the philippines became commonwelth the bodypolitic in manila realized that the only way to marginalised the moros control of mindanao was to resettle the landless people in luzon and visayas to mindanao. thats why the spirit of separatism rekindle in very heart of every moros because their christian countrymen betray them, not only they inherit the religion of their invader but also the wishes of christimdom of christianize the whole philippines.
The Spaniards, Japanese and American invaders killed a lot of our countrymen. They distroyed our cities to the ground.
But after all of this the people of luzon and visayas stood up and moved on with their lives. They brushed off their wounds and healed their hatered to once again stand up and have a wonderful and peaceful life. Mindanao never stood up, many moslems live in hatred. Or maybe all they want is the whole of Mindanao. Yes we will never forget the lessons of the sacrifices of our heroes. And it made us more My friend Malvar
Moros are like the ordinary and peace loving citizen of this country, who yearn for years of peacful and lively condition of life. But their countrymen never gave respite to them, not because they are not too patriotic in defending our motherland during the war but because culturally and religiously dissimilar with the rest of the country. during the war time, though philippines no longer under the yoke of foreign invaders, most people harbored the same mentality with their colonisers who hated the moros, the term which came from the word moors archenemy of spain in africa. I hope this time around our countrymen and the national government learned from their mistake. Hey, this is the 21st century, why cant the moslems move on with their lives.
You have been stagnant and as if we are still in the spanish colony. Educate your children, not kidnap the teachers. In your first sentence you probably attempted to make it appear that the moslems are peace loving as if there are no kidnappings and beheadings in your place. Clean your homes rid of the garbages that smudge your society. And please dont blame the centuries old history. And the other religions and its laws. If you people dont clean your garbages we may just conclude that your erratic religion is to be blamed. In your first sentence you probably attempted to make it appear that Muslems are peace loving as if there are no kidnappings and beheadings in your place.
Clean your homes and rid of the garbages that smudge your society. Please dont blame the centuries old history,the other religions and its laws. GUMAMIT KARIN NG APOSTROPHE. gantio oh can't. bobo Have you heard about Muslim Domination? The Vatican had released a press statement that just this 2008 the Muslim population has surpassed of which the Catholic Religion.. and by the year 2015.. Islam is the Religion of the World! So, I would not be surprised if you brother Malvar would convert to Islam by the year 2012.. and you would preach the teachings of Islam to our family and to your relatives. But I want to ask you a Catholic question.. Is "Jesus" the real name of Jesus? cause I believe the Bible was written in Hebrew language and in Hebrew there no such alphabet as J.. How did Christianity came up with the name Jesus?
we'll bro'
this i can say to you.. the coming of the spaniards in this fair and beautiful country is not only a mere chance, it is already destined to be like that, right and the spaniards/american did what they could to propagate the christian faith, so here we are enjoying the fruits of their labor, we even acknowledge our pagan ancestor even though they are not christian, for their independent spirit, unlike those in the islam they will always concoct stories"that before islam all these people are like these and like that... just like a sick joke!!!egypt,syria,turkey were all christians before and look what is happening to them now stupidity,ignorance,backwardness and they're also killing christians there coz they're not worthy of respect..they are infidels!!!!!if you do not pay jizya or protection money, you'll experience hell on earth kind like of a situation. that's why the spaniards are correct in christianizing our islands, 700 hundred years under the yoke of these satanic minions(yeah spain was under muslim dominion for 700 years, they came not to trade but to wage war against the infidels, and so up to now bin laden and rest of the gangs are still clinging to that mentality of jihad along with our copycats here... that's why i admire christians in mindanao who are willing to resist these evil people coz' i don't want to see what happen to christians in smyrna and in armenia will happen also in my beloved homeland mindanao, there is only one god muhammad and allah is his prophet..convert or else.... shalom.. ramjan phillip Ramjan Kumar good day sir
your name sound like you are indian descent. no wonder, your topic seems knew no bounds. you start to excite with your cut and paste twisted view against islam. The usual hollywood and western media propaganda mantra. Islam teaches all evils, violence and backwardness and christianity on the contrary teaches all good and brought democracy and freedom to the people. sound familiar right? But let see what history tells us. My friend your insulting your forefather. you attributing the hardwork and labors done by your ancestor to the spanish and yankees who only exploit the wealth of this country and enslave its people. The only legacy these invader left us were poverty and mental dependency as if we cannot live without them. Regarding christian enlightenment. You know, during the dark ages of europe, most scholars in christimdom were learning knowledge in the great city of cordova, who happened to be under the control of according to you the evil people the moorish, morisco or moors. during the time there were many evil scholars including avicenna. And you know the good church's doing that time. theyre busy persecuting heretic in what they call inquisition! oh great good plan of murdering scholars who happened to had different opinion in life with that of churchmen. do you know, that democracy and freedom of thinking were the branch of secularism which first espoused by avicenna not the church and continuously molded into perfection by the athiest followers and not the church again because during that time clergymen considered sicularism as abhorrent to the teaching of christ. therfore we can safely conclude that the european enlightenment that they achieved was not because they follow the teaching of christ but they disobey it. Now with regards to you bias view that christian has and always mistreated in muslim land. perhaps, some but mostly mistreated purely on political grounds. In fact, you can see in egypt lebanon and other parts of ME that there are centuries old christians in those places like coptic and other christian sects. if that there were indeed systematic persecution of christians like what spain did to moorish in cordova, then you also see only their churches turn into mosque today. Peace to you... ang Mindanao hopeless case na yan in terms of finding Peace ,
Ika nga leave them alone..kasi ang majority ng Moro ang perception nila di sila kasama sa Phillipine Republic. ang mga Christians ang tingin nila foreign subjugators na kailangan paalisin. best option? Battle?War? ewan ko hopeless case nga eh pagnatalo mo sila sasabihin nila you win in Battle but not in War ,kita mo ayaw magpatalo . Global warming na lang hintayin natin para lumubog ang mga isla ng Mindanao . o kaya total isolation ng Mindanao, Naval blockade kaya kaso puro bulok barko ng AFP, shalom..
there you go again always assuming the intellect of your fellow human being or maybe polemics..copy and paste...correct!!! copy and paste..i will if that article is true and correct..gets mo. avicenna was a persian dude maedically influence by galen and by these two indians sushrutu and charaka.... christians in muslim, you should go to islam watch.com or ffi.org so you will know and watch the video there so he only borrowed and expound, research their work. and also that time, he was living under the samanids dynasty who along with the abbasids are ushering the so-called golden age of islam...actually a rediscovery of the previous early works of greek philosopher...ok we'll christianity also had done some nasty activities in the the past we'll your correct but we prefer the humanist way by accepting our faults not hiding them unlike yours, we are searchers of truth, adik .our actions are not dictated by those beard monkeys ..who issue fatwas that earth is not round but flat...islamic science i think.. so no need comparison.. i'm only rebutting your answer ok shalom ramjan Oh yes, it was aviroes not avicenna the one espoused the idea of secularism. avicenna too had contributed alot in medicines. his book on medicine had been in used as late as 16c many european universities. many more islamic scholars which you called evil people.
huh! greek philosophy? actually most of those greek works were mytical stories far from real and other works were purely theoritical. science studies progress again only when Islam and muslem scholars introduced experemental method in science. The darkness and backwardness of christianity clouds europe for hundred years. only when cordova came under the control of the moors did euperean thinkers saw the light of science. Humanist? oh yes, no wonder christianity now had divided into many sects because you people no longer follower the true teaching of christ but worldly desire of men who for centuries were concocting, changing, or twisting the words of god in order to suit their own interest and worldly purpose. In fact, there are so many copies of your holy book. The same title but different contains. this only confirm my views. Our religion does not dictate only guides us. good luck research more! Peace to you... Haha, I hope you could comprehend what you recite in prayers. You tell us that we twist the word of God.
Our God loves his creations, He created mankind so they will love each other. Your god you say also created mankind..Why will he tell his people to murder his own creations You even claim that your god is most merciful...then why will he teach his people to behead people. ................ Why dont you research on the life of your dear prophet mohammad. How he married a 6 year old girl... How he murdered men and rape their wives. How he massacered 700 men wemen and children How he raped his caprured slaves. And made it legal in islam How he kissed a black stone and revered it. How he murdered a man beside your most revered black stone. How he beheaded his so-called disbelievers. As well as these who saw his vile characrer and converted to other faith. How he lured his cohorts into believing that 70 virgins awaits them in heaven. Please how can people see this man as a person to be emulated This what hated most when people can no longer defend reasonably their belief. they start panicking and become emotional and They resort to character assassination. making false accusation citing unreliable sources and even twisting or qoute facts out of context to suit their devilish intention.
this is childish act which only show you ignorance about islam and the prophet Mr Malvar. you know that islam is one of the fastest growing religion in the world. today, 1/5 of world population are muslems. theres one thing sure here now that is; you are liar... HOy... yung claim na islam is a fast growing religion is a falsehood..
Propaganda lang yan ng mga islamic extremists... Kaya nga gulo-gulo ng mundo kasi sa mga muslim.. tingnan nyu kung saang bansa may mga muslim separatist rebels ay ang gulong-gulo din ng bansa na iyan like IRAQ, CHINA, INDIA, PAKISTAN, EAST TIMOR, CZECH republic, PHILIPPINES,. kahit sa EUROPE at AMERICA lahat ng bombings dun ay dahil sa mga islamic radicals. Kung saan may muslim.. may gulo at patayan... kasi nasa preachings sa ISLAM na ang pagkaviolente... so hindi ka na magtaka kung bakit mga muslims ay mga violente na tao... BOBO kanga talaga!!!
Saan kaba nanggaling na school? Bakit tigtatatlo ang priod mo? bobo nakakahiya ka. San mo natutunan yan? Or maybe you are right blogger radical when you said ISLAM is the fastest growing religion with 1/5 of the world's population are muslims...
Just as the scriptures in the Bible will be fullfilled..."Many will be deceived and will follow the anti-christ before the world will end and judgement day shall come." Kaya pala marami na ang naconvert to muslims para matupad ang nakasaad sa revelation ng bible. Kasi alam natin na konti lang ang ma save during JUDGEMENT DAY so that means that most people in the world will have to embrace islam so that the scriptures will be fullfilled. Napaka bobo mong aling dionesia ka.
dalawang bisis mo ng nbng8 ang FULLFILL ah. Ang tamang spelling nyan ay F U L F I L L gets mo. Atsaka may be hindi maybe. bobo Isumbong kita KAY IDOL MANNY. Hey Mr Radical, Are you telling me what I wrote is a lie?
*Why dont you answer this questions about your prophet mohammad*. Did he marry a 6 year old girl.???.. Did he murder men and raped their wives???? Did he massaker 700 men wemen and children???? Did he rape his caprured slaves. And made it legal in islam Did he kiss a black stone and revered it.???? Did he murder a man beside your most revered black stone????? Did he behead his so-called unbelievers. As well as those who saw his vile characrer and converted to other faith.?????? Did he lure his cohorts into believing that 70 virgins await them in heaven??? Sould this man's deeds be emulated ??? MASSACRE, WOMEN, AND CAPTURED YATA ANG IBOG MONG SABIHIN?
bakit mga bobo kau? Simpling spelling d nyo pa alam. nasosoka na ako sa inyo.
#73.1.3.1.1
che
on
2009-05-23 13:45
(Reply)
Kureksyon
Mali spelling ko ng IBOG at NASOSOKA Pero tama ang spelling ko sa eynglish Klasmeyt ko si MJ sa grammmar.....hehehehe OO nga.. yan si propet muhammad ay parang si PBMA founder and convicted murderer ECLEO sa modern day era...
Tingnan nyu si ECLEO daming ni rape na mga followers nya t mag sex orgy pa sa kanyang mansion. Tapus sinasamba pa sya ng mga tao. Parang si muhamad talaga. Magaling mangloko ng mga tao. At pangakohan ka ng paraiso at mga 70 birhen kung ikaw ay mag suicide bombing.. helllooo? logic po gamitin.. meron bang panginoon na gusto mag suicide bombing ang mga tao? hindi kaya si satanas yun na nagpapanggap kay muhamad??? Oo, legions na mga demonyo ang sumanib kay muhamad kaya ang daming fanatico na muslim ang nabiktima nito at ito ang tandaan nyo mga kapatid na muslim, ispirito din ang demonyo, siya ung pinatalsik sa langit dahil gusto niya, maging diyos din siya kaya nandito siya ngayon kasama ang kanyang kampon sa lupa para maghasik ng lagim.
Prophet, at hello. bobo pati simpling english word di nyo pa alam ang spelling.
KAya nga BOBO ang pangalan ko!!! kasi hindi ko alam ang tamang spelling..
Anu ka ba.. ang bobo mo naman... Nobody here attempt to answer directly the Questions of MJ above.
HEMMMMMM...!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Talu na kayo ni MJ pagdating sa legality. Pagdating sa History, talong talu kayo. PALIBHASA KASI MGA TALONG LANG ANG ALAM NYO. Nobody here attempts to answer directly the Questions of MJ above.
HEMMMMMM...!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Talu na kayo ni MJ pagdating sa legality. Pagdating sa History, talong talu kayo. PALIBHASA KASI MGA TALONG LANG ANG ALAM NYO. we'll at least my dear kababayan
what these people are capable of.. when they resort to these statement "panicking"... islam was uncontested for a thousand years coz' nobody dared to challenged it. anyone who challenged the word of mo' a.k.a. allah will be summarily executed and sometimes if your a popular figure..like you'll be asked to recant, just like what my dear friend in the otherside about the inquisition..so i will not explained further coz they are numb to all our explanations.. greek philosophers works..mythical??? hoy! kung nag-aral ka sa college at engineering ka ano ba ang ginagamit dun..geometry eh kay euclid, trigonometry kay pythagoras atbp at kung sa medicine naman di ba may hippocratic oath eh greek din yan, sa nuclear physics saan ba kumuha ng ideya si john dalton tungkol sa kanyang atomic theory eh sa greek din ...(kung sino yon, yong mga mujahiden sa kabila na lang ang mag-research.. mga tol' nung mga panahong yan napasakamay nila ang ang aklatan ng alexandria that time biggest library of the world containing the works of plato, socrates, archimedes...atbp.. kaya yung mga books na hindi akma sa koran ni mo' yun ginawang panggatong sa mga paliguan sa cairo..(catasthropic yun di ba..) nagtataka rin ako bakit bakit pinag-gigiitan nitong kabila na sa kanila nagsisimula ang secularism (he was influenced by aristotle's the republic..kung tutuusin wala totoong secular na bansang muslim puro based on the koran. at nabasa ko rin yong mga buhay nang mga taong ito magaling..dito mo makikita ang utak ng tao pag hindi kinulong malayo ang naratating, siguro kung nabubuhay tong mga 500 years after sigurado kakatayin to' nga taong gumagamit ng hashish o' hashasin(assasin in english, back to this century suicide bomber!!!) at kita mo ngayon "grand mufti ng saudi na nagsabi na ok lang ikasal ang isang 8 years old na bata sa isang lalaki para na nyang lolo..eh sa atin yun kulungan na yun kasi pwersahan..(kasi ginagaya nila si mo'.remember ayesha..) yan lang muna tol'. sumerian,akkadian babylonian,persian greek,egyptian,indian,chinese civilaztion are already there... don't just read your mythical book koran and your genocidal book ahadith free your mind, The GOD of Abraham,Isaac,Jacob & Ishmael (not the god of mo' alla) have given you free thinking mind that have unlimited potential to do whatever good in HIS sight for the good of all, not by bombing,beheading killing,raping, insulting/sneering at those who do not share your belief and so on... so look who's panicking.. shalom.. ramjan Hoy!!! Boy Baho Indyanong Itik na produkto ng pagiging tangang Pinay kaya nalahian ng mga humanoids na mabaho pa kaysa paniki.....hakhakhakhak!!! Yung mga pinagsasabi mo walaaaaaang kalatuy-latuy.Yan lang pala ang alam mo e kaya nagsasanay ka pa lang kung paano makalusot dito sa blog na ito...Anong Aristotle ka dyan at anong sa college ka dyan at mga Pythagoras at mga kung ano-anong mga sinasabi mong mga history na totoo naman pero hindi mo pala naintindhan hekhekhekhekhek!!!!Alam mo wala kang pinagkaiba sa Indiano at Kapampangan,puro mga Hypocrite at Manunuba....Hehehehehehehe....
Ni hindi mo nga naintindihan ang ibig sabihin ng Kultura!,ang Islam pa kaya at ang mga patakaran at prinsipyo nito!!!Ikaw paano ka ba naging Pilipino gayung ikaw ay isang mabahong Indiano aber???Paano ka ba nakapagsalita ng Tagalog gayung isa ka namang Itik na mabaho???Alamin mo muna yan tsaka mo maintindihan kung bakit yung 8 taon na babae ay pwedeng ikasal sa matandang lalaki.....Bakit dimo tanungin si Senator Enrile kung bakit ang kabit este ang ka live-in niya ngayon ay mas bata pa sa kanya gayung siya ay isa ng Hukluban???Tanungin mo rin si Mike Arroyo kung bakit mahilig din siya sa batang babae gayung matanda na siya,Si Jalosjos,Dolphy,Mga pari ninyong Pidophiles at mga Bading itanogn mo sa knila bakit mahilig sila sa bata???? Saka mo sagutin lahat yung katanungan mo sa Islam,kung bakit allowed yan sa Islam.Hindi yung puro ka dakdak ng mga paliwanag mong ang tanging basehan ng moralidad mo ay Katolisismo or kulturang Hilaw-Luto na hindi mo maintindihan kung anong klaseng kultura. Pag-aralan mo muna ang Kultura at Relihiyon mo,bago ka manghusga ng mga practices ng Islam na mga ayun sa iyo ay masama.Pag-aralan mo rin ang Hinduism na kultura rin ng mga Ninuno mong mga mababaho at idolater...Pangalan mo pa lang ang bantot na Ramjan Kupal. Siguro pati mga damit mo ay 3 buwan din bago lalabhan buwahahahahahahahakahak!!! ANG MGA KATOLIKO ROMANO CORPORATION NAKIKIALAM NA NAMAN HEHEHEHEHEHE.... BAKIT KAYA????
CBCP wants 7 'killer amendments' out of CARP bill 05/23/2009 | 11:57 AM Email this | Email the Editor | Print | ShareThisMANILA, Philippines — With two weeks left before Congress adjourns sine die, the Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines warned lawmakers against passing seven "killer amendments" in the extended and reformed Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (Carper) bill. The CBCP issued a pastoral statement where it stressed the positive impact of agrarian reform on poverty reduction, if it is properly implemented. "We oppose in the strongest terms, the threat of 'killer amendments' being inserted by some senators and congressmen that will effectively emasculate the objectives and gains of the CARP with Extension and Reform (Carper) Bill for the poor farmers. These amendments are called 'perfecting' amendments by their proponents, which in reality would dilute, slow down, and reverse the gains of the program and reduce the resources available for it," it said in its pastoral statement signed by CBCP President Angel Lagdameo. On the other hand, it commended some initiatives by "well-meaning" legislators seeking to extend and reform the flawed provisions of the old agrarian law. It particularly referred to consolidated Senate Bill 2666 and House Bill 4077, now up for Senate’s and the House of Representatives' deliberation and approval. "Unfortunately, time is running out as there are only nine session days left for Congress to enact this essential law," it said. The CBCP branded as "unacceptable and antithetical" the seven proposed amendments to the Carper bill, including: • Phasing of land acquisition and distribution, which targets first those landholding measuring 50 hectares and above without prejudice to the coverage of lands below 50 hectares, after an accomplishment trigger of 90% by the respective provinces. This is unconstitutional in that the 1987 Constitution does not distinguish on whatever basis the agricultural lands to be covered under CARP. Putting the 90% trigger as condition for resumption for coverage of smaller landholdings may actually result in most of the remaining landholdings being left uncovered or undistributed, the CBCP said. • Reconsolidation of agricultural lands by previous landowners after the 10-year retention period, and/or the reduction of the 10-year prohibition on sale of awarded land to three years. "These provisions clearly favor former landowners and could defeat the purpose of the program because it will allow them to reacquire foreclosed lands, thus reconsolidate their landholdings," the CBCP said. • Allowing leaseback arrangements of awarded lands between farmers and landowners/corporations. "We find this proposal to be inequitable and contradictory to the ultimate goal of agrarian reform, which is to grant ownership and control over the land and its resources to the tillers. CARP does not intend to protect whoever has the capacity to buy and operate big plantations, at the expense of the small farmers," the CBCP said. • Institutionalization of Commercial Farm Plantations in CARP. This proposal is objectionable as it expressly seeks the transfer of control of lands from farmer-beneficiaries to the landowner or any other agribusiness venture “partner." • Increasing the compensation to landowners and increasing the downpayment from the present 25%-30% to 50%. This proposal, which is based on case-specific decisions of the Supreme Court, would result in a reduction of funds available for land acquisition and distribution and support services and would effectively prevent the program from being completed. • Transfer of jurisdiction over agrarian cases from the Department of Agrarian Reform Adjudication Board (DARAB) to the regular courts. "We fear that the transfer of jurisdiction will only serve to marginalize the farmers, who could be subjected to a more adversarial and costly processes," the CBCP said. • Legislating the disqualification of “habitual squatters" from becoming CARP beneficiaries and making them criminally liable and punishable with specific penalties under the law. "There is an alarming likelihood that this will be used as an instrument to harass legitimate farmer-beneficiaries, who are typically branded as 'squatters' by landowners. Legislating this provision will allow landowners to threaten farmers with criminal cases," the CBCP said. On the other hand, the CBCP twitted some legislators who it said are willfully neglecting a vital sector that contributes to the country’s economic growth. "Abandoning the agricultural sector will not only threaten farmers but imperil food security itself. Conversely, distributing lands to small farmers will provide equitable economic opportunities in the rural areas and eventually reduce poverty and unrests, which are major deterrents to democratic development," the CBCP said. It appealed to political leaders to make a serious examination of conscience and focus their attention on the swift resolution of the mounting forms of injustice and violation of fundamental human rights of the rural poor. "The small farmers deserve our attention and espousal of their cause. They continue bringing hope to society, and nurture life from season to season. No man of upright conscience much more that of a principled leader, can allow the Filipino farmer to be laid bare and vulnerable to the claws of globalization and continuous hopelessness," it said. "Let us all pray for justice and peace to reign in our country, through an authentic agrarian reform, carried out in the spirit of distributive justice and solidarity with the rural poor. We pray for the Holy Spirit to lead us away from sin, enlighten our minds, and purify our intentions. And may the love of Christ impel us in our quest for a morally reformed society," it added. - GMANews.TV CDO archdiocese wants alternative mining bill passed 05/23/2009 | 12:30 PM Email this | Email the Editor | Print | ShareThisMANILA, Philippines — The Cagayan de Oro Archdiocese has started efforts to drum up support for the Alternative Mining Bill (AMB), which it hopes will replace the Mining Act of 1995. Church workers from the archdiocese’s parishes signed their names on a big tarpaulin to show support for the “urgent passage" of House Bill 6342 and scrapping of the Mining Act of 1995. “Fourteen years of the implementation of the Mining Act of 1995 had brought about the physical and economic dislocation of many indigenous peoples and other upland rural communities, as well as aggravated the already dire situation of our environment - by handing over our lands and mineral resources for corporate exploitation. All these, in exchange for a grossly disadvantageous amount from mining revenues," Cagayan de Oro Archbishop Antonio Ledesma said in an article on the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines website (www.cbcpnews.com). Ledesma lamented that no solid proof of progress especially in the sites of struggles (SOS, the term used to refer to communities in the mining areas) is evidenced. The CBCP Episcopal Commission on Indigenous People (ECID) and other Church leaders have expressed their support to AMB as well. However, it remains unclear if the AMB can be passed before Congress adjourns sine die first week of June. Francis Patindol, chairman of the board of the Mindanao Media Advocates for Environment Preservation (MMAEP) Inc., said people must urge their representatives in Congress to support the AMB. “We must not be complacent but do our part in urging our congressmen to support the urgency of the passage of the AMB," Patindol said. AMB seeks to regulate the rational exploration, growth and consumption of mineral resources onshore, as well as quarry resources, sand and gravel, guano and gemstones. It also guarantees the impartial sharing of benefits for the country, indigenous peoples, local society and other purposes. The AMB prohibits offshore mining and other resources such as petroleum and coal natural gas, radioactive materials and geothermal energy because these reserves entail specific principle. For its part, the Mines and Geosciences Bureau of Region 10 reported that total sales of various mineral products in the region in 2008 amounted to P63.04 million. It said the region’s total mineral production for 2008 was 628,911.50 cubic meters. MGB-10 also reported that total extraction fees collected for 2008 region-wide amounted to P9.82 million; while total excise tax collected amounted to P1.27 million. Meanwhile, Archdiocese social action center head Fr. Jose Cabantan called on the House of Representatives to support the passage of the AMB, saying “it is now time to scrap the RA 7942." “The AMB aims to bring back the exploration, development and utilization of mineral resources within the framework of national development, the right of peoples to self-determination, and respect for human rights and the environment," Cabantan said. - GMANews.TV may problema ka talaga sa utak andris, chapsuy na talaga lumalabas sa utak mo.
Ng copy-paste ka nanaman. Kaning baboy talaga ang laman ng utak mo. kupal ka talaga...Sa totoo lang. Kaya galit sa katulad mo si MJ/Morojasan. Tintoy,hanggang ngayon ba yan lang ang alam mo?Ang mamuna ng copy-paste???Hehehehehe....siguro naman pwede ka ring magbigay ng mga ideya dito sa blog na ito kahit hindi sa iyo....Huwag lang yung idea na Tintoy's idea na pinupulot galing sa Barber shops at Kangkongan...Tignan mo nga nag mga idea mo?Tignan mo heheheheh diba mga bulok?Ni walang isa nga dyan na pwedeng sabihing may kahulugan at may impact sa usaping pangkapayapaan or pang sosyal na kabutihan.
Sample sa mga pinagsasabi mo rito na mga walang silbi; #8.2 Tagalugin mo na lang, Pwede? #8.2.1.1 Sa totoo lang lahat ng muslim katulad ni andres. Napaka gaspang ng pagkatao. Pakabait ka ha andres. pobre gayot!!! #20.1.1 Nauulol ka na nga talaga, mujaheedin ka pa diyan. Mga mamamatay tao yan na naniniwala sa kabulukan ng islam. #24.1 nakakasakit ng ulo ang inglis mo....tagalugin mo na lang. sira siguro ulo mo!!!!!! observe ko lang..... #29.1.1 alam mo ba andres na ang kaibigan mong si Ibrahim at mummin ay sumapi na sa dating daan? Hinihintay ka na nila doon. #61 Si ibrahim, andres at mummin ay pumasok na sa ibang relihyon. Di nila makayanan ang katotohanan kaya ayun bumalimbing na...Welcome Bruder..... Wala kayong panakot kundi pumatay. GAGO, ang inspirasyon mong si mohamad ay isang kampon ni satanas... mga demonyong mujaheedin kuno. #79 may problema ka talaga sa utak andris, chapsuy na talaga lumalabas sa utak mo. Ng copy-paste ka nanaman. Kaning baboy talaga ang laman ng utak mo. kupal ka talaga...Sa totoo lang. Kaya galit sa katulad mo si MJ/Morojasan. Lahat-lahat yan langa ng naisulat mo dito Tintoy....Napaka-kapal ng mukha mo wala kang contribution at wala ka ma-ishare na idea...alam mo Tintoy ...ako kahit papaano negative sa negative ako sa mga Katoliko,pero marami akong nai-amabag na ideya....Ikaw tignan mo nga ang mga naisulat mo lang...Ganyan ka na lang ba hakhakhakhakhakhak,,, Sigue nga mga readers husgahan niyo nga si Tintoy kung anong klaseng Manunuba ito ay este manunulat??? Hayan sa lahat ng kanyang sinulat yan lang...papaano kasi yan yung mga MalvaBoy,Noviciate na nag-nakatukasa GMANEWS.TV na mga KATOLIKO ROMANO na mga BOBO at mga Retarded...kakahiya kayo hehehehehehe.....Ni isang mga argumento walang na refute kakahiya ka Tintoy dapat sa iyo ay hindi Tintoy kungdi Yoyoy...buti pa nga si Yoyoy e palitan natin "Turagsoy" hakhakhakhakhakhak..... Mahiya ka sa naman at magbigay ka naman ng ideya mo!!!!Ha Bugok at utak bulalo na Tintoy hikhikhikhik...... ah yan ba!!
so folks..kayo na lang ang hurado.. kong ano ang pinagsasabi nitong nagtutuwad... o ito copy paste.. basahin mo abdulah tuwad, tuwad ka kasi ng tuwad sa lupa kaya kaya utak mo utak lupa din.. Lennard James “Religion is an illusion and it derives its strength from the fact that it falls in with our instinctual desires.” — Sigmund Freud But what is religion? The question is not easy to answer. As St. Augustine said ‘of time, most of us know perfectly well what religion is — until someone asks us to define it‘. The groups, practices and systems that we identify as “religion” are so diverse-e.g., not all religions refer to God or gods, not all religions are concerned with morals, not all religions have beliefs about the afterlife…-that it is no easy task to bring them all under one simple definition. Of course, this difficulty has not stopped people from attempting to define religion. The definitions are quite wide-ranging: some emphasize the personal, others the social; some the beliefs, others the uses; some the structures, others the functions; some the private, others the public; some the mundane, others the transcendent; some the truth, others the illusions. In many cases, a person’s definition of religion is actually a definition of his or her own thinking of his or her religion. While no one definition of religion can completely sum up what religion is, they all tell us something about religion, and, perhaps, bring us closer to an understanding of what we mean when we talk about “religion.” Thus a selection of definitions and quotes addressing the question “What is religion?” and we take a look into the Religion of Islam, these thoughts/facts are provided below as a backdrop to the countless suspicions that we gather and understand and question…??? Human beings are born free: free to talk, free to choose our friends, and free to do whatever we THINK we want to do. Our laws are enshrined with all these cardinal points of various individual freedoms, especially in non-Muslim nations. And above all, the greatest freedom we have is the freedom of thought. Absolute followers cannot and will never be freethinkers. Just like sheep, they need only brainlessly follow like morons. The choices rational human beings make are based on their individual capacity to THINK for themselves. Freedom to believe in anything we want is our greatest asset! If we think something is not to our needs, we can rethink and are free to change our minds. It is up to individuals to THINK and to come to a conclusion and act as accordingly… From the creation of man, we humans have developed our brains to THINK critically and consciously held ourselves responsible for all our actions, deeds and subversive activities-’good’ or ‘bad’, ‘right’ or ‘wrong’, ‘true’ or ‘false’. If the human race, with its natural ability to think, believes that there is a genuine God, Who demands and expects to worship, adore, kill, maraud, love and obey to all his/her commands, has NO rational thinking of its own… In Islam, al-Ilah (the Muslim God) demands believers to surrender to him completely and to obey to his every command given in their Holy Book, the Quran, in its totality. Al-Ilah states that everything recorded in the Quran is his own words. Al-Ilah’s unconditional demand to his followers to follow the Quran is absolute. Muslim scholars of more than 200 Islamic sects agree, confirm and believe this is absolutely true that it is mandatory to obey al-Ilah’s commands in the Quran with no reservation of any kind by every believing Muslim. (No ‘ifs’ and ‘buts’ are allowed). The Quran, in reality, is a book of an imperfect scripture, allegedly sayings of God, filled with errors, contradictions, stupidities, historical inaccuracies. The contents of the Quran are also not arranged according to importance, continuity, sacredness, biography, chronology, significance or sequence of any sorts, but simply by length: the longest chapter, followed by the next longest. The Verses are disorderly arranged and jumbled up in unrelated subjects/topics. The Quran has no prophecy, no chronology, no geography, no biography of anybody (except bits & pieces of Muhammad’s), no ministry, no history, no proverbs, no parables, no miracles, no psalms, no sequence of any sort. It’s generally a manual of dos and don’ts, like an instruction manual of a vacuum cleaner, with punitive punishments, reprisals and rewards specified in it. The Quran is, undoubtedly, not a book created by an intelligent being, and is unfit for the intelligent and rational thinking persons. This book fraught with lack of fraud, stupidity and logic and reason (discussed below), which makes it a complete lie. In demanding absolute and unconditional obedience from his believers, al-Ilah categorically states (Surah 33.36): “And it becometh not a believing man or a believing woman, when al-Ilah and his messenger have decided an affair (for them), that they should (after that) claim any say in their affair(s); and who so is rebellious to al-Ilah and his messenger, he verily go astray in error manifest.” So as believers, Muslims have no right to think independently about their own affairs, because al-Ilah and his messenger have already done the thinking for them. All that Muslims are required to do is just to obey (like sheep) to al-Ilah’s words as in the Quran, and becoming totally obedient morons. If these Muslims do not obey and follow all the commands, they will be considered by al-Ilah as “rebellious” and face consequences. In the same verse, al-Ilah also demands Muslims to obey his human messenger, Muhammad (giving equal status with al-Ilah???). No other religion on earth demands from its followers such absolute and unconditional obedience to a human messenger and his puppet god. This defies all logic. Why shouldn’t Muslims use their God-given brains for independent, rational thinking into their own affairs? Islam is like a magician: once he put an illusory spell over his audience, he has complete control of everything he wants people to believe and do! By taking control of Muslims mind, and making them force Islam on those not in controls, Islam deprives Muslims from questioning and leaving Islam, even if one wishes so? Either you believe and behave, or you will be forced by true believers to conform; thus Islam keeps an absolute grip on the community. Almost everything in Islamic community is forced upon against the will and rational thinking of the individual: there’s no choice of one’s own. And, exceptional rewards are promised to believers: al-Ilah attempts to sell them a fake death insurance policy to reward them with eternal paradise filled with wine, honey, and angelic virgins… Al-Ilah also attempts to shame, threaten, and bribe Muslims into leaving their worldly life and sign up for jihad, with the promise of gaining entry into paradise. Islam is sure a trap with no way out. If a Muslim tries to get out, he/she will be killed as an apostate (Surah 4:89). This is why Muslims dare not criticize Muslims, who commit violence, murder, bombings, etc? With no rational thinking allowed, Islam has proved itself to be a bloody murderous trap! Is this from God? Will God(s) ever be so merciless and have narcissist thinking? Or this may be just a plain fake religion? Once an ideology gets control of its believers, it will only work its way up, just like communism that got control of half the world in the twentieth century! However, people, at least from the outside, were able to criticize communism and its propaganda, leading its eventual fall to obscurity… Truth always finds a way to emerge victorious in the end; truth always sets you FREE!!! Jewish Prophets were Muslims? In the same light, al-Ilah claims in numerous verses that all Jewish prophets are believers in Islam and demands that those Jewish prophets were ‘Muslims’. But the problem here is that, al-Ilah did not specify who those Jewish prophets were, leaving his believers in darkness forever. There is no complete list of these Jewish prophets in the Quran, let alone the proof of their ever being ‘Muslim’-that too, before the Quran was revealed or invented? Are those Jewish prophets, not mentioned in the Quran (but mentioned in the Jewish/Christian scriptures), were ever a part of al-Ilah’s Scripture or were they just figment of Muhammads’ imaginations or just hoax? How did those Jewish prophets ever know about al-Ilah or Muhammad or Islam as a religion, which would later on come to the world. (Indeed, the Quran did not exist until 786 CE, 154 years after Muhammad’s death in 632, when the Quran was complied as a religious book. see “The Invention of Islam“). Moses and Jesus was recorded by their followers/Apostles, who lived with them (and the Quran/al-Ilah have the cheeks to claim the Bible is all corrupted!!!); and there is not a single acceptable historical record of any Jewish Prophet(s) of ever having been a Muslim. Just a claim that they were ‘Muslim’ does not necessarily make them ‘Muslim’, does it? It’s a silly, laughable claims at best; the world must be wondering why Islam makes such hideous and preposterous claim on Jewish Prophets like Abraham, Noah, Moses, etc. These stupid assumptions even astound the Christians as well. Jews are so passionate of their Jewishness that the majority of them don’t even accept Jesus as a Jew. This is just because, Jesus tried to reform Judaism by shedding some of the barbaric Jewish beliefs of the previous era, such as stoning for adultery, which Islam has blindly copied and Muslims are following till today. By copying those Mosaic codes, al-Ilah and Muhammad had thought that the Jews would embrace Islam easily. But did it happen or would it ever? It’s not even remotely possible. All these facts make it crystal-clear that al-Ilah, Muhammad and the Quran are plain and simple lies: Islam is a completely fake. Period! Jewish and Christian Scripture included in the Quran? Al-Ilah claims in Surah 3:50 that “he revealed the Torah”, and in Surah 5:48 “al-Ilah claims he revealed the Gospel and the Torah”. So, was al-Ilah really revealing to Jesus the Gospel about his trials in front of Pontius Pilate the Roman Governor in Jerusalem? Was al-Ilah whispering into Jesus’ ears of all the happenings around the fourteen Stations of the Cross, about Jesus’ shout to God, the torn temple curtains, the earthquake, the breaking open of graves, the Roman army officer’s response, about the Romans fleeing, and foretelling Jesus in ‘detailed whispers’ of all the numerous events which are to follow, while Jesus was bleeding in agony by the Roman tortures and death on the cross? These are all part and parcel of the Gospel. So did al-Ilah reveal this entire Gospel to Jesus as al-Ilah claims? It does sound absurd, ridiculous and plain stupid, doesn’t it? Al-Ilah further claims that all Jewish/Christian Scriptures came from him, but mentions only Torah and the Gospels in the Quran. The problem here is that the Torah is only ‘five’ out of the ‘thirty nine’ books of the Old Testament, just 12.8% of the total Jewish Scriptures (Judaism counts them as 24 books only, because they join some together in the Tanakh). Concerning the Bible, al-Ilah mentions just an Injil (Gospel). But there are several Injils (Gospels) in the Christian Bible with 66 books divided into ‘Testaments’ (Old and New). In Surah 5:46, “al-Ilah clearly claims he revealed the Gospel (Not in the plural form) to Jesus”. So, which Injil (Gospel) did al-Ilah ever refer to? Since the Quran says, “baby Jesus talked in his cradle”, we can assume from this that it was the “Gospel of Luke”, which only describes the birth of Jesus Christ. But there is a problem here, because less than 10% of this very Gospel is in the Quran. But al-Ilah’s ridiculous tale of baby Jesus talking in his cradle is a laughable joke to Christians? Even if we take one whole Gospel, from a total of 66 books, it is just 1.5% of the Bible only… The Torah is NOT the Jewish Scriptures, but just a very small part Tanakh; and the Gospel of Luke is NOT all the Christian Scriptures, but just a tiny part of the Bible!!! And al-Ilah laughably claims that ALL scriptures of Judaism and Christianity are in his holy crap, the Quran. How can this claim of al-Ilah ever be true? Is some part of the Quran written in invisible ink that on-one can see? It is no wonder that so little of the Torah and the Gospel of Luke are mentioned in the Quran leaving out most of the prophets from both these Books, and that too inaccurately??? The Quran is relatively a small book and three Qurans will be need to accommodate everything from the Jewish scripture alone; and with the Bible, it will be even more voluminous. It is clear that al-Ilah had no clear idea of the scriptures of Judaism and Christianity. He falsely claims that he revealed it obviously to fool his ignorant Muslim followers. It is also obvious that only some parts of the ‘Torah’ and the ‘Gospel of Luke’ were ever plagiarized/copied from these two ‘Holy Books’. How those Jewish Prophets ever became Muslim in pre-Islamic times is ridiculous and mind bogglingly! If al-Ilah is God, shouldn’t have He known all these? To rational person, al-Ilah would obviously come, not as God, but a completely fake creation of Muhammad! When al-Ilah is fake, it doesn’t need affirming what Islam is! Facing the Kaba for praying The Arabs were facing the Kaaba in Mecca for their prayers in pre-Islamic times. As per the Pagan Arab practices of respect in Mecca and Medina, they always showed respect by facing to their respected and venerated God(s). Muhammad and his followers in his early days of preaching did the same. Then his narcissist al-Ilah changed his mind, after Muslims’ migration to Medina, demanding that ALL Muslims face only Jerusalem instead, for all their prayers (Surah 2:142-145). Years later, al-Ilah changed his mind again, demanding that Muslims face the Kaaba while praying. This is how the Quran was invented: al-Ilah cannot make up his mind and keep changing things around like a childish game. When Muslims were facing Jerusalem for praying, they were showing their backsides to the Kaaba, a mark of disrespect in Arab tradition. Why did the Muslims disrespect the Kaaba in this way on al-Ilah’s orders? Was al-Ilah’s first command wrong? Was this al-Ilah so fickle minded? Why should Muslims worldwide face the Kaaba to pray in the first place? If God is everywhere, why face only in one direction to pray? Is al-Ilah squatting only in the Kaaba? How did this thinking ever come about? In pre-Islamic Arab Paganism, it was disrespectful to face something deemed holy, or someone respectful-a person of high regard, like a king, parents, grandparents, etc., when in communication with them. The Flat Earth In Surah 15:19, “al-Ilah says that the Earth is flat (and not a sphere) “the earth spread out like a carpet” and to drum this “scientific Islamic theory of a flat earth” into the believing Muslims, earth is also referred in Surah 20:53 as a bed, in 43:10 as a resting place, in 78:6 as an expanse, in 84:3 as spread out, and in 88:20 as spread. As if that is not enough stupidity, al-Ilah goes further and confirms in Surah 18:87 that “the sun sets everyday in a muddy spring water on the earth”, and people living there. The claim that a huge sun would land on an spring on the surface of our tiny planet earth sends all logics out the window??? The heat from burning fires of the Sun which are in thousands of degrees centigrade will set the whole earth into a ball of flames and disintegrate it in just milliseconds, even before it gets within a million Kilometers of earth’s atmosphere. Where on this spherical earth has “its setting-place”? The fact that the sun is a ball of fire that cannot even come a bit closer to the earth seems didn’t dawn on this al-Ilah yet. Al-Ilah also thought that the earth is flat, and that the sun sets everyday on it? This al-Ilah also thought that he was cleverer than the Pagans and decided to be one up on them and made it compulsory for Muslims to face the Kaaba to pray. And why not: he thought, when he thought the world is flat as a carpet or a bed. But when the world is a sphere in actuality, Muslims end up facing the outer space, not the Kabaa, thanks to al-Ilah’s poor understanding of the universe! This has become a comic of errors with Muslims straining themselves five times everyday trying to face the Kaaba, but failing to do so. Is al-Ilah, the alleged creator of the universe, so stupid, or was it just Muhammad, who actually invented the Quran, full of errors. And what about al-Ilah’s other “scientific Islamic theory” in Surah 39:5, which says the Sun revolving around the earth. With so many illogical and erroneous verses in the Quran, none can imagine that Islam is from a true almighty God. Islam is just a fake creation of Muhammad, plain and simple! Quran multiple authors The Quran was at the least took a minimum of 154 years in the making, AFTER Muhammad died. And it is known for sure that there were many people involved in coining the verses of the Quran. It must have taken Muhammad and his 700 companions, Muhammad’s wives, his concubines, slaves, relatives, friends, scribes, t least one was a Christian (whom the Pagan Arabs accused of inventing the Quran for Muhammad), two caliphs; and Zayed Ibn Thabit, who compiled, recompiled and re-recompiled, and edited and re-edited and even withdrew the initially distributed Qurans under Abu Bakr and had them burnt. The Satan also had a hand in the making of the Quran as admitted in Surah 22:52. How can the Satan beat or deceive al-Ilah to make his contribution in this Quran? How come al-Ilah fails to thwart Satan’s intended interference in His creation of the final holy book to mankind? Al-Ilah’s fickle mind and Deception Al-Ilah himself clearly prove in Surah 2.106 that He has an unstable, fickle mind: “Such of Our revelations as We abrogate (cancel, Naskh) or cause to be forgotten, we bring (in place) one better or the like thereof. Knowest thou not that al-Ilah is Able to do all things.” Now if this al-Ilah is ‘able to do all things’, then why didn’t this al-Ilah get it right in the very first instance, instead of canceling and replacing lots of Surahs? Why did al-Ilah write a Surah in Muhammad’s heart and then replace it with a better Surah? By replacing with a better Surah, al-Ilah is admitting that all his initial Surahs were not good. And what does “cause to be forgotten” got to do with canceling and replacing some/all the Surahs? As if this is not deceitful enough, al-Ilah has to repeat this deceit in Surah 16:101: “And when we put a revelation in place of (another) revelation, - And al-Ilah sknoweth best what He revealeth - they say: Lo! Thou art but inventing. Most of them know not.” These facts prove it right the Pagan Arabs’ charge that Muhammad verses were a deceitful invention. Although the Quran cliams “al-Ilah knoweth best”, His words prove it otherwise. The question must also be asked: Why did al-Ilah waste so much time in writing, canceling, rewriting, writing, replacing, rewriting, his messages to mankind? Didn’t He have anything else useful to do? Don’t all these facts points to hands of an ordinary man, a self-appointed prophet, in the making of the Quran? So Islam confirms itself to be a fake by its own admissions. Not so powerful al-Ilah One would know by now that al-Ilah claimed that it was he who revealed the Jewish and the Christian Scriptures to the Jews/Christians. But Surah 2:159 says, “Those who hide the Proofs and the Guidance which We had made it clear in the Scriptures: such are accursed of al-Ilah and accursed of those who have the power to curse.” Now there are lots of questions here unanswered within this Surah stated below: 1. Why did al-Ilah want, or allow, the scriptures he supposedly gave to the Jews/Christians be corrupted? 2. If al-Ilah was indeed a God, couldn’t he by just flicking his fingers, taken the scriptures back than to blabber it in the Quran? 3. Were the Jews and Christians so powerful, that they could hide their scriptures from this al-Ilah? 4. Was al-Ilah so weak in comparison with the Jews/Christians God(s)? 5. Since al-Ilah claims, it is he who gave the Scriptures, isn’t there anything left of it, in his memory, than to deny at a later time of its’ corruptions? 6. What kind of a God is al-Ilah, if the Jews and the Christians can hide something from him? 7. Why is al-Ilah cursing the Jews and the Christians for/from hiding their own holy scriptures? 8. If al-Ilah “made it clear”, surely he should be able to reproduce it, instead of cursing. 9. Or did al-Ilah want it to plagiarize/copy in full into the Quran? 10. So who is this powerless al-Ilah? Is it this Muhammad himself who is saying all this? Whatever be the answers to these questions, it, without doubt, does prove that Islam is a fake religion. Whoever was inventing this Quran, he failed to proceed properly without plagiarizing/copying a little from here and there of the Jewish/Christian texts. Like Surah 2:140 says, “Or say ye that Abraham and Ismael, and Isaac, and Jacob, or the tribes were Jews and Christians? Do ye know best, or doth al-Ilah? And who is more unjust than he who hideth a testimony, which he had received from al-Ilah? al-Ilah is not unaware of what ye do.” Here again al-Ilah is threatening the Jews and the Christians from hiding their own testimonies -their Scriptures. Hiding scriptures is also repeated in Surah 3:187. Why do they need the scriptures if not to copy it into their Quran? So by killing and wiping out the Jews and the Christians from Arabia and other Islamic countries, Muhammad tried to wipe out those, with knowledge or possession of the Scriptures of the Jews and the Christians, albeit unsuccessfully. It was impossible for Muhammad to wipe out all Christians and Jews and their holy books. Muslims are quick to condemn the Jewish and Christian scriptures as changed and corrupted. Over this, they laugh at, mock, make fun of, scorn and even condemn the Jewish and Christian scriptures. But when one ever questions the Maulanas (Muslim clergy) ‘what part or the specifics of the corruption does al-Ilah in the Quran talk about?’ they have no answers. Muslims cover up these mistakes and contradictions and such stupidities in their holy Quran by giving anyone an opportunity to question any doctrine of the Quran or saying of Muhammad. They brainwash the Muslim kids from childhood with Islamic teachings, without ever allowing them critically investigate those teaching. In Islamic schools, the teaching are done in a repetitive manner aiming at memorizing the Quran by heart, not understanding it. These constant parroting and repetitions, leads a child into believing what they are taught is period: , they are turned into braindead zombies. They child may never have to chnace to fathom what they are taught, which is all a bunch of gibberish! If anyone try to question the errors of the Quran, Muslims go on the offensive? The Quran threatens: “Those who believe and keep their duty (to al-lah). Theirs are good tidings in the life of the world and in the Hereafter -There is no changing in the words of al-Ilah (in the Quran) -That is the supreme Triumph.” [Surah 10:64-65] “There is none to alter the decisions of Allah.” [Surah 6:34] The fallacies, corruptions, and lies of the Quran and Muhammad thus remain unchallenged. Islamic lies, thus, perpetuate. Doubtful al-Ilah Allah goes further and commands Muhammad in Surah 10:95says “And is thou (Muhammad) art in doubt concerning that which We reveal unto thee, then question those (Christians) who read the scripture (that was) before thee (Bible). So be not thou of the waverers.” From this Surah, we can see that al-Ilah is asking Muhammad to ask the Christians whenever, he is in doubt about the Quran. So here you have a so-called ‘prophet’ who is told by a so-called God, to learn from ordinary Christians, to clear his/her doubts. So what kind of a ‘prophet’ is this Muhammad really? When even al-Ilah wants him to seek the Christians’ help for Islam? Now we come to the coup de grace for this faux pas! In the Arabic Quran, Surah 27:91 says, “I am commanded only to serve the Lord of this land which he had Hallowed, and unto him all things belong. And I am commanded to be of those who surrender.” Now if all the words in the Quran are from al-Ilah, then ‘I’ refers to al-Ilah. So the question is: who has commanded al-Ilah according to this Surah? And is this al-Ilah serving a Lord? If this Surah is true, then al-Ilah is not God period. Because a True God does not have to serve anyone, right? The Quran obviously declaring that al-Ilah is not a God. This again proves that al-Ilah is fake, so is the Quran and Islam! Cover up by Islamic scholars I must also point out that the most recognized English translation (recognized by the OIC) is the M. M. Pickthall’s Quran. He must have been horrified to recognize this corruption in the Quran and he cleverly tried to cover this up, by adding the word ‘Say’ as though al-Ilah is telling Muhammad to say and Muhammad’s name in brackets, to imply as though, “(Say): I (Muhammad) am commanded only to serve the Lord…” But M. M. Pickthall was not clever enough for this deceit to cover up for al-Ilah. Because if it is Muhammad speaking, then it would contradict this Surah 10:65 and Surah 6:34 as mentioned above; wherein al-Ilah says his words in the Quran cannot be changed. And in Surah 10:39 says, “Or say they: He hath invented it? Say: then bring a Surah like unto it, and call on all ye can beside al-Ilah, if ye are truthful.” This Surah confirms that only al-Ilah speaks in the Quran. For the skeptics, let me give another example as in Surah 19:64 says, “We come not down save by commandment of thy Lord. Unto him belongeth all that is before us and all that is behind us and all that is between those two, and thy Lord was never forgetful”. Pickthall solved this problem in the Quran by deceitfully adding the word ‘angels’ in brackets, thus; “We (angels) come not down save by commandment of thy Lord…” But the problem is, it confirms that angels are the ones speaking in the Quran, right? This has completely changed the connotation/dynamics of this Surah. The question here needs answering, is the Quran only the words of al-Ilah, or is it a free for all, to whoever can state their views??? It appears at least, angels, Muhammad, al-Ilah are speaking in the Quran. And if al-Ilah was the speaker of these Surahs, then it is wrong; he is not the God he claims to be! If someone else is speaking these Surahs, it is also wrong, because then the words in the Quran are not ONLY from al-Ilah, as the Quran claims. It is a Catch-22 situation: Muslim scholars cannot deny. neither solves this… The Muslims are themselves trapped with so many of such Surahs in the holy Quran! Either way or whichever way, one interprets them, the fact remains THAT THE Quran IS CORRUPTED/CHANGED. Islam is therefore FAKE!!!… And with this, I rest my case! so who is panicking.... shalom... ramjan Well atleast medyo papalapit na sa katotohanan itong si Indianong Kupal,subalit matanong ko lang si Ramjan,Ano ba ang pagkakaiba sa Freedom of Thought at sa Atheist???Sabi nila nag mga atheist ay mga free thinker or totally renounced existence of god.Well Ramjan, if you believe on the Freedom of Thought that is your belief and I respect that.But,my question is that,is really freedom of thought exist?Or it is only hypocrisy???Is there really existing atheist or they are just merely a claimer of popularity.
What part of this world that they raised their children wihtout teaching them about God?They are saying that religions have no true definition,I agree no one definition,but I refute that there is no true definition of religion.Simple lang ang argumento ko dyan e????How we exist?How all the Solar system in the Universe get along to their paths???Do they just Plok or exist like a bubbles in the universe??? How the sun lights??Where it come from?The water,the heat???Is there no creator all of these things?Has no designers of all these thing??? If you don't believe on creation,morality,religions and God then you are Hypocrites...Even Science cannot explain the existence of black hole,existence of atoms,the continuous expansion of the universe.In the next episode of my refute will present to you a Philiosophy of existence and religions,why I do believe God,religions and morality. mga booboo nangungupiya pakayo ah. Like what the MJ said use your mind.
BAKA NAMAN PWEDI NYONG SAGUTIN AN TANONG NIYA SA TAAS? THERE IS ONE AND ONLY ONE GOD. AND THIS GOD IS KNOWN IN SO MANY NAMES.
I BELIEVE HE DOESN'T MIND BEING CALLED IN WHATEVER NAME WE CALL HIM. HE UNDERSTANDS OUR LIMITATIONS. WHAT HE IS AFTER, IS HOW WE SHARE AND PRACTICE WHAT HE IS - LOVE, MERCY, AND JUSTICE. THE TRUE RELIGION THEN IS THE ONE THAT PROPAGATES THESE ATTRIBUTES. IS YOUR RELIGION AFTER THESE QUALITIES? OR, IS IT AFTER HATRED, VENGEANCE, DIVISION AND CONFUSION. EXAMINE YOUR RELIGION. IS IT BRINGING PEACE TO THE WORLD, OR IS IT DESTABILIZING MANKIND. THE PROPHET YOU ARE WORSHIPPING COULD BE SATAN IN DISGUISE. REMEMBER, HATRED; VENGREANCE; DIVISION AND CONFUSION, ARE SATAN'S BIGGEST TOOL IN TAKING AWAY PEOPLE FROM GOD. RIGHT NOW HE IS SUCCEEDING. I confront you with great respect with the religion you are practising right now the same as how we respect Prophet Isah (Jesus) as the prophet of God.. sent for the Jews.. it is in your Bible.. and also in your Bible He once said the coming of Prophet Mohammad (peace be upon Him) we believe in the teachings of Prophet Isah (Jesus) as the word of GOD or we say in the Muslim term ALLAH.. We are not to mock Isah because for us he was a prophet before Mohammad the last messenger.. And we have to believe in him to embrace Islam.. So, I ask you a very simple question the same question I asked MALVAR.. what is the real name of Jesus? He was a Jew? right? with a Hebrew language tongue... but unfortunately in Hebrew language there is no alphabet that corresponds with letter J.. so how thy name Jesus came about? and as I again I ask you this with great respect of your religion...
The Question now is Who are the one hates,vengeance and
He said: THERE IS ONE AND ONLY ONE GOD. AND THIS GOD IS KNOWN IN SO MANY NAMES. Answer: But Never Jesus is GOD!!! He said: I BELIEVE HE DOESN'T MIND BEING CALLED IN WHATEVER NAME WE CALL HIM. HE UNDERSTANDS OUR LIMITATIONS. Answer: Are you GOD?to know and believe your own belief that He don't mind???that is blaspheme.Ok we can belief but not to the extent that even the God's thinking and action will be assumed as what you believe. He said: WHAT HE IS AFTER, IS HOW WE SHARE AND PRACTICE WHAT HE IS - LOVE, MERCY, AND JUSTICE. Answer: You are fabricating your own belief about God without basis. He said: THE TRUE RELIGION THEN IS THE ONE THAT PROPAGATES THESE ATTRIBUTES. IS YOUR RELIGION AFTER THESE QUALITIES? Answer: Love,Mercy and Justice is not the only basis that the true religion propagates and can be considered as the true religion.It is also that who believe on Him as the TRUE God Allah, but not Jesus.If your God is Jesus then your religion is not the true Religion.Then your religion is paganic and Satanic. He said: OR, IS IT AFTER HATRED, VENGEANCE, DIVISION AND CONFUSION. Answer: Who is doing it anyway?Catholic History,American History,European history,Crusader history,Holocaust history,World war I and world war II.Who's history are those???The most devastative human history is belong to Christian Fake religiion history especially Roman Catholic History. He said: EXAMINE YOUR RELIGION. IS IT BRINGING PEACE TO THE WORLD, OR IS IT DESTABILIZING MANKIND. Answer: Examine Catholicism,Capitalism,Democratism,Colonialism,imperialism, whose work is that?Observe and study. He said: THE PROPHET YOU ARE WORSHIPPING COULD BE SATAN IN DISGUISE. Answer: We never worshipped Prophet Muhammad[PBUH] as GOD,unlike the Roman CAtholic and almost all Christians that made JESUS as GOD!!!It is you CAtholic and most of the Christians who worshipped Jesus as GOD!!!Never the Muslims. He said: REMEMBER, HATRED; VENGREANCE; DIVISION AND CONFUSION, ARE SATAN'S BIGGEST TOOL IN TAKING AWAY PEOPLE FROM GOD. Answer: You are right again, and remember, crusade 1,2,3,....upto 11 is a symbol of HATREDS,VENGEANCE....Catholic Social Doctrines is also an act and work of Catholicism to divide and confused mankinds. He said: RIGHT NOW HE IS SUCCEEDING. Answer: Yes the devil is succeeding in the form of humans like the Pope's, Roman Catholic Hoy unggoy, tinuruan kaba sa paaralan mo kung paano gumamit ng question mark?
Ulitin ko yung tanong ni MJ sa taas, hindi kasi kayo sumasagot eh?
Panay ang paninira nyo sa Islam pero, sira ulo din at korakot din pala si Jesus nyo. Aha!!! from # 29 above, NOVICIATES said that Walang masama kung ang Simbahan ay lumahok sa isyung pampulitika dahil sila ay isang Democratic Institution na kabahagi para magkaroon ng Check & Balance sa lipunan. OH really, you are not aware of the 1987 constitution, the supreme law of the land mandated that the CHURCES and the STATE shall be seperated at all times. For that reason the People's CONSTITUTION abolished the religion!!! Malinaw na ang ibig sabihin dito ni MJ ay bawal sumali ang pare sa pulitika ayun sa batas, taliwas sa sinabi ni bading na Noviciates. Mr. Noviciates claim again from his above statement that Lahat ng Relihiyon ay humihingi ng donasyon sa membro para maipagpatuloy nila ang serbisyong espiritwal. The law said that the money of the governmet shall not be used in any religion denomination impliedly or direcly. Ibig sabihin ang pera ng pamahalaan ay hindi pweding gamitin sa relihiyon ayun sa saligang batas, salungat nanaman sa paniniwala ng mga hangal. Now brilliant people of this chat room tell whose religion has violated the laws of the land? PLEASE??? Ibig sabihin sino ngayun ang relihiyong lumalabag sa ating batas? ITO OA YUNG TANONG NIYA SA MGA RAPEST NA CATHOLIC. PATI ANAK KINAKANTOT.
You were also vehemently calling our leaders as corrupt public offocials. Thus, you blamed to them the plight of Bangsamoro. My answere is very simple, they became corrupt because of the corrupt system of government that we adopted from western colonizers. What if our system of government is like in Sudi Arabia, Kuwait, Brunie, Malaysia, Qatar, Dubai and etc., do you think corruption will be part of our culture in this country, my answer would be no, because corrupt public officials will be scared to the law who would give them harsh punishment once they attempt. Remember that the richest and most beautiful country now in the world are Muslim countries, were millions of our compatriots are wosking like slaves. Can you name even five public officials in Country who are honest and never corrupt in their whole life of public service? Ito pa para sa talo ang panginoon, AMA, SPIRITO, at kng ano ano pa, sabinga ni MJ pati boti sinasamba parin nila, tingnan mo ''SAN'' MIGUEL BEER.
Have you read the statement of the great Jun Mercado above? let me qoute it to you mr. coward. ''During the past 100 years, Mindanao has seen a dramatic shift in population and landownership that has contributed to the Moro rebellion. In 1900 the Muslim population in Mindanao made up more than 90% of the island’s inhabitants, but by 1970, the Muslims constitute barely 20% of the population of Mindanao. The population shift came about through policies that gave the settler population from Luzon and the Visayas incentives to migrate to Mindanao. The new immigrants cleared the vast plains in Central Mindanao for agriculture and soon new towns and provinces were established.'' NOW TELL ME FROM THE DEEPEST OF YOUR CONSCIENSE, WHO IS THE REAL AGGRESSOR? PLEASE? Itinoro ba sa bibliya niyo na kunin ang hindi sa inyo. Nasaan na yung sinasabi nyo na mga peac loving kayo kung mang-aagaw pala kayu ng lupa. mga pokpok na mga tao, puro kantot lang ang alam, pati nanay kinakantot. Hahaha ang sasama na ng lumalabas sa baboy ninyong bunganga.
Kumakatas ang sangsang ng hininga mo na para bang totoo ang sinasabi mo. Who are the aggressors kamo? Di na kayo nakausad hanggang ngayon bilanggo pa kayo ng nakalipas na daang taon na. Sino kamo ang aggressor? Sino nga ba ang nangingidnap at humihingi ng ransom.....Sino nga ba ang namumugot ng mga taong walang sala at kapag pinupugutan ay dinadakila pa ang pangalan ng kanilang panginoon.... Mga guro kinikidnap pati mga musmos kinikidnap at ginagahasa tulad ng manyskis na propeta. Punta ka dito sa saudi mga anak dahil walang dowry para makapangasawa ayun iniiyot ang nanay kasi na divorce na din at tigang na..... Magkapatid ngiiyutan dahil parehong divorcee walang maiyot kaya ayun........ Pag nabuntis tinatapon ang kawawang bata ayun kinakain lang ang bata ng saong bundok.. Lalaki sa lalaki ayun nagpupuwitan wlang pang dowry para makapangasawa kaya ayun..... Maranaw na domestic helper ayun ginahasa ng among arabo.... Tausug na driver at maranaw na domestic helper ayun nagiiyutan kahit hindi magasawa....... Maranaw na babae ginahasa ng apat na kabataan ayun pati wetpu wasak..... Hay kung ng high school ka malalaman mo na ang unang tao sa pilipinas ay mga aetas.....bakit naman mali ang pumunta ang mga masisipag na katoliko at paunlarin ang agrikultura sa mindanao?????. Kasi ang gusto nyo mga asawang babae ang magararo ng bukid nyo....ang lalaki nagkakamot ng yagbolts.... Yang sinasabi ng MJ na si Ibn Sina, mahusay siya hindi dahil muslim ang kanyang ama. Ito ay dahil pinili nyang magaral at di humawak ng mga patalim at maging mamamatay tao. Eto pakisagot lang" mga tanong tungkol kay mohammad na idolo nyo, Pwe.. Did he marry a 6 year old girl.???.. Did he murder men and raped their wives???? Did he massaker 700 men wemen and children???? Did he rape his caprured slaves. And made it legal in islam Did he kiss a black stone and revered it.???? Did he murder a man beside your most revered black stone????? Did he behead his so-called unbelievers. As well as those who saw his vile characrer and converted to other faith.?????? Did he lure his cohorts into believing that 70 virgins await them in heaven??? Tapos ang masasabi lang ng mga kapatid natin sa chatolic ay mali yung spelling at grammar niya, hemmm, hindi talaga ako nagkamali na Islam ang pinili ko. hhohohoo.
Thanks to che, MJ, radical, andres, at marami pang muslim defender dito, kahit sa salita lang ay okay na. Biography of Muhammad
by Ahmed Simon Condensed by : MALVAR Sirat Rasulallah - The life of the prophet of Allah Muhammad's Early Life Muhammad was born in 571 A.D.; but his father, Abdallah, died 4 months before he was born. His family belonged to the Banu Hashim clan of the Qoraish tribe of Saudi Arabia. Orphaned, infant Muhammad and his widowed mother, Amina (daughter of Wahd), were looked after by Abdul Mutalib (Grandfather of Muhammad). During this time, Halima, a Bedouin lady, nursed infant Muhammad {I have no record of why Amina did not breast-feed/nurse infant Muhammad}. After a few weeks, Halima complained infant Muhammad was possessed by the devil and refused him. At age 20, Abu Talib passed Muhammad to work for Khadija, who owned a thriving and large caravan business. At age 25, Muhammad married his boss, 40-year-old rich widow Khadija, and thereby became stepfather of Khadija's two daughters from a previous marriage. Muhammad did not show 'his true colours' while married to Khadija. He was faithful to Khadija (1 wife for 2 decades) and was obedient and respected her, till she died. Muhammad, The Keeper & Trader of Slaves After Khadija's death, Muhammad inherited all her wealth and her businesses. With such power in his hands, it is then that Muhammad's true character and nature emerged to terrorize Saudi Arabia. Eventually, Muhammad ignored his caravan business and began to concentrate on his lucrative business in trading with thousands of captured slaves from his frequent raids on villages, after beheading their adult men {Jews, Christians and Arabs} and taking their women and children as slaves and stealing their belongings {The loot he stole from these people was an added bonus} He always kept the 'Best' slaves for himself before selling some later. Because Muhammad had sexual intercourse with his slaves without marrying them, it has become 'legal' in Islam to have sexual intercourse with slaves {to justify Muhammad's behavior with slave men, women and children}; and_ all slaves have to submit to their Muslim owners' carnal sexual desires_ as in Quran 4:24, 23:6, 33:50, 70:30. In Sahih Bukhari's Hadiths volume 1, Book 6, number 316 - Muhammad had sex with his wives, and slaves, while fasting - Thus, Muhammad violated the {no daytime sex} rule of Allah/Quran 2:187 and he *showed no respect for Allah's commands (because he obviously knew there was no Allah*, as it was his own fabrication). This deceit in Islam, was 'legalized' because of Muhammad's maniac behavior. Imagine, the many men, women, & children still living as slaves perpetrated in the name of Allah? Muhammad the Pedophile & Sex-Maniac Muhammad married Aisha, the 6-year-old daughter of Abu Bakr. He consummated the marriage after Aisha got her first menstruation at age 8 (9 by the Islamic Calendar) when he was 52. What do you think he could have done with all those child-slaves he captured in his raids? Tabari VIII: 187 "The (sixty-two-year old) Messenger of Allah married Mulaykah. She was young (12) and beautiful. One of the Prophet's wives came to her and said, 'Are you not ashamed to marry a man who killed your father during the day he conquered Mecca?" She therefore took refuge from him" {fled}. Sunaan Abu Dawud: Book 13, Number 2380: "The Prophet (pbuh) used to kiss her (Aisha) and suck her tongue when he was fasting." Sahih Bukhari: V3B31N149: Narrated 'Aisha: "The Prophet used to kiss and embrace (his wives) while he was fasting,-" {What more need be said of this peodophile sex-maniac messenger of Allah, who dishonored Allah's Quranic fasting rule for sex} Muhammad The Fake Prophet Interestingly, the Quran itself records many confirmations of borrowing/plagiarizing leveled against Muhammad by his own Arab contemporaries: Quran 25:4 "And those who disbelieve say: This is naught but a lie that he invented, and other folk have helped him with it, so that they have produced a slander and a lie." {Fake Quran} Quran 25:5, "And they say: Tales of the men of old (ancient), which he hath written down: so that they are dictated to him morn and evening." {Muhammad's Fib} Quran 16:103, "And We know well that they say: Only a man teacheth him-" {But Muhammad claimed, angel Gabriel passed the revelations from Allah.} In Bukhari: B61, V6, Hadiths 521, pp. 487-488; Narrated Masruq: "... I heard the Prophet saying, '(learn) the Qurans from the four; Abdullah bin Masud, Salim, Mu'adh and Ubai bin Ka'b.'" {These men, made their own Qurans and taught them to their students. However, these Qurans were not the same and confusion soon arose amongst the early Muslims. Muhammad and his companions were illiterate, and so they used to memorize their Quranic verses. But according to Bukhari Vol.6:509 p.478 some verses were written down by scribes. In Bukhari Vol.4:57,62,69.299, many verses were lost after many who had memorized were killed and Muhammad himself was poisoned and after suffering for 2 years {likely liver damage}, died in June 8th 632 A.D. The present Quran was fabricated over hundreds of years after Muhammad's death; by various caliphs and their scribe. Why didn't Allah protect his Quran, if he did exist; as God did the Bible?} Bukhari:V5B59N727 "When Allah's Apostle became seriously sick, he started covering his face with a woolen sheet. When he felt short of breath, he removed it, and said, 'that is so! Allah's curse be on Jews and Christians.'" {Even in his deathbed, he had only curses. The Bible condemns terrible curses on anyone coping/plagiarizing any part of the Bible and using them for any other purpose or religion. Thus, it is a fact, that Muhammad & Allah & Muslims and Islam, are all dreadfully cursed by the Bible as stated in Rev.22: 18-19.} Muhammad's equal status with Allah (Sura), in many verses of the Quran. For example, Sura 33.36 - "And it becometh not a believing man or a believing woman, when Allah and his messenger have decided an affair (for them), that they should (after that) claim any say in their affair; and whoso is rebellious to Allah and his messenger, he verily go astray in error manifest." {*Since this Muhammad fabricated the Quran, he equated himself in equal rank/status with Allah -Muslim God*. This is an uneducated and illiterate man in the human flesh, arrogantly demanding absolute obedience from all Muslims towards him, to decide in the Muslims' own affairs. While claiming to be a prophet of Allah, he being just a human being, shouldn't he have been humble in showing his subservience to Allah instead? Wasn't obeying Allah alone sufficient? By this Sura, Muslims have no rights to decide and must completely surrender brainlessly - like sheep/morons to Muhammad. *This also confirms independent thinking is not allowed in Islam*. No other religion makes such a demand on their followers - lucky for us, only Muslims are to be morons of Muhammad. In stark contrast, the Bible demands Christians intelligently challenge/test whoever claims to be a prophet or from God} Bukhari:V4B52N203 "I heard Allah's Apostle saying, 'He who obeys me, obeys Allah, and he who disobeys me, disobeys Allah.'" Unique only in Islam. Islam is also unique when it says in numerous verses in the Quran "Non-Muslim men, women and children must die, for what Muslims believe." Muhammad The Idolater (Sahih al-Bukhari 2:667, 675, 676, 679, 680) Narrated 'Abis bin Rabia: 'Umar came near the Black Stone and kissed it and said, "No doubt, I know that you are a stone and can neither benefit anyone nor harm anyone. Had I not seen Allah's Apostle kissing you I would not have kissed you." Al-Kharqushi, Sharaf al-Mustafa - "The Prophet slaughtered a ewe for one of the idols (nusub min al-ansab); then he roasted it and carried it with him eating as he walked. The Prophet asked Zayd ibn Amr, "Would you like some food?" He said, "Yes." Then the Prophet put before him the meat (of the ewe). He (Zayd ibn Amr) asked: "What did you sacrifice to, O Muhammad?" He replied, "To one of the idols." Zayd then said: "I am not the one to eat anything slaughtered for a divinity other than Allah." This is also recorded in Bukhari 7:407 and what Zayd ibn Amr replied to Muhammad, "-I do not eat of what you (Muhammad) slaughter on your stone altars (Ansabs) for your idols, nor do I eat except that on which Allah's Name has been mentioned on slaughtering." {Not only Muhammad broke Allah's rule against idols, he even cared less what others thought of him, and instead; enjoyed publicly walloping food, which he himself slaughtered and sacrificed for idols.} Muhammad the Savage & Racist Hadith Tabari VII:97/Ishaq:368 "We carried Ka'b bin Al Ashraf's head and brought it to Muhammad during the night. When he came out to us, we cast Ashraf's head before his feet. The Prophet praised Allah that the poet had been assassinated and complimented us on the good work we had done in Allah's Cause." {Now Ashraf was a God-fearing intelligent poet, and well loved by the higher echelon of Arabs. Muhammad ordered Ashraf's beheading not because of any crimes or misdemeanors he had done; *but just that he believed Muhammad was a fake and said so*. Many intelligent/good people who knew Muhammad personally, were forced to accept this fake or have their heads chopped off. - Tabari VII:97 "The morning after the murder of Ashraf, the Prophet declared, 'Kill any Jew who falls under your power.'" {A blanket order, based on race} Bukhari:V1B1N6 "Just issue orders to kill every Jew in the country." Tabari IX:126 "The Messenger of Allah married fifteen wives. He combined eleven at a time and left behind nine {*This does not include about 28 concubines*.}" Tabari VIII:38 "The Prophet selected for himself from among the Jewish women of the Qurayza, Rayhanah. She became his concubine. When he predeceased her, she was still in his possession. When the Messenger of Allah took her as a captive, she showed herself averse to Islam and insisted on Judaism." {But okay for sex?} Hadiths Tabari VIII:178/Ishaq:550 "Muhammad ordered that certain men should be assassinated even if they were found behind the curtains of the Ka'aba. _Among them was Abdallah bin Sa'd _(the Quran's one and only scribe). The reason that Allah's Messenger ordered that he be slain was because he had become a Muslim and used to write down Quran Revelations. But later he was an apostate, rejecting Islam." Hadith Ishaq:595 "The Apostle said, 'Get him away from me and cut off his tongue." {Just for criticizing Muhammad? With such savagery, inhumanity and intolerance against non-Muslims; Muslims then claim 'Islam is peaceful?} Muhammad the Mental Case Bukhari:V7B71N661 "Magic was worked on Allah's Apostle and he was bewitched, so that he began to imagine doing things which in fact, he had not done." Bukhari:V6B60N658 "A man worked magic on Allah's Apostle until he started imagining that he had done a thing that he had not really done." Bukhari:V7B71N660 "Magic was worked on Allah's Apostle so that he used to think that he had sexual relations with his wives while he actually had not. That is the hardest kind of magic as it has such an effect. One day he said, 'O Aisha, do you know that Allah has instructed me concerning the matter I asked Him about? Two men came to me and one of them sat near my head and the other near my feet. The one asked, 'What is wrong with this man?'" {Forgets sexual intercourse?} Bukhari:V7B71N665 "The Prophet said, 'No contagious disease is conveyed without Allah's permission.'" Bukhari:V4B54N509 "The Prophet said, 'Yawning is from Satan" *Muhammad the Murderer*/*Thief*/*Liar*/Terrorist Tabari IX:69 "Killing disbelievers is a small matter to us." Ishaq:368 "Ka'b bin Ashraf's body was left prostrate (humbled in submission). After his fall, all of the Nadir Jews were brought low. Sword in hand we cut him down. By Muhammad's order we went secretly by night. Brother killing brother. We lured him to his death with guile (cunning)." Tabari VII:97/Ishaq:368 "Our attack upon Allah's enemy cast terror among the Jews, and there was no Jew in Medina who did not fear for his life.'" Tabari VII:97 "The morning after the murder of Ashraf, the Prophet declared, '*Kill any Jew who falls under your power*.'" Ishaq:369 "Thereupon Mas'ud leapt upon Sunayna, one of the Jewish merchants with whom his family had social and commercial relations and killed him. The Muslim's brother complained, saying, 'Why did you kill him? You have much fat in you belly from his charity.' Mas'ud answered, 'By Allah, had Muhammad ordered me to murder you, my brother, I would have cut off your head.' Wherein the brother said, 'Any religion that can bring you to this is indeed wonderful!' And he accepted Islam." Ishaq: 676 "(To Muhammed's companions),'you obey a stranger who encourages you to murder for booty. You are greedy men. Is there no honor among you?' Upon hearing those lines Muhammad said, 'Will no one rid me of this woman?' Umayr, a zealous Muslim, decided to execute the Prophet's wishes. That very night he crept into the writer's home while she lay sleeping surrounded by her young children. There was one at her breast. Umayr removed the suckling babe and then plunged his sword into the poet. The next morning in the mosque, Muhammad, who was aware of the assassination, said, 'You have helped Allah and His Apostle.' Umayr said. 'She had five sons; should I feel guilty?' 'No,' the Prophet answered. 'Killing her was as meaningless as two goats butting heads.'" Bukhari:V1B11N626 "The Prophet said, 'No prayer is harder for the hypocrites than the Fajr. If they knew the reward they would come to (the mosque) even if they had to crawl. I decided to order a man to lead the prayer and then take a flame to burn all those who had not left their houses for the prayer, burning them alive inside their homes.'" {Burning men, women and children alive in their homes - how great?} Ishaq:309 "(Muhammad said),'Bind Abu Aziz tight for his mother is rich and she may ransom him for a great deal of money.'" {Some said he had no greed for money} Tabari VIII:179 "Abdallah bin Sa'd fled to Uthman, his brother, who after hiding him, finally surrendered him to the Prophet. Uthman asked for clemency. Muhammad did not respond, remaining silent for a long time. Muhammad explained, 'By Allah, I kept silent so that one of you might go up to him and cut off his head!' One of the Ansar said, 'Why didn't you give me a sign?' Allah's Apostle replied, 'A prophet does not kill by pointing.'" Tabari VIII:179/Ishaq:550 "Among those who Muhammad ordered killed was Abdallah bin Khatal. The Messenger ordered him to be slain because while he was a Muslim, Muhammad had sent him to collect the zakat tax with an Ansar and a slave of his.... His girls used to sing a satire about Muhammad so the Prophet ordered that they should be killed along with Abdullah. He was killed by Sa'id and Abu Barzah. The two shared in his blood. One of the singing girls was killed quickly but the other fled. So Umar caused his horse to trample the one who fled, killing her." Ishaq:551 "Another victim was Huwayrith. He used to insult Muhammad in Mecca. Huwayrith was put to death by Ali. The Messenger ordered Miqyas' assassination only because he became a renegade by rejecting Islam." Tabari VIII:180 "Also among those eliminated were Ikrimah bin Abu Jahl and Sarah, a slave of one of Abd Muttalib's sons. She taunted Muhammad while he was in Mecca." {So many Arabs mocked and thought of Muhammad as a clown} Tabari VIII:181 "_The Messenger ordered six men and four women to be assassinated. One of these women was Hind, who swore allegiance and became a Muslim-." {And yet, she was killed?}. Ishaq:597 "When the Apostle returned to Medina after his raid on Ta'if, word spread that he had killed some of the men who had satirized him. The poets who were left, fled in all directions." Quran 8:69 "So enjoy what you took as booty; the spoils are lawful and good." {Believe me when I tell you, 'Muslims still believe and do rob and steal from non-Muslims as their ordained right'}. Bukhari:V4B52N260 "Ali burnt some [former Muslims alive] and this news reached Ibn Abbas, who said, 'Had I been in his place I would not have burnt them, as the Prophet said, "Don't punish with Allah's Punishment." No doubt, I would have killed them, for the Prophet said, "If a Muslim discards his Islamic religion, kill him." Ishaq:316 "Following Badr, Muhammad sent a number of raiders with orders to capture some of the Meccans and burn them alive." Bukhari:V1B4N1229-33 "Aisha [who was 9] said, 'I used to wash semen off the Prophet's (who was 53 then) clothes. When he went for prayers I used to notice one or more spots on them.'" Tabari IX:76 "Malik has reported to me that you were the first from Himyar to embrace Islam and that you have killed infidels, so rejoice at your good fortune." {Rejoice in killing human beings? And yet Muslims say Islam is nonviolent?} Ishaq:308/Tabari VII:65 "When the Apostle was in Safra, Nadr was assassinated. When Muhammad reached Irq al-Zabyah he killed Uqbah. When the Prophet ordered him to be killed, Uqbah said, 'Who will look after my children, Muhammad?' "Hellfire,' the Apostle replied, and he was killed." Tabari VII:85 "Muhammad killed many Quraysh polytheists at Badr." Tabari VII:101/Ishaq:483 "Sallam's wife came out and we told her that we were Arabs in search of supplies. When we entered, we bolted the door on her so she gave a shout to warn him of our presence. We rushed upon him with our swords as he lay in his bed. He took his pillow and tried to fend us off. Abd Allah thrust his sword into his stomach and transfixed him while he was shouting, 'Enough! Enough!' She said, 'By the God of the Jews, he is dead.' I never heard any more pleasing words than these. We went to the Messenger of Allah and told him that we had killed the enemy of Allah. We disagreed in his presence about the killing of Sallam, each of us claiming to have done it. The Prophet said, 'Bring me your swords.' We did and he looked at them. He said, 'This sword of Abd Allah killed him. I can see the marks left by bones on it.'" Tabari VII:112/Ishaq:372 "When a blind Jew became aware of the presence of the Messenger and the Muslims he rose and threw dust in their faces, saying, 'Even if you are a prophet, I will not allow you into my garden!' I was told that he took a handful of dirt and said, 'If only I knew that I would not hit anyone else, Muhammad, I would throw it in your face.' Sa'd rushed in and hit him on the head with his bow and split the Jew's head open." Ishaq:403 "*Allah killed twenty-two polytheists at Uhud*." Tabari VII:147 "Amr was sent by Muhammad to kill Abu Sufyan (the Quraysh leader and merchant. The Prophet said, 'Go to Abu Sufyan and kill him.'" Ishaq:434 "Amr and an Ansari waited until they were asleep. Then Amr killed them, thinking that he had taken vengeance for the Muslims who had been slain. When he came to the Messenger, he told him what had happened. The Prophet said, 'You have killed men for whom I shall have to pay blood-money.'" Ishaq:564 "The Muslims stole our goods and divided them. Their spears pierced us not once but twice. Their squadrons came at us like a swarm of locusts. Were it not for the religion of Muhammad's people, their cavalry would never have attacked us." Tabari VIII:22 "Hassan was with the women and children. A Jew passed by and began to walk around his settlement. There was no one to protect them while the Apostle and his Companions were at the Meccans' throats. So I said: 'Hassan, this Jew is walking around. I fear he will point out our weakness while the Muslims are too busy to attend to us. So go down to him and kill him." Ishaq:464 "The Jews were made to come down, and Allah's Messenger imprisoned them. Then the Prophet went out into the marketplace of Medina, and he had trenches dug in it. He sent for the Jewish men and had them beheaded in those trenches. They were brought out to him in batches. They numbered 800 to 900 boys and men." Tabari VIII:40 "The Messenger commanded that furrows should be dug in the ground for the Qurayza. Then he sat down. *Ali and Zubayr began cutting off their heads in his presence*." Tabari VIII:38 "The Messenger of Allah commanded that all of the Jewish men and boys who had reached puberty should be beheaded. Then the Prophet divided the wealth, wives, and children of the Banu Qurayza Jews among the Muslims." Bukhari:V4B52N281 "They took Khubaib to Mecca after the battle of Badr- Said he, 'I'm being martyred as a Muslim. I do not mind how I am killed in Allah's Cause. For my killing is for Allah's Sake. If Allah wishes, He will bless the amputated parts of my torn body.' Then the son of Harith killed him." Tabari VIII:90 "Abu Basir went out with his companions. When they stopped to rest he asked one of them, 'Is this sword of yours sharp?' 'Yes,' he replied. 'May I look at it?' Basir asked. 'If you wish.' Basir unsheathed the sword, attacked the man, and killed him. The other Muslim ran back to the Messenger, saying, 'Your Companion has killed my friend.' While the man was still there, Abu Basir appeared girded with the sword. He halted before Muhammad and said, 'Messenger, your obligation has been discharged.'" Ishaq:288 "The Quraysh said, 'Muhammad and his Companions have violated the sacred month, shed innocent blood, stole property, and taken men, women and children captive. Muhammad claims that he is following obedience to Allah, yet he is the first to violate the holy month and to kill (innocent humans).'" Bukhari:V9B84N59 "When the Prophet died, Arabs reverted to disbelief. Umar said, 'Should we fight these people?"' Bakr said, 'By Allah! I will fight whoever differentiates between prayers and Zakat, as Zakat is the right to be taken from property according to Allah's Orders. Bukhari:V5B59N546 "Fatimah, the daughter of the Prophet, sent someone to Bakr, asking for her inheritance of what Allah's Apostle had left of the property taken from the Fai booty. Quran 2:195 "Spend your wealth for the cause of Allah (fighting non-Muslims). And be not cast by your own hands to ruin; and do good. Lo! Allah loveth the Beneficent." (From Muhammad's era, this has been evident of terrorists' funds and the means of Jihadists' activities worldwide. Terrorism needs money to function} Bukhari: V9B87N127 "The Prophet said, 'I have been awarded victory by terror, so the treasures of the earth are mine.'" {This is clear evidence, by Muhammad's own admission (mouth) of being a terrorist and stealing from people as a common thief} Tabari VII:133/Ishaq:387 "When Muhammad saw Hamzah he said, 'If Allah gives me victory over the Quraysh at any time, I shall mutilate thirty of their men!' When the Muslims saw the rage of the Prophet they said, 'By Allah, if we are victorious over them, we shall mutilate them in a way which no Arab has ever mutilated anybody." Hadith Tabari VIII:96 "A raiding party led by Zayd set out against Umm in Ramadan. Zyad tied her legs with rope and then tied her (legs) between two camels until they split her in two. During it, Umm suffered a cruel death. She was a very old woman. Then they dragged Umm's daughter and Abdallah to the Messenger. {Tearing the legs apart could keep her torso alive for at least a hour, in excruciating pain; and the bloody torn human torso bleeding; and an old frail lady at that; just to rob her of a booty and take her children as slaves for sex and material profit? Muhamad raided and killed people even during Ramadan for booty/plunder.} NOTE: Muslims will tell you, all this was done in wars and try to pass it off (What wars, with villages/innocent civilians?). But the truth is, Muhammad raided, what was basically, villages (even from the small towns of Mecca and Medina in those days). The Hadiths below confirms it all. Bukhari:V5B59N512 "The Prophet had their men killed, their children and woman taken as captives (slaves). The captives were divided among the Muslims. Then the Messenger began taking the homes and property that were closest to him." {He murdered men, took slaves and stole from civilians homes. That is the truth} Dear Readers, I need say no more. These are all verses from the Quran and the Hadiths, which no one can deny. You be the judge and jury - DID MUHAMAD HAVE ANY MORALS? Is he a prophet or a Fake? WHAT SORT OF MAN WAS HE? MALVAR, what I am trying to ask from you is what is the real name of Jesus? and don't preach me of Mohammad (pbuh)... If you read about Mohammad (pbuh) then you must know the real name of Jesus as you know more about our Prophet (pbuh).. so please I ask you of a simple question.. don't .. If you can't answer it I would you don't know your religion or you don't have religion and people w/o religion is an anti-christ..
But though you haven't reply to my question like you have replied a very different topic from my argument I would like to point out some facts on the article you copy pasted from islam-watch.. First, Ahmed Simon is nobody.. just like you.. they are being paid by the Jews to do this work.. there is no spiritual motivation behind their work.. Second, Aramaic, Hebrew and Arabic differ in very small words as far as language is concern.. they all speak Arabic.. and the verses where they are extracting their verses was from a Quran plagiarised by the Jews.. as it was a challenge for the people of the book (the jews in the Quran) to make a book noble than the Quran.. so after reconciling all their scholar.. and 16 years of Hard-Labor they have met the challenge but made it very different from as what it was with the Holy Quran.. and to give you a trivia.. google the real name of Jesus and you see it if you cant answer it on your own.. or maybe you are afraid that you might be caught on your own practice.. but I know you wont do it... because you will put your religion in jeopardy.. and I will answer it for you.. Jesus (pbuh) name was Yeshua, in hebrew meaning Salvation, not JESUS.. on the second coming of Yeshua everybody will call him JESUS but he will snob those who call him in that wat cause it is not his name.. He never heard of the name before.. and that would be a big problem to Christian followers.. but I have a follow up question on the query that you must have been answering.. What does Jesus means?
Che tama ka curruption is a part of life na talaga..kahit saan sulok ng mundo..
kahit sa mayayamang bansa ay nangyayari itong curruption.. naka base ako dito sa Saudi matagal tagal narin ako dito..panahon pa ni King Khalid..kaya alam na alam ko kahit papaano kung ano ang nangyayari dito sa Saudi at ibang karatig na bansa sa middle east lahat mga nababalitaan sa mga friend na foreigners..dito Saudi talamak dati ang nakawan sa gubyerno dito..kaya pinalitan ang sistema lahat ng transaksiyon ng gubyerno ay sa bangko lahat dumadaan.. Tama ka talagang mayaman ang mga bansa sa middle east..dati isang "bugkos" silang mga Arab countries..at biglang nagka watak watak dahil kay Sadam Husein..ang pinagmulan ng gulo ay sa oil na nakukuha ng Kuwait sa boundary between Iraq..at pinasok ang Kuwait marami crimen nakawan at pati mga babae ninakaw din..marami kumampi kay Sadam mga "Arab countries" humingi ng tulong si King Fahad sa USA.. Dati lahat ng Arab countries ay puwedeng maglakbay saan mang lugar sa middle east ng walang kaukulang visa..ngayon ay iba na.. Ang hindi ko lang maliwanagan kung bakit Pati nga ang sagradong lugar ng Muslim ang Mecca ay pinasok ng terorista mga Muslim Iranian..kung nabalitaan ninyo..marami ang namatay na pilgrims.. Hindi rin pinatawaqd ng mga teroristang ang sagradong lugar ng Saudi Arabia kung nabalitaan din ninyo..sila sila nag aaway away nawawala na ang respeto sa Holy land ng Muslim (Saudi Arabia) Mayaman talaga sila.. Copy paste bobobobobobobbbbobobobbo........
boboks. HINDI MAKASAGOT ANG MGA POKPOK NAKAKAHIYA KAYO. Simpling tanong hindi nila alam ang tanong. GAGO.... KAKAASAR KA. hehehe NAINTINDIHAN MO BA ANG NILAGAY MO JAN HAHHH MALVAR alyas ibntaheer.... Ok Mr pointless i will answer your question to the best of my knowledge.
In your koran which was partly copied from the bible you named Jesus Isa. Yahshwa Bin Yosef is tought to be his real name but the mighty name of Jesus is how we call Him. I also know that your god has 99 names. Now Mr. pointless why don’t you answer my questions in # 86 *Why dont you answer this questions about your prophet mohammad*. Did he marry a 6 year old girl.???.. Did he murder men and raped their wives???? Did he massacer 700 or more men wemen and children???? Did he rape his caprured slaves. And made it legal in islam Did he kiss a black stone and revered it.???? Did he murder a man beside your most revered black stone????? Did he behead his so-called unbelievers. As well as those who saw his vile characrer and converted to other faith.?????? -Did he lure his cohorts into believing that 70 virgins await them in heaven?_?? Sould this man's deeds be emulated ??? I wont answer a question from a person who is coward to address himself..
and I have an answer to every question you are throwing.. and I believe #86 is from che and the question from which you copy pasted it was from MALVAR from #88.. Is MALAVAR and You the same? and as you answered my question you have put a great insult in Jesus.. or Yeshua.. you said.. YESHUA bin Yousef in Joseph english YESHUA son of Yousef.. BIN meaning son.. Then what happened to YESHUA or JESUS SON OF GOD? Is jesus son of god or son of Joseph? You have to clear that mess up... In our Quran it does not say YESHUA bin Yousef but... YESHUA bin Maryam... meaning YESHUA son of Maryam... cause Joseph was not his biological son same as the fact in your Bible.. Identify yourself and you would be answered on every question you have raised... gago ka talaga anonymous alyas malvar.
-Did he marry a 6 year old girl.???.. one question mark is enough tanga saan kaba naka pag-aral ha? -Did he murder men and raped their wives???? Did he massacer 700 or more men wemen and children???? Did he rape his caprured slaves. And made it legal in islam CAPTURED gAGO. Did he kiss a black stone and revered it.???? Did he murder a man beside your most revered black stone????? Did he behead his so-called unbelievers. As well as those who saw his vile characrer and converted to other faith As to eden, tell me your base there, so that I could recommend you to your boss to give you a higher possession and salary. Princes and kings in the Middle east will be my close friends n the future, trust me. Che, langya kung makasigaw ka ng bobo parang may laman ang ulo mo...
Siguro kick out ka lang diyan sa MSU. Mag aral kang maigi gayahin mo si Avicenna hindi si Manyakis mohammad. Kung hindi pag tagal isa ka na rin sa namumugot ng ulo...hehe tatanga tanga ka talaga. Tipong naniniwala ka pa hanggang ngayon sa 70 virgins na pangako ng papa mohammad mo. Pag nagkataon imbes na birhen si papa shaytan mo ang makasama mo..... Enrollment na magpatulong ka na lang kay MJ para makaenroll ka sa MSU.....baka bagsak ka at di ka pa nakatapos ng elementary....... Nga pala isama mo si andres at si pointless....di pa sila nakakapasok sa university kahit visitors pass lang... Bakit may ulo bang walang laman?
Buti kami kasi mga babae, kayo ang pangako sa inyo ng mga pari ay blojob bwahahaha. Puro titi ang lamn ang utak, yakssssssss. Hey che aka MJ, Morojasan you really like to use "trust me" in your letter.
You have gone down to the pigpen, taking the name of your idol Che the radical...... Be the Ibn Sina not the Mohammad its good for your soul... BELIEVE ME I wish I could be the MJ.
KAYA ginagaya ko lahat ng meyroon siya. Gets mo? I wish I could be the MJ.
KAYA ginagaya ko lahat ng meyroon siya. Gets mo? Thank you 4 giving me that honour. hehehe 4 that reason magiging lenient na ako sayo. ThAKS HAA, bakit kaw lang ang nakapansin? TO WHO EVER YOU ARE:
I wont answer a question from a person who is coward to address himself.. and I have an answer to every question you are throwing.. and I believe #86 is from che and the question from which you copy pasted it was from MALVAR from #88.. Is MALAVAR and You the same? and as you answered my question you have put a great insult in Jesus.. or Yeshua.. you said.. YESHUA bin Yousef in Joseph english YESHUA son of Yousef.. BIN meaning son.. Then what happened to YESHUA or JESUS SON OF GOD? Is jesus son of god or son of Joseph? You have to clear that mess up... In our Quran it does not say YESHUA bin Yousef but... YESHUA bin Maryam... meaning YESHUA son of Maryam... cause Joseph was not his biological son same as the fact in your Bible.. Identify yourself and you would be answered on every question you have raised... *pointless you dont have the balls to answer this questions about your prophet mohammad*.
Did he marry a 6 year old girl.???.. Did he murder men and raped their wives???? Did he massacer 700 or more men wemen and children???? Did he rape his caprured slaves. And made it legal in islam Did he kiss a black stone and revered it.???? Did he murder a man beside your most revered black stone????? Did he behead his so-called unbelievers. As well as those who saw his vile characrer and converted to other faith.?????? -Did he lure his cohorts into believing that 70 virgins await them in heaven?_?? Should this man's deeds be emulated ??? My real name: Jacinto Reyes...You don't have the guts pointless. Kuhang kuha mo na si MJ / Morojasan kasing talino mo na siya kasi iisa kayo......
punta ka sa MCU MR. MALVAR inaasar mo talaga ako bakit mo sinasabing bobo si pointless at MJ?
NAkAKAASAR ka talaga. Promise, hindi tayo maggng close nyan. I wish you are woman becouse I will really marry you. hehe Hemmm, I think Malvar is women, tingnan nyo against na against siya sa pagpapakasal ng marami.
Isa bigla siyang nagblush ng magpa regards ko sakanya hehehe. Oh bakit iba na ang tingin mo saakin? hemmm I am now learning to appreciate some of the points of ms. malvar, let us find a common denominator here?
Ok lang pakasal tayo para pag tuwad mo makikilala mo ang alaga kong tuta....
malapit ka na tumuwad......matitikman mo na sa wakas ang alagang tuta ni malver. mamaya ha che tumuwad ka na pag labas ng liwanag ng araw..... Di ba gusto mo din talaga -0 -0 -0 Pag sigaw mo ng ALLAHOY SWAKBAR mamaya maaalala mo ang alaga kong tuta....hehehe Che sumusubra kana magagalit nayan sina pointless at MJ sau!!!
Maniniwala na sana akong babae ka kayalang mali yung spelling ng CHATERINE mo, Catherine dapat.
hehehe. Hindi sila saakin magagalit. Oh ano Che magsama na tayo alam naman ng mga tao kung sino ang tutuwad sa atin...
Maski limang beses ka tumuwad kayang kaya yan ng alaga kong tuta kung gusto mo isama mo si pointless promise ko mindi ako "pointless" Trust me pag tuwad mo mamaya sasadsad ang noo mo sa sahig hanggang magkakalyo noo mo..... sigaw na ng Allahoy alam ko excieted ka na makilala ang alagang tuta ni malvar... Its nice knowing you Bro. Reyes... or should I say Malvar.. or Anonymous..
Now we can have a fruitful conversation.. Did he marry a 6 year old girl.? Yes, and her name was Aisha. She was betrothed to the Prophet (pbuh)by His close companion Abu'bakr the father of Aisha. She stayed in her parents' home until the age of nine. Did he murder men and raped their wives? That's a false accusation on Mohammad (pbuh) Did he massacer 700 or more men wemen and children? No, How could a single man can massacre a hundred man? Did he rape his (caprured) slaves. And made it legal in islam? I cant answer this because I don't know what caprured means... Did he kiss a black stone and revered it.? Please elaborate your question... Did he murder a man beside your most revered black stone? No, he did not... It is not the practice of Islam to murder man unjustly... Did he behead his so-called unbelievers. As well as those who saw his vile characrer and converted to other faith.? Do you mean "character"? -Did he lure his cohorts into believing that 70 virgins await them in heaven? It is the reward of ALLAH to give to the Shahids.. the Martyr's of Islam.. and ALLAH said not as a revelation to the prophet. Now, can you ask my question? What happened to "Jesus son of God" if the real name of Jesus was Yeshua bin Yousef? and what does Halleujiah means? Now, can you ask my question?
Sorry I can't do that. I just read something like Mohammad died while in the act of sex with his beloved Aisha?.... And do you aspire the 70 virgins promised by your god.? I was using my notebook and have small keypads.. and did not notice the screen... but I would ask you again..
What happened to Jesus Son of God? When you just confirmed in this blog that Yeshua bin Yousef is the real name of Jesus... How Yeshu’a Become Jesus
By:JOSEPH STALLINGS Published in Catholic Digest January 1992 vol.32,no.6 page 17, The Mystery of the Magi We usually don’t think about it, but our Lord’s name was not always Jesus. It was in fact originally the popular Aramaic name Yeshu’a.. In first century Judea and Galilee, the name Yeshu’a was very common and shared fifth place with Eleazar (Lazarus) in popularity as a name for Jewish men. The most popular male names at that time were Shime’on (Simon), Yosef (Joseph), Yehuda (Judah or Judas) and Yochanan (John). In the Holy Land at the time of Christ, Aramaic had replaced Hebrew in everyday conversation, but Hebrew remained the holy language and was used in worship and daily prayers. The rabbis also used Hebrew when instructing their disciples. The two languages were closely related, however, as close as Italian is to Spanish, and both used the same alphabet. Yeshu’a was the Aramaic version of the Hebrew name Yehoshu’a (Joshua), and means “Yahweh saves”. Throughout Christ’s lifetime in Galilee, Samaria and Judea of course the name Yeshu’a presented no problem for those who spoke Aramaic and read the Bible and prayed in Hebrew. But outside the Holy Land it become a different story as Good News spread. The Gentiles of the Roman Empire spoke Greek and Latin and simply could not pronounce Yeshu’a. It contained sounds that did not exist in their language. When the Gospels were written in Greek, therefore, the Evangelists had a real problem regarding how they might render our Lord’s name into acceptable Greek. The initially ‘Y’ (Hebrew and Aramaic letter ‘yod’) was easy. The Evangelists could use the Greek letter ‘iota’, written ‘I,’ since it was pronounced like the ‘y’ in yet. The next sound was a vowel, and that was a little more difficult. Unlike Greek, all the letters of the Aramaic-Hebrew alphabet are consonants. The marks for the vowels were not invented until some centuries after Christ and were simple dots and dashes, placed above or beneath the letters. At the time of Christ apparently, the first vowel in our Lord’s name was pronounced like the ‘a’ in gate. And the Evangelists believed they could approximate that sound by using the Greek letter ‘eta’. (The capital Greek letter looks just like our English letter H). Then followed the first of two almost insurmountable problems with Hebrew and Aramaic pronunciation. There was no letter for the ‘sh’ sound in the Greek alphabet. Such a familiar name as Solomon was actually Sh’lomo in Hebrew, Samson was Shimson and Samuel was Sh’mu-El. Like the Greek translators of these Old Testament Hebrew names, the Evangelists used the Greek sigma (s) for the Hebrew shin (sh) when rendering Christ’s name. The first three Greek letters ‘iota’, ‘eta’, and ‘sigma’, moreover came to be used in early Byzantine religious art as an abbreviation of Jesus name. As they look very much like the Latin letters HIS, the letters were adapted in Western European religious paintings and church architecture as a symbol for Christ’s name. The next letter in the Aramaic name Yeshu’a was the Hebrew letter ‘waw’, which here represents the sound ‘oo’, as in too. It was easy for the Evangelists to duplicate this sound in Greek. It takes two letters, however, the omicron (o) and upsilon (u). But that easy substitution was followed by the biggest problem of all: the final ‘a’ sound. In Greek, there was no substitute for the Hebrew letter ‘aiyin’. Though the ‘aiyin’ has no sound of its own, it causes the vowel that it controls to be pronounced deep in the throat. The Greek couldn’t do that, and neither could the Romans when speaking in Latin. Usually, a Greek or Roman would pronounce an ‘aiyin’-controlled ‘a’ like the ‘a’ in father. A final ‘a’ on a name however was most commonly feminine in both Greek and Latin. Thus it was decided to drop the Hebrew ‘aiyin’ completely and replace it with the final Greek sigma (s) which most often indicates the masculine gender in nouns. Throughout the Roman Empire then our Lord’s Aramaic name Yeshu’a, had become the Greek name Iesous, pronounced yeh-SOOS. And this remained Christ’s name throughout the Roman Empire as long as Greek remained the dominant language. But after some centuries Greek lost its favored position and Latin took its place. In the last quarter of the fourth century, the Bible was translated from Greek into Latin by *St. Jerome who had no trouble rendering the Greek Iesous into Latin, it became Iesus. The accent, however, was moved to the first syllable and the name pronounced YAY-soos, since the Romans liked to accent the second from the last syllable. In about 14th century, in the scriptoria of the monasteries where Bibles were copied by hand, Monks began to elongate the initial ‘I’ of the words into a ‘J’. (The pronounciation remained the same-like the ‘y’ in yet but the Monks thought a ‘J’ looked better). Probably the first Monks to do this were Germans because the letter ‘j’ in that language sounds the same as the ‘y’ in English. The name Iesus, consequently, evolved into the familiar written form of Jesus by the 17th century. Everyone still pronounced it YAY-soos, however, as it was in the official liturgical Latin. Way back in the fifth and sixth centuries, some pagan Germanic tribes called the Angles and Saxons invaded England. St Augustine of Canterbury came to convert them to Christianity in A.D.396. Of course St. Augustine established Jerome’s Latin translation as England’s official Bible. The Anglo-Saxon learned that our Lord’s official Latin name was Iesus. Naturally the Germanic Anglo-Saxon converted the initial Latin ‘I’ into the German ‘J’. They pronounced the name, however, as YAY-zoos, since a single ‘s’ between two vowels is sounded like our ‘z’ in Germanic languages. When the Normans invaded England in A.D.1066 they brought with them the French language. Since neither the Anglo-Saxons nor the Normans would surrender their language to the other, the two become wedded and eventually evolved into Modern English. The Normans did influence the pronunciation of the first letter of Our Lord’s name, though, they brought the French pronunciation of ‘j’ (jh), which evolved into our English sound of ‘j’. When King James commissioned the first official translation of the Bibles into English in the early 17th century, the Latin Jesus was carried over unchanged into the new English Bible. The average English citizen of the day probably pronounced the name JAY-zus which ultimately evolved into our modern English JEE-zus. The long process was now complete. A name that began as the Aramaic Yeshu’a would remain written in English as it was in Medieval Latin, but now would be pronounced in English speaking countries as the familiar and loving name of the One who is our Savior, JESUS. • St. Jerome is Eusebius Hieronymus A.D.347 – A.D.419 nandito na naman si Yeshua, parang nakikita ko na saan magtatapos itong usapang ito. Nabasa ko na iyan sa www.Scribd.com ang PILIPINAS AY NASA BIBLIA 2008 at isa pa ANG PILIPINAS AY NASA BIBLIA 2004 WITH OPHIR. totoo na lahi tayong levitang-Pare kaya marami ang malakas ang loob na mag-comment sa Bible at Koran kahit di naman nakabasa at haka-haka lang ang alam kasi dugong Pare, di ba Pare Ko?
Kilala mo ba si YAHSHU’A ang pangalan ng Messiah na nagturo sa Israel 2,000 taon na ang nakakalipas ?
Ang pangalang itinawag sa kanya ng kaniyang Hebreong magulang ay pangalang Hebreo na Yahshu’a na isinusulat sa wikang Aramaic na YESHU’A. Ang Aramaic na pangalang Yeshu’a ay isinalin sa pangalang Greek na Iesous na binibigkas na Yeh-sous, at isinalin sa Latin na Iesus na binibigkas na Yay-sus at ng maimbento ang letrang ‘J’ noong 1633 A.D. ay naisalin sa English na Jesus, mababasa sa ‘How Yeshu’a Become Jesus’ sa pahina “o”. Mas Mahalaga ba ang pangalang Yahshu’a kaysa Jesus ? Sa YahYah (Juan) 14:26 “ang Mang-aaliw na siyang Banal Na Ispiritu ay ipadadala ng Ama sa pamamagitan ng Aking Pangalan, at iyang Banal Na Ispiritung iyan ang siyang Magtuturo sa iyo ng lahat ng bagay at Magpapa-alala ng lahat ng sinabi ko sa iyo”. Ang pangalan niya nang binangit sa YahYah (Juan) 14:26 ay Yahshu’a, hindi pa na-iisalin ang pangalan niya sa Iesous o Jesus, samakatwid ipadadala ng Amang Yahweh ang Banal Na Ispiritu sa pamamagitan ng Pangalang YAHSHU’A. Bago tayo magpatuloy alam natin na bagong imbento lamang ang Letrang ‘J’ kaya imposibleng Jesus ang pangalan ng Messiah, ganoon din ang pangalan ni Juan o ‘John’ ay ang dapat ay ‘YahYah’. Sa Israel ngayon ang tawag kay John ay ‘Yochanan’ na isang kontradiksyon sa nakasulat sa YeremiYah (Jeremiah) 43:4 at sa Luke 1:61. Tangi ang Banal na Pangalan ni Yahweh na ‘Yah’ sa Awit 68:4 ang may kapangyarihan na pagsalitaing-muli si ZechariYah sa Luke 1:22, Luke 1:59-64. Ang Semetic na kapatid na wika ng Hebreo at sa Arabic ang pangalan ni John ay ‘Yahya’. Si Yahshu’a ang Messiah ay ANAK NI YAHWEH o ANAK NG TAO ? Noong kapanahunan pa ni Emperor Constantine na nagtatag ng Romano Katoliko ay pinagtatalunan na kung ang Messiah (na naisalin na sa pangalang Latin na ‘Iesus’) ay ‘Anak ng Kataas-taasan’ o ‘Anak ng Tao’. Nang ipatawag ni Emperor Constantine noong 325 A.D. ang 1,800 na Bishop na ang dumalo ay 318 Bishop lamang sa Council of Nicea, ang pinagkatiwalaan ni Bishop Alexander na si Athanasius ay ipinipilit na si Iesus ay ‘Anak ng Kataas-taasan’ at ang Banal na Ispiriti at ang Ama ay iisa o ang ‘Paniniwala sa Trinity’. Si Arius naman ay ipinagpilitan na si Iesus ay ‘Anak ng Tao’. Si Yahshu’a ay Anak Ni Yahweh: Sa geneology sa Luke 3:23-38 “Si Yahshu’a ay magtatatlumpong taon na ay anak ni Yohseph na anak ni……. si Seth na anak ni Adam na Anak ni Yahweh”. Si Yahshu’a raw ay anak ni Yohseph na ang ninuno ay si Adam na Anak ni Yahweh. Sa Genesis 6:2-4 sa kapanahunan ni Adam “At nakita ng mga ‘Anak ni Yahweh’ na magaganda ang mga babaeng ‘Anak ng Tao’ at pumili sila ng kani-kanilang mapapangasawa”. May mga higante sa mundo ng kapanahunang iyon, at ang naging supling ng Anak ni Yahweh sa mga babaeng Anak ng Tao ay naging Magigiting (Mighty men) o tinawag na Elohim. Nalito ang mga Translators kung Sino ang Anak ni Yahweh at Sino ang Anak ng Tao: YahYah (Juan) 12:32-34 “at Ako, kung Ako at maitaas na, ilalapit ang lahat ng tao sa akin (and I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me)”. YahYah (Juan) 12:33 ay komentaryo ng Translators. YahYah (Juan) 12:34 “Ang mga tao ay sumagot, ‘narinig namin sa batas na ang Messiah ay lalagi magpakailanman, bakit sinasabi mo na ang Anak ng Tao ay kailang maitaas, sino ba itong Anak ng Tao ? (“The people answered him, We have heard out of the law that Messiah abideth forever, and how sayest thou, The Son of Man must be lifted up ? who is this Son of Man ?). Wala naman binanggit sa YahYah 12:32 ang Translators na Anak ng Tao ay kailang maitaas, bakit sa isinagot ng mga tao at nagtatanong sino ba itong Anak ng Tao ? Samakatwid sa YahYah 12:32 ay ang binanggit ni Yahshu’a ay HINDI ‘Ako’ KUNDI ‘Anak ng Tao’ ay maitaas na. Bakit nalito ang mga Translators ? Si Yahshu’a Messiah ay Anak Ni Yahweh na Buhay: Mateo 16:13-17 “Nang dumating si Yahshu’a sa lupain ng Caesaria ng Filipos, tinanong niya ang kanyang mga Alagad. Sino raw ang Anak ng Tao ayon sa mga tao? At sumagot sila na sabi po ng ilan ay si YahYah (Juan Bautista), sabi naman ng iba ay si EliYah, at may nagsabi pang si YeremiYah o isa sa mga Propeta”. Kayo naman ano ang sabi ninyo ? sino ako ? tanong niya sa kanila. Sumagot si Simon Pedro, “Kayo po ang Messiah, ang Anak Ni Yahweh na Buhay”. Sinabi sa kanya ni Yahshu’a “mapalad ka Simon na Anak ni Yonas sapagkat ang KATOTOHANANG ITO’Y HINDI INIHAYAG sa iyo ng laman at ng dugo (ng sinumang tao) kundi nang aking Ama (Amang Yahweh) na nasa langit”. Tanging si Simon Pedro na anak ni Yonas ang pinahayagan ni Amang Yahweh ng KATOTOHANAN na si Yahshu’a ay ANAK NI YAHWEH NA BUHAY. Ang mga Translators ay nalito dahil hindi sila pinahayagan ni Amang Yahweh ng katotohanang ito kaya inakala nila na si Yahshu’a ay Anak ng Tao kagaya ng ayon sa mga Tao. Ano ang Inihayag ni Amang Yahweh kay Simon Pedro na Anak ni Yonas na Hindi inihayag sa sinumang tao ? Marcos 4:11 ‘sa inyo’y ipinagkaloob na malaman ang lihim tungkol sa paghahari ni Yahweh, ngunit sa iba ay ang lahat ng bagay ay itinuturo sa pamamagitan ng talinghaga’. Kung inihayag din sa inyo ito ay matatanggap ninyo ang mga SUSI sa Kaharian ni Amang Yahweh na nasa Mateo 16:19 at maiintindihan ninyo ang nangyaring sabwatan sa Golgotha. SABWATAN SA GOLGOTHA ANG BULAANG PROPETA NA SI CAIPAS: YahYah 11:51 ‘sinabi niya ito hindi sa ganang kanyang sarili lamang, bilang punong Seserdote ng panahong iyon, hinulaan niyang mamamatay si Yahshu’a dahil sa bayan’. YeremiYah 23:31-32 ‘ako’y laban sa mga propetang kumakatha ng sariling pangitain saka sasabihing iyon ay ang sabi ni Yahweh. Ako’y laban sa propetang nagsasalaysay ng kasinungalingan upang dayain ang aking bayan, hindi ko sila sinugo at wala silang kabuluhang idudulot sa bayang ito’. Deuteronomo 18:21-22 ‘upang matiyak ninyo kung ano ang sinasabi ng propeta ay kung galing kay Yahweh o hindi, ito ang palatandaan: kapag hindi nagyari o hindi nagkatutoo ang sinabi niya, yaon ay hindi mula kay Yahweh, sariling katha niya iyon, huwag ninyo siyang paniwalaan’. Si Caipas ay isang bulaang Propeta at hindi karapat-dapat na maging punong Seserdote dahil hindi siya nanggaling sa lahi ni Aaron na Levita. Samakatwid hindi mula kay Yahweh ang kanyang inihula. Bakit ang mga tigapagturo ng Jesús ay naniniwala sa hula ng bulaang propetang si Caipas, at pati na ang mga naniniwala sa tunay na pangalan ni Amang Yahweh at Yahshu’a Messiah ay pinaniwalaan din ang hula ng bulaang propetang si Caipas at naniniwala sa Hindi Seserdote ni Amang Yahweh. PINANGGALINGAN NG BULAANG SESERDOTE NA KAGAYA NI CAIPAS 1 Hari 12:31 ‘nagtayo pa sila ng mga sambahan sa burol at naglagay ng mga Seserdote na hindi mula sa lipi ng Levita, kundi pangkaraniwang tao lamang (NehemiYah 7:63-65)’. 1 Hari 13:33 ‘sa ginawang kasamaang ito ni Yeroboam, hindi siya tumigil sa paggawa ng kasamaan, patuloy parin siyang nagtatalaga ng mga Seserdote na hindi lahing Levita kundi pangkaraniwang tao lamang’. Si Caipas ay hindi nanggaling sa lahi ni Aaron na Levita, samakatwid si Caipas ay hindi tamang Seserdote. ANG TAMANG SESERDOTE Lukas 1:5 ‘Nang si Herodes ang hari ng Judea, may isang Seserdote na ang pangalan ay ZechariYah sa pangkat ni Abias, at mula rin sa lipi ni Aaron ang kanyang asawa na si Elizabeth’. NehemiYah 12:4 ‘mga Seserdote’ na Levita, ‘Iddo, Ginetoi, Abias’. Exodus 29:1 ‘Ganito ang gagawin mo sa pagtatalaga kay Aaron at sa kanyang mga anak na lalaki bilang Seserdote’. SINO ANG NAGPLANO NA IPAPATAY ANG MESSIAH? YahYah 11:45-54 ‘marami sa mga Hudyong dumalaw kay Maria ang nakakita sa ginawa ni Yahshu’a at nanalig sa kanya. Ngunit ang ilan sa kanila’y pumunta sa mga Pariseo at ibinalita ang ginawa ni Yahshu’a, kaya’t tinipon ng mga punong Seserdote at ng mga Pariseo ang mga Kagawad ng Sanhedrin. ‘Ano ang gagawin natin’? Wika nila, gumagawa ng maraming kababalaghan ang taong iyon, kung siya’y pababayaan natin mananampalataya sa kanya ang lahat, paparito ang mga Romano at wawasakin ang Templo at ang ating bansa. Ngunit ang isa sa kanila si Caipas ang pinaka-punong Seserdote noon ay nagsabi ng ganito, ‘Ano ba kayo, hindi ba ninyo naiisip na mas mabuti para sa atin na isang tao lamang ang mamatay alang-alang sa bayan, sa halip na mapahamak ang buong bansa. (sinabi niya ito hindi sa ganang kanyang sarili lamang bilang punong-Seserdote sa panahong iyon – hinulaan niya na mamamatay si Yahshu’a dahil sa bansa – at hindi lamang sa bansang iyon lamang kundi upang tipunin ang nagkawatak-watak na mga Anak ng Maykapal). Mula noon ay binalangkas na nila kung paano ipapapatay si Yahshu’a. Kaya’t siya’y hindi na hayagang naglakad sa Hudea. Sa halip, siya’y nagpunta sa Efraim, isang bayang malapit sa ilang at doon siya nanirahan kasama ng kanyang mga alagad’. BINALAK NA IPAPATAY NA RIN SI LAZARO YahYah 12:10-11 ‘Binalak ng mga punong Seserdote na ipapatay din si Lazaro, sapagkat dahilan sa kanya’y maraming Hudyong humihiwalay na sa kanila at nananalig na kay Yahshu’a’. IBIG IPAPATAY NI HERODES SI YAHSHU’A Lukas 13:31 ‘Dumating noon ang ilang Pariseo, sinabi nila kay Yahshu’a, ‘umalis ka rito, sapagkat ibig kang ipapatay ni Herodes’. Lukas 3:6 ‘umalis ang mga Pariseo at nakipagsabwatan sa mga kampon ni Herodes upang ipapatay si Yahshu’a’. ANAK NI YAHWEH AY IBA SA ANAK NG TAO Genesis 6:2 ‘ang mga Anak ni Yahweh ay nakita ang mga babaeng ‘Anak ng Tao’ na magaganda, kaya pumili sila ng kani-kanilang mapapangasawa’ ANAK NG TAO Genesis 11:5 ‘bumaba si Yahweh upang tingnan ang lungsod at ang toreng itinatayo ng mga Anak ng Tao’. SI YAHSHU’A HANGGANG SA NINUNO NIYANG SI ADAN AY MGA ANAK NI YAHWEH Lukas 3: 23 – 38 ‘ si Yahshu’a ay mag-tatatlumpung taon na ng magsimulang magturo, na anak ni Yahseph, na anak ni Heli,………38..na anak ni Enos, na anak ni Seth, na anak ni Adan na Anak ni Yahweh’. SINO ANG ANAK NG TAO, SINO AKO? SI YAHSHU’A AY ANAK NI YAHWEH NA BUHAY Mateo 16:13-17 ‘Nang dumating si Yahshu’a sa lupain ng Caesaria ng Filipos, tinanong niya ang kanyang mga alagad, ‘sino raw ang ‘Anak ng Tao’, ayon sa mga tao? At sumagot sila, ang sabi po ng ilan ay si YahYah Bautista, sabi naman ng iba ay si EliYah, at may nagsabi pang si YeremiYah o isa sa mga propeta. Kayo naman, ano ang sabi ninyo sino ako? Tanong niya sa kanila. Sumagot si Simon Pedro, ‘kayo po ang Messiah ang Anak ni Yahweh na buhay’, sinabi sa kanya ni Yahshu’a, mapalad ka Simon na anak ni Yonas, sapagkat ang katotohanang ito’y hindi inihayag sa iyo ng sinumang tao kundi ng aking Ama na nasa langit’. ANO ANG KATOTOHANAN NA HINDI INIHAYAG NG SINUMANG TAO KUNDI ANG AMANG YAHWEH LAMANG? Na makilala na BUHAY si Yahshu’a ang Messiah na ANAK NI YAHWEH SINO BA ANG ANAK NG TAO? YahYah 12:32-34 ‘at kung ako’y maitaas na, ilalapit ko sa akin ang lahat ng tao’, sumagot ang mga tao, ‘sinasabi sa Kasulatan na ang Messiah ay mananatili Magpakailanman, sino ba itong Anak ng Tao?’ Samakatwid, ang binanggit ni Yahshu’a ‘at kung ako’y maitaas na’ ay ang tamang pagkakasulat ay ‘at kung ang ‘Anak ng Tao’ ay maitaas na’. Ito’y mapapansin sa kasagutan ng mga tao sa pagtatanong ng ‘sino ba itong Anak ng Tao?’ Ang Translators ay hindi “Mapalad’ na kagaya ni Simon na anak ni Yonas na pinahayagan ni Amang Yahweh na si Yahshu’a ang Messiah ay BUHAY na ANAK NI YAHWEH NAGPAKILALA SI YAHSHU’A NA ANAK NI YAHWEH YahYah 10:36 ‘ako’y hinirang at sinugo ng Ama, paano ninyong masasabi ngayon na nilalapastangan ko si Yahweh sa sinabi ko na Ako ay Anak ni Yahweh’. KINILALA SI YAHSHU’A Mateo 3:17 ‘ito ang minamahal kong Anak na lubos kong kinalulugdan’. SINO BA ANG BINANGGIT NI YAHSHU’A NA KAILANGANG MAMATAY? Markos 8:31 ‘Anak ng Tao’ ay dapat magbata ng maraming hirap, siya ay itatakwil ng Matatanda ng Bayan, ng mga punong Seserdote at ng mga Eskriba at ipapapatay. Ngunit sa ikatlong araw muli siyang mabubuhay’. Lukas 9:21-22 ‘Anak ng Tao’ ay dapat magbata ng maraming hirap at itatakwil ng Matatanda ng Bayan, ng mga punong Seserdote at ng mga Eskriba, ipapapatay nila siya, ngunit sa ikatlong araw siya ay muling mabubuhay’. MULING IPINAHAYAG NI YAHSHU’A ANG KAMATAYAN NG ANAK NG TAO Lukas 9:44-45 ‘ipagkakanulo ang Anak ng Tao’, ngunit ito’y hindi nila maunawaan sapagkat inilihim ito sa kanila’. Markos 9:31 ‘Ang Anak ng Tao ay ipagkakanulo at papatayin, ngunit muling mabubuhay sa ikatlong araw’. Mateo 17:22-23 ‘sinabi sa kanila ni Yahshu’a na ang Anak ng Tao ay ipagkakanulo at papatayin, ngunit muling mabubuhay sa ikatlong araw’. IKATLONG BESES NA INIHAYAG NI YAHSHU’A ANG KAMATAYAN NG ANAK NG TAO Markos 10:33-34 ‘ang Anak ng Tao ay ipagkakanulo sa mga punong Seserdote at sa mga Eskriba, siya’y kanilang hahatulan ng kamatayan at ibibigay sa mga Gentil, siya’y tutuyain nila, luluraan, hahagupitin at papatayin, ngunit muli siyang mabubuhay pagkaraan ng tatlong araw’. Mateo 20:18 ‘aakyat tayo sa Yahrusalem. Doo’y ipagkakanulo sa mga punong Seserdote at sa mga Eskriba ang Anak ng Tao, hahatulan siya ng kamatayan at ibibigay sa mga Gentil. Siya’y tutuyain, hahagupitin at ipapako sa krus, ngunit muli siyang bubuhayin sa ikatlong araw’. Lukas 18:31-34 ‘tandaan ninyo ito pupunta tayo sa Yahrusalem at doo’y matutupad ang lahat ng sinulat ng mga propeta tungkol sa ‘Anak ng Tao’. Ipagkakanulo siya sa mga Gentil, tutuyain, dudustain at luluraan siya ng mga ito. Siya’y hahagupitin at papatayin nila, ngunit sa ikatlong araw ay muling mabubuhay. Subalit wala silang maunawaan sa kanilang narinig, hindi nila nakuha ang kahulugan niyon, at hindi man lamang nalaman kung ano ang sinabi ni Yahshu’a’. Samakatwid ay tinutukoy ni Yahshu’a ay ang ‘Anak ng Tao’ ay dapat magbata ng maraming hirap, siya ay itatakwil ng Matatanda ng Bayan, ng mga punong Seserdote at ng mga Eskriba at ipapapatay. Ngunit sa ikatlong araw muling mabubuhay’. Si Yahshu’a ay ‘Anak ni Yahweh’ na inihayag kay Simon Pedro na anak ni Yonas, ito ay hindi inihayag ng tao kundi tanging si Amang Yahweh lamang ang naghayag nito. UNANG ITINURO NI APOSTOL SAUL (PABLO) NA SI YAHSHU’A AY ANAK NI YAHWEH Gawa 9:20 ‘Una niyang itinuro sa mga sinagoga na si Messiah Yahshu’a ay siya’ng Anak ni Yahweh BAGO MAGBAUTISMO SI FELIPE NA DISIPOLO NI YAHSHU’A Gawa 8:37 ‘at si Felipe ay nagsabi ‘kung ikaw ay naniniwala ng buong puso, maniwala ka’, at siya’y sumagot, ‘naniniwala ako na si Yahshu’a ay Anak ni Yahweh’. PINANGGALINGAN NG ALAMAT NA ‘NABUHAY NA MULI’ ALAMAT NI MYTHRA BAGO LUMITAW SI YAHSHU’A MESSIAH (1200 B.C.E.) Si Mythra ng Persia ay ipinanganak ng inang Birhen noong December 25, ipinako sa krus hanggang mamatay at ‘Nabuhay Na Muli’ sa ikatlong araw. ALAMAT NI ATTIS BAGO LUMITAW SI YAHSHU’A MESSIAH NG NAZARETH (1200 B.C.E.) Si Attis ng Gresya ay ipinanganak ng inang Birhen noong December 25, ipinako sa krus hanggang mamatay at ‘Nabuhay Na Muli’ sa ikatlong araw. ALAMAT NI KRISHNA BAGO LUMITAW SI YAHSHU’A MESSIAH NG NAZARETH (900 B.C.E.) Si Krishna ng India ay ipinanganak ng inang Birhen noong December 25, ipinako sa krus hanggang mamatay at ‘Nabuhay Na Muli’ sa ikatlong araw. ALAMAT NI TAMMUZ BAGO LUMITAW SI YAHSHU’A MESSIAH NG NAZARETH Ezekiel 8:14 (597 B.C.E) Si Nimrod II ay tinawag naTammuz ng mga Babylonia, Azur naman ang tawag ng mga Asyrian, at Osiris naman ang tawag ng mga Egyptian. Si Nimrod II ay napatay at ang kanyang asawa ay nagbuntis sa ibang lalaki at pinalabas na ang bata ay si Nimrod II na ‘NABUHAY NA MULI’.Mula noon ang Alamat na ito ay naging bantog sa mga Alamat ng Griyego at Romano kahanay nila Jupiter at Zeus. ALAMAT NI HORUS BAGO LUMITAW SI YAHSHU’A MESSIAH NG NAZARETH (300 B.C.E.) Si Horus ng Egypt ay ipinanganak ng inang Birhen noong December 25, ipinako sa krus hanggang mamatay at ‘Nabuhay Na Muli’ sa ikatlong araw. ALAMAT NI DIONYSUS BAGO LUMITAW SI YAHSHU’A MESSIAH NG NAZARETH (200 B.C.E.) Si Dionysus ng Gresya ay ipinanganak ng inang Birhen noong December 25, ipinako sa krus hanggang mamatay at ‘Nabuhay Na Muli’ sa ikatlong araw. Mapapansin na ang mga unang nagsalin (translators) ng Biblia ay nanggaling sa bansang naimpluwensyahan ng mga Alamat na ‘NABUHAY NA MULI’. Mapapanood sa Google video clipping ‘Part 1 The Greatest Story Ever Told’. NADALANG PANINIWALA NI HERODES Markos 6:14-16, Mateo 14:1-22 ‘nakarating kay Haring Herodes ang balita tungkol kay Yahshu’a, sapagkat bantog na ang pangalan nito. May nagsabi, siya’y si YahYah Bautista na muling nabuhay, kaya nakakagawa siya ng mga himala. May nagsabi naman na siya’y si EliYah, siya’y propeta, katulad ng mga propeta noong una anang iba. Sinabi naman ni Herodes nang mabalitaan niya ito, ‘NABUHAY NA MULI’ si YahYah Bautista na pinapugutan ko’. Mapapansin na dati nang pinaniniwalaan ang alamat na ‘NABUHAY NA MULI’ ay sikat na sikat na paniniwala ng halos lahat ng Paganong Bansa bago pa magturo si Yahshu’a Messiah. ANO BA ANG TALINGHAGA SA NABUHAY NA MULI? Lukas 15:32 ‘ngunit dapat tayong magsaya at magalak, sapagkat ‘NAMATAY NA’ ang kapatid mo, ngunit –‘MULING NABUHAY’, ‘NAWALA’ ngunit muling nasumpungan’ Epeso 2:5 ‘tayo’y ‘BINUHAY’ niya kay Messiah kahit noong tayo’y mga patay pa dahil sa ating mga pagsuway’. Lukas 9:60 ‘ipaubaya mo sa mga patay ang paglilibing ng kanilang mga patay’. Marcos 4:11 ‘sa inyo’y ipinagkaloob na malaman ang lihim tungkol sa paghahari ni Yahweh, ngunit sa iba ay ang lahat ng bagay ay itinuturo sa pamamagitan ng talinghaga’. PANALANGIN NI YAHSHU’A Lukas 22:42 ‘Ama’, wika niya, ‘kung maaari’y ilayo mo sa akin ang sarong ito, gayunma’y huwag ang kalooban ko ang masunod kundi ang KALOOBAN MO’. DININIG ANG PANALANGIN NI YAHSHU’A Hebreo 5:7-8 ‘Noong si Yahshu’a ay namumuhay rito sa lupa, siya’y nanalangin at lumuluhang sumamo kay Amang Yahweh na makapagliligtas sa kanya sa kamatayan, at DININIG SIYA dahil sa lubusan siyang nagpakumbaba’. KALOOBAN NG NAGMAMAY-ARI NA MAKAKUHA NG PRUTAS HINDI ANG MAPATAY ANG KANYANG ANAK Mateo 21:33-41 Pakinggan ninyo ang isang Talinghaga: May isang nagmamay-ari ng pataniman ng ubasan at tinayuan niya ng gawaan ng alak at tore at iniwan niya sa kanyang mga Magsasaka at siya ay pumunta sa ibang bansa. Nang dumating ang panahon na malapit ng magbunga ang mga pananim ay ipinadala niya ang ang kanyang mga Tagasunod sa Magsasaka upang makatanggap ng mga prutas. Ang Tagasunod ay binugbog at pinatay at ang iba ay pinagbabato. Muling nagpadala ng iba pang Tagasunod at ganoon din ang ginawa ng Magsasaka. Ngunit sa huli ay ipinadala ang kanyang anak sa paniwalang kanilang igagalang ang kanyang anak. Ngunit ng makita ng mga Magsasaka ang anak ay nagkaisa sila na sinabing “ito ang Tigapagmana, atin siyang Patayin at ating angkinin ang kanyang pagmamanahan” At ang Anak ay kanilang kinuha sa Pataniman ng ubas at kanilang Pinatay. Ngayon kung dumating na ang Nagmamay-ari ng pataniman ng ubas, ano ang kanyang gagawin sa mga Magsasaka? At sumagot sila na matinding sisirain ang mga masasamang tao at ibibigay ang kanyang pataniman ng ubas sa ibang Magsasaka na magsusukli sa kanya ng mga Prutas sa Tamang Panahon”. KALOOBAN ba ng Nagmamay-ari ng ubasan na mapatay ang kanyang Anak o ang KALOOBAN niya ay Makakuha ng Prutas? INILAGAY SA KANILANG ISIP NA AKO’Y PATAY Awit 31:12 ‘ako ay kinalimutan nila at inilagay sa kanilang isip na ako ay patay’ Awit 118:17-22 ‘hindi ako mamamatay kundi mabubuhay, ihahayag ang kagila-gilalas na ginawa ni Yahweh. Kinastigo ako ni Yahweh, ngunit hindi ako ibinigay sa kamatayan’. 118:22 ‘ang batong inayawan ay siyang naging pinaka-saligang bato’ Ito ay naisalin sa Gawa 4:11-12 ‘ang batong inayawan ay naging pinaka-saligang bato, walang kaligtasan sa kaninuman, dahil walang tanging pangalan sa silong ng langit na ipinagkaloob sa mga tao kundi sa pangalan ni Yahshu’a Messiah’. Lukas 24:44 ‘ito ang tinutukoy ko ng sabihin ko sa inyo noong kasama-sama pa ninyo ako, ‘dapat matupad ang lahat ng nakasulat tungkol sa akin sa Kasulatan ni Moses, sa Aklat ng mga Propeta, at sa mga Aklat ng Awit ni David’. ANG MGA NAKASULAT SA MGA KASULATAN NI MOSES, AKLAT NG MGA PROPETA AT SA AKLAT NG AWIT NI DAVID Deuteronomo 18:15 ‘si Yahweh ay magtatalaga ng Propeta sa kalagitnaan ninyo, na kalahi ninyo, na kagaya ko (si Moses ay Levita rin), sa kanya kayo dapat makinig’. Awit 118:17-22 ‘hindi ako mamamatay kundi mabubuhay, ihahayag ang kagila-gilalas na ginawa ni Yahweh. Kinastigo ako ni Yahweh, ngunit hindi ako ibinigay sa kamatayan’. 118:22 ‘ang batong inayawan ay siyang naging pinaka-saligang bato’ Daniel 9:26 ‘at paglipas ng animnapu at dalawang linggo ang Messiah ay mapuputol, ngunit hindi para sa kanyang sarili’: Mapuputol ngunit hindi sinabing mamamatay. Isaiah 53:8 ‘siya ay inilabas sa kulungan at sa paghatol: at sino ang makakapagsabi sa kasama niya sa kanyang henerasyon na siya ay pinutol sa lupain ng mga buhay? Dahil sa kasalanan ng kanyang bayan siya ay nagdalamhati’. Si Propeta Isaiah ay sumulat ng pangsubok na katanungan na sino sa kanyang kapanahunang ka-henerasyon na makakapagsabi na siya ay naputol sa lupain ng mga buhay. Dahil sa kasalanan ng kanyang bayan siya ay nagdalamhati (stricken). WALANG NAKASULAT SA MGA KASULATAN NG MGA HUDYO NA ANG MESSIAH AY MAGBABATA NG HIRAP. ITO AY DAGDAG NG NAGSALIN NG SULAT NI MATEO NA ANG MESSIAH AY MAGBABATA NG HIRAP Mateo 26:27-28 ‘NAGPASALAMAT’. Tingnan ang Mateo 15:36 ‘ibinigay niya sa kanila – LAHAT KAYO, kagaya sa Markos 14:23-24, sa sunud-sunod na ulat ni Markos ang mga Disipolo ay UMINOM at pagkatapos ay sinabi ni Yahshu’a ang salitang ito. Sa Mateo ay PINALITAN ITO at ginawang pautos na INUMIN NINYO sinundan ng salitang ‘AKING DUGO’, tingnan ang Leviticus 17:11 dahil ang dumanak na dugo ang dahilan ng buhay at kung ilalagay ito sa altar ay MAKAKAPAGPATAWAD ng mga KASALANAN na may relasyon sa Huling Hapunan. Sa mga salita na nasalin sa Griyego, tingnan ang Markos 14:24 ‘MARAMI’, tingnan ang Mateo 20:28, dahil sa ‘KAPATAWARAN NG KASALANAN’ AY IDINUGTUNG SA AKLAT NI MATEO. Parehas na salita ang nasa Markos 1:4 sa pagbabautismo ni YahYah Bautista ngunit sa Mateo ay INIWASAN ITO (Mateo 3:11). Ginawa ito maari dahil ‘NAIS NIYANG IPALAGAY NA ANG PAGSASAKRIPISYO NG MESSIAH SA KAMATAYAN AY ANG MAGBIBIGAY NG KAPATAWARAN NG MGA KASALANAN’. Maliwanan na IDINAGDAG lamang sa Mateo na ang ‘KAPATAWARAN NG MGA KASALANAN AY ANG KAMATAYAN NG MESSIAH’. Ano ba ang KAPATAWARAN ng mga kasalanan? JUBILEE YEAR Ang Kapatawaran sa Mga Kasalanan Leviticus 25:8-55, ang Jubilee Year ay ang KAPATAWARAN sa mga materyal na mga pagkakautang, ngunit ang espiritual na utang ay mga kasalanan na katulad sa Jubilee Year na PINATATAWAD ang materyal na utang ay ganoon din PINATATAWAD ang espiritual na utang na mga kasalanan. Lukas 4:19 ‘upang ituro ang Katanggap-tanggap na Taon ni Yahweh’. Ang tinutukoy na Katanggap-tanggap na Taon ni Yahweh ay ang Jubilee Year. Lahat ng mga Escolar ay naniniwala na ang Katanggap-tanggap na Taon ni Yahweh ay ang Jubilee Year. Lukas 7:36-50 ‘si Yahshu’a ay inimbitahan ni Simon na isang Pariseo upang kumain sa kanyang tahanan, at ang isang masamang babae ay hinugasan sa luha at pinunasan ng kanyang buhok, nilagyan ng pabango at hinalikan ang mga paa ni Yahshu’a. Ang mga nanduroong Pariseo ay nagsabi na kung talagang Propeta si Yahshu’a ay makikilala niya agad ito na isang masamang babae. Ngunit tinanong ni Yahshu’a si Simon (na Pariseo) tungkol sa dalawang tao na may pagkakautang na 500 Dinaryo at 50 Dinaryo, Nang hindi parehong makapagbayad ay agad na pinatawad sa pagkakautang ang dalawa. Ngayon sino sa kanila ang higit na magmamahal sa nagpatawad sa utang? Sumagot si Simon na ang mas Malaki ang pagkakautang ang mas higit na magmamahal. Sa ganitong sagot ni Simon ay itinuro ni Yahshu’a ang makasalanang babae (Lukas 7:47) at sinabi na kahit Marami o Malaki ang kasalanan ng babae ay PINATAWAD NA dahil Malaki rin ang isinukli niyang pagmamahal. At sinabi ni Yahshu’a sa babae ‘Ang iyong mga kasalanan ay PINATAWAD NA’ (Lukas 7:48). At ang mga kasalo sa pagkain ay nagsimulang magtanong sa sarili, ‘sino ba ito na pati pagpapatawad ng kasalanan ay pinanga-ngahasan? Ngunit sinabi ni Yahshu’a sa babae ‘INILIGTAS KA NG IYONG PANANALIG, YUMAON KA NA AT IPANATAG MO ANG IYONG KALOOBAN’. Samakatwid ang may malaking pagkakautang na pinatawad ay kagaya noong babae na may malaking kasalanan, ito ay ang ibig sabihin ng Jubilee Year, na mas-Malaki ang halaga na maisasanla ang ari-arian kung Malaki pa ang panahon bago dumating ang Jubilee Year, at mas-Maliit naman ang halaga kung maliit na ang panahon bago dumating ang Jubilee Year. Ang Jubilee Year ay nagpapatawad sa mga utang na materyal, samantala ang utang na espiritual ay ang mga kasalanan ay ganoon din ay PINATATAWAD sa Taon na Katanggap-tanggap kay Yahweh . Ang pananampalataya ng babae ang nagligtas sa kanya, ito ang pananampalataya sa itinuro ni Yahshu’a sa Lukas 4:19 na Jubilee Year. Kung ang pananampalataya sa Taon na Katanggap-tanggap kay Yahweh (Jubilee Year) ay isang daan sa IKAPAPATAWAD sa mga utang na kasalanan, Bakit kailangan pang mamatay ang Messiah sa ikapapatawad ng ating mga kasalanan? IMBISTIGASYON SA MGA NAGANAP: SINO ANG NAGPLANO NA IPAPATAY ANG MESSIAH? YahYah 11:45-54 ‘marami sa mga Hudyong dumalaw kay Maria ang nakakita sa ginawa ni Yahshu’a at nanalig sa kanya. Ngunit ang ilan sa kanila’y pumunta sa mga Pariseo at ibinalita ang ginawa ni Yahshu’a, kaya’t tinipon ng mga punong Seserdote at ng mga Pariseo ang mga Kagawad ng Sanhedrin. ‘Ano ang gagawin natin? Wika nila, ‘gumagawa ng maraming kababalaghan ang taong iyon, kung siya’y pababayaan natin mananampalataya sa kanya ang lahat, paparito ang mga Romano at wawasakin ang Templo at ang ating bansa. Ngunit ang isa sa kanila si Caipas ang pinaka-punong Seserdote noon ay nagsabi ng ganito, ‘Ano ba kayo, hindi ba ninyo naiisip na mas mabuti para sa atin na isang tao lamang ang mamatay alang-alang sa bayan, sa halip na mapahamak ang buong bansa. ( sinabi niya ito hindi sa ganang kanyang sarili lamang bilang punong-Seserdote sa panahong iyon – hinulaan niya na mamamatay si Yahshu’a dahil sa bansa – at hindi lamang sa bansang iyon lamang kundi upang tipunin ang nagkawatak-watak na mga Anak ng Maykapal). Mula noon ay binalangkas na nila kung paano ipapapatay si Yahshu’a. Kaya’t siya’y hindi na hayagang naglakad sa Hudea. Sa halip, siya’y nagpunta sa Efraim, isang bayang malapit sa ilang at doon siya nanirahan kasama ng kanyang mga alagad’. IBIG IPAPATAY NI HERODES SI YAHSHU’A Lukas 13:31 ‘Dumating noon ang ilang Pariseo, sinabi nila kay Yahshu’a, ‘umalis ka rito, sapagkat ibig kang ipapatay ni Herodes’. Lukas 3:6 ‘umalis ang mga Pariseo at nakipagsabwatan sa mga kampon ni Herodes upang ipapatay si Yahshu’a’. BLASPHEMY Noong kapanahunan nang ang Israel ay masasakop na ng Bansang Assyria ay naglabas ng Batas ang Sanhedrin, sa sinumang bumanggit ng Banal na pangalang Yahweh ay magkakasala ng ‘Pamumusong’ (Blasphemy). Ito ay mababasa sa Encyclopedia Judaica sa Titulong ‘YHWH”. Kahit na ang pinaikling tawag kay Yahweh na ‘Yah’ ay binibigkas na ng ‘Ye’ (Ezra 2:2) sa pag-iwas sa pagbanggit ng pangalang Yahweh. Sa kapanahunan ni Yahshu’a Messiah ay pinatawan siya ng pagkakasala ng Blasphemy. Mateo 26: 64-65 ‘sinasabi ko sa inyo na ang ‘Anak ng Tao’ ay uupo sa kanan ng ‘Makapangyarihan’ at darating sa mga alapaap ng kalangitan’ sa ganoon ay pinunit ng punong Seserdote ang sariling kasuutan at pinatawan ng kasalanang ‘Kapusungan’ (Blasphemy) si Yahshu’a. Ang ‘Blasphemy’ ay pagkakasala sa pagbigkas ng Banal na pangalang Yahweh, kaya hindi ‘Makapangyarihan’ ang binanggit ni Yahshu’a kundi ang pangalang Yahweh kaya siya ay pinatawan ng pagkakasala ng “Pamumusong’ (Blasphemy). Si Yahshu’a ay dinala ng mga tauhan ng punong seserdote kay Gobernador Pilato at ipinadala naman ni Pilato si Yahshu’a kay Tetraikang Herodes, ngunit hindi hinatulan ng Kamatayan ni Herodes si Yahshu’a, at si Yahshu’a ay ibinalik kay Gobernador Pilato. Naging magkaibigan tuloy sila na dati’y magkagalit. Sa ganiton pananaw ay hindi sasalungatin ni Pilato ang naging desisyon ni Herodes na kabago-bago palang niyang kaibigan, (Lukas 23:13-15). Si Gobernador Pilato naman ay pinagsabihan ng kanyang asawa na huwag pakialaman si Yahshu’a dahil pinahirapan siya sa panaginip sa nakaraang gabi. Sa ganito ay hindi nanaisin ni Pilato na hindi pagbigyan ang kahilingan ng kanyang asawa, (Mateo 27:19). Dahil lamang sa pangangailangang pagbigyan ang mga tao na alam ni Pilato na sinuhulan ng mga punong Seserdote ay kinailangang baguhin ang una niyang desisyon na ‘walang kasalanan si Yahshu’a at kanyang palalayain, (YahYah 18:38, Luke 23:4, Luke 23:13-16, Luke 23:20). ANO ANG UGALI NI GOBERNADOR PILATO? Paanong maging sunod-sunuran si Pilato sa kagustuhan ng mga tao lamang, kung ang ugali niya ay ganito, ‘ ang naisulat na niya’y hindi na pwedeng baguhin? Samakatwid, ang unang desisyon ni Pilato na si Yahshu’a ay walang kasalanan at palalayain ay hindi pwedeng magbago. Ngunit dahil sa pagnanais ng mga punong Seserdote (na mas mababa ang kapangyarihan kaysa kay Gobernador Pilato) na maipapatay si Yahshu’a, kinakailangan pulungin ni Pilato ang lahat ng kanyang batalyon. Pinapasok niya ang mga ito sa kanyang palasyo at doon ay sila-sila lamang ang nag-usap na paanong ipatupad ang kagustuhan ng mga tao na sinuhulan ng mga punong Seserdote at ang pagsunod sa unang desisyon ni Pilato na palayain si Yahshu’a. (Hindi nakapasok sa Palasyo ang mga Hudyo dahil maituturing silang marumi at hindi karapat-dapat sa Hapunang pang-Paskua, (YahYah 18:28, YahYah 19:19-22). Lumabas ang Batalyon na kasama si Yahshu’a na may buhat na kahoy (krus). Nang makita nila si Simon na taga-Cyrene (Libya sa ngayon), kanilang ipina-buhat kay Simon ang kahoy na buhat ni Yahshu’a at si Yahshu’a ay inilagay sa likuran. Ang kanilang dinaanan ay pasilyong makitid na daanan lamang, kaya sa susunod na pagliko ay ang nakita na ng mga tao na may buhat ng kahoy ay si Simon na. Mapapansin na sa ika-labingdala ng tanghali hanggang sa ikatlo ng hapon ay nagdilim sa kapaligiran. Mapapansin din na walang nakasulat sa Bagong Tipan na ‘isinauli ni Simon kay Yahshu’a ang kahoy kaya ng siya ay sumigay ng ‘Ama, patawarin mo sila dahil hindi nila alam ang kanilang ginagawa’. Si Simon na taga Cyrene ay nagsasalita ng Griyegong wika. Sa Cyrene hanggang sa ngayon ay marami pang lahi ng mga Griyego sa Susa, sa Shihat, sa Beda at sa iba pang lugar sa Libya. YahYah 8:29 ‘at kasama ko ang nagsugo sa akin, hindi niya ako iniiwan sapagkat lagi kong ginagawa ang nakalulugod sa kanya’. Paanong si Yahshu’a ay magsasalita ng ‘Ama, Ama bakit mo ako pinabayaan? o ang ‘Eli, Eli lama Sabacthani’ kung hindi naman siya iniiwan ng nagsugo sa kanya? Ayon sa Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Hebrew Bible Chaldean Hebrew at Greek Dictionary: Greek Dictionary: 2241 (Greek) ELI = my God – in Hebrew (EL) ‘Ale’ = mighty, Almighty 1682 (Greek) ELOI = my God 2982 (Greek) LAMA = why – in Hebrew 4100 MAH = why In Hebrew 3027 YAD = Thou 4518 (Greek) SABACTHANI = thou has left me – in Hebrew 7662 In Hebrew 7662 SHEBAQ = allow to remain ‘Ama, Ama, Bakit Mo Ako Pinabayaan’ ay salitang sumisisi sa Ama. Yob (Job) 1:22 ‘sa kabila ng mga pangyayaring ito ay hindi nagkasala si Yob, hindi niya sinisi si Yahweh’. Hindi maaring sisihin ni Yahshu’a ang Ama sa Langit dahil ito ay kasalanan. Si Yob ay hindi nagkasala dahil hindi niya sinisi ang Ama sa Langit. MGA SAKSI May mga saksi na ang taong nakabayubay sa kahoy (krus) ay sumigaw ng Eli, Eli Lama Sabacthani na isang salitang Griego. Hinintay ng mga saksi na baka dumating si Propeta EliYah na tinawag ng nakabayubay sa kahoy. SI YAHSHU’A AY HINDI NAGSASALITA NG SALITANG GRIYEGO KUNDI SALITANG HEBREO LAMANG Gawa 10:28, Gawa 26:14 ‘alam ninyo na ang isang Hudyo ay pinagbabawalan ng kanyang pananampalataya na makisama o dumalaw sa isang hindi Hudyo’. ‘ Nakarinig ako na nagsasalita sa wikang Hebreo’ KASABWAT SI PILATO SA SABWATAN SA GOLGOTHA Markos 15:44 ‘hindi magugulat si Gobernador Pilato at magtatanong pa, ‘kung may napatay’ at kung tutuo na desisyon ni Pilato na ipapatay si Yahshu’a. ANG DECOY YahYah 19:39 ‘sumama sa kanya si Nicodemus, may dalang pabango, mga 100 libra ng pinaghalong mira at aloe (si Nicodemus ang nagsadya kay Yahshu’a isang gabi). Mateo 27:62-65‘kinabukasan, pagkatapos ng Araw ng paghahanda, sama-samang nagpunta kay Pilato ang mga punong Seserdote at mga Pariseo. Sinabi nila ‘Naaalala po namin na sinabi ng mapagpanggap na iyon noong nabubuhay pa na siya’s muling mabubuhay pagkaraan ng tatlong araw. Baka pumaroon ang kanyang mga alagad at nakawin ang bangkay at sabihin nila sa mga tao na siya’y muling nabuhay. At ang pandarayang ito ay magiging ‘MASAHOL PA SA NAUNA’ Mateo 28:65 ‘ dahil sa ang napatay ay nagsasalita ng wikang Griyego na Eli, Eli Lama Sabacthani ay pinuntahan kaagad ng mga punong seserdote si Gobernador Pilato upang matiyak nila kung sino ang talagang napatay. Nagdahilan pa sila na baka mabuhay muli ang napatay ayon sa sinabi nito ng nabubuhay pa at baka nakawin ng kanyang alagad at palabasing nabuhay na muli. Ito ay mababaw na dahilan dahil kakailanganing maipakita ang taong napatay na ito ay buhay. Kaya sinabi sa kanila ni Gobernador Pilato na mayroon silang sariling kawal (kawal ng punong Seserdote na dumakip kay Yahshu’a) kaya sinabihan sila ni Pilato na ‘bantayan nila ang libingan’ (Mateo 27:65) Mateo 28:14-15 ‘bukas na ang libingan ng datnan ng mga kawal at ipinakita sa mga punong Seserdote. Inakala naman nila na makakarating sa Gobernador na pinakialaman nila ang libingan na buksan upang masiguro kung sino ang nailibing doon, ngunit wala silang natagpuang bangkay, kaya nagkatha sila ng salita at sinuhulan ang mga kawal ng punong Seserdote na palabasin na kinuha ang bangkay ng mga alagad ni Yahshu’a.. ‘Sinabi ng mga Seserdote na ‘huwag kayong mag-alala, makarating man ito sa Gobernador ‘KAMI ANG BAHALA’.Tinanggap ng mga bantay ang salapi at ginawa ang bilin sa kanila – hanggang sa ngayon ito parin ang sabi ng mga Hudyo’. MGA SAKSI NA SI YAHSHU’A AY BUHAY Si Gobernador Festo at Si Apostol Saul Gawa 25:19 ‘ ang pinagtatalunan lamang nila ay tungkol sa kanilang pananampalataya at sa isang tao na ang pangalan ay Yahshu’a, patay na ang taong ito ngunit ipinipilit naman ni Saul (Pablo) na siya’y SIGURADONG BUHAY. Si Gobernador Festo ang pumalit kay Gobernador Felix at nang dumating si Haring Agrippa upang bumati kay Festo, inilahad ni Festo kay Haring Agrippa ang tungkol kay Pablo, at sa kanyang salita sa Hari ay nabanggit niya na ipinipilit ni Saul na SIGURADONG BUHAY si Yahshu’a. Sa pagsasalita sa kagalang-galang na Hari, ang isang Gobernador ay magsasalita ng tamang salita, at si Gobernador Festo ay nakapag-aral na tao at alam niya ang salitang ‘RESURRECTION’ o nabuhay na muli, ngunit bakit hindi niya ginamit ang salitang ‘NABUHAY NA MULI’ kundi ang kanyang tinuran ay ‘ipinipilit ni Saul na si Yahshu’a ay SIGURADONG BUHAY’. Anghel ni Yahweh Lukas 24:5 ‘bakit ninyo hinahanap ang BUHAY sa gitna ng mga patay? Ito ang tinuran ng Anghel ni Yahweh na sinabing si Yahshu’a ay ‘BUHAY’ at hindi ang ‘Resurrection o Nabuhay na Muli’. Ang isang Anghel ni Yahweh ay hindi magsasalita ng mali, sa Lukas 24:23 ‘mga Angel na nagsabing ‘BUHAY SI YAHSHU’A’. Si Yahshu’a na mismo ang Saksi Lukas 13:31-33 ‘dumating doon ang ilang Pariseo, sinabi nila kay Yahshu’a na ‘umalis ka dito sapagkat ibig kang ipapatay ni Herodes’. At sumagot si Yahshu’a, ‘sabihin mo sa kanya na nagpapalayas pa ako ngayon ng mga demonyo at nagpapagaling, bukas ay ganoon din, at sa ikatlong araw tatapusin ko ang aking gawain. Ngunit dapat akong magpatuloy sa lakad ngayon, bukas at sa makalawa sapagkat ‘IMPOSIBLENG MAMATAY ANG ISANG PROPETA SA LABAS NG YAHRUSALEM’. (Hosea 6:2). Si Yahshu’a narin ang nagsabi na imposibleng mamatay ang propeta na tinutukoy niya ang sarili niya (Deoteronomo 18:15). Sa Awit ni Haring David Awit 118:17-22 ‘hindi ako mamamatay kundi mabubuhay, ihahayag ang kagila-gilalas na ginawa ni Yahweh. Kinastigo ako ni Yahweh, ngunit hindi ako ibinigay sa kamatayan’. 118:22 ‘ang batong inayawan ay siyang naging pinaka-saligang bato’ Sa Isinulat ni Lukas Ito ay naisalin sa Gawa 4:11-12 ‘ang batong inayawan ay naging pinaka-saligang bato, walang kaligtasan sa kaninuman, dahil walang tanging pangalan sa silong ng langit na ipinagkaloob sa mga tao kundi sa pangalan ni Yahshu’a Messiah’. HINDI PWEDENG PATAYIN ANG ANOINTED NI YAHWEH 1 Samuel 24:4-7 “Ang mga tauhan ni David ay sinabihan siya, dumating na ang araw sa sinabi ni Yahweh na aking ipagkakaloob sa iyong kamay ang iyong kaaway upang gawaan mo siya ng iyong ikatutuwa. At si David ay pinutol ang laylayan ng damit ni Saul ng palihim”. Sa puso ni David ay pinatay na niya si Saul dahil pinutol niya ang laylayan ng damit ni Saul. At sinabi ni David sa kanyang mga tauhan “patawarin ako ni Yahweh sa ginawa kong ito sa aking amo na ‘Anointed ni Yahweh’ na lumaban ako sa kanya na alam nating siya ay Anointed ni Yahweh”. Sinabihan ni David ang kanyang mga tauhan na huwag silang gagawa ng masama kay Saul. At si Saul ay nagising at lumabas ng kweba”. 1 Samuel 24:10 “Ngayong araw na ito nakita ng mga mata mo sa loob ng kweba ay ipinagapi ka sa akin, ang iba ay sinabihan ako na patayin ka, ngunit sa aking mata ay iniligtas kita at sinabi ko na hindi ko gagamitin ang aking kamay laban sa aking amo DAHIL SIYA AY ANOINTED NI YAHWEH”. 2 Samuel 1:14-16 “sinabi ni David ‘Hindi kaba Natakot na ginamit mo ang iyong kamay upang wasakin ang Anointed ni Yahweh?, at tinawag ni David ang isang kabataang lalaki at ipinapatay ang Amalekita. At sinabi ni David ‘ang dugo mo ay sumaiyong ulo dahil sa iyong labi ay sumaksi ka laban sa iyong sarili nang sinabi mong ‘Pinatay Mo ang Anointed ni Yahweh’. Natagpuang aklat ni Pedro sa isang Libingan sa Egypto Bible Dictionary of the Holy Bible Natagpuan sa isang libingan sa Egypto noong 1886 A.D. ang ‘THE GOSPEL OF PETER’ at nailathala noong 1892 A.D. ay maaaring DOCETIC GOSPEL at mahalang katibayan sa istorya na CRUCIFIXION at RESURRECTION kahit na ito ay may halatang BINAGO sa pag-pabor sa mga HERESY na iyan. Catherin ka pa diyan Che, mga letra ng pangalan mo andyan eh.
Meeenjoy mo mamaya pagtuwad mo promise itanong mo kay andres...hayaan mo ipahihimas ko muna alaga kong tuta sa iyo bago ka tumuwad.... Dala ka ng pamada ha che... pointless gusto mo din siguro himasin alaga kong tuta ano? Ok lang lam ko naman tutuwad ka din mamaya....hingi ka ng pamada kay che... Che ...yooohooo, tutuwad na yan....nandyan na alaga kong tuta....
Sa unang tuwad mo pa lang mararamdaman mo na ang inaasam asam mo.... hehehe natawa ko kay dakilang pointless, may pagka comedianti pa to hohoho, sana andito cna andress, radical, mumin, at mj.
Wag saakin malvar, ipakain mo nlang yan sa mga pari nyo. hahaha. 1. Ang nanay daw ni Jesus ay isang pokpok, si gandang MARIA the pokpok?
Kasi ipinanganak si Jesus na walang ama. 2. Si Jesus ay Bakla, kasi he hate women, Ayaw niyang makapangasawa yung mga pari. 3. Ang Christianismo ay mga magnanakaw, terrorist at mga mamatay tao. Kasi inagaw nila ang mga lupain sa Mindanao sa pamamagitan ng pagpatay sa mga ninunu namin. Sagutin mo Malvar na bading. E anlyse nga natin ang pangalang JESUS.
JE, pweding gamiting Jehan, Jem, Jeniffer, see lahat pahalan ng babae. SUS, sus ginoo, see mahilig pa talaga sa mga maginoo, hemm, un ba ang ideal guy niya? Hahaha......
Talagang nangagalaiti ka na at nanginginig pa. Alam mo Che talagang pinagagalit mo ang alaga kong tuta para maligayahan ka nanaman. Sinabi ko sa iyo mamaya pag tuwad mo sa tanghali sasapwit mo nanaman ang alaga kong tuta... Tandaan mo Che sa twing tutuwad ka sasapwit ma ang alaganf tuta ni malvar. Pag lingon mo sa kanan paf salam mo...nakaabang na rin ang alaga ko sakto sa bunganga mo ...tootbrush ka ha......lagay na din ng pamada.... Jesus means SAVIOR
Jesus Christ means ANNOINTED SAVIOR Christ or Messiah means ANNOINTED Ibase nyo sa Bible verse ang pagkakilala nyo kay Jesus at huag sa sabi-sabi lang or dahil napanuod sa pelikula Ayon sa research ng BBC World ang claims ng Da Vinci Code movie ay pawang hoax (Panloloko) lamang Pabulaanan nyo ang AKUSASYON KAY MUHAMMAD ayon sa pagkakasulat sa verse ng QURAN at HADITH sa #88 Give me a script which says that Jesus means Salvation... In wikipedia there is no clear statement that Jesus means Salvation rather in Hebrew.. Yeshua means Salvation.. Why rely on the Latin term when the Bible was formally constructed on the Hebrew.. and if it is translated on English why change the name to Jesus? do you have an authority to change a persons name? Is it the reason why Jehovah meaning salvation does not reconcile with the term Jesus which is a different term also.. If I am an hesitant Christian I would go for Jehovah because the name is more closer..
Now, in Hebrew alphabet there are no such letter as the letter J in Hebrew alphabet.. So how did they come up with the name Jesus? like you.. If I call you Malvar and you have won a million peso jackpot I will not give that prize because your name is Jacinto Reyes, way too different from MALVAR.. Why? does Jesus needs a pseudo name to be familiar? Just like Francis Pangilinan would run for VP and he would use KIKO to gain the sympathy of the people.. ANOINTED SAVIOR.. oh... it goes with a single N.. I asked a fellow christian of yours about the meaning anointed.. he said.. "to be anointed for their respective offices" he even needed a dictionary to look for the meaning of it.. good thing there is one available.. as it say to anoint, anointed, to put someone to a respective position or office.. BUT WHO ANOINTED HIM? DID HE PROCLAIMED HIS SELF AS GOD? IN your Bible give me a verse which says that Jesus, Yeshua, Jehova, proclaimed himself as GOD.. I will tell you now for its not yet too late.. Prophet Isah (Jesus, Yeshua, Jehovah) will come back on the Day of Judgment and will curse you people for calling Him a name he never heard before in his entire life time.. JESUS.. HUH! You mentioned about the Da Vinci Code... I have nothing to do with that... Its a clear statement that those who are worshiping the roman Catholics for most of their lives has to expose something which is very distorting for them.. and have no choice but to expose what really is happening in Christianity nowadays.. and also.. watch Angels and Demons... just watched it yesterday.. very intriguing movie... On the accusation of Muhammad (pbuh) as it was written their.. May the ALMIGHTY ALLAH forgive you all.. we will wait also for a Movie Documentary of the Prophet, and see if it is included in his biography because so far.. I have nothing to defend on that matter cause those acts never had existed.. and I am confident of that cause if it did.. I may not be a Muslim now.. Bro. Jacinto Reyes.. asked me about Islam.. I know now that you want to know more about what Islam really is.. and I would gladly guide you to the real way of life.. • History will answer:
In 325 A.D. a meeting of all denominations of Christianity was called at Nicea (now called Iznik, Turkey). Bishop Alexander was not able to attend the conference and he deputed his lieutenant Athanasius, who subsequently succeeded Alexander as Bishop of Alexandria. The conference had many prolonged sessions. Emperor Constantine could not grasp the full implications of the ecclesiastical confrontation, but he was very clear in his mind that for maintaining peace in his realm the support and cooperation of the Church was necessary. Accordingly he threw his weight behind Athanasius and banished Arius from the realm. Thus the belief of Trinity became the official religion of the empire. The fearful massacre of Christians who did not believe in Trinity followed. It became a penal offense to possess a Bible not authorized by the Church and according to some estimates as many as 270 different versions of the Bible were burnt. Princess Constantina was not happy at the turn of events.The Emperor ultimately was persuaded to accept the faith of the men he killed.The result was that Arius was called back in 346. The day Arius was scheduled to visit the Cathedral of Constantinople in triumph, he died suddenly. The Church called it a miracle. The Emperor knew it was a murder. He banished Athanasius and two other Bishops. The Emperor then formally accepted Christianity and was baptized by an Arian Bishop. Thus Monotheism became the official religion. Constantine died in 337. The next Emperor Constantanius also accepted the faith of Arius. In 341 a conference was held in Antioch and Monotheism was accepted as a correct interpretation of Christian faith. This view was confirmed by another Council held in Sirmium in 351. As a result Arianism was accepted by an overwhelming majority of Christians. St. Jerome (Eusebius Hieronymus) wrote in 359 that 'the whole world groaned and marvelled to find itself Arian'. Mohammedans A.D. 622 Pope Honorius who saw the rising tide of Islam whose tenets very much resembled those of Arius. As the mutual killings of Christians was still fresh in his memory he perhaps thought of finding a via media between Islam and Christianity. In his letters he began to support the doctrine of 'one mind', because if Deus has three independent minds the result would be chaos. The logical conclusion pointed to the belief in the existence of one God. This doctrine was not officially challenged for about half a century. Pope Honorius died in October 638 A.D. In 680, i.e. 42 years after his death, a council was held in Constantinople where Pope Honorius was anathematized. This event is unique in the history of Papacy when a Pope was denounced as abomination by a succeeding Pope and the Church. Among the present-day Christians large numbers of men and women still believe in one God. They are not always vocal,due to the crushing power of the Churches they cannot express themselves and there is not much communication between them. The initial doctrine of Catholic is absolutely WRONG and the Muslim doctrine COPIED the WRONG doctrine from Catholic (Name of Yahshua in Catholic IESUS copied by Muslim as IESSA) and make minor revision to appear that they are ORIGINAL. How can you say The Holy Koran is Better that the BIBLE? The Koran was made After the Bible. Read the Dead Sea Scroll you can proved to your self that Bible comes first than the Koran. Yes not only 55,000 error in the Bible but more that, that it was provened by ORIGINAL writing in the copies of Dead Sea Scroll because of the LYING PEN OF THE SCRIBES mentioned in Jeremiah 8:8 is bo be BLAMED. BUT FOR SURE KORAN COPIED THE WRONG COPIES OF THE BIBLE. The original copies of the Old testament was already FOUND in the Dead Sea Scroll. No one can deny that. Prove to your self and compare the Koran in the Original Old testament of dead Sea scroll, the Koran is totally different from the original writings. Do not be offended, The Dead sea scroll according to carbon 14 dating is about 3,000 years old, Koran is according to Muslim is about 1,400 years old (2009-622=1387 years ago) Vulgate Bible the Duay version is 1,600 years ago, King James Bible of 1611 is 398 years ago. who is older of course the Dead sea scroll, what event is 3,000 B.C. in the Bible? Is Catholic already existed at that time, is Muslim already existed at that time isKing James Bible already existed at that time? Mohamed original name is Ahmud, Ahmud means Pillar in Hebrew and his wife is KalhiYAH , KaldiYAH is from Syria, In Syria where the original Israelite was deported 2Kings 17:24. In the name you can identify the nationality, like ramjan kumar for sure it was a name from India, KaldiYAH is aname of Israelite, like ZechariYAH, EliYAH, YAHYA, etch, the name YAH was attached to the name signifies that the name is from Israel. History in Koran (Mohamad Pichtal) tell that the cousin of KaldiYAH prophecied that mohamad is a Prophet. Yes Mohamad is no read no write in ARABIC because he is not ARAB, he was adopted by Arab when his cousin a Jew step-back when he was fighting with his enemy and Mohamad was wounded. at that time the Arab help Mohamad and start to adapt him as the son of Arab and started the HATERD against the Jews. remember Mohamad is leader in warfront. can we rely on High School Dropout to be our leader to warfront? NOW MY QUESTION IS, The story of Abraham, Isaac,Jacob, Ismael, King David and King Solomon mentioned in Koran? if your answer is YES, who are they, are they ARAB or ISRAELITES? How can another nationals other than Israelites can KNOW and LITERALLY KNOWLEDGIABLE to the story of ADAM to Marriam if he is not relatives of Israelites? Acts 10:28 'you know how that it is an UNLAWFUL THING for a man that is a JEW to keep company or come unto one of ANOTHER NATION' Muslim has different God. During the reign of the wicked King Antiochus Epiphanes (175-164 B.C), Jews were compelled under the penalty of death not to speak the name of YAHWEH because Antiochus wanted the Jewish people to follow Greek practices (Hellenization). Greek was the dominant culture of the east during this time. Hence, when the Scriptures were translated into Arabic, the words Eloha, Elohi, Elohim, el and Adonai were used to substitute the name of YAHWEH. Mohammed the founder of Islam used the word, “Allah”, which in Arabic is Eloha, as the Fathers personal Name. The rabbis of the time who taught Mohammad did not tell Mohammad that Allah was merely a substitute name. When the Scriptures were then translated into Greek, the Greek translators used the words “Kurios” meaning Lord and “theos” meaning God as substitutes for the words Adonai and Eloha or el. The Church later adopted this practice into their thinking and teaching and used the terms LORD, GOD and Jehovah. Do not be offended we are in a very healthy discussion be open minded. Alam ninyo itong si Malvar makitid at ang tigas talaga ng bungo nitong asong ito....Pabalik balik na lang yung mga tanong niya at gusto niya pabalik balik din sasagutin ang mga bulok at na-aagnas ng mga katanungan niyang mga yan...
Hindi malaman kung tao ba itung asong ito or tape recorded ay cd recorded pala at automatikong nag rereplay na lang ng lahat ng mga dating mga tanong niya sa mga naunang mga topics. Gusto ba ninyo ibalik ko uli yung mga kabulukan,baho at pagiging demonyo ng Katolisismo??? Pag-usapan natin uli ang mga tungkol sa mga prelates nitong 666 na ito na Roman Catholic Corporations. Pag-usapan ba uli natin ang mga dogma ng Romano Katoliko na matagal ng namayagpag at sumira sa kapayapaan at kaayusan ng lahing kayumanggi? Bakit ba ipinagpipilitan ng Romano Katoliko ang pagsusulat at lansihin ang madla sa tunay na nasa likod ng lahat ng kaguluhan at patayan sa bansang arkipelago na ito?Kailangan bang ipaliwanag uli natin dito sa blog na ito ang tungkol sa Compendium of Social Doctrines of Roman Catholics? Malinaw na malinaw doon kung ano talaga ang na established nilang ng Roman Catholic Church Christ sa lipunan ng mundong ibabawa na ito.Kaya hindi nakapagtataka na kahit mga bansang muslim or mga Islamikong lipunan ay pinapaki-alaman nila sapagkat inihalintulad nila ang kanilang corporation sa itinatag ni Jesus na kawan. Ngunit kung atin namang mamasdan ang kanilang mga gawain ay malayo doon sa mga salita at mga ginawa ni Jesus na ayun sa kanilang bibliya. Andyan yung mga baklang Pari at mga Madreng uhaw sa tete ng mga bata,mga prelates na nanghihingi at nag oorganize ng mga ibat-ibang oragnisasyon sa ibat-ibang hanay ng lipunan.Itong mga militanteng organisasyon na ito ay nakapagtataka kung saan nanggaling ang kanilang mga logistics gayung sa hirap ng bansang Pilipinas nakuha pang gumastos ng mga mahihirap na militanteng pagkilos. Ano ba ang role ng CBCP/NASSA na ito???Mga Opus Dei na ito,Jesuits na ito,OMI na mga ito.Not to mention ng mga ibang militanteng grupo kuno na sila rin ang mga nag organisa. At syempre sa laki ng mga nakulimbat nito sa buong mundo sa mga simbahan nila or STUPID BANKS nila ay ganyan na lamang ka lakas ang pwersa nila upang maghasik ng kaguluhan at walang kapayapaan sa lipunan. Mga impluwensya nila sa mga Politiko at mga Heneral sa kasundaluhan sa mga chaplain na mga sundalo na lahat ng mga yan ay may connection sa sulsol at desisyon sa pang-aatake sa mga Muslim at mga komunistang grupo. Kailangan pabang pasubalian ang mga yan gayung malinaw na ang mga yan sa mga nagdaang mga topics????? And I think this is not the proper place to exchange ideas of our religious facts and belief.. we even don't have the permission from the blog owner in which our topic is way far from what he had posted..
So, I may not entertain another question again but if there would be a peaceful way to have this conversation more fruitful.. I am just around.. and would accept any invitation... and I would like to comment also in Fr. Mercado's blog entitled " The Political Separatism" I may have some few points I would like to elaborate... First, We did not took any land from the Philippine Government.. It is our land prior to the coming of the Spaniards as to your wonderful research could back up our claims.. Second, as I quote from your statement "During the Spanish time, the Moro populace was, largely, left on their own. They lived under their sultans and datus and were governed according to their laws and traditions. The Spanish government interfered in the Moro affairs by way playing politics in several succession issues in the Sultanate of Sulu and in the two dominant Sultanates in the mainland Mindanao (Buayan and Maguindanao). However, the Moro people always rejected any Spanish ‘anointment’ of their Sultan." It is not "DURING" even before the the Spaniards arrived the sultanate rulers of Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao. And yes, we were governed by our laws and tradition but you have never mentioned what system did we acquire and you have forgotten that.. It was the Quran and the Hadith we base our form of government, the laws of the Shariah under the banner of Islam. And tell me.. . what's with the "anointment" term you used? does it mean something that you don't want to elaborate to your readers? what does it mean to you? does it state if you could use another term it would be "Christianizing the Muslims" Third and last... The reason behind the inevitable minoritization was not because of the "Policy of Neglect" as you have said on the quoted portion above that we are largely and left on our own but still we have run a form of government under the rule of god and not governed by man made law and a book which your people call the constitution... we have fought what our forefathers had fought centuries ago.. but with the "ANOINTMENT" of the "ANOINT" brothers before, we are who are out the sweet promises of the Spaniards who distorted our way of life with BAD POLITICS and WRONG RELIGION.. But we cannot turn back what happened long ago but we are to correct and get what is ours... May ALLAH bless us all.. Mr. Pointless, any issue of piece and order in Mindanao will certainly touch religions and their teachings..
We will always wonder why the victims in kidnappings are always christians... We will always look for the etiology of the gruesome beheadings in mindanao. And why they do it. There are kidnappings of young girls and for a measly ransom but the child when returned is already molested by demonic people. Pointless I am sure you are an educated person...You people intentionally terrorize christians for reasons that happened 400 years ago... You dont want peace, you want the whole of mindanao and displace christians who are residents there from the past 400 years.... I told you be the Ibn Sina not the Mohammad. Ang dami nyong sinasabi...ano naman ang masasabi nyo sa manyakis nyong propeta na si mohammad....
The person that your allah want you moslems to emulate.... I wont tell my child to emulate a person who kills and behead people. I wont tell my child not to emulate a maniac who force his slaves in sexual acts.... I wont tell my child to emulate a child molester.... You cant dispute the ill morals of your prophet moslems emulate his ways in mindanao...kidnap for ransom......Beheading peaceful people, kidnapping children and molesting them. What do they expect? 70 virgins??... You people are turning your head away from this issues....This things are all in your koran. What about Jesus Christ you cant blemish Him in terms of the perfect book which is the Bible.... Wake up...You talk about christian priests, christian politicos, christian bankers,christian people.....Read the Bible and you will know the goodness of Jesus... Ano ba namang klasing grammar to?
This is not a proper furom for issues like what you have been discussing, this is a grammatical furom. Mga boboks Ang dami nyong sinasabi...ano naman ang masasabi nyo sa manyakis nyong propeta na si mohammad.... -Ang dami nyong sinasabi(,) ano naman ang masasabi nyo sa manyakis nyong propeta na si (M)ohammad(.) The person that your allah want you moslems to emulate.... -The person that (A)llah want (Mu)slims to be emulated(.) -I won(')t tell my child to emulate a person who kill(ed) and behead(ed) people. BOBO I wont tell my child not to emulate a maniac who force his slaves in sexual acts.... -I won't pa at may not pa. hahaha bobo. Saan ka naka graduate? -Forced and sexual inter course. TANGA I wont tell my child to emulate a child molester.... You cant dispute the ill morals of your prophet moslems emulate his ways in mindanao( What a sentence, I did not undrstnd wht u men bro?) ...kidnap for ransom......Beheading peaceful people, kidnapping children and molesting them. What do they expect? 70 virgins??... You people are turning your head away from this issues(.)This things are all in your koran. What about Jesus Christ you can(')t blemish Him in terms of the perfect book which is the Bible(.) Wake up(!) You talk about christian priests, christian politicos, christian bankers,christian people(.)Read the Bible and you will know the goodness of Jesus(.) WHAAAAAA AYAW KUNA TALAGA DITO. nga tol'
ito pa ayos to... sana may mapulot tayong magandang halimbawa sa mga mohammedans wika nga eh.. moro-moro...na to dito.... Tuesday May 12, 2009 EGYPT: CONVERT’S RELIGIOUS RIGHTS CASE THREATENS ISLAMISTS Muslims said to fear that freedom to legally change religion would wreak societal havoc. CAIRO, Egypt, May 12 (Compass Direct News) – In the dilapidated office here of three lawyers representing one of Egypt’s “most wanted” Christian converts, the mood was hopeful in spite of a barrage of death threats against them and their client. At a court hearing on May 2, a judge agreed to a request by the convert from Islam to join the two cases he has opened to change his ID card to reflect his new faith. The court set June 13 as the date to rule on the case of Maher Ahmad El-Mo’otahssem Bellah El-Gohary’s – who is in hiding from outraged Islamists – and lawyer Nabil Ghobreyal said he was hopeful that progress thus far will lead to a favorable ruling. At the same time, El-Gohary’s lawyers termed potentially “catastrophic” for Egyptian human rights a report sent to the judge by the State Council, a consultative body of Egypt’s Administrative Court. Expressing outrage at El-Gohary’s “audacity” to request a change in the religious designation on his ID, the report claims the case is a threat to societal order and violates sharia (Islamic law). “This [report] is bombarding freedom of religion in Egypt,” said lawyer Said Faiz. “They are insisting that the path to Islam is a one-way street. The entire report is based on sharia.” The report is counterproductive for Egypt’s aspirations for improved human rights, they said. In the eyes of the international community it is self-condemned, the lawyers said, because it is not based on Egypt’s civil law, nor does it uphold the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights that Egypt has signed. The report stated that those who leave Islam will be subject to death, described El-Gohary as an “apostate” and called all Christians “infidels.” “During the hearing, they [Islamic lawyers] were saying that Christians are infidels and that Christ was a Muslim, so we said, ‘OK, bring us the papers that show Jesus embraced Islam,’” Faiz said, to a round of laughter from his colleagues. Ghobreyal, adding that the report says El-Gohary’s case threatens public order, noted wryly, “In Egypt we have freedom of religion, but these freedoms can’t go against Islam.” The trio of young lawyers working on El-Gohary’s case, who formed an organization called Nuri Shams (Sunlight) to support Christian converts’ rights, said they have received innumerable threats over the phone and on the Internet, and sometimes even from their colleagues. Churches Challenged To date no Christian convert in Egypt has obtained a baptismal certificate, which amounts to official proof of conversion. Churches fear that issuing such certificates would create a severe backlash. As a result, converts cannot apply for a change of religion on their ID, but El-Gohary was able to travel abroad to get a baptismal certificate from a well-established church. In April a Coptic Cairo-based priest recognized this certificate and issued him a letter of acceptance, or “conversion certificate,” welcoming him to the Coptic Orthodox community. El-Gohary’s baptismal certificate caused a fury among the nation’s Islamic lobby, as it led to the first official church recognition of a convert. A number of fatwas (religious edicts) have since been issued against El-Gohary and Father Matthias Nasr Manqarious, the priest who helped him. “The converts have no chance to travel, to leave, to get asylum, so we have to help them to get documents for their new religion,” Fr. Manqarious told Compass by telephone. “So I decided to help Maher El-Gohary and others like him. They can’t live as Christians in broad daylight.” For several months El-Gohary has been in hiding, relying on others to meet his basic needs. When Compass spoke with him by phone earlier this month, he said he lives in fear for his life and worries about his 14-year-old daughter’s safety. “I’m hiding. Someone brings me my food and water. I haven’t gone out in a week,” said El-Gohary. “Many Muslims and sheikhs … say if anyone sees Maher Gohary, he must kill him. My life is very difficult.” His original case, filed in August of last year, included an attempt to change the religious affiliation on his teenage daughter’s ID, but he later dropped it after further legal consultation. El-Gohary said that when radical Muslims recognize his daughter on the streets, they warn her that they will kill her father when they find him. “She’s afraid for me,” he said. His church acceptance letter has re-kindled discussion of a bill proposed by parliamentary members affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, a hard-line Islamist opposition movement, which would make apostasy punishable by death, said El-Gohary’s lawyers. Human rights experts, however, say that such a bill does not stand a chance in the Egyptian Parliament and is primarily a smokescreen to induce fear in Egypt’s Christian converts from Islam. Some Hope from Baha’is Sources said the fact that the judge asked for a baptismal certificate and filed the letter of acceptance in the case represents progress in the ongoing struggle of Egyptian converts, who are not recognized in their own country. Now that El-Gohary’s lawyers have produced the acceptance letter, the judge in the case finds himself in a bind, said Hassan Ismail, general secretary of the Egyptian Union of Human Rights Organizations. “The judge is in a paradox with the document he asked for,” Ismail said. “It is difficult to accept it, and yet it is difficult having this document among those of the case.” Ismail, who has worked for years defending the rights of both Baha’is and converts, said it is hard to predict what the judge will decide in June. Even with all the required documents and “proof” of El-Gohary’s conversion, he said, the judge may still deny his right to change religions. “For us human rights activists, these decisions are political, not legal,” he said. “These sorts of documents put the government into a corner, and we are working hard to get them in order to push the government to make different decisions.” At the age of 16 all Egyptians are required to obtain an ID that states their religion as Muslim, Christian or Jewish. These cards are necessary for virtually every aspect of life, from banking, to education and medical treatment. Baha’is, who do not fall under the rubric of any of Islam’s “heavenly religions,” were forced to lie about their religion or not obtain cards until March, when in a historical decision Egypt’s Supreme Administrative Court upheld a lower court’s 2008 ruling that all Egyptians have a right to obtain official documents, such as ID cards and birth certificates, without stating their religion. The gains of Baha’is have been a gauge of sorts for the Christian convert community, even though in reality they are not granted the freedom to change their stated religion or leave it blank on their cards and the official registry. “I’m very optimistic about the cases of minorities and converts in Egypt,” said Ismail. “I believe that the case of Baha’is was an indicator for converts … If we were able to push their case, then we can defend the rights of converts.” The human rights activist said that although discrimination against converts who are seen as apostates from Islam is greater than that against those raised in other religions, ultimately converts will be able to gain legal ground. El-Gohary’s case, he said, will play an important role. “After years of fighting, the Baha’is have rights,” he said. “I think converts will succeed even if it takes years. Many are expecting to see Maher’s case [succeed], because it’s well documented.” Attorney Ghobreyal said that El-Gohary’s case is on solid legal footing based on Article 46 of the Egyptian Civil Code, which grants religious freedom to the country’s citizens. In his mind it is irrational that the government gave rights to the Baha’is, who fall outside of the three heavenly religions, while not granting the same rights to Christian converts. His only explanation is that a governmental green light to people to leave Islam could wreak havoc. Not only is there fear of the Muslim front reacting violently to such a decision, but “they’re afraid that if they allow it, then all Muslims will become Christians,” said Ghobreyal. “They know there are many converts, and they will all officially become Christians.” The lawyer said there are rumors circulating that there are a few million converts eagerly awaiting the results of El-Gohary’s case. Egypt’s last census in 2006 did not factor in religion, so figures of the Coptic population are based on estimates. These range from 6 to 15 percent of the country’s 80-million population. It is not possible to estimate the number of converts, most of whom live in secrecy. “Ten years ago, you never heard about a convert, but now you hear that someone is going to the court to ask to become a Christian,” said Ghobreyal. Hegazy’s Hope The first convert to file for a change on his ID card, Mohammed Ahmed Hegazy, said he was pleased with the progress of El-Gohary’s case and hoped that more converts would take the risk of joining their cause. “I think that every case added to the convert case will be a help,” said Hegazy. An outspoken critic of the refusal of Egypt’s established churches to openly baptize converts, Hegazy said that in El-Gohary’s case publicity and criticism pushed the church to take a step in the right direction in producing the conversion certificate. “But this is not a big step, and there are many more that need to be taken and have not been,” he said. “Just to be clear, the [Egyptian] church has not given a baptism certificate, it has given an acceptance letter, and the church has declared they are not going to give a baptism paper … but we can’t deny that the step that the priest took to give the certificate was audacious.” Hegazy, who lost his case in January 2008 and is waiting for an appeal date, was never able to get a baptism certificate, nor can he travel since he does not have a passport. If he returns to his hometown to apply for one, he risks losing his life. He said he still hopes any of Egypt’s churches will help him by baptizing him and giving him a certificate in time for his appeal or for a new case he plans to open soon. Hegazy said that although his case is not as public as it used to be, he still faces danger when he leaves his house. Although he is also in hiding and fears for his life, El-Gohary said he hopes his case opens the way for other converts to experience freedom. “I hope this for all of those who want to live in the light and the sun; there are many families,” he said of Egypt’s converts. “I want to live in peace as a Christian. I hope my country gives me the freedom to worship my God and gives me my human rights.” Egypt is a member of the U.N. Human Rights Council, an inter-governmental body made up of 47 states responsible for strengthening the promotion and protection of human rights around the globe. On April 18, 2007, in its written statement applying for a seat to the Human Rights Council, the representative of Egypt to the U.N. stated that if elected it would emphasize promoting cultural and religious tolerance, among other human rights. END bat baligtad akala ko mga bata ni' mo ang dumadami. ay mali pala..well egypt is christian before so ...shall be... people who don't have guts to answer the question of my fellow christian bloggers here...(i'm before braindead zombie) at ito pa... » 05/18/2009 12:12 TURKEY Ohran Pamuk, the Armenian genocide and Turkish nationalism by Geries Othman The trail against the Turkish writer, guilty of having spoken about the Armenian genocide and the massacre of Kurds, could be reopened. Turkey is sliding towards Islamic fundamentalism and nationalism. Tell-tale signs; its friendship with Syria and Iran. Ankara (AsiaNews) – The infamous article 301 of Turkey’s Penal Code which severely punishes anyone who dares to “sully Turkey’s national identity” is once again in the news. Over the past few years it has silenced many intellectuals who dared to contest “Turkey’s democratic government”. Once again the writer Orhan Pamuk is being targeted, in a case that has been on the shelf for over three years. Just as the writer, the first Turk to receive the Noble Prize for Literature (2006), was in Florence to receive a degree honoris causa, rumours began to circulate that he will probably have to appear before Turkey’s courts once more for having “offended the Turkish identity”. In reality the charge is an old one, even if ever present in public memory. Born in Istanbul in 1952, in 2005 Pamuk was charged with having declared to the Swiss weekly Das Magazin that “we Turks are responsible for the death of 30 thousand Kurds and a million Armenians and no-one in Turkey dares speak about it, except me”. However he was absolved by an Istanbul court, above all tank to the intervention of the International Community which also urged the partial modification of art. 301. Approved in 2008, the change led to the cancellation of the generic “offense against Turkish identity” and its’ substitution with a more detailed “offense against the State or organs of the Turkish State”. However on May 4th last, Ankara’s Supreme Court rejected the primary courts ruling and decided to proceed against Pamuk because he holds his country responsible for the Armenian “genocide” – a taboo word for the Turkish nation – during the Ottoman Empire, thus committing a grave crime according to the Turkish Penal Code. World famous Pamuk is held as one of the most translated contemporary writers, not only into European languages. Since his debut in 1982, he has published nine novels and other writings, which have received awards in Europe and the United States. He elaborated an original form of narrative, at times complex and not always easy to read, through which he explores, from a historic point of view, the problematic issues of art, expression, identity and the relationship between the East and the West. In his homeland and abroad Pamuk has had great literary success. But despite this, he is still opposed by a large part of public opinion in Turkey. An official in Isparta even went to the point of ordering the destruction of his books in libraries and bookshops throughout the province. Pamuk, invited to the International Book Fair in Turin, decided not to mention any of this. In the past he ad even refused to participate in debates and discussion on the murder of the Armenian journalist and long-time friend Hrant Dink. In Turin, when asked about the case currently going to the courts, he commented: “I don’t think it is a serious matter, even if I don’t really know the details of the latest developments, nothing is official yet, but from what I have understood I could be on trial again. Unfortunately, in my country the justice system is politicised – said Pamuk - and you know that if there is no freedom in a nation then there is no justice. This is why I feel obliged to speak freely”. For now Turkey’s press prefers to hold its tongue on the issue and only Hurriyet has dared to nod its head at the probable opening of a new trial. No-one is sure of anything and they prefer to keep quiet, given the scandal generated by the first case involving Pamuk and article 301. Many hope that this is not the latest sign of the current government’s increasingly authoritarian and nationalist stance. Many see confirmation of this suspicion in recently improved relations between Syria, Iran, and the Turkish government which has forgotten the principals of secular kemalism and is moving towards an Islamic extremism, in which nationalism and fundamentalism are dangerously united. kita mo binuko ng kauri ninyo nagalit pa ang gobyerno..ano ba to!! and spaniards well what happen to them 700 hundred years of muslim domination. you cannot get-away the hang-over of muslim influence in an instant, but now with a twist they are conquering in the name of the one true GOD. In islam they are ok when they are minority, but when they are in majority, well you already know... sa inyo na lang yong mga insulto nyo kasi utak kamel/lupa kasi kayo shalom... ram the jam Mr malvar, your hates and prejudice toward islam and the prophet made you look pathetic and stupid. obviously nothing comes out of your wicked brain worthy of arguing!
If you really have the balls to back up your copy and paste craps then I personally challenge you in a Debate in faltalk or whatever public website you wish. People like you wouldnt last in debate or dialogue, because you dont even knew what you posting here. you just copying your comments from anti islam propaganda website. I bet, you dont even knew your religion! sample; why is that your bible's title accoring to luke; according to marcus, and so on... this seems to me that bible is not a book of god but a book of historians. See your answer tomorrow, make a good research then! and try to memorise it, dont just copy and paste here because am starting to doubt you cerebral capacity. until then nitwit.. hahaha you now insist that i hate moslems...
I have a concern about Mindanao the kidnappings, beheadings, Child molestation and the random bombings. I came across some writings about the life of your prophet Mohammad... Shocking revelations on his life connected on the demonic character of the kidnappers ,beheaders, child molesters that victimize christians exclusively. Even more shocking it is indicated that your Allah tells his people to emulate the prophet. It is not hate my friend...it is plain asking... I am also sure if given a chance your friends would like to have a piece of me particularly my head.... We dont need to debate on the history of Mindanao, We are in the 21 century. Christians of this generation are peace loving people. We are not used to beheadings and hurting people especially those who have no intention to harm us. Our parents guided us to study have a good job and be a peace-loving Christian. Please dont blame the Christians for the misdeeds of your moslem political leaders. Pound on them for their crimes and dont show your anger to unsuspecting christians. And dont worry my father will sell our lands to peace loving moslems...please dont bully them when you are in power... I have been advicing you be an "Ibn Sina and not the Mohammad"..You will be a lot better Moslem Child molestation ba kamo.
Bakit hindi natin bilangin kung ilang libo ang na molestyang bata dito lang sa kamaynilaan. Ang masakit panon ay sariling ama pa nila ang gumagawa ng kabastoan. Beheading o pagpatay ng kapwa tao ay pariho lang. Bakit hindi natin bilangin ilang milyong katao na ang namamatay na pinapatay ng mga christiano dito sa Manila? Ilang daang libo ang nakidnap ng mga kristiyano dito sa Manila? At ang bombing na sinasabi mo ay hindi kagagawan ng mga Muslim yan, yan ay kagagawan ng mga mayayaman na tao dito sa Maynila para mapaalis ang mga investors. If you hate those things that you have mentioned earlier, then, I guess you have to go in the middle east like Saudi Arabia, to have a beautiful life. Ahmed Simon accused Muhammad of SAVAGERY & GENOCIDE to civilians
1. Tabari 8:96 -Killing & torture of an old woman because of refusing to embrace Islam 2. Tabari 7:85, 7:97, 8:179 -Genocide killing of civilians due to extreme hatred for the jews Muslims of course would justify every act of their prophet NOW YOU GET THE POINT!!! The Filipinos came from one bloodline the bloodline of Great-great grandfather Abraham. The original 12
Regions in the Philippines represents the 12 Tribes of Yahshurun (Israel), Matthew 10:5-6 and the Forever Covenant of Abraham is ‘the Circumcision’, is the Sign of the true descendant and the seed of Abraham. Let us bind together the 12 original Regions – the 12 Lost Tribes of the House of Israel into one belief, the original belief of our Great-great Grandfather Abraham who praise YAHWEH, who has Forever-Covenant with YAHWEH and the sign is circumcision. The 12 Disciples of Yahshu’a will be questioned whether they followed the instruction to look for the lost sheep of the house of Israel, not into uncircumcised territory or enter not the Samaritan town but go rather to the lost sheep of the House of Israel. Cure the sick, raise the dead, cleans lepers, drive out demons. Without cost you have received, without cost you are to give. As you enter the house wish in peace.‘Shalom’ means peace, and ‘at’ (short of lahat) means ‘to all’. ‘Salamat’ means ‘peace to all’. you can read that in www:SCRIBD.COM 'Pilipinas Ay Nasa Biblia 2004 with Ophir' For My Brother Jacinto Reyes,
You have been brainwashed by another Latin modifying name scheme, like they did with Yeshua to Jesus.. and like what you are telling me now.. Ibn Sina which the Latin called Him Avicena.. Latino's are good in making pasta.. same as distorting ones name.. and not just an ordinary name but a name of a very influential persons. So let me go on with what you insist Ibn Sina.. he was a born Muslim, and he displayed exceptional intellectual behaviour and was a child prodigy who had memorized the Qur'an by the age of 10.. prays 5 times a day.. and respects his neighbours.. We recognize his contributions to Islam same as the Caliphs and the companions of the Prophet (pbuh) but without Islam he might be not be a man of history.. And let me tell you something, we do not pray onto Mohammad (pbuh) for we pray for God alone.. He is the greatest blessing ever given to mankind.. and we are observing his teaching and Sunnahs as written in the Hadith just like what Ibn Sina did. Ibn Sina see the Prophe (pbuh) as his mentor. For it would be a wrong doing in Islam for a person putting Him on the level of Godhood.. Its a sin.. So now I believe that I dont have to preach you.. cause now I know you are a Muslim.. and you disgust those Muslim who do such unjust acts on innocent women and children.. that is your grief! But let me tell you, Ibn Sina was born in Afghanistan.. where people you hate live.. now, does it come across to you anything? The one you love would come from a tribe which one you hate? Muslims must be proud of who they are because Muslims had contributed mostly 80% of scientific inventions which we acquire today in fields of Medicine, which Ibn Sina came popular of the term Avicennian Medicine, in Mathematics, Arabs own he numbers we are using right now.. they invented it. In the early empires, Usman was the greatest conqueror ever lived though they changed their name as Ottoman Empire to tag it along not in an Islam name.. and many more that if I am to enumerate each this blog site would be enough.. So you see how they have labelled our great men and branded it to their own.. from Ibn Sina to Avicenna... from Usman to Ottoman... from Yeshua to Jesus... we believe in one god so as these mentioned above... they are great men of one true god and I hope you believe would believe in me that there is only one God. and I would not be surprised if you would confess that you are included in an Islamic affiliation which is the Markzus Sabab.. mas maganda sigurong kung itagalog nalang natin kasi baka hindi naiintindihan ng mga taong to ang mga pinagsasabi natin dito eh!
To Mr. Morojasan,
I admit history is important knowledge. And yes I have no passion on researching muslim history and the things you are saying. So I can't refute all your insinuation on on this matter. What I am bothered is that you really did not answer the meat of what I have been telling you. Things that affects the lives of the Christians in Mindanao. I am sure a lot of moslems have peaceful instincts , and the armed one are just loud and too muderous not to be noticed. It appears you did not read my past postings and you keep on pouring your history of your moslem brothers. I repeat your moslem brothers are wrecking lives of Chrisatians in Mindanao a feat only satan could provoke. Kidnap for ransom, Beheadings, Child molestation, Indiscriminate bomdings.......Why are you shying away from this topic.......This is a very important aspect of our communicarion......let us not be blind on the true issues that affect our people in Mindanao. This is the beef of this blogsite....to bring peace and order that will will lead to progress. You can preach your history in MSU.... TO MALVAR.
Ano ba namang klasing grammar to? This is not a proper furom for issues like what you have been discussing, this is a grammatical furom. Mga boboks Ang dami nyong sinasabi...ano naman ang masasabi nyo sa manyakis nyong propeta na si mohammad.... -Ang dami nyong sinasabi(,) ano naman ang masasabi nyo sa manyakis nyong propeta na si (M)ohammad(.) The person that your allah want you moslems to emulate.... -The person that (A)llah want (Mu)slims to be emulated(.) -I won(')t tell my child to emulate a person who kill(ed) and behead(ed) people. BOBO I wont tell my child not to emulate a maniac who force his slaves in sexual acts.... -I won't pa at may not pa. hahaha bobo. Saan ka naka graduate? -Forced and sexual inter course. TANGA I wont tell my child to emulate a child molester.... You cant dispute the ill morals of your prophet moslems emulate his ways in mindanao( What a sentence, I did not undrstnd wht u men bro?) ...kidnap for ransom......Beheading peaceful people, kidnapping children and molesting them. What do they expect? 70 virgins??... You people are turning your head away from this issues(.)This things are all in your koran. What about Jesus Christ you can(')t blemish Him in terms of the perfect book which is the Bible(.) Wake up(!) You talk about christian priests, christian politicos, christian bankers,christian people(.)Read the Bible and you will know the goodness of Jesus(.) WHAAAAAA AYAW KUNA TALAGA DITO. Nagsisisigaw ka na dahil miss na miss mo na ang alagang tuta ni Malvar.....
Hindi na muna kita papatulan dahil alam ko na gusto mo lang magpapansin. Basta isipin mo lang na sasapuwit mo ang tuta ni malvar sa tuwing pagtuwad mo.......Hehehe...happy ka no! Agay Malvar, ano ba yan lugar na iyan parang nasa bunganga ka ng buwaya........puno ng kasinungalingan.......
to MALVAR.
Morojasan is not here, this furom is debate for grammar lang daw hehe. Mambabalot at manggugupit ang dapat dito, sayang ang effort nina pointless the great, MJ, Radical, andress at ibp. O baka naman nag-asawa na yun ng apat. hehheehehe Hindi ka nainvite Malvar. Sorry. Child molestation ba kamo. Bakit hindi natin bilangin kung ilang libo ang na molestyang bata dito lang sa kamaynilaan. Ang masakit panon ay sariling ama pa nila ang gumagawa ng kabastoan. Beheading o pagpatay ng kapwa tao ay pariho lang. Bakit hindi natin bilangin ilang milyong katao na ang namamatay na pinapatay ng mga christiano dito sa Manila? Ilang daang libo ang nakidnap ng mga kristiyano dito sa Manila? At ang bombing na sinasabi mo ay hindi kagagawan ng mga Muslim yan, yan ay kagagawan ng mga mayayaman na tao dito sa Maynila para mapaalis ang mga investors. If you hate those things that you have mentioned earlier, then, I guess you have to go in the middle east like Saudi Arabia, to have a beautiful life. The Belligerent in Mindanao.
As the future BANGSAMORO cause advocates, I oblige myself to give justice to the needy, not only because it is my future obligation as what the Code of Professional Responsibility mandated that a lawyer shall not refuse his services to the needy, especially indigent client, but it is of my dream to be called a COMMANDER OF OPPRESSED. You can call me as LEGAL REVOLUTIONARIAN because my revolution is based on the existing laws of the land, as what the CPR mandated that a lawyer shall represent his client with zeal within the bounds of the law. You can even call me as LEGAL TERRORIST if you like, because I will twist the law if I can just to make my clients free from aggressions and injustices, as what the lawyers oath said that a lawyer should conduct himself as a lawyer according to the best of his knowledge and discretion. According to my simple legal dictionary belligerent refers to the nation or state of being at war or conflict and protected by the International laws on war. And according to the case of Tan Se Chiong, belligerent occupation is referring to the temporary military occupation of the enemy’s territory during the war. The occupation need not have its feet planted on every square foot of territory, provided it maintains effective control and military superiority therein, being able to send, in case of attack, sufficient forces to assert its authority within a reasonable time. We could deduce from the Colourful history of the Bangsamoro that prior to the Arrival of the Spaniards, and the Americans, and of the integration of the Bangsamoro to the Philippine political system, the Brave and honourable Sultans of Mindanao have established their own sovereignty ever their territories. But the Spaniards, the Americans and the Filipinos came without swearing allegiance to the Sultans; they fought against the Sultans and unconditionally grab the lands of the Bangsamoro. Therefore, the real rebel is the Philippine government. The bangsamoro homeland were temporarily militarily occupied by the government, as what the 1935 said that all territory over which the present Government of the Philippine Islands exercises jurisdiction. It is crystal clear from the definition of the BELLIGERENT that the Bangsamoro homelands and the civilians or the fighters are subject to be treated in accordance with the International Laws of War, the HAGUE CONVENTION to be particular. THEREFORE, in my scant understanding of the laws whether it be local or international laws, MO-OAD must be signed in accordance with the international laws not of the 1987 constitution. THANK YOU. I HOPE, I DID NOT HURT YOU. HEHE 'The brave & honourable Sultans of Mindanao have establish their own sovereignity over their territories.'
This is partly true because Sultans during early Moro time in the Philippines institutionalized SLAVERY of which native slaves are being acquired by raids on neighbouring peoples. The seaport of Jolo in Sulu towns became the residence of MORO SULTANS who ruled a minimal group of islands until late 1800s, when the small archipelago became a SPANISH PROTECTORATE. In 1899 following the Spanish-American War, US seized control of the Sulu archipelago & in 1940 the archipelago was ceded to RP. Be it known that in 1905, the Sultans of Brunei & Sulu leased land to foreign traders. The leased was taken on by BRITISH trader-adventurer & they have subsequently signed treaties with both Sultans, giving it FULL CONTROL over the territories. James Brook to name some of them were given muslim titles such as 'white rajas'. By the records of history we can determine that Moro Sultans were not the sole authority over half of the region of Mindanao. A better governmental system after WW1 & WW2 were establish to cater to the needs of modern society without the institutions of slavery & of which will apply fairness & proper representaions to a multi-ethnic nation. Itong mga Romano Katolikong mga etes dati ang lakas mamuna ng mga copy-paste ko,hekhekhekhek ngayon ginaya din pala hakhakhakhakhak....Wala talaga kayong mga straight na prinsipyo...manang-manang kayo sa Vicarius Fili Dei[a.k.a 666] ninju.
Pa style pa kayo ng ibang topic ninju upang hindi mapag-usapan ang operasyon ng Romano Katoliko Corporation sa mundong ibabaw... Malinaw na itong Blog na ito ay ginawa para sa advantage ng Katolisismo sa media public opinion.Itinatag ito upang impluwensyahan ang opinion ng madla especially ang mga Katolikong ayaw ng maging Katoliko...Mga pagkakataon upang buhayin uli ang spirit ng Catholic Loyalaty dahil nga sa 10% na lang ang pumapasok sa knilang simbahan. Lalo na itong si MalvaBOY na isang LAity ng Katoliko Romano corporation ay talaga nga namang kahit buking na at ilang beses ko ng nilampaso sa mga nakaraang mga topic aba ay napaka-kapal nga naman ng bungo at sikmura nitong magkukunwaring magaling at maraming mabuting alam sa peace and order....Tete mo MalvaBOY....hehehehehehe matino ang usapan at legalidad na ang palitan ng kuro-kuro nina MJ at NOVI
kaya ikaw Andres tigilan mo na ang pang insulto mo dahil dyan kalang magaling bukod sa copy-paste mo Magaling talaga si andris, baka hindi alam ng readers isang sanitary engineer ang taong yan.......
magaling talaga pero nakalimutan niya ang Zakat panay kasi ang titig sa maunlad na catholic corporation ayon sa kanya....... Sa tuwing darating sa buwan ng ramadan lahat ng muslim ay nakapila sa bangko upang i withraw ang lahat ng pera nila..........bakit? Syempre para makaiwas daw sa zakat na alam nila na ginagamit lang ng mga imam nila upang mag asawa nanaman...... Andris, bakasyun ko next month......hahaha punta ka dito para matulungan mo mga muslim dito mga muk mafi kasi (walang utak) ay nga pala wala ka din palang utak... kukulo na naman ang dugo mo sa inggit........amo kong babae lumalabas kasama ibang lalaki pag nasa abroad ang asawa.....minsan tulog sila sa kwarto.....hehehe Andris.....ano gusto mo pasalubong..... Belligerent in Mindanao.......... would mean as a form of war where in participants are in a fight that is recognize by international law
1.It will not include war strategy using civilians as human shields 2. Civilians as prime target to terrorize 3. Civilians being sacrifice without any consultation on their behalf to a war crafted module such as the MOA AD May nakausap akong isang Indian national dito sa Saudi he is a muslim at pinag aralan niya about "Islam"..sinabi niya ang tungkol sa mga nakapaloob sa islam..at ang istorya..ako nagtatanong lang dahil sa alam nyo na gusto kong malaman kung ano pagkaka iba ng Muslim at Kristiyano..
Sa ngayon ay 2009 at ang "Hijra"or muslim calendar naman ay 1430 at kung susumahin ang agwat ay "579" years ang diperensiya.. Lumalabas na ipinanganak or itinatag ang Islam "579" ang agwat sa "bibliya" at kung pagbabasihan ang "Bible" at ang Quran ay halos magkahawig ang nilalaman..gaya halimbawa na naniniwala sila sa Heven and Hell, Adan ang Eve at marami pa pagkakahawig.. Sinabi sa akin ng friend kong Indian national na totoo na naunang itinatag ang Christian at ang agwat ay "579"years bago ang Muslim..kaya para sa aking pananaw at sa marami pang Christiano ay "Ang Islam ay Hango or "Ikinumpara sa "Bible" ako naniniwala kaya puro Kristiyano ang mga OFW dito sa Saudi..at yung Friend kong India naniniwala rin na ang Bible at Quran ay iisa ang pinagmulan.. ANDRES BONIFACIO
YOUR ANSWERS (82.2) TO MY BLOG(82) SHOW THAT YOU ARE NOT ONLY DUMB AND STUPID BUT A LYING HIPPOCRITE AS WELL, WHO CANNOT ACCEPT THE FACT THAT ISLAM IS THE MAJOR CAUSE OF DESTABILIZATION IN THE WORLD TODAY. BE THANKFUL THAT CHRISTIANITY PREACHES FORGIVENESS, TOLERANCE, AND UNDERSTANDING, OTHERWISE, THIS WORLD WOULD HAVE BEEN IN TOTAL CHAOS GIVEN THE DOCTRINE THAT YOUR DEVILISH PROPHET MOHAMMED PREACHED, AND OF WHICH YOU ARE SO ARDENTLY ADHERING TO UP TO NOW. I READ YOUR BLOG IN EARLIER ARTICLES AND I CAN SAY THAT YOU DON'T DESERVE TO BE SENDING YOUR NON-SENSE IDEAS. YOUR MESSAGES SPEAK WELL OF YOURSELF, YOUR PERSONALITY AND YOUR MUSLIM RELIGION - WEIRD; UNGODLY; TROUBLESOME. Ang gulo sa Mindanao ay napakatagal na talaga halos wala na yatang katapusang paglalaban at pakikibaka..ang mas higit na apektado dito ay ang mga sibilyang Muslim at Kristiyano na nasa Mindanao..
Maraming katanungan na hindi na yata kayang "SAGUTIN" habang walang humpay nating pagpapalitan ng KATWIRAN sa isat isa... Sa tingin ko ay walang patutunguhang maganda..at kahit kaylan ay hindi magpapatalo ang isat isa kabilang narin ako na nakikipag talo.. Para sa akin at sa lahat ng Kristiyano at Muslim sana ay matuldukan na ang napa tagaaaaal na hidwaan..na sa paki wari ko ay puwede namang mangyari na magkaroon ng "PEACE"..ang malaking katanungan lang na laging naglalaro sa aking isipan buhat ng magsimula ito ay bakit at bakit pa na ayaw ng mga taga Mindanao na maging mapayapa ang lahat.. Ang ating gubyerno ay laging handa na magkaroon ng kapayapaan sa Mindanao..ANO BA TALAGA ANG NAIS..HINDI BA NILA GUSTO..?? MGA SIBILYAN ANG MAS HIGIT NA KAWAWA..HINDI ANG MGA NAKIKIPAG LABAN OR ANG MGA MAY KATUNGKULAN SA MINDANAO.. Sana ang mga sibilyang mamamayan sa Mindao ay MAGING MAPAG MATYAG HINDI YUNG NAKIKIPAG PALITAN NG TALINO AT PRESIPYO SA KOLUM NA ITO..ISIPIN NILA "BAKIT HINDI MATAPOS TAPOS ANG GULO" sino ba talaga ang mga nasa LIKOD NG KAGULUHANG ITO..hindi kaya PERA ANG NAGPAPA IKOT IKOT..ALALAHANIN NINYO ANG KASAYSAYAN NI "ARAFAT NG PALESTINIAN".. Gaya ng nasabi ko noon si Arafat ng namayapa ay nadiskubre sa account niya ang US Dollar 4 Billions saan at papaano nagkaroon ng ganitong napaka laking halaga si Arafat..?? alam lahat natin na NAGHIHIRAP ANG PALESTINE ng kapanahunan ni Arafat at hangang sa ngayon..at ang higit na masaklap ay hindi nakuha ng Palestine goverment ang halaga (US 4 Billions) ang asawa niya ang nakinabang.. Matalino si Arafat totoo na aping api ang Palestinian.."ngunit" ang pagiging API ng Palestinian ay ginawang malaking "PAGKAKAKITAAN" ni Arafat..mas MAGANDA MARAMING NAMAMATAY,NASASAKTAN AT NASUSUGATAN..at maraming mga kapatid na muslim at Arab countries ang nagbigay ng tulong kay Arafat..TOTOO YAN.. Ang kasay sayan ni "Arafat" ay isang "ARAL" na nagbukas sa isipan ng mga taga Palestinian at maging sa lahat ng Muslim at Arab countries..sa ngayon... Ayokong isipin na sana ay hindi HALINTULAD KAY "ARAFAT" ang mga lider lider na nakikipaglaban sa Mindanao..KAYA HANGANG SA KASALUKUYAN AY WALANG MALINAW NA KASAGUTAN SA KAPAYAPAAN... Habang tumatagal ang KUWENTUHAN AT PALITAN NG KURO KURO AY LALONG LANG LUMALABO AT NAGIGING TAKIP SILIM ANG PALIGID NATING LAHAT...
Sa tingin ko ay hindi na maganda..nawawala na ng control.. WALANG PANALO AT TALO..pati ang "masamang mga salita" ay ginagamit na.. WE NEED.... "PEACE"... MGA SIBILYAN ANG KA "AWA AWA" DITO hindi ang mga katwiran natin sa isat isa...na nauuwi lang sa "AWAY"..!! !! Sus, tigilan na ang pagkukunwaring mga profound, ok?
It's too simplistic to confine the Mindanao conflict into Islam vs. Christianity. More than the peoples' faith, the big issue down south is ancestral domain! ang likas na yaman ng Mindanao, oil-rich nga yun kaya hindi mapakawalan ng central government kahit anong autonomy ang pangarapin nila dun. YUN LANG, kaya let the prophets and the founders of any religion rest in peace. Problema na ng kanilang followers if they're being blind followers, achu-chu-chu. I think the problem is that MORO people think that they are really a different people where in FACT they are Filipinos. This blog only shows how one-sided the mind of Jun Mercado is. Yes, he is a one-sided mind person and blame all what is happening to mindanao to the Government.
If you are going to look at the bigger picture, muslims are the one who are always involve in terrorism, rape, etc etc.. so tingin mo sino ang dapat sisihin sa kaguluhan?! Sino ba ang #1 terrorist sa Mundo? Just check out pakistan.. unti unti na silang nilulusob ng mga Al-Queda at nagpapasabog ng mga building at pumapatay ng tao kapag hindi nasunod ang gusto. I think it's time na matutong sumunod sa isang gobyerno ng pilipinas ang mga moro. Nagkakaroon ng conflict kasi, may mga tao talagang gusto sila ang mamuno sa mindanao, like MILF. The radical muslims theorized and made as a basis for their separatism the intended Christianization of Mindanao. There is no such policy of Christianization. In Christianity, no one is forced to believe. I remain Christian because I believe in my religion as the true path to salvation.
But to say that Christians wanted to Christianized others. Of course! Its hypocritical for Abu Sayyaf, MILF and Islamist radicals to say that they never intend to convert people of the world to their religion. The ultimate intention of Islamist radicals is convert us all to Islam so that we will become their slaves and our women will become their sex toys. In other words they want superiority to satisfy their beastly, carnal desires. Isa lng ang ating tandaan wala tyo nuong nagsimula ang alitan ng mga kristyano at muslim...kung ano ang totoong dahilan sila sila n lng ang nakakaalam..Ang mga nasusulat sa history kuno ay mi dagdag na at bawas na kaya ang mabuti tyo na nbubuhay s ngayon pilitin n lng natin mapabuti ang relasyon ntin sa isat isa muslim man o kristyano...after all tayo rin ang nagiging biktima, tayong mga Pilipino ang matatalo kung patuloy tyong watak watak at di nagkakaisa.."Be wise , Be a true Pinoy"
|
Latest Posts
Friday, May 15. 2009» The politics of separatismCalendar
CategoriesSyndicate This Blog |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
